Buy new:
$26.34$26.34
FREE delivery:
April 4 - 19
Ships from: GrandEagleRetail Sold by: GrandEagleRetail
Buy used: $6.32
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
77% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
FREE Shipping
67% positive over last 12 months
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
How Mathematics Happened: The First 50,000 Years Hardcover – Illustrated, February 5, 2007
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length316 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPrometheus
- Publication dateFebruary 5, 2007
- Reading age14 - 17 years
- Dimensions6.39 x 1.03 x 9.13 inches
- ISBN-109781591024774
- ISBN-13978-1591024774
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 1591024773
- Publisher : Prometheus; Illustrated edition (February 5, 2007)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 316 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9781591024774
- ISBN-13 : 978-1591024774
- Reading age : 14 - 17 years
- Item Weight : 1.51 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.39 x 1.03 x 9.13 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,091,391 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #390 in Assyria, Babylonia & Sumer History
- #621 in Mathematics History
- #3,028 in Evolution (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Approximately the first half of the book is devoted to the origin of various number systems. Many readers are likely already familiar with the fact that our decimal system is not the only or even the oldest number system, but even those who already know a little bit about ancient mathematics will likely find it interesting to learn about Torres-Strait body-parts counting or the Babylonian sexagismal system. However, for the reader whose undergraduate mathematics education did not include (as mine did) significant time spent performing operations with unit fractions (sometimes written in Egyptian Hieroglyphics), this first part of the book might seem to drag on a bit longer than it needs to.
The book begins to obtain a broader general interest in the second half when it moves on from counting systems and the most basic concepts of arithmetic into the early history of algebra, spending a good amount of time discussing the algebraic problems from ancient Egypt recorded in the Rhind Papyrus. The author does an excellent job of communicating, in relatively few pages, the depth of mathematical understanding possessed by the ancient Egyptians, including concepts of geometric series, algebraic geometry, and precursors to integral calculus. The following chapter traces an alternate lineage of mathematics in Babylon covering similar but distinct mathematical territory including a rather stunning approximation of the square root of 2 and a special case of the Pythagorean theorem.
Arguably the most interesting mathematics is found in relatively few pages toward the end of the book where the author describes the development of rigorous proof. Illustrative examples include one of my own favorite stories from mathematical history: Eratosthenes, whose sieve can be used to locate prime numbers and whose knowledge of geometry allowed for a remarkably accurate calculation of the Earth's circumference as early as some 250 BCE. While this chapter does include a few of the "greatest hits" of early (Greek) mathematics, as well as a brief description of our own mathematical lineage (it can, after all, be argued that we are all the mathematical descendants of the Greeks), it's not the strongest point of the book because the description is, frankly, far too brief to allow for any real depth of understanding.
The book concludes with a brief but important plea for improved education in mathematics. While this certainly isn't the message you buy this book to hear, it remains a message that more people interested in mathematics need to start thinking about. The author's nine pages on the subject won't solve any problems, but I applaud him for devoting even a few pages to an attempt to start a conversation we desperately need to have.
The bottom line is that this book is a fascinating if somewhat superficial look at the early history of mathematics, culminating in a brief discussion of early "rigorous" mathematics. I recommend it for anyone with an interest in mathematics, OR anyone with an interest in history. The reader needn't be an expert mathematician to understand the vast majority of the book's material (a bit of high school algebra and geometry should easily suffice). If you're looking for a book that traces some of the famous proofs in mathematics, however, you'll be disappointed. That subject is taken up only at the very end of the book in a chapter I consider to be a bridge between this book and the many other works that have been written on Greek mathematics. If you find yourself looking for more of that kind of material after finishing this book, William Dunham's Journey Through Genius provides an excellent follow-up (conversely, if you read a book like Dunham's and want some more of the earlier history, this book would be perfect for you).
Others here seemed to critique him without an ounce of counter argument.
Mr Rudman tries to disprove that there were cultures that only counted up to two, and then three, and so on . . . as explained in say Barrow's "Pi in the Sky", chapter 2. Point is that 'imprints' from previous number base cultures are in the number linguistics. For instance, three is tres which is 'beyond', and nine means 'new' number. He even mentions the point that one can say there's an equivalent amount of objects in say this sack, without actually knowing the number. For instance, if you have a theater(imagine an old Greek theater), and all the seats are filled; you can say that there's a theater of people without actually knowing the number. Archaeologists have found Babylonian pots with objects in them that were used in this fashion. They'd just put the objects in the pots as they matched one by one say the sheep they were going to move from one person to another. They wouldn't know the actual amount, but they'd know there's an equivalent container of sheep, or whatever. Yes, the the ancients really did go from such beginning understandings of number to a more systematic arithmetic. He even mentions this after argueing there were no two and three counter cultures. Let me put it another way.
People in general can only 'see' how many objects there are with five or less objects say on a table. Five or more, and they start counting. Mathematics, in this sense, is a kind of mental crutch to help us deal with things we can't normally see on first hand.


