Shop top categories that ship internationally
Ähnliche Artikel Versand nach Deutschland
DE
Deutschland
Hinzugefügt zu

Es ist ein Fehler aufgetreten.

Es gab einen Fehler beim Abrufen deines Wunschzettels. Versuche es noch einmal.

Es ist ein Fehler aufgetreten.

Liste nicht verfügbar.
Bild des Kindle App-Logos

Lade die kostenlose Kindle-App herunter und lese deine Kindle-Bücher sofort auf deinem Smartphone, Tablet oder Computer – kein Kindle-Gerät erforderlich.

Mit Kindle für Web kannst du sofort in deinem Browser lesen.

Scanne den folgenden Code mit deiner Mobiltelefonkamera und lade die Kindle-App herunter.

QR-Code zum Herunterladen der Kindle App

Dem Autor folgen

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Wiederhole die Anfrage später noch einmal.

An Infinity of Worlds: Cosmic Inflation and the Beginning of the Universe Gebundene Ausgabe – 5. April 2022

4,4 4,4 von 5 Sternen 119 Sternebewertungen

What happened before the primordial fire of the Big Bang: a theory about the ultimate origin of the universe.

In the beginning was the Big Bang: an unimaginably hot fire almost fourteen billion years ago in which the first elements were forged. The physical theory of the hot nascent universe—the Big Bang—was one of the most consequential developments in twentieth-century science. And yet it leaves many questions unanswered: Why is the universe so big? Why is it so old? What is the origin of structure in the cosmos? In
An Infinity of Worlds, physicist Will Kinney explains a more recent theory that may hold the answers to these questions and even explain the ultimate origins of the universe: cosmic inflation, before the primordial fire of the Big Bang.

Kinney argues that cosmic inflation is a transformational idea in cosmology, changing our picture of the basic structure of the cosmos and raising unavoidable questions about what we mean by a scientific theory. He explains that inflation is a remarkable unification of inner space and outer space, in which the physics of the very large (the cosmos) meets the physics of the very small (elementary particles and fields), closing in a full circle at the first moment of time. With quantum uncertainty its fundamental feature, this new picture of cosmic origins introduces the possibility that the origin of the universe was of a quantum nature.

Kinney considers the consequences of eternal cosmic inflation. Can we come to terms with the possibility that our entire observable universe is one of infinitely many, forever hidden from our view?

Kundenrezensionen

4,4 von 5 Sternen
119 weltweite Bewertungen

Dieses Produkt bewerten

Sag deine Meinung zu diesem Artikel
A phenomenal introduction to the making of the modern Multiverse
5 von 5 Sternen
A phenomenal introduction to the making of the modern Multiverse
In An Infinity of Worlds, Kinney picks up where Guth’s The Inflationary Universe left off 25 years ago. A vibrant refresher on the subject, thoroughly documenting the latest observations and challenges to the theory of inflation. Kinney’s shimmering prose demystifies this most-inscrutable cosmic epoch and illuminates the way for future generations of researchers to explore its many remaining mysteries.Beautifully bound and printed with delightful images, you’ll treasure this time for all time!Brian Keating Chancellor’s Distinguished Professor of Physics at UC San Diego,
Vielen Dank für dein Feedback.
Leider ist ein Fehler aufgetreten.
Leider konnten wir die Rezension nicht laden

Spitzenrezensionen aus USA

  • Bewertet in den USA am29. Dezember 2022
    This book was for me the most informative and interesting physics popularization I have ever read, but then I was a physics major in the 1970s before moving on to an unrelated career. While containing only a little math as such, there is a great deal of jargon filled discussion that I was comfortable with because of my background that might cause readers who haven’t had as much exposure to physics to get a little bit lost. I encourage potential readers who would like having the general physics background to be completely comfortable with books like this one to watch Leonard Susskind’s excellent half-dozen different ten-lecture series on different subjects within physics, which can be found on YouTube and at theoreticalminimum.com, although these require having some comfort with basic calculus. If you don’t want to deal with the math, then watch as many relevant videos as you are willing to on the excellent PBS Spacetime YouTube channel in order to get more comfort with as much physics and cosmology as you like at a non-mathematical level.

