Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The House of Mirth (Norton Critical Editions) Paperback – January 17, 1990
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Mass Market Paperback
"Please retry" | $3.99 | $1.18 |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $9.99 | — |
- Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 3 million more titles $0.00 to buy -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your Audible trial - Hardcover
$15.981 Used from $11.19 1 New from $15.98 1 Collectible from $10.99 - Paperback
$8.9988 Used from $1.33 6 New from $21.64 - Mass Market Paperback
$5.9580 Used from $1.18 18 New from $3.99 - MP3 CD
$9.991 New from $9.99
This Norton Critical Edition of Edith Wharton's quintessential novel of the Gilded Age reprints the Scribner's magazine text of 1905, including the eight original illustrations.
The text has been introduced and thoroughly annotated by the editor for student readers. Backgrounds and Contexts includes selections from Edith Wharton's letters; articles from the period about etiquette, vocations for women, factory life, and Working Girls' Clubs; excerpts from the work of contemporary social thinkers including Thorstein Veblen, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, and Olive Schreiner; and a consideration of anti-Semitism at the turn of the century by historian John Higham. Also included are Charles Dana Gibson's precautionary piece "Marrying for Money" (including four Gibson drawings) and a tableau vivant of "The Dying Gladiator."
Criticism reprints six central contemporary reviews of the novel and six biographical and interpretive modern essays by Millicent Bell, Louis Auchincloss, Cynthia Griffin Wolff, R. W. B. Lewis, Elaine Showalter, and Elizabeth Ammons.
A Chronology and Selected Bibliography are also included.
Including original illustrations- Print length374 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
- Publication dateJanuary 17, 1990
- Dimensions5.2 x 0.9 x 8.4 inches
- ISBN-100393959015
- ISBN-13978-0393959017
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Pulitzer Prize-winning American writer and designer Edith Wharton (1862-1937) is the author of The House of Mirth, The Age of Innocence, Ethan Frome, The Decoration of Houses, and many other books.
Elizabeth Ammons is the Harriet H. Fay Professor of Literature at Tufts University. She is the author of Conflicting Stories: American Women Writers at the Turn into the Twentieth Century, Edith Wharton’s Argument with America, and Brave New Worlds: How Literature Will Save the Planet. She is the editor or co-editor of many books, including Tricksterism in Turn-of-the-Century American Literature: A Multi-Cultural Perspective, Uncle Tom’s Cabin: A Casebook, American Color Writing, 1880-1920, Short Fiction by Black Women, 1900–1920, and the Norton Critical Edition of Edith Wharton’s The House of Mirth.
Product details
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company; Critical edition (January 17, 1990)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 374 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0393959015
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393959017
- Item Weight : 13.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.2 x 0.9 x 8.4 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,711,628 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #21,867 in Contemporary Literature & Fiction
- #37,933 in Classic Literature & Fiction
- #75,768 in Literary Fiction (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
HOUSE OF MIRTH
This classic novel revolves around Lily Bart. She is the only person in the novel with dimension. The others are tools for her demonstration and destruction. Lily is presented as a lesson in conditioning. Her character is fixed and permanent. She does not learn from life, only is diminished by it, though she has some distant understanding that, at the end, there was little she could have done to alter the inevitable. The novel would be grim and foreboding if the style were not so distinguished and the analysis of the heroine and the society in which she lives so compelling and repulsive.
Before returning to Lily Bart, something must be said of the fin de siecle New York moneyed class on the edge of which she lives. The people presented in the novel are mostly shallow, talentless, in fact meaningless. Selden, Gerty Farish and Rosedale are the exceptions. The others have appetites but no taste, copying one another as sharks do in a feeding frenzy, but maintaining their position by violent defense of their privileges. Each is classed by money and the length of time it is possessed. The mind, in their view, is an organ of little value unless it is an engine that permits more money to be acquired and promotes further ascent on the social ladder. Nothing has value unless it is confirmed by someone else. Everything is acquired but temporary. They are as vulgar as the British upper classes but without the structure and fittings of royalty and title. Perhaps, in Ms Wharton's view, the villain of the story is democracy in America that lifts people who are in truth so low so high. And then envies and applauds the miracle performed.
Lily is part of the decoration, a tool for entertainment and use which when it loses its purpose is cast aside, dismissed and forgotten. Were she a horse her destiny would be glue. If she had not certain definitions of conduct, she would inexorably have become a prostitute. But even for that role, she does not have aptitude. She must marry wealth. It is her mantra. Money is the buoy that will save her from drowning but there is a fatal indecision in her conduct and a taste for decency which defeats her impulse to survive. After exploring a few brief years of existence from twenty-nine to the low thirties, there is no role in the end for which she is fit other than corpse. Which she plays very well though unremarked by the society she esteems and despises.
