Follow the Author
OK
How the West Won: The Neglected Story of the Triumph of Modernity Hardcover – March 17, 2014
|
Rodney Stark
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$32.49 | — |
-
Print length432 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherIntercollegiate Studies Institute
-
Publication dateMarch 17, 2014
-
Dimensions6 x 1.5 x 9 inches
-
ISBN-101610170857
-
ISBN-13978-1610170857
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customers who bought this item also bought
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
Review
Praise for How the West Won
“Fortunately, a few unapologetic defenders of Western civilization can still be found. In How the West Won, Rodney Stark details how and why the vital aspects of modernity—defined here as a combination of sensible economic arrangements, political freedoms and scientific knowledge—developed in the West rather than elsewhere. In the process he adds considerably to the content of the old Western Civ courses, which would often discreetly ignore the contribution of Christianity and neglect practical matters such as advances in technology and banking.” —Wall Street Journal
“Stark’s lively and absorbing new work beheads the academy’s dictatorship of relativism and enthrones in its place concrete and fact-based understanding in order here to give Western civilization the credit it richly deserves. . . . Along the way he upsets one politically correct apple cart after another. . . . Stark’s book should have as wide an audience as possible.” —Catholic World Report
“Exposes gaping holes in the prevailing narrative . . . Stark sets out to critique, and, in some instances, demolish several widespread mythologies about the West’s development. . . . In making these points, Stark is happy to engage in the deeply politically incorrect exercise of comparing developments in the West to that of other civilizations.” —Crisis
“What sets How the West Won apart from similar histories, and what makes it a sheer delight to read, is Stark’s wit, his elegant writing and, most especially, his reinterpretation of various historical events. . . . Nearly every chapter of How the West Won breaks some widely held opinion. . . . If you are looking for lively, erudite history, you’ll find How the West Won a splendid companion.” —Smoky Mountain News
Praise for Rodney Stark
“Stark has a vigorous prose style and a gift for clear explanation. The pace is swift, and the narrative thrilling.” —New York Times
“Fun to read, full of anecdote and incident . . . Mr. Stark is especially adept at challenging received ideas.” —Wall Street Journal
“Stark proves himself once again as a historical myth-buster.” —CBN.com
“Rodney Stark turns what we ‘know’ about history on its head.” —Relevant Magazine
“Stimulating and provocative . . . Deftly researched.” —Publishers Weekly
“Fresh, blunt, and highly persuasive.” —Newsweek
“Gripping, with tales of courage and desperation, outsized characters, and fate of cultures hanging in the balance . . . Masterful . . . Sets the record straight.” —National Catholic Register
“Wonderfully readable prose and politically incorrect conclusions.” —World Magazine
“[Stark’s] works are an encouraging corrective to the anti-Western history routinely taught in our schools.” —New Oxford Review
“Compelling reading, adding depth and coherence to the often nebulous hyperbole of historical hypotheses. Highly recommended.”—Library Journal
About the Author
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Intercollegiate Studies Institute; 1st edition (March 17, 2014)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 432 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1610170857
- ISBN-13 : 978-1610170857
- Item Weight : 1.72 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.5 x 9 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,032,271 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,276 in History of Civilization & Culture
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In light of this, Stark offers his book as a sturdy (indeed, contrarian!) defense of the currently-maligned West. Doing so, he challenges many of the voguish views of the academy, arguing that the fall of the Roman Empire was in fact beneficial, that the “Dark Ages” never happened, that the Crusades are defensible, that global warming in earlier eras was a blessing, that the “Scientific Revolution” clearly began in the Medieval period rather than the 17th century, that the Protestant Reformers replaced a repressive Catholic system with equally repressive Protestant systems, and that Europe’s colonies impoverished rather than enriched their sponsors. Still more: he argues that non-Western societies such as the Chinese and Islamic, Mayan and Indic, failed to become “modern” because of intrinsic factors making such a transition impossible. To Stark, the West’s distinctiveness resides in its ideas, and contrary to many historians (operating within a generally materialistic—whether Darwinian or Marxist—philosophical perspective) he thinks economic developments do not fully explain why cultures and civilizations rise and fall.
Glancing at the world of Classical Beginnings (500 BC-AD 500), he finds: “At the dawn of history most people [whether in China or India or Mesopotamia or Egypt] lived lives of misery and exploitation in tyrannical empires that covered huge areas” (#151). Subject to arbitrary and frequently despotic rulers, forced to work within a command economy, deprived of secure title to property, the masses of mankind loved poorly. Consequently, “in 1900 Chinese peasants were using essentially the same tools and techniques that had been using for more than three thousand years. The same was true in Egypt” (#228). But then, “In the midst of all this misery and repression a ‘miracle’ of progress and freedom took place in Greece among people who lived not in an empire but in hundreds of small, independent city-states. It was here that the formation of Western civilization began” (#158).