    I graduated just before Alan Guth came up with cosmic inflation, and never really focused on cosmology. I had heard the theory was meant to solve the horizon and flatness problems (discussed in this book) but always felt that these problems could be solved in other as yet unknown ways without the need for a theory that seems so ad hoc in terms of positing mechanisms for no underlying reasons other than to produce the desired effect. And Will Kinney says as much in the last chapter of his book: “Geometric flatness and homogeneity could reasonably be taken as boundary conditions, set by some as yet unknown symmetry.”

    But he then continues “Cosmic perturbations are a different matter.” The real surprise and new news for me (and Kinney goes through the ins and outs of this in detail, citing the actual papers of the relevant physicists) is that the tiny angular fluctuations in the strength and polarization of the cosmic microwave background radiation, successfully measured by satellites launched for that purpose in recent decades, can be explained by no other known or hypothesized process than inflation, clinching the case for this strange theory. So it looks like the cosmos really is crazier than I had thought, and than I had hoped.

    Beyond the strong case made for the reality of cosmic inflation itself, the book has two other important subtexts. One is that, particularly when combined with string theory (if string theory is in fact true) the laws of physics in effect in what is for us the whole observable universe are anthropically selected from a very large ensemble of different sets of laws. So-called eternal inflation provides a mechanism for generating a potentially infinite collection of isolated universes that vary in their physical laws according to the vast array of possible different string theory compactifications. Kinney makes it clear that he is very uncomfortable with and unsatisfied by anthropic reasoning, although I think that in an appropriate set-up, anthropic reasoning is tautologically true.

    The other subtext with which I sadly agree is that cosmology (and I think also fundamental physics as a whole) is probably reaching the limits of what we can know. I believe the limitation on how much further we can explore energies in accelerator experiments is well-known and clear. But Kinney makes the point that the evidence we have already collected, which appears to clinch the case for inflation, might be at the limit of what we can possibly collect because of the way a period of cosmic inflation censors and hides the physics that came earlier. So neither data from the lab nor observations of the universe may give us much more insight into fundamental physics than what we already have. I’ll risk giving it away, but at the end of the book he writes “Our understanding may have fundamentally inescapable limits, and we may ultimately have to learn to live in the presence of the nameless as we seek to comprehend the ultimate origin of the cosmos. There may be no other way.”
    24 Personen fanden diese Informationen hilfreich
    Melden
  • Bewertet in den USA am2. Juni 2024
    I started studying astronomy and cosmology as an undergraduate student a very long time ago. I remember an open-ended final exam in my cosmology class in which we had to answer one question — describe the first 3 seconds of the universe. That would take many volumes now.

    Kinney divides the first second of the universe into six different eras, bounded on the later end by the birth of the first atoms and at the earlier end by “The Planck Era,” the first 10 to the minus 43 seconds in which physics fails us. The Planck Era is the era of quantum gravity, for which we have speculations but no accepted theory.

    I wanted to read the book in order to fill in my fuzzy understanding of those earliest eras. A lot in the field has changed since I first studied those first (nano) moments, and I’ve tried to keep up, but it ain’t easy. For that matter, my understanding of the universe’s history before the origin of the cosmic background radiation, our best source of data for understanding the big bang, is sketchy at best. And that era is far more expansive than nanoseconds — that’s the first 300,000 years (give or take).

    Kinney’s book helps, but not as much as I’d hoped.

    Let’s start with the good.

    This is an astrophysicist talking in the present tense about the questions that he’s actively researching. It butts up against the limits of scientific knowledge, both the limits of today’s theories and the ultimately unfathomable.

    As such, and as Kinney kind of reluctantly admits, we come as much to a philosophical as a scientific endpoint. What can we say about the unobservable?

    The unobservable pokes holes in any hope for complete understanding on both the scale of the very early universe, at energies unimaginably beyond anything we can recreate in particle labs, and at a much more macro scale, as the expansion of the universe has long ago carried regions of the physical universe well beyond our “cosmic horizon” — the limits imposed by distance and the finite speed of light.

    Kinney neatly develops a set of three fundamental problems with our understanding of the earliest eras of the universe:
    - its remarkable homogeneity in terms of density and temperature, given that that homogeneity stretches across regions of the universe that cannot be causally related to one