The society that Ms Wharton presents is peopled by wealthy vauriens who have no purpose but status. Their prized activity is consuming and elbows. They are bicyclists bowing down in servility before those above them and pounding down as hard as they can on those beneath. They make no mark on time or place, only engulfing everything of value to their peers. They hold in contempt all under them and are devoured by fear of all above. They are predators who never are replete and visitors like Lily have no role but as prey. Of course were she to acquire a wealthy husband, she would instantly alter status and be classified after a short apprenticeship as ONE OF US. Though Wharton shows a few British upper class characters for contrast, they are done with so little emphasis that we readers don't understand the vital difference between the American rich and the British aristocrats. Both groups worship money but the Americans breath it and without it, they lose purpose. The British aristos are convinced of their actual worth which is independent of possessions, founded on history and a system of place which is permanent unless some truly catastrophic conduct intervenes. Wharton's Americans are vulgarians and not the least of the tragedy in this book is the energy and drive Lily employs to attain a place among these unremarkable plutocrats.
To sum up, Ms Wharton wants to demonstrate in a brief and heavily selected form the society of New York at the turn of the century. She shows perhaps ten or fifteen specimens and a limited number of scenes in which they interact, feeding on whatever is esteemed by a peer, and despising in unison whatever at the moment is considered unsuitable. Anything that threatens money is the most unsuitable of all, of course. Ms. Wharton succeeds in her task, presenting a loathsome but convincing pack of wealthy jackals, chewing up every comestible before them. They are thoughtless and reflect a collective rascality which goes for purposeful conduct and earns them esteem from anyone who fears or hopes to gain from them. The interchange of fear and greed motivates everything they do. Just as in the stock market, the players go from greed descending the Slopes of Hope and fear ascending the Walls of Worry. The social game has rules which are known and obeyed. They can be broken only by those few with the most, but the rules are created to maintain just those few so they have little incentive to diminish their advantages. So I have suggested Wharton's purpose and agreed that she has achieved it classically.
Lily is shown always as the suppliant, someone of little stature. Her dreams are few and modest. She is presented as severely conditioned, unable to develope. She is fulfilled by the clothes she wears, the society she frequents, and the latest attitude she presents. She takes little space and it grows less as the book develops, ending finally in the contemptible boarding house room with its narrow single bed and sparse light. As an inept milliner-seamstress, she excites little pity from others and only a measured sympathy from herself. A classical tragedy causes a heightened awareness of the cruelty of life and focuses on an ill-chosen action, but this tragedy is a domestic misfortune that is sad and of brief duration.
The remaining question then is a literary one of where this work stands. The main character, Lily Bart, is memorable but in silhouette. She is a tragic figure, but since her major dream is contemptible, it discolors everything else including the sweetness and true gentleness of her person. All the other characters are flat and forgettable, necessary only for Lily's ruin, so the book stands and falls entirely on Lily whose shoulders are not constructed for such heavy-lifting. So The House of Mirth takes its place in the high upper ranges of the second rank. The writing is faultless and the style estimable, but the contents are soon overcast by haze and, if not forgotten, not remembered with great acuity.
[...]
Mirth is an excellent novel, finely crafted, beautifully written and alive with Wharton's darkly humorous outlook. Wharton writes of the world she lived in, among the wealthy elite of turn-of-the-twentieth-century New York City, and her characters are frighteningly real: flawed and damaged, the best of them sometimes unsure how to act or whom to trust, and the worst... Oh God, the worst of them are as unspeakably horrible as the idle rich of any time and place.
So why the lower rating? Mirth is, for me, the lesser work because of its extremes. Where Innocence relied on a more nuanced look at its characters and central situation, Mirth follows the formula of many writers' early works, with too much "goodness" on the side of its protagonist, and too much unrelieved wickedness on the other side.
Lily Bart, the unmarried, beautiful, twenty-nine-year-old woman at the center of the story, who has been brought up to be merely an "ornament" in her world, not a worker or contributor, is emotionally incapable of marrying without love or, as the story progresses, unwilling to sink to the level of her abusers, to use blackmail to regain her lost position in the world. The degree to which she grows in self-knowledge is remarkable, and her ethical restraint, while suffering the worst reversals of poverty and ostracism, is not always believable.
Part of what made Innocence such an enjoyable story was its "historical" aspect, the way Wharton contrasted the limited, blinkered world of the 1870s with the freer, more sophisticated world of 1900, when that story ends. In Mirth, we see the other side of that "modern" freedom, and what it means for women who are alone in the world, without family or close friends to protect or guide them. For Lily, it's an unrelenting downward spiral, and it's a heartbreaking read.
