| Kindle Price: | $2.99 |
| Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Inadequate Equilibria: Where and How Civilizations Get Stuck Kindle Edition
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Whether you’re trying to outperform in science, or in business, or just in finding good deals on eBay, it’s important that you have a sober understanding of your relative competencies.
The story only ends there, however, if you’re fortunate enough to live in an adequate civilization.
Eliezer Yudkowsky’s Inadequate Equilibria is a sharp and lively guidebook for anyone questioning when and how they can know better, and do better, than the status quo. Freely mixing debates on the foundations of rational decision-making with tips for everyday life, Yudkowsky explores the central question of when we can (and can’t) expect to spot systemic inefficiencies, and exploit them.
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateNovember 16, 2017
- File size347 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
From the Author
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B076Z64CPG
- Publisher : Machine Intelligence Research Institute (November 16, 2017)
- Publication date : November 16, 2017
- Language : English
- File size : 347 KB
- Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 181 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #759,338 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #353 in Microeconomics (Books)
- #2,707 in Business Economics (Kindle Store)
- #10,113 in Social Sciences (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Eliezer Yudkowsky is a decision theorist and computer scientist at the Machine Intelligence Research Institute in Berkeley, California who is known for his work in technological forecasting. His publications include the Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence chapter “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence,” co-authored with Nick Bostrom. Yudkowsky’s writings have helped spark a number of ongoing academic and public debates about the long-term impact of AI, and he has written a number of popular introductions to topics in cognitive science and formal epistemology, such as “Rationality: From AI to Zombies” and “Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality”.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book easy to read and insightful, with concise explanations. They appreciate the creative and unique writing style. However, some readers found the pacing boring and not memorable.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers appreciate the book's insights. They find it insightful and a quick read, with useful explanations for major institutions. The book provides great epistemic advice, models for identifying and evaluating opportunities, and balanced insight that readers appreciate. Some sections of the book will be revisited, and the reasoning is better than in "The Dark Lord's Answer". Overall, customers find the book interesting and easy to read, changing their thinking about trying new projects.
"...Concise and useful explanations for how major insitutions (academia, medicine, politics, venture capitalism) break -..." Read more
"This book contains some interesting ideas and models for identifying and evaluating opportunities one can pursue...." Read more
"...That's putting it glibly. It's actually pretty insightful and a quick read." Read more
"...The written contents were okay. More original ideas and better reasoning than "The Dark Lord's Answer" which I got at the same time, but with less..." Read more
Customers find the book easy to read with concise explanations. They appreciate the author's writing style and interesting ideas on problem-solving. The first half of the book is considered outstanding and engrossing.
"...Concise and useful explanations for how major insitutions (academia, medicine, politics, venture capitalism) break -..." Read more
"...It's an overall quick read, so even if you get lost in some sections, I recommend continuing through to the end." Read more
"...That's putting it glibly. It's actually pretty insightful and a quick read." Read more
"...Very poor binding quality. The written contents were okay...." Read more
Customers find the book creative and unique. They find it insightful and useful.
"...The written contents were okay. More original ideas and better reasoning than "The Dark Lord's Answer" which I got at the same time, but with less..." Read more
"I learned so much from this book. It is so well written and so creative. It's exactly the right length and doesn't drag on. Buy this book!!!" Read more
"Unique, Insightful, Useful..." Read more
Customers find the book's pacing slow. They find it boring, pointless, and not much fun.
"It was an OK read, but not memorable" Read more
"...I understood anyway, the long explanations seemed pointless and not much fun. Where I didn't understand, the long explanations didn't help much...." Read more
"Trite, boring; high opportunity cost..." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 17, 2017Some of the useful things inside:
- Microeconomic tools for judging the epistemic incentives of groups of experts
- Concise and useful explanations for how major insitutions (academia, medicine, politics, venture capitalism) break
- Case studies in how to successful use Aumman's agreement theorem in real life
The most valuable part of this book by far is chapter 3, which is an extended dialogue between a cynical conventional economist ("C.C.E" or 'Cecie') and a visitor from a different world, trying to explain why a particular institution is killing babies. The example is a real one - the FDA hasn't approved a simple set of fats for intravenous baby food, causing severe brain damage in something like dozens of babies per year. And the explanation is a whirlwind tour of how our institutions work and how they break, with many concepts that I've been able to use elsewhere to great benefit.
Above all, this book has changed the way I think about learning from experts. I'll end my review with an example of how I analyse things like this now.
Recently someone came to me proposing a project for building a math-education website - combining math explanations and machine learning algorithms, connecting you with the best explanation given your background knowledge. And of my first 3 thoughts, 2 were about how the site would function and how a user would interact with it - it's important to concretely visualise a product to figure out if it feels like it would work. However, my 3rd thought was to do an adequacy analysis - I looked for data points about whether I should expect that, if this is a good idea that can work, why hasn't someone already done it? Think about all the money and time people spend on education each year - all the tutors in universities, all the teachers in high schools, all the assistant lecturers and support staff and government subsidies. Surely, if this project was a good idea, someone would've built it and it would be a common website we all use. Is the fact that this doesn't exist already enough evidence that it won't work?
In general I don't see the educational marketplace of resources changing rapidly in response to new tech and research. There was a bunch of research about spaced repetition and how memorisation works, that nobody has jumped to incorporate into how universities work. Many people can tell you the best physics/math textbooks (e.g. Feynman Lectures) but most students will never read them. It *doesn't* look to me like a space where it would require a great deal of effort to out-do the best in the field. You might counter by pointing out the success of Khan Academy, but personally I'm not sure I'd consider the fact that a single dad can make lots of videos and do better than everyone else, a sign of success for the educational market.
