Buying Options
| Print List Price: | $17.99 |
| Kindle Price: | $10.99 Save $7.00 (39%) |
| Sold by: | Hachette Book Group Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The House of Silk: A Sherlock Holmes Novel Kindle Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Library Binding
"Please retry" | $28.12 | $39.42 |
|
Mass Market Paperback
"Please retry" | — | $16.03 |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" | — | $5.00 |
Once again, The Game's Afoot...
London, 1890. 221B Baker St. A fine art dealer named Edmund Carstairs visits Sherlock Holmes and Dr John Watson to beg for their help. He is being menaced by a strange man in a flat cap - a wanted criminal who seems to have followed him all the way from America. In the days that follow, his home is robbed, his family is threatened. And then the first murder takes place.
Almost unwillingly, Holmes and Watson find themselves being drawn ever deeper into an international conspiracy connected to the teeming criminal underworld of Boston, the gaslit streets of London, opium dens and much, much more. And as they dig, they begin to hear the whispered phrase-the House of Silk-a mysterious entity that connects the highest levels of government to the deepest depths of criminality. Holmes begins to fear that he has uncovered a conspiracy that threatens to tear apart the very fabric of society.
The Arthur Conan Doyle Estate chose the celebrated, #1 New York Times bestselling author Anthony Horowitz to write The House of Silk because of his proven ability to tell a transfixing story and for his passion for all things Holmes. Destined to become an instant classic, The House of Silk brings Sherlock Holmes back with all the nuance, pacing, and almost superhuman powers of analysis and deduction that made him the world's greatest detective, in a case depicting events too shocking, too monstrous to ever appear in print...until now.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherMulholland Books
- Publication dateNovember 1, 2011
- File size1283 KB
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Childhood, after all, is the first precious coin that poverty steals from a child.Highlighted by 838 Kindle readers
It has always struck me that any interpretation of a series of events is possible until all the evidence says otherwise and even then one should be wary before jumping to a conclusion.Highlighted by 203 Kindle readers
For all men are equal at the moment of death and who are we to judge them when a much greater judge awaits?Highlighted by 199 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
Review
"The latest edition to [Sherlock's] distinguished legacy...Admirers of Horowitz's ITV series, Foyle's War, and Sherlockians will delight in equal measure. With consummate grasp, Horowitz unfolds an intricate and rewarding mystery in the finest Victorian tradition...For all its deft and loving fidelity, THE HOUSE OF SILK sees the great detective in grisly and unfamiliar straits."―Vanity Fair
"Cliffhanger plotting... Watson's elegiac voice should silence the objections of even the most persnickety Sherlock scholar."―NPR
"A book firmly rooted in the style of Doyle, faithful to the character as created and with just enough wiggle room to allow the author to say all the things he's been longing to say about the world of 221B Baker Street...THE HOUSE OF SILK will satisfy."―The Huffington Post
"Enormously involving and entertaining, and even funny in parts... Classic tales such as the Arthur Conan Doyle stories carry the ideals and anxieties of their age, and of later ones. THE HOUSE OF SILK capably does the same."―The Philadelphia Inquirer
"The hype surrounding what's being billed as the first pastiche ever officially approved by the Conan Doyle estate is amply justified ... authentic. Horowitz gets everything right-the familiar narrative voice, brilliant deductions, a very active role for Watson, and a perplexing and disturbing series of puzzles to unravel-and the legion of fans of the originals will surely be begging for Horowitz to again dip into Watson's trove of untold tales."―Publishers Weekly (starred review)
"Nicely captures the storytelling tone of Holmes' inventor in a galloping adventure that boasts enough twists, ominous turns and urgent nocturnal escapades to make modern moviemakers salivate ... Author Horowitz delivers some dramatic tableaux in these pages, including a railway robbery, a prison escape and a horse-drawn carriage chase ... the Holmes we see here is just as cryptic and clever as we've come to expect."―Kirkus Reviews
"Horowitz truly pulls off the wonderful illusion that Arthur Conan Doyle left us one last tale... Close your eyes and you can smell the shag tobacco of Holmes' church warded pipe as he sorts through the evidence."―San Diego Union Tribune
"Worthy of [its] canonical inspiration ... an impressive read ... Horowitz plots masterfully, foregrounding Holmes' trademark investigative techniques against Watson's pacey narration."―The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
"A tone-perfect, action-packed story of corruption, greed and dissolution, all the while capturing the sights, smells and social problems of 1890's London...This reader, albeit no Holmes expert, totally forgot the novel wasn't from Doyle himself."―The Cleaveland Plain Dealer
