Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

MLB Houston Astros Men's Retroscript Wool Snapback Cap, One Size, Charcoal

5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
    This fits your .
  • Enter your model number to make sure this fits.
  • 15/85 Wool Blend
  • Imported
  • Snapback design
  • Made from 15/85 wool blend
  • Flat brim shape
  • Adjustable back closure
  • Raised embroidered team logo on front

Houston Astros Fan Shop
Show your team spirit with jerseys, T-shirts, caps, souvenirs, and much more. Shop now.
Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Product Description

47 Brand provides the quality all true fans desire in their gear. Known for their vintage look and feel, '47 has managed to also provide a new school spin to this old school craze. The Big Shot series is designed to feature enlarged primary team and league logos. After all, you're a fan, so why not wear it loud and wear it proud. Also featuring tight, crisp stitching, '47 Brand has made their claim as the source for snapbacks. Snap this hat and never look back.

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 4 ounces
  • Domestic Shipping: Item can be shipped within U.S.
  • International Shipping: This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
  • ASIN: B009QWJDAG
  • Item model number: BCPTN-RTRSC10WBP-CC65
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,863,691 in Sports & Outdoors (See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors)
  • Discontinued by manufacturer: Yes

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
My husband usually wears fitted caps and he loves this hat. He loves the fitted feel of this snap back.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse