Buy new:
-11% $20.45$20.45
$7.29 delivery
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$8.54$8.54
Delivery Wednesday, October 2
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Books For You Today
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel (Great Discoveries) Paperback – February 17, 2006
Purchase options and add-ons
"A gem…An unforgettable account of one of the great moments in the history of human thought." ―Steven Pinker
Probing the life and work of Kurt Gödel, Incompleteness indelibly portrays the tortured genius whose vision rocked the stability of mathematical reasoning―and brought him to the edge of madness.
4 illustrations- Print length300 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
- Publication dateFebruary 17, 2006
- Dimensions5.4 x 0.9 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100393327604
- ISBN-13978-0393327601
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
― Brian Greene, author of The Elegant Universe and The Fabric of the Cosmos
"In this penetrating, accessible, and beautifully written book, Rebecca Goldstein explores not only the work of one of the greatest mathematicians but also the relation of the human mind to the world around it."
― Alan Lightman, author of Einstein's Dreams
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company; Reprint edition (February 17, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 300 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0393327604
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393327601
- Item Weight : 9.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.4 x 0.9 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #994,787 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #441 in Mathematical Logic
- #646 in Mathematics History
- #1,989 in Scientist Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Rebecca Goldstein is a MacArthur Fellow, a professor of philosophy, and the author of five novels and a collection of short stories. She lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the writing style good, readable, and beautifully formulated. They also describe the biography as interesting, pertinent, and wrapped in a fascinating tale of genius.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the writing style good, unexpectedly readable, and beautifully formulated. They also describe the author as engaging, lucid, and informative. Readers mention the book is clear and deals with personalities as well as mathematics.
"...But for anyone, mathematics devotee or not, who is interested in a readable, clear, and enjoyable study of Gödel’s life and influence, Goldstein’s..." Read more
"...The author is very good, too, at using her philosophical training at putting everyone in philosophical boxes -- platonists, positivists,..." Read more
"...Although my experience suggests that the theorems are being suppressed...." Read more
"...This book is an excellent introduction to Godel's work. I find it fascinating due to its effect on the intellectual world...." Read more
Customers find the biography interesting and pertinent. They say it's wrapped in a fascinating tale of genius. Readers also mention the book weaves deep knowledge, personal experience, and great storytelling. They say it provides a nice historical context to the meaning and importance of Godel's theories.
"...This is a remarkable book – the story of a mathematical genius, a disturbed mind, a “Platonist” about mathematics in an age that was anti-Platonist..." Read more
"...Goldstein’s descriptions of the Vienna Circle are pretty fascinating, and her recollections and the recollections of her colleagues at Princeton..." Read more
"...I find the theorems a source of optimism and a clear, present and immensely important antidote for authoritarian dependency...." Read more
"...In my opinion, Rebecca Goldstein is one of the most interesting and pertinent among those contemporary philosophers who write for the wider public...." Read more
Customers find the book elegant. They say it paints a lovely portrait of a genius who triumphs but sadly ends.
"...de force on Kurt Gödel, his two main "theorems", and a painless, elegant treatment of well-known self-referential paradoxes in philosophy in general..." Read more
"...Second, it paints a lovely portrait of a genuis who triumphs but sadly ends his life in despair...." Read more
"...She still gets his story across in a comprehensible and appealing manner such that you cannot help but appreciate the man for who and what he was:..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
While a little background in philosophy would be useful, it is not necessary and I recommend this completely enjoyable biography in the strongest terms.
One has to wonder how important the incompleteness proofs will still be a hundred or two hundred years from now. Goldstein appears to recount how both Russell and Hilbert resisted the conclusions of incompleteness, but Russell was overwhelmed by the force of personality of Wittgenstein, and Hilbert couldn’t always get his own program back on track by herding in the cats. If the heart of a logical proof is itself a paradox of logic, as the liar’s paradox is, then one has to wonder about its conclusions. This is a little like premising a proof of arithmetic on ‘zero divided by zero’, where you then might be able to prove almost anything. Russell sounds in the book that he wanted to limit this sort of problem by the theory of types, but perhaps there should just be some more general prohibition against introducing paradoxes into mathematical proofs, and then to see where you can go from there. Godel is commonly compared to Escher, who built logically impossible buildings, which may be interesting, but perhaps it is more important to understand ways to build actual buildings -- or build proofs -- that architecturally won’t fall down in the real world. When I was growing up, all of the proofs in geometry class appeared to be pretty straightforward -- you could generally follow the logic and understand why they had to be true. Perhaps there was always some over-preaching about ‘finding a neighborhood around a point’ or ‘taking the limit as a value goes to zero’, but you could usually understand what they were getting at. Yet these days everything is more complicated and less immediately verifiable: take the four color map theorem, which was evidently only ‘proved’ by a computer enumerating a vast number of special configurations (even though earlier proofs from the nineteenth century looked pretty good), and then Wiles’ proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem that is premised on the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture relating elliptical curves and modular forms. Maybe someday seventh graders will understand how elliptical curves relate to modular forms, but if everything is so complicated, then how do we really know what is true.
Then there’s the question of what it all means. Even if there is no proof, the idea it embodies still resonates. Goldstein appears to want to limit the impact of Godel’s incompleteness theorems to just what it says about the theory of the arithmetic of natural numbers, and wants to reject the implications used by modernism, existentialism, and anti-intellectualism that makes everything relative to man and downplays the power of the rational. But she still wants to draw on her own philosophical training to bring in its relevance to the old academic debates on the theory of mind, and whether a computer can ever think the way a person does. Undoubtedly, Godel’s work has had implications, or at least established some benchmarks, that are relevant today to the fields of computer science, coding theory, and algorithmic complexity. But it appears to me to be fairly pointless to argue about whether computers will ever think like people, particularly as new varieties of neural networks continue to develop; these philosophical problems may help point the way, but they don’t really contribute to the technical solutions, where only time will tell, and machines may never be able to do everything exactly the way a human can, even if they are able eventually to pass a Turing Test. And I guess the author would disagree with me if I tried to draw implications from the incompleteness theorems to the more rigorous theories of physics, which she doesn’t consider, where incompleteness might be read to say that the entire movement to unify the laws of physics is pointless because each theory -- gravity, quantum mechanics, electromagnetism -- simply stands independently on its own, is incomplete, not necessarily consistent with the other theories, but simply co-existent. This problem may have originated with Einstein, pondering in his old age at what the author implies is the turkey farm of the Institute of Advanced Study, and how his unified field theory -- continued by others with theories of everything and spontaneous symmetry breaking -- is all leading us astray. Suppose we just draw the implication that the theories of physics don’t unify, that the universe just continues to diversify with more and more unrelated phenomena, that ‘all laws are local’, which is really all that is implied by incompleteness.
Top reviews from other countries
(I skipped the 10 or so pages which are supposed to explain the proof, I find that either you are an expert in a given field or the simplified explanation is pointless.)