"An homage to the Holmes canon; Horowitz does a fine job with the atmospheric setting and tense plotting, and he captures Watson's voice and Holmes' character well. The crimes they uncover will, even in the 21st century, have a shocking ripped-from-the-headlines impact."―St. Petersburg Times
"Can Horowitz astonish us? Can he thrill us? ... Emphatically, yes!"―The Guardian (UK)
"The author excels at turning his readers into 'Watsons' who are devoted to Holmes and enthusiastically leap into danger just to follow the detective throughout a case...The characterization of Holmes and Watson is true to the original but also offers greater insight into a fascinating friendship...Horowitz even knows how to write a riveting chase scene that, were it filmed for Ritchie's movie franchise, would certainly be an adrenaline-fueled cinematic climax...for its attention to character, quality of plot, and Horowitz's familiarity with the original stories, it scores highly."―PopMatters.com --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
About the Author
Review
Product details
- ASIN : B004W3VY2Y
- Publisher : Mulholland Books; 1st edition (November 1, 2011)
- Publication date : November 1, 2011
- Language : English
- File size : 1283 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 300 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #53,305 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Welcome to my Amazon author page. It's strange to think that when I wrote my first book, there was no Amazon - in fact there was no internet, no computers. That doesn't make me particularly old. It just shows how quickly times have moved.
In fact I wrote my first book when I was ten, stuck in a miserable, north London boarding school where reading and telling stories were my only lifeline. Every time I write a new book, I have the same sense of urgency that I had then. I knew without any doubt that I would be an author. Perhaps it helped that I wasn't much good at anything else.
Cut forward to the present and now I have over forty-five published novels to my name. The game changer for me was Stormbreaker, the first Alex Rider adventure, published in 2000. There were eleven more books in the series - the latest, Never Say Die, was published in 2017 - and they are now being developed for TV. I have plenty of other children's books out there - I was delighted to discover my Power of Five series (Raven's Gate, Evil Star etc) on sale in a tiny bookshop in Elounda, Crete only a few days ago.
But as I grew older (and my original audience entered their twenties) I felt a need to move into adult writing. This began with two Sherlock Holmes continuation novels, The House of Silk and Moriarty, followed by my entry into the world of James Bond with Trigger Mortis. A second Bond novel is on the way. An original thriller, Magpie Murders was published last year and got some of the best reviews I've had. One of the joys of Twitter, incidentally, is that it allows readers to contact me directly and these 140-character exchanges are as valuable to me as what the professional critics have to say.
I also write for TV. After cutting my teeth on the hugely popular show, Robin of Sherwood, I moved on to work with David Suchet and his brilliant portrayal of Hercule Poirot, writing about nine or ten episodes of Agatha Christie's Poirot. I was the first writer on Midsomer Murders and then went on to create Foyle's War which I worked on for the next sixteen years. Somewhere along the way, I also created a five-part series for ITV called Injustice which very much influenced the book I'm publishing now.
The Word is Murder is hopefully the start of a long-running series. It introduces a detective by the name of Daniel Hawthorne - a rather dark and dangerous man whom I actually met on the set of Injustice. At least, that's my version of events and that's what counts here because, very unusually, I actually appear in the book as his not entirely successful sidekick; the Watson to his Holmes.
The whole point of being an author is that you're in control. But here I am, writing a book in which I have no idea what's going on, following in the footsteps of a character who refuses to tell me anything. What I'm trying to do is to give the traditional whodunit a metaphysical twist. I hope, if you read it, you'll enjoy all the clues, the red herrings, the bizarre range of suspects and the occasionally violent twists. With a bit of luck you won't guess the ending (nobody has so far). But at the same time, The Word is Murder offers something more. It's a book about words as much as murder, about writing crime as well as solving it.
Do let me know what you think. I really hope you like the book. If you do, you can tweet me your thoughts at @AnthonyHorowitz. I hope to hear from you!
Anthony Horowitz
Crete 2017
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on November 21, 2017
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I’ve tried reading Holmes “sequels” or “knock-offs” before — usually with varying degrees of disappointment. There was no disappointment with this one, though.
