- Explore more great deals on thousands of titles in our Deals in Books store.
Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
How the End Begins: The Road to a Nuclear World War III Hardcover – Bargain Price, March 1, 2011
Up to 50% off select Non-Fiction books
Featured titles are up to 50% off for a limited time. See all titles
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed
Special Offers and Product Promotions
From Publishers Weekly
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
Top Customer Reviews
I respect the author's opinion, but I think it is poorly defended and subject to considerable question.
In addition, the book digresses way too far into subjects of religion and philosophy.
Finally, and I hate to say this part the most, the book is kind of boring. The prose is (again) heavy-handed as well as long-winded. I found myself skipping ahead, which is something I never do.
I did manage to finish the book, but I was left with a sense of buyer's remorse.
If you describe yourself as a "zeroer", you will find much to your liking. Otherwise, you will probably find little to change your mind.
The major question that seems to concern the author is once someone launches nuclear weapons. What is the morality of nuclear retaliation? Say side A does an atomic strike on side B, is it moral for side B to retaliate? Of course, the real problem here is if side A thinks that side B will not retaliate; they may be very tempted to strike.
I think the writer, is dishonest with his facts. For example, he must know that it is questionable whether Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov's decision had much to do with preventing nuclear war as plenty is available on the net about it.
I am sure he is misrepresenting the facts on purpose about the US nuclear triad policy. It is expensive, but the point of it is not for first strike. The idea is by having a variety of methods of retaliations it makes it harder for the other side to make a successful first-strike on the US so giving the US a more credible threat of a second strike. If, for example, say the USSR did develop the blue-green laser that could detect submarines, which people had been working on?Read more ›
On more than one occasion I wanted to forget what I've learned from this book, but that wouldn't make any of it less true. The subject matter is pretty heavy, and I came away with the same feeling of unease I felt after the laughs wore off in Dr. Strangelove. Nonetheless, I would recommend this to a friend.
The major thesis is the non-use of nuclear weapons, and their eventual removal and destruction. A commendable objective that fails to acknowledge the difficulty of actually enforcing such a ban and the huge advantage furtive ban breakers might gain in an otherwise nuclear free environment. That doesn't justify the immolation of millions of people but is a reality none the less. This omission alone suggests the author's willingness to support his position through careful omission rather than a considered and forthright discussion of all relevant facts.
He carefully skirts issues or dilemmas that his target audience would find troubling. For example he points out the immorality of killing millions of innocent enemy civilians, something I certainly agree with, but avoids the obvious repugnant question: is there any acceptable loss of life to avoid a wider conflict?
Mr. Rosenbaum is lavish in praise and omits substantial condemnation of Soviet (now Russian) military officers who support his position while offering many anecdotes of (primarily) U.S. nuclear weapons security systems flaws and lapses, frightening lapses by the way.
I found the work to be well written, engaging and intellectually incomplete.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
This book is one of a kind. We are imperiling ourselves, very deeply. Though much of this material is available elsewhere, piecemeal, only Mr. Read morePublished 15 months ago by Jeep Rosenberg
A VERY SCARY BOOK,if u have not built your bunker yet,u will after this. as i have got older i realize that we have not learned anything. Read morePublished 23 months ago by KENNY
While there were some warnings that this book isn't a full "how" things would go down and more of an opinion piece, it turned out to be a liberal hit job on nuclear... Read morePublished on May 17, 2013 by ralphie wiggum
The Cold War was a tense and emotionally frenzied period for the United States and, moreover, the whole of humankind. Read morePublished on May 9, 2013 by Shelby S. Thomas
This book can be hard to find. We got a used copy but it was in great shape. Pleased with how quickly it came.Published on January 13, 2013 by PianoMom
more than a little scary when you read this and think just how close we were (and are) to a world wide nuc. meltdown and the nut-bags that have the control. Read morePublished on January 4, 2013 by michael
This book contains much useful information and is well-written overall, however the reader who is familiar with critical thinking and logical argumentation may find this author's... Read morePublished on November 3, 2012 by Dd Cushing
Not so great. I do not recommend this book. Numerous better options exist for covering this subject. Disappointing coverage of an important topic.Published on February 22, 2012 by MRHWillcox