Despite the persistence of slavery, the Greeks tasted and celebrated (in both games and politics) the luxury of freedom. Thriving as individuals, they flourished in such areas as: warfare; democracy; economics; literary; the arts; technology; speculative philosophy and formal logic. Importantly (as Herodotus noted in explaining the differences between Egypt and Greece), “the ancient Greeks took the single most significant step toward the rise of Western science when they proposed that the universe is orderly and governed by underlying principles that the human mind could discern through observation and reason” (#473). This was possible because—as Anaxagoras and Plato saw—there is a Mind (Nous) underlying the physical cosmos—a monotheistic perspective that undergirds the West’s triumphs.
Anticipating and complementing developments in Greece, Jewish theologians also proclaimed a “rational God” who was eternal, immutable, conscious and revealed to us through both creation and scripture. Due to Alexander’s conquests and the subsequent Roman occupation of their land, many Jews were quite cosmopolitan—two centuries before Christ Jerusalem was actually known as “Antioch-at-Jerusalem.” Early Christians such as Justin Martyr drew upon the best Greek thinkers (“Christians before Christ”) as they developed their theology. Both Christian and Greek philosophers (preeminently Plato) revered “the divine gift of reason” which “has sown the seeds of truth in all men as beings created in God’s image’” (#698). Thus, to Augustine: “‘Heaven forbid that God should hate in us that by which he made us superior to the animals. Heaven forbid that we should believe in such as way as not to accept or seek reasons, since we could not even belief if we did not possess rationals souls’” (#751). Confidence in the rationality of the Creator—as well as His providential care for creation—enabled later Christian thinkers to do significant the scientific and historical studies basic to Western Civilization.
By contrast: “Islam holds that the universe is inherently irrational—that there is no cause and effect—because everything happens as the direct result of Allah’s will at that particular time. Anything is possible. Attempts at science, then, are not only foolish but also blasphemous, in that they imply limits to Allah’s power and authority. Therefore Muslim scholars study law (what does Allah require?), not science” (#825), and Islam, for 1400 years, has demonstrably failed to develop anything comparable to the science and technology, literature and philosophy of the West. Similarly, in China, the Confucian reverence for the past encouraged an opposition to change clearly illustrated by the great Chinese admiral Zheng He, who led large fleets (involving several hundred ships) across the Indian Ocean to the coast of East Africa between 1405 and 1433 A.D. His expeditions, which could easily have led to the a Chinese of the globe, came to naught when the emperor dismantled his ships and forbade further construction of oceangoing vessels. Even the blueprints for Zheng’s ships were destroyed!
Following the fall of Rome (“the most beneficial event in the rise of Western civilization”), the West emerged from the crucible of Greek and Christian culture. In the “Not-So-Dark” Middle Ages, its genius emerged and flourished. Political decentralization encouraged creativity and competition, progress and prosperity. An “agricultural revolution” enabled Medieval Europeans to eat better and live longer—as did the favorable climate during the “Medieval Warming” era (800-1250 A.D.). “As food became abundant, the population of Europe soared from about 25 million in 950 to about 75 million in 1250” (#2737). Harnessing wind and water with sophisticated machinery (often shaped in blast furnaces) enabled them to irrigate land and grind grain and navigate seas. Germans and Scandinavians, Hungarians and Slavs were successfully converted and began contributing to the creative Christian Culture responsible for impressive monuments—Gothic cathedrals; universities at Oxford and Paris; scientific inquires and advances under the guidance of brilliant thinkers such as Nicole Oresme and Jean Buridan; and magisterial scholarly works such as Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologica.
Within that Medieval incubus there emerged, Stark stresses, the “freedom and capitalism” essential for the modern world. Slavery slowly disappeared throughout Christendom. It “ended in medieval Europe only because the Church extended its sacraments to all slaves and then banned the enslavement of Christians” (#2349). Only in the Christian world was slavery eliminated! Persons were increasingly free (despite the persistence of serfdom) to work voluntarily and creatively—and to increasingly to take part in the political life of their communities. Capitalism emerged throughout Europe during the late Middle Ages, long before the Protestant Reformation. Private property, commercial activities flourishing through free markets, and capital investments rendering income all brought about an incredible economic transformation. Above all else: “If there is a single factor responsible for the rise of the West, it is freedom. Freedom to hope. Freedom to act. Freedom to invest. Freedom to enjoy the flirts of one’s dreams as well as one’s labor” (#2663). This freedom flourished in Medieval Europe and shaped the future of the West.
Dramatically evident in 1492, the West quickly expanded to control much of the globe in successive centuries. Technological developments, markedly evident in superior military equipment and trades goods, enabled relatively small groups of Europeans to conquer or colonize the Americas. They also proved decisive in numerous conflicts with Muslims, insuring their retreat from Europe. “In 1800 Europeans controlled 35 percent of the land surface of the globe. By 1878 this figure had risen to 67 percent. Then in the next two decades, Europeans seized control of nearly all of Africa, so that in 1914, on the eve of World War I, Europeans dominated 84 percent of the world’s land area” (#6604). Intellectually, the “Enlightenment” proved equally decisive. Though it did indeed prompt various heterodox notions, the Enlightenment must be understood, in accord with Alfred North Whitehead, as rooted in many of the scientific and theological insights of Medieval thinkers—most especially the rationality of God and His world. “For, as Albert Einstein once remarked, the most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible: ‘A priori one should expect a chaotic world which cannot be grasped by the mind in any way . . . That is the “miracle” which is constantly being reinforced as our knowledge expands.’ And that is the ‘miracle that testifies to a creation guided by intention and rationality” (#5963).