Horowitz falls naturally into the Victorian-style drama. It doesn’t feel forced. Or coerced. And there were times I forgot I was reading a modern novel.
The story is a bit convoluted, as expected. But beautifully played out. And I can’t recommend it highly enough.
In those 81 years since Doyle's death, Doyle's family estate never commissioned any other author to write another Sherlock Holmes adventure until Anthony Horowitz was given the official nod to write "The House of Silk", in 2010. If Doyle's descendants revived Holmes out of dire financial circumstances, Horowitz's riveting "The House of Silk" does not suggest any sort of fast buck motivation on the part of the Doyle estate or Mr. Horowitz. This tale of intrigue with it's serpentine plot line is a worthy addition to Doyle's body of Sherlock Holmes tales. Horowitz has said none of Doyle's survivors have commented on the literary merits of "The House of Silk" which he takes as a good sign, because if he botched the job, he felt certain that he'd never hear the end of complaints from Doyle's descendants.
In real life, Doyle was a physician like the fictonal Sherlock Holmes chronicler and associate detective Dr. John Watson. Doyle based Sherlock Holmes on his former college teacher and friend, Joseph Bell, who was a pioneer of forensic science and a proponent of the use of logic to solve crimes. Dr. Bell was a consultant in the Jack the Ripper case, the Ardlamont murder and several other leading criminal cases in both Scotland and England. So real life the Doyle/Bell friendship was the basis for the fictional Watson/Holmes partnership. In real life Dr. Bell was fond of telling friends that he was the basis for the Sherlock Holmes character and relished the attention he public attention he received for being the "real life" Sherlock Holmes.
It was the highly unorthodox bond of friendship between Watson and Holmes that made the Doyle's stories so appealing. Many the earliest readers of the Doyle's Sherlock Holmes adventures believed that Watson & Holmes were real people not fictional characters, because of the authenticity of the Holmes/Watson partnership. The credibility of any latter day commissioned Sherlock Holmes story rests the ability of the author to recreate the Holmes/Watson partnership with the same amount of authentic detail as Doyle did.
Horowitz is successful in capturing this highly unusual and nuanced relationship relationship between the two men. Earlier authors, most notably Nicholas Meyer who wrote the "Seven per Cent Solution" in 1974, have also had success in writing modern day Holmes books, but it's only "The House of Silk" that captures the essence of complex and somewhat eccentric bond between Watson and Holmes. Any modern day story line which involves a middle aged physician who leaves his wife unattended their country home for months at a time, to move into the boarding house room of his middle aged detective friend to fight crime, would be a novel that is eligible for the Christian Coalition's banned book list in these modern times. That's not to say that Doyle ever gave so much as hint that there was a homosexual element to the Watson/Holmes relationship. What was an authentic platonic relationship between two men in Victorian England is now capable of raising eyebrows in these sexually liberated modern times.
This new story by Horowitz has Holmes and Watson racing streets of London attempting to lock horns with an anonymous force of evil that is responsible for corrupting the social order of the entire nation. I won't go into the plot details but this secretive evil that lies within the House of Silk even manages to wrap it's tentacles around Holmes to frame him for a seemingly incontestable charge of murder. Horowitz's Victorian London is harsher and more depraved city than Doyle's London, but that only adds to the sense of foreboding that permeates this dark tale. It's great adventure will please both Sherlock Holmes fans and those readers who enjoy a gritty police procedural mystery.
For Horowitz, in his novel, poverty comes in two parts. The first part is how he represents the lower classes and poverty stricken being kept in their place by the upper classes, while the second major part is the homeless boys that live on the streets. Horowitz uses these dual points of poverty to help paint the picture of what Victorian London was like for many living there during that time. In Victorian London, poverty was a major issue that Doyle seemed to almost completely ignore. Anthony Horowitz successfully portrays Victorian London and some of the many issues that plagued it while still writing an entertaining story, something Doyle had trouble doing.