I've noticed, as often with stories like this, some readers' contempt for Lily as someone who makes "stupid" choices. And I've often wondered what makes these readers think they would have done any better, assuming they were products of that same time and place, and did not have their hundred-years' worth of twenty-twenty hindsight. For me, my sympathy for Lily makes reading about her downfall too painful to be enjoyable, despite Wharton's engaging writing style. Lily sabotages all her near successes, precisely because she has too much intelligence and "sensibility," in the Jane Austen meaning, to marry without love, to spend the next forty years tied to a man she can't respect.
The comparison with Austen is apt, because Wharton's writing is Austen without the gloss of two centuries of cultural change, the separation of the Atlantic Ocean, or a "quaint" country setting. It's New York City, not Netherfield, and it has this city's unabashed brutality. I was astonished at how similar the NYC of 1900 was to the city I grew up in and still inhabit. Austen's world is every bit as tough, but we don't always see it, because we're too easily lulled by her elegant, eighteenth-century manner to feel the stiletto blade until it pierces our heart. Wharton carries her cavalry saber unconcealed, and we (at least I do) sometimes shrink from its slashing force, dreading the inevitable bloody end.
As Lily destroys one chance after another for herself, I found myself wishing that she would use the means at hand to defeat or at least control her female enemy, and not worry about hurting the man she loves in the process. In Wharton's world, as in Austen's, it's the women who pay the price for sexual indiscretions, gambling losses and other misbehavior, no matter who commits the actual sins. When one minor character, a silly young man, gambles away his fortune, it's his two unmarried sisters who are reduced to shabby spinsterhood, trying to earn a living, a mode of existence for which they are woefully unprepared. "Miss Jane reads aloud very nicely--but it's so hard to find anyone who is willing to be read to."
Wharton writes with the kind of magical style that draws a reader in no matter what. Even if we know the story from having seen the movie version(s); even if we aren't happy about how it ends; even if we find some of the extreme duality of good and bad characters a little tedious--still, we want to spend time with this narrator. Like Jonathan Franzen, another author with this specific talent, Wharton can tell us any story she chooses, about any characters, and most readers will only say, "More, please."
On that level alone, Wharton's work deserves five stars, but what I'm doing here is ranking her against herself, not everybody else.
At the end of The Age of Innocence, I felt that it was a perfect work of art, the final scenes just right; a somewhat ambiguous, sad but not tragic ending that was the only acceptable resolution for the main characters. Mirth, by contrast, leaves most readers dissatisfied. "No," we think, "that can't be right." It's an argument in Wharton's favor that her ending is in many ways more realistic than the happier one most of us wish for. People do kill themselves, not literally by suicide, but by making one misstep after another, until they reach a place where death is the only possibility.
Wharton's only "mistake" is in allowing us to see each of her heroine's missteps all too clearly, and with no way of turning her in a different direction. Perhaps this book deserves five stars after all.
Top reviews from other countries
On the eligible but tedious bachelor, Percy Gryce: ‘Mr. Gryce was like a merchant whose warehouses are crammed with an unmarketable commodity.’
On Lily’s aunt, Mrs Peniston: ‘To attempt to bring her into active relation with life was like tugging at a piece of furniture which has been screwed to the floor.’
‘It was the “simple country wedding” to which guests are conveyed in special trains, and from which the hordes of the uninvited have to be fended off by the intervention of the police.’
‘Lily presently saw Mrs. Bry cleaving her determined way through the doors, and, in the broad wake she left, the light figure of Mrs. Fisher bobbing after her like a row-boat at the stern of a tug.’
And I have to mention the elegance of the writing that can convey so much in just a few sentences. For example, as Lily observes those she has regarded as friends: ‘That very afternoon they had seemed full of brilliant qualities; now she saw that they were merely dull in a loud way. Under the glitter of their opportunities she saw the poverty of their achievement.’
Throughout the book, my sympathy was always with Lily and the situation she finds herself in. Yes, she has a role which is largely confined to being an ‘adornment’ to the social scene. However, I admired her determination to use the gifts she has been given, even if that does involve a degree of manipulation. Unfortunately, an entirely innocent action and a chance meeting set in motion a chain of events that put Lily in the power of others, risking her future happiness. Lily believes her beauty allows her to manipulate men but, sadly, she finds it is she who is being manipulated because of a mistake and the need to maintain her social status because of her (relative) poverty.