Due to this “miracle,” we Moderns enjoy unprecedented prosperity. The standard of living has dramatically increased during the past two centuries. Enjoying “political freedom, secure property rights, high wages, cheap energy, and a highly educated population,” the West now features an unprecedented quality-of-life. Back-breaking manual labor has been largely replaced by machines. Ordinary people enjoy “consumer” goods available only to the super-wealthy in earlier centuries. Hardly the catastrophe denounced by romantics (from William Wordsworth to Al Gore), technology has greatly improved the lot of ordinary folks. And this is, quite simply, how the West won!
This is a hard read. The book is a polemic rather than just a history. The good is that there are interesting facts that are brought up, some quite peripheral to his case, but fun to know. I did not know, for example, that “Arabic” numerals actually originated in India. However, the author clearly has a religious bias, not just that Christianity supported science but that Catholicism specifically is a superior Version of Christianity. Additionally he occasionally throws up strawman arguments against the secular or atheism.
“ there now exists a militant group of atheists,…Who attack religion as superstitious nonsense and claim that science refutes the existence of God and the possibility of miracles “.
His apologia of the Galileo incident is nothing short of nauseating.
Further The author’s conservative bias also appears, frequently decrying “ left-wing historians”, intellectuals who are unfamiliar with hard labor.
Another problem is that the author will portray events to make it seem like western superiority. A couple of examples:
He mentions the six Galleasses (larger more heavily gunned) in the battle of Lepanto. Reading his brief summary one would think that this superior technology won the day. But their effect on the bottle was minimal. There were over 200 ships on each side and most of the battle was fought between the crews with the ships engaged side-by-side. Further the wind changed to coming from the west and blew the heavier galleasses through the enemy and effectively out of the battle. Oddly A better detail supporting the author’s viewpoint was the discovery of a large cache of gold aboard one ship revealing the weakness of a confiscatory government.
A second example was his mention of the battle of Tours. Although the troops under Charles Martel were quite good both in equipment and discipline, it was superior generalship that set up the victory. The Muslims under Umayyad caliphate had had several easy victories in the prior weeks, so had both frittered away a time advantage (Martel got to choose an excellent site) as well as becoming overconfident.
In each of these battles it was superior generalship as well as the fortunes of war ( especially at Lepanto) that gave the west the victory, not inherent superiority.
A third point and this is the most unfortunate. His broad portrayal of certain other cultures such as China fails on specifics. As other reviewer‘s have pointed out, he dismisses the Chinese failure to develop and make serious use of gun powder. This is an old trope, and a historian should know better.
The author is on stronger ground with two main points. One is that a confiscatory Government will undermine free enterprise and invention. He gives two examples again in China for this. One was the destruction of all ocean going vessels after the Zheng He voyages and the confiscation and destruction of the privately held iron smelting.
The second (and possibly more controversial) is the assertion that Christianity sets a philosophical background that supports investigation and research. He purports that it is derived and evolved from rational Greek philosophy and that God expects us to further discover his nature by investigating the world. He contrasts this superficially with other eastern religions as well as Islam, who he says fail to encourage investigation.
Overall I would caution the reader. This is a polemic. The “facts” aren’t aren’t always accurate or are portrayed in a misleading manner. Further The work is interspersed with what can only be termed unbridled support of Christianity and more specifically the Catholic Church.
Top reviews from other countries
Instead of the usual root dismissal, Stark takes us back over two millennia to show how the unique western concept of God paved way for a triumphal civilisation. A God that bequeathed humanity with “free will”, the necessary “tool” to the unravelling of natural phenomena and hence the pursue of knowledge that begets science, that begets technology!
In this wonderful over two millennia journey, here and there, dogmatic “truths” are challenged on substantiated terms, such as why the so called Dark Ages were not so dark after all! As for the “whys”, you've come this far, so I won't be a spoiler.....
Excellent account, easy read, five stars, (because there are no more to award).
No doubt there will be some challenges from other historians, but it's about time someone brought some balance into the accounts of Western history. He feels a lot less guilty about our country's past, now. Well done Mr. Stark.,and thanks.
- how backwards and anti-progressive the Romans were;
- how the Dark Ages were actually an era of tremendous scientific, technological, and economic progress;
- how the "Scientific Revolution" was actually birthed centuries early in the supposed "Dark Ages";
- how the ideas and practice of Christianity have been, overwhelmingly, the greatest force for good in the world, and how it birthed the idea and culture of progress that led to modernity












