Importing Democracy: The Role of NGOs in South Africa, Tajikistan, & Argentina Kindle Edition
|New from||Used from|
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
Top customer reviews
An excellent book providing the reader a sharp view in the landscapes of civil society organizations in three very different types of 'new democracies'; a convincing comparative analysis underlining the similarity of democratization CSO's in these three countries but actually also worldwide, a founded and pronounced appeal to the international community of scholars and practitioners to learn from misconceptions and mistakes, to leave behind the phase of democratic ingenuity. As one of the founders of the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy and for many years in charge of democratic governance programmes within the UN, I enjoyed reading this book. This book can help scholars and practitioners to critically assess existing practices and to understand why some democratization processes deliver and others do not, why civil and political societies need to have distinctive roles and how international actors could collaborate. In many cases civil society helps to fill the gap created by the lack of a strong political society and multiparty system; it can temporary play the role of a loyal opposition; in the long run it cannot replace political institutions. Julie Fischer convincingly argues for a change in both the culture and governance of international assistance.
Let me focus first on the research: Ms. Fisher shows how many of the elements that make democracy sustainable are present in the three nations she focuses in on. These elements range from markets to grassroots organizations and associations which ensure governmental accountability and form civil opposition, preventing the use of force to implement "regime change" (or "administration change"). At times it feels as though Ms. Fisher is hammering the reader with facts, sometimes so much so that I found myself discombobulated reading through them.
Which leads me to the unfortunate aspect of the actual writing. First off, I found the organization of the book poor: the first chapter is heavy on presenting her theory, which lends the later chapters, where she lays on the facts, the aspect of trying to fit them into what she has already determined she will show. This is, of course, the way the scientific method often works--but this kind of book is not describing science, it is describing society and institutions, which should be treated much more casually. If, however, Ms. Fisher had laid out all the facts first, and then theorized afterwards, I believe that the writing would have been much smoother and the book would have been easier to read. At times, because of how she has organized the material, it appears that she uses "but" four or five times in a span of two or three paragraphs, which should not happen. Laying out the facts first would have prevented this. When I teach writing, I tend to tell my students: think like a lawyer. In no place is that more relevant than here.
Beyond that, the use of language leaves much to be desired. Every scholar ought to be familiar with George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language." Never use a long word where a short one will do, avoid barbarous usage, and so on and so forth. One particularly striking passage in it is where Orwell quotes famously from Ecclesiastes, then rewrites the quote in very technical, modern "scholarly" language, in which long words replace short ones and the attempt to sound sophisticated results in something approaching insanity. I find that Ms. Fisher, like so many other scholars, forgets at times that the book's contents only have meaning if the reader can digest them. Thus while at the time of writing some of her phrasing and construction may have appeared good because it was sophisticated, upon revision the proper thing to do would be to try to place the same ideas in simpler, clearer language. And this was apparently not done.
So, in respect of the facts, the book deserves three stars--it would get four or five from me if the writing were not as it is.
Each of the three countries have a different starting point, set of democratization forces, and outlook. South Africa is promising. Many Tajik NGOs are weak, but there is evidence that they do well when they concentrate on Tajikistan's strongest local democratic traditions and institutions. Although Argentina is lacking words for accountability, much less legal accountability, democratization NGOs help strengthen government institutions at both the local and national levels. The author is open-minded and critical of the influences of AIDS and poverty, ad Peronism. The fate of democratization ultimately depends on the state, on civil society, and on the relationship between them.
The many names and examples in the book will not be remembered by heart, the main findings, conclusions and recommendations are far more important. The book provides insight in the inner workings and practical consequences of the active role NGOs play in further democratization of countries.
Most recent customer reviews
Set up an Amazon Giveaway
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Ideologies & Doctrines > Democracy
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Specific Topics > Civics & Citizenship
- Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Ideologies & Doctrines > Democracy
- Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Specific Topics > Civics