- Hardcover: 320 pages
- Publisher: Oxford University Press; 1 edition (July 13, 2017)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0190658800
- ISBN-13: 978-0190658809
- Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 1.2 x 6.4 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 1 customer review
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,146,582 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Inconsistency in the Torah: Ancient Literary Convention and the Limits of Source Criticism 1st Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
"Neverworld Wake" by Marisha Pessl
Read the absorbing new psychological suspense thriller from acclaimed New York Times bestselling author Marisha Pessl. Learn more
Customers who bought this item also bought
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
"Berman's book is a helpful foray into the area of 'biblical criticism criticism.'"--Rachel Slutsky, Reading Religion
"Joshua Berman puts forward what may be the most seriousand, to many in the field, disturbingchallenge in over a century to theories about the composition and dating of biblical texts. Biblical critics will have to reckon with Berman's lucid and detailed investigations of ancient Near Eastern literature if they are to continue using the classic methods of their field. Many scholars will want to disagree with Berman's conclusions, but none can ignore them."--Benjamin D. Sommer, author of Revelation and Authority: Sinai in Jewish Scripture and Tradition, winner of the Goldstein-Goren Prize for Best Book in Jewish Thought
"Joshua Berman throws down the gauntlet and challenges all critical scholars who have based their research on modern conceptions of literary unity and on the diachronic growth of the Pentateuch. He opens up a new path for the study and unity of the Pentateuchal literature, which will surely lead to much debate and further intensive review."--Shalom M. Paul, Professor Emeritus Bible, Hebrew University
"In this groundbreaking and provocative new study, Berman demonstrates some of the methodological problems within traditional biblical source criticism, especially how dependence on the scholar's own intuition to identify fissure in a text can yield misleading results. Berman argues that there is need among source critical scholars for a self-awareness of their own aesthetic senses of literary unity, and that cognate ancient Near Eastern literature can provide the necessary controls to diachronic inquiry in the study of the Torah. Through his own analyses of different genres of ancient Near Eastern literature, he illustrates 'a procedure for knocking out at least some errors' and for arriving at more modest and contingent results, ones that can withstand empirical scrutiny in the light of the ancient Near Eastern cultural literary world."--K. Lawson Younger, Jr., Professor of Old Testament, Semitic Languages, and Ancient Near Eastern History, Trinity International University, Divinity School
About the Author
Joshua A. Berman is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Hebrew Bible at Bar-Ilan University in Israel. He is the author of Created Equal: How the Bible Broke with Ancient Political Thought.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Scholars raised questions about these problem areas and using their intuition, without looking at the writings of other cultures or any similar proof, argued that the problem they saw in the scriptural text proved to them that the Bible is a document that was composed by several different authors and editors, frequently living at different times and frequently altering the text they received to reflect the situation they saw in their time, and to insert their own world-view.
But looking at other ancient writings, as Dr. Berman suggests, explains what bothered these scholars, we see that the ancients did what these modern scholars consider problem areas. For example: Not only Israelites gave God more than one name – Elohim and y-h-v-h, other ancient religions also gave their gods more than one name.
Similarly, Berman discusses the many incidences where there appears to be conflicting texts, such as the following: (1) Genesis chapter one seems to say that Adam and Eve were created at the same time, while chapter two states that Eve was formed from Adam’s side when God felt that it was not good for man to live alone. (2) The differences between the wilderness accounts in Exodus and Numbers on the one hand, and Deuteronomy on the other. (3) The inconsistency between the narrative versions in regard to the splitting of the sea in Exodus 13:17 and Barak’s defeat of Sisera’s army in Judges 4, and the poetic descriptions of these events in Exodus 15:18 and Judges 5. (4) Exodus 17:14 states that God will engage in the struggle with Amalek, while Deuteronomy 25:19 gives the mandate to the Israelites. And there are many more texts that deviate from another. Berman explains that the ancients also told inconsistent versions of events, even when it is certain that the two versions were composed by the same individual, and he explains why they did so.
He also discusses other questions raised by scholars such as the alteration between the use of the singular and the plural to refer the same person or event. He shows by examples from ancient texts that such grammatical usages, what we would consider an inconsistency today, was widespread in Near East documents.
He also focuses on the differences between the laws in Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers and their differences in Deuteronomy, and compares this phenomenon of changes with those in the Near Eastern texts. His explanation for the changes is very enlightening.
Berman quotes Levi ben Gershom (1288-1344), a great scholar known as Gersonides, who wondered why Exodus repeats in chapters 35-40 what appears to be tedious detail that was already stated in chapters 25-31. Gersonides wrote: “Perhaps we may say that it was the convention at the time of the giving of the Torah to fashion literature in this way and that the prophet expresses himself through the conventions of his time.”
Although Gersonides lacked the ancient documents, Dr. Berman shows by reference to them that what Gersonides thought might be true is now proven to be correct. There is no doubt that Dr. Berman’s findings will make a great impact upon future biblical study.