While Horowitz fantastically displayed the poverty, a hard topic to do successfully, he seemingly lost focus when it came to the characters Doyle created for him. We all know Sherlock Holmes, the cold calculating machine. In the canon he cares about very little and ignores things that are irrelevant, such as the fact that the Earth revolves around the Sun. Horowitz seems to have forgotten that fact. He shows a caring, angry, and beaten down Holmes. The mystery of the House of Silk disgusts and revolts Holmes, to the point where he actually sets things on fire. In the canon, Holmes only breaks the law when he believes it is for the greater good. The only reason for arson in The House of Silk is disgust and bad memories, things that definitely wouldn’t cut it in the canon. Another weird deviation from the typical Holmes character was the fact that he blamed himself for the death of Ross. In canon, Holmes couldn’t have cared less. For god sakes in the Hound of the Baskervilles, Holmes literally uses a man as bait for a vicious man killing beast which sends the man into shock and permanently scars him and Holmes didn’t care. The only thing he was worried about was whether or not he caught the criminal.
Watson was also changed from canon. Watson is known as being totally for anything Holmes is doing, but in the House of Silk he is irritated and angry at Holmes for his constant insults and digs. Doyle’s Watson would never have showed that much anger towards Holmes in any capacity.
All of this couples with the fact that Horowitz sprinkles in so many unneeded references to characters and events. We hear about Irene Adler. We have a very unneeded and awkwardly written scene with Moriarty. There is the constant mentions of past cases. It all seems clumsily added in there as a tribute to Doyle.
In my opinion, Horowitz had tried to hard to be Doyle. If he just would have focused on his case and left out the many different references that book would have been even more fantastic than it already was. Horowitz’s portrayal of London during the Victorian era was incredible and more accurate than Doyle’s. The plot had many unexpected twists and turns and the resolution was, at least in my case, unanticipated and went a completely different direction than I thought it would. Despite its flaws, The House of Silk was a great ADAPTATION that I will definitely read in the future. So, if you’re looking for a true to the canon Holmes story, this is not your read. But if you want an adaptation of the Holmes universe, you should definitely pick this up.
Top reviews from other countries
Holmes chuckled and pointed his pipe at a sheet of paper Mrs Hudson had just placed next to his breakfast things.
"Oh Watson, you dear old thing. I'd better come clean. It was me who wrote the book. Quite easy really. Knowing you these long years, it was a straightforward endeavour. All I had to do was insert four examples of your cumbersomely wooden prose on every page, along with your routine errors of fact."
"But why, Holmes? Why on earth - " Watson was cut off by his own spluttering.
"This missive," Holmes tapped the sheet of paper with his pipe, " informs me of sales exceeding 3,000 copies. Something of a bonus. But my purpose is somewhat more interesting."
Footsteps were heard coming up the staircase.
"Hah!" exclaimed Holmes. "I think, my dear friend, you will learn from our guest the part that my disguising myself as you plays in unravelling a wickedly foul conspiracy that strikes at the heart of government and even threatens the safety of our beloved queen."
If the above gets one out of ten, Horowitz gets ten. Complete with peasoupers.
The story itself is robust, well thought out and handled superbly. Small, personal touches are almost teased out of the characters of both Holmes and Watson with a rare skill. The pace of the book is perfect, and it does have that 'just one more chapter' element, which keeps you turning the pages long after you should have been asleep. There are the usual twists and turns, and flashes of absolute brilliance from Holmes that we've come to expect and believe. If someone had told me that Conan Doyle was sat next to Horowitz as he was writing this, discussing ideas and telling him what to write, it would make complete sense.
Very happy to recommend on every level.
The book was not flawless though. At one point it suggests that opium, i.e. morphine, dilates the pupils – it doesn’t, it constricts them. But cocaine dilates them. The original Dr Watson would not have made that mistake. Another error is when the book refers to the Diogenes Club as being established 70 years earlier. In fact, Mycroft Holmes was allegedly a co-founder and he would have been about 45 or 50 in 1890. There were some other minor errors but none important enough to list here. I guess it’s a problem for anyone brave enough to write this kind of book that half the readers are going to be on the lookout for mistakes.
Leaving aside the mistakes, the first chapter bordered on parody when Sherlock Holmes kept making one impossible deduction after another in a most unconvincing way. That was disconcerting and almost made me give up, but my main problem with this book was that there were too many twists and turns - a surprise on almost every page. Never a dull moment! But, for me, it was far too dramatic and deviated from the gravitas of Conan Doyle so I was constantly aware this was fanfiction and not the original. More Indiana Holmes than Sherlock Holmes, to repeat the author’s little joke. Having said that, I shall certainly read more of Horowitz’s works – they may have an ersatz quality, but I anticipate they’ll be great fun.