I'm not actually very confident in this analysis. However, the best part is that I can learn about the whole field by working on the one project. If the project fails, or I find out that someone else has tried this and failed, then I'll change my assessment of other projects in this space. On the other hand, if the project succeeds, I will update about how good the educational market is at incentivising people to create useful things like this.
I wouldn't have made these models and hypotheses before, and for that reason I'm really glad I read this book.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 19, 2021This book contains some interesting ideas and models for identifying and evaluating opportunities one can pursue. There are some useful sections of the book that I will probably re-read. I found the overall flow of the writing to be uneven in some sections, but it was still worth it to plow through the rambling examples and parenthetical thoughts to find the nuggets of clarity. It's an overall quick read, so even if you get lost in some sections, I recommend continuing through to the end.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 7, 2018Equity markets are efficient in the sense that all stock prices instantly adjust to new information--there are no genuine bills on the ground waiting to be picked up. Thus you can safely ignore someone tells you that INTC is overpriced because of the recent problems with its chips.
But largely because of varying incentive structures, not every domain is efficient in this way. Thus it is feasible for a mere decision theorist to correctly diagnose problems with the Bank of Japan's monetary policy, even though the BoJ is run by domain experts.
How is this possible? And why do some people insist that it is not possible?
It is possible because (a) the BoJ governor cannot personally profit handsomely by making correct monetary policy, and (b) an outsider who lacks object-level expertise can still possess meta-level expertise, allowing him to correctly identify worthy object-level experts whose opinions to trust.
Some people insist this is not possible, and that adjusting your beliefs to those of a wider reference class is always preferable. They do this at least in part because of status-related emotions.
This book is basically an extended meditation on why EY should not have to quit his contrarian ways just because of Aumann's theorem. That's putting it glibly. It's actually pretty insightful and a quick read.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2022I ordered a physical copy of this book, and I would say about 20 out of the 80 pages pulled out when I read those pages. Very poor binding quality.
The written contents were okay. More original ideas and better reasoning than "The Dark Lord's Answer" which I got at the same time, but with less emphasis on solutions. A little rambling, more like a collection of essays than a book. It will be more interesting if you haven't already read "Meditations on Moloch". Continues his usual theme of "arguing against common errors the author encounters (that I may or may not see often myself)".
- Reviewed in the United States on June 6, 2018It was an OK read, but not memorable
- Reviewed in the United States on July 26, 2018I loved the part explaining housing bubbles. As a bit of a real estate nerd that was a valued insight. I personally do not experience modest epistemology much myself,but when I do witness it there does not seem to be a universal epistemological adoption by the individual expressing it. I think this is common in the Midwest, where people seem to oscillate wildly from modest epistemology “We can’t possibly understand God’s plan” to arrogant epistemology “I could turn this economy around with a few simple tweaks to the budget”. I’m not sure what demographic the author interacts with that adheres so entirely to modesty, but I haven’t met many of them. As an entrepreneur I appreciated the balanced insight.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 19, 2019I learned so much from this book. It is so well written and so creative. It's exactly the right length and doesn't drag on. Buy this book!!!
- Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2019The book is written as a long, conversational essay. Yudkowski answers the question "How can I know when I really see an opportunity nobody else is taking, and how can I know when I'm fooling myself?"
Top reviews from other countries
Alberto Flaño LombardoReviewed in Spain on October 11, 20225.0 out of 5 stars A brilliant introductory book for anyone with an interest in economics and investing.
I read this book online for free, but I liked it so much that I bought it to lend it to some of my friends and family members. An essential work that I would recommend to anyone. Yudkowsky has yet to disappoint me, I have enjoyed immensely everything he has written.
Kindle CustomerReviewed in Canada on December 2, 20175.0 out of 5 stars There is a special delight in reading something original
There is a special delight in reading something original. Something unpredictable. Something useful - truly useful. Eliezer's "Inadequate Equilibria" is all of these things. Written in accessible language, and with plenty of amusing conversations, it does not talk down to (or up to) any reader - but includes them in a process of discovery. Highly recommended.
-
ceroniReviewed in Germany on December 1, 20175.0 out of 5 stars Unzureichende Gleichgewichte: Wo und Wie unsere Zivilisation stecken bleibt
Warum bleiben wir als Menschheit in bestimmten Bereichen stecken? Weswegen findet man, wohin man sieht, Verschwendung, Ineffizienz und Probleme, die nicht gelöst werden? Und wann darf man davon ausgehen, dass man es als Individuum tatsächlich besser weiß als alle anderen, und sich nicht nur etwas vormacht (was leider schneller passiert als einem lieb ist).
Sehr spannend und kurzweilig zu lesen, mit vielen intelligenten Ansätzen um über die großen Fragen unserer heutigen Welt nachzudenken.
OisínReviewed in the United Kingdom on April 4, 20185.0 out of 5 stars More than adequate book
This is an excellent book. For various reasons authors tend to make books longer than they need to be but that is not the case here. This short and incredibly astute book explains why things can get so messed up, even by seemingly reasonable people. It is all available for free online but at this price it's hard to resist getting the physical copy and makes a great spontaneous gift to anyone interested in humans, society, civilization, science, healthcare, etc.
Kindle CustomerReviewed in Australia on July 26, 20184.0 out of 5 stars Sage Advice
Author makes clear statements about knowledge, thinking, prediction, and why many of our systems are inadequate , but hard to fix. Good meta rules that test reality and need to be used, applied, experienced, in order to be useful. When to be different to the herd?





