|Print List Price:||$12.99|
Save $5.04 (39%)
The War on Human Nature in Australia's Political Culture: Collected Essays Kindle Edition
|New from||Used from|
Kindle Feature Spotlight
Try Kindle Countdown Deals
Explore limited-time discounted eBooks. Learn more.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
His basic views are that the multi-ethnic societies created by mass immigration suffer from stratification along ethnic lines and lack of public trust and hence are unstable and unpopular; and that gender roles are determined by biology to a significant degree. He concludes with a very interesting summary of the philosopher Hiram Caton's ideas on biopolitics that tries to generalize the argument.
My own feeling is that Salter's criticisms of the humanities are broadly correct. However, there is also a danger in allowing biological interpretations of social phenomena too much sway. Fundamentally the question of whether a belief is true or false is distinct from the question of whether it is biologically "functional" (and besides, current theories of functionality are fallible) and so needs to be treated separately. Salter does not go so far as to deny this, but some of his summary of Caton strays into this territory, particularly the "psychological" interpretation of positivism. The priority given to "domain general" rational considerations in the humanities is not a mistake, though it has been subverted by political agendas.
The take home point though, is that political policy made on the assumption that human behavior is infinitely malleable, rather than largely an expression of biological and genetic interests, is foolhardy and based on fashionable but implausible assumptions. This is particularly so in the case of displacement level immigration of potentially hostile populations into Western countries, as in some aspects of family policy.