Somewhere midway through Human Error, James Reason (what an excellent name for someone of his profession, by the way!) quotes another author: "When we are studying an uninteresting subject, if our mind tends to wander, we have to bring back our attention every now and then by using distinct pulses of effort, which revivify the topic for a moment, the mind then running on for a certain number of seconds or minutes with spontaneous interest, until again some intercurrent idea captures it and takes it off."
This is probably the best summary of this book I could come up with, unfortunately.
While Reason's points about human error form in many respects an interesting read, the book is so densely written as to be un-recommendable for most casual readers. I find myself yearning for the light and airy "Thinking: Fast and Slow" by Kahneman instead of the heavy passages that Reason exposes us to.
It is, without a doubt, a well-researched book that covers some interesting ideas: the differences between skill, rule or knowledge-based errors (i.e. ranging from small slips like pouring your tea in the sugar holder instead of the teacup all the way down to latent, massive design errors in nuclear power plant systems), the Swiss cheese model of accident causation, the fact that technology has made our systems less prone to operator errors (many but fixable) but rather more prone to design errors (few but hard to recover from) and so on.
However, these ideas are presented in such a bland and difficult to digest way, that the casual reader may struggle (like I did) to properly appreciate them. It is perhaps not Reason's fault: this book was written in the late 1980s, before the self-help industry truly came into its own, and it is admittedly targeted more towards academics.
Towards the end of the book, Reason explains that "human supervisory control was not conceived with humans in mind." I'll cheekily bastardize that phrase to sum up my views of Human Error as "reading this book was not conceived with the reader in mind" unfortunately, which dramatically limits its reach.
Human Error 1st Edition
by
James Reason
(Author)
ISBN-13: 978-0521314190
ISBN-10: 0521314194
Why is ISBN important? ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
More Buying Choices
Modern technology has now reached a point where improved safety can only be achieved through a better understanding of human error mechanisms. In its treatment of major accidents, the book spans the disciplinary gulf between psychological theory and those concerned with maintaining the reliabiblity of hazardous technologies. Much of the theoretical structure is new and original, and of particular importance is the identification of cognitive processes common to a wide variety of error types.
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Choose items to buy together.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"...an in-depth analytical framework of human error..." Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing
"...a comprehensive and often innovative treatment of human error that is both readable and informative." Gavan Lintern, Human Factors Society Bulletin
"...a comprehensive and often innovative treatment of human error that is both readable and informative." Gavan Lintern, Human Factors Society Bulletin
Book Description
This 1991 book is a major theoretical integration of several previously isolated literatures looking at human error in major accidents.
Product details
- Publisher : Cambridge University Press; 1st edition (October 26, 1990)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0521314194
- ISBN-13 : 978-0521314190
- Item Weight : 14.5 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.73 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #185,769 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #562 in Cognitive Psychology (Books)
- #614 in Medical Cognitive Psychology
- #733 in Biology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
98 global ratings
How customer reviews and ratings work
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on August 8, 2021
7 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on June 21, 2020
Great book on safety and error. I enjoyed it. Will use it in future endeavors and career plans involving errors.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on May 4, 2017
I really enjoyed this book that was the basis of so many models built for solving human error in many different occupations. I find it interesting that some human error can be avoided in the workplace by building a company culture that is willing to tackle error and do what is necessary to reduce it via shoring up deficiencies in the organization.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on April 23, 2018
school book
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on December 12, 2017
The scientific principles are valid, but the book could benefit from a more “reader friendly” workover to gain in popularity.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on April 22, 2013
Great effort to classify human errors but not to avoid or resolve. Great issue to introduce to the human behaviour, lapses, memory recalls, examples, ...nice.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on February 22, 2018
Even though it was published some 27 years ago still very relevant to today's industry
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on January 20, 2014
Dr Reason's work is fascinating and we see his influence all over the safety literature. A basic text for anyone interested in the science of safety and reliability
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Martin Jones
4.0 out of 5 stars
Trial by error
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on August 23, 2019
I read this book because working in a pharmacy, I hoped that having an understanding of the psychological basis of error might be helpful in avoiding it.
The book starts with some history. In the early twentieth century Freud was pondering on apparent slips and “accidents” having a basis in the subconscious. I suppose according to Freud, if someone made a slip in dispensing medication it would be because they had some deep seated dislike of a patient, or harboured unconscious opinions about their treatment! Thankfully, other views from the early twentieth century have aged better. In 1905 Ernst Mach wrote that “knowledge and error flow from the same mental sources, only success can tell one from the other.” Mach is referring to the fact that certain helpful types of behaviour, can also cause problems. For example, people have the ability to learn skills which involve a high level of automatic facility, allowing musicians to play musical instruments, typists to type, drivers to drive cars - all without thinking about the mechanics of every string plucked, key pressed or gear changed. But this automatic facility, so useful in many situations, can be a liability when circumstances alter. Step from a manual car into an automatic and you can run into problems when your left foot wants to press a clutch that isn’t there. In a pharmacy, if you have dispensed hundreds of boxes of a medication in a particular strength, there is an opening for error when you come to dispense an unusual strength of that same medication.