It transpires that navigating the social scene is akin to a game of snakes and ladders. Working your way up takes time, requires skill in order to cultivate contacts and involves being seen in the right places with the right people. ‘She had been fashioned to adorn and delight; to what other end does nature round the rose-leaf and paint the humming-bird’s breast? And was it her fault that the purely decorative mission is less easily and harmoniously fulfilled among social beings than in the world of nature?’ However, one misstep, one troublesome rumour or item of mischievous gossip and you can slide down very quickly. ‘Lily had the doomed sense of the castaway who has signalled in vain to fleeing sails.’
Very few of the characters in the book come out well. So-called friends (I’m looking at you, Mrs. Fisher) prove to be anything but in Lily’s hour of need – because they are too timid, too afraid of what others will say or possess ulterior motives.
I’ll confess, I was unprepared for the impact the ending had on me. Part of me could understand why Lily did what she did and part of me wished she had found the strength to take another course. The romantic in me wanted another outcome altogether which, I’ll admit, would not have been true to the spirit of what the author was trying to communicate in the book. Call me an old softy.
This will definitely not be the last book by Edith Wharton I read. What an amazing author to have discovered; even more amazing when you realise The House of Mirth was Wharton’s first published novel.
Beautifully written and perceptively observed, Edith Wharton's story of New York society and the lives of the rich and idle, juxtaposed with the lot of the much less wealthy and those who fall by the wayside, makes for a compelling read. Aside from the story's main protagonists, this novel is filled with a whole cast of interesting characters and is it easy to become drawn right into Lily Barton's life and watch her as she travels towards her downfall. Although, as bystanders, we can see the mistakes Lily is making and we may become exasperated with her for her foolhardiness, Lily is not as shallow as she initially seems, she does have scruples and she avoids taking others down with her, and the reader (or this one anyhow) feels for her in her predicament. First published in 1905 and one of Edith Wharton's best novels, this is a poignant and resonant story and one to read, to think about and to then put back in the bookcase to read again later. Recommended.
5 Stars.
Lily looks to the future and sees her life narrowing. Early in the book she is on the verge of marrying a fabulously rich man, only to turn away at the last moment because she doesn’t love this boring mummy’s boy. She also had the chance to marry a middling prosperous lawyer, who she does love, only to turn her back on that idea as well. After making these decisions, a general tendency to contrariness hardens into a firm determination to escape her fate. When problems created by others damage her prospects, Lily throws a few spanners of her own in the works. She is seemingly incapable of allowing herself to follow her natural course, whether this course is marriage to a rich man, marriage to a man she loves, the well paid life of a social fixer, or even a career as the owner of an elegant hat boutique. Whenever a course opens up, Lily helps shut it down. She wants to escape the social machine of which she is a part, only to find herself in a different part of the same machine. There are those who wear fancy hats, and there are those who make fancy hats for those that wear them. Both are part of the same mechanism.
So, on the positive side, this is a story which feels universal in the way it considers freedom and fate. On a less positive note, the book was a frustrating read, as Lily trips herself up over and over again. Then there is the voice telling her story, which for all its apparent freedom to look down on flawed human characters, has a few flaws and prejudices of its own. This waspish author voice is prone to switching between character points of view with confusing suddenness. I also found myself feeling distinctly uneasy towards the beginning of the book, reading the stereotyped portrayal of Jewish businessman, Simon Rosedale:
“a plump rosy man of the blond Jewish type, with smart London clothes fitting him like upholstery, and small sidelong eyes which gave him the air of appraising people as if they were bric a brac.”
I wondered if this was supposed to be Lily’s point of view, but as I say, point of view is not stable in this book, and remains ultimately with the author. This voice portrays many of her characters in an unflattering light, but does not otherwise link a specific heritage with human failings. So bringing up a Jewish heritage in relation to an individual’s shortcomings felt jarring. Even though later in the book he becomes a somewhat more sympathetic character, the portrayal of Rosedale still left a bad taste. I know we are reading about a different time with different attitudes, but there is this odd feeling that a point of view which aspires to seeing the weakness in others has blind spots of its own.
Ultimately for me, The House of Mirth was like being in the company of an unpredictable Greek goddess. This deity has the power to flit about over the lower human world and make some profound observations in poetic language, while also displaying a rather human and irrational partiality for some people over others.
About this book; love reading about the female experience, especially from the past. Find it so insightful how women had to navigate in a mans' society and how their future was limited to the choices they could make. Very descriptive, also explores mental health which is very interesting. Would highly recommend this read to others who enjoy older novels set in the past. You will not be dissapointed :)
The finale was predictably tragic for the age old lament of haplessly ignoring golden opportunities.