I suppose an awareness of this kind of situation does potentially help guard against times when routine brings the possibility of diminished conscious control. But Human Error is not the book to go to if you want simple answers. First there are those bad outcomes arising from useful behaviour. Then there’s the sense that an error is rarely confined to one person. When things go wrong it is usually the result of lots of people making many decisions meeting varied circumstances, which finally lead down to the unfortunate individual who makes a blunder - the last piece in a malign jigsaw puzzle. Then there are the traps in all the means we employ to guard against error - automated systems leading to loss of skills in dealing with problems; or systems protected by layers of defence tending to soak up hidden deficiencies until there is a sudden failure. Oddly, I came away from this book with a greater acceptance of error, even in trying to find a way to avoid it. Error is inevitable, and if you make error a forbidden sin, then you can never discuss or learn from things going wrong.
It is perhaps ironic that Human Error is a highly academic book, which leaves nothing to chance in its numbered sections, sub sections and sub sub sections. It does not flow. Concepts have to be nailed down into endless acronyms, leaving me floundering amongst SLIMs, SLIs, THERPs, PSFs, PIFs and SUs. Even the name Three Mile Island gets turned into TMI. I did not enjoy wading through this academic acronym code. I can’t see any problem with calling Three Mile Island by that name as many times as required.
Nevertheless, if you can live with the style, and accept that you won’t find an easy prescription that will make you a more accurate, less error prone person, this is a very interesting book. I would recommend it to anyone working in a job where a small slip can have serious consequences; or to anyone making big decisions, where small, unintended consequences in those decisions can store up serious problems for the future.
The book starts with some history. In the early twentieth century Freud was pondering on apparent slips and “accidents” having a basis in the subconscious. I suppose according to Freud, if someone made a slip in dispensing medication it would be because they had some deep seated dislike of a patient, or harboured unconscious opinions about their treatment! Thankfully, other views from the early twentieth century have aged better. In 1905 Ernst Mach wrote that “knowledge and error flow from the same mental sources, only success can tell one from the other.” Mach is referring to the fact that certain helpful types of behaviour, can also cause problems. For example, people have the ability to learn skills which involve a high level of automatic facility, allowing musicians to play musical instruments, typists to type, drivers to drive cars - all without thinking about the mechanics of every string plucked, key pressed or gear changed. But this automatic facility, so useful in many situations, can be a liability when circumstances alter. Step from a manual car into an automatic and you can run into problems when your left foot wants to press a clutch that isn’t there. In a pharmacy, if you have dispensed hundreds of boxes of a medication in a particular strength, there is an opening for error when you come to dispense an unusual strength of that same medication.
I suppose an awareness of this kind of situation does potentially help guard against times when routine brings the possibility of diminished conscious control. But Human Error is not the book to go to if you want simple answers. First there are those bad outcomes arising from useful behaviour. Then there’s the sense that an error is rarely confined to one person. When things go wrong it is usually the result of lots of people making many decisions meeting varied circumstances, which finally lead down to the unfortunate individual who makes a blunder - the last piece in a malign jigsaw puzzle. Then there are the traps in all the means we employ to guard against error - automated systems leading to loss of skills in dealing with problems; or systems protected by layers of defence tending to soak up hidden deficiencies until there is a sudden failure. Oddly, I came away from this book with a greater acceptance of error, even in trying to find a way to avoid it. Error is inevitable, and if you make error a forbidden sin, then you can never discuss or learn from things going wrong.
It is perhaps ironic that Human Error is a highly academic book, which leaves nothing to chance in its numbered sections, sub sections and sub sub sections. It does not flow. Concepts have to be nailed down into endless acronyms, leaving me floundering amongst SLIMs, SLIs, THERPs, PSFs, PIFs and SUs. Even the name Three Mile Island gets turned into TMI. I did not enjoy wading through this academic acronym code. I can’t see any problem with calling Three Mile Island by that name as many times as required.
Nevertheless, if you can live with the style, and accept that you won’t find an easy prescription that will make you a more accurate, less error prone person, this is a very interesting book. I would recommend it to anyone working in a job where a small slip can have serious consequences; or to anyone making big decisions, where small, unintended consequences in those decisions can store up serious problems for the future.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
BikeMan
4.0 out of 5 stars
The definitive guide to human error
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on December 21, 2005
In this superb, easily read book James Reason deftly summarises many years of world wide research into the fascinating field of human error. If you ever wondered why you walk into your bedroom having forgotten just why you climbed the stairs in the first place - then this is the book for you.
The structure is simple with each chapter exploring a different aspect. The new reader is invited to skip the more theoretical parts and focus just on the most useful applications of current thinking.
This book is universlly cited as THE definitive book on the subject. For resolutely non-technical readers a more accessible text is 'Design of Everyday Things' by D Norman.
The structure is simple with each chapter exploring a different aspect. The new reader is invited to skip the more theoretical parts and focus just on the most useful applications of current thinking.
This book is universlly cited as THE definitive book on the subject. For resolutely non-technical readers a more accessible text is 'Design of Everyday Things' by D Norman.
19 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Helen
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent book
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on May 10, 2022
Excellently written, easily readable, great for students
maryg
5.0 out of 5 stars
Human error
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on February 28, 2013
Well written piece of work looking at accidents happening in the workplace and how to calculate the findings, used for dissertation purpose.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
MR
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Book
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on July 18, 2015
I used this when studying for my MSc, and I still use as a handy reference at work.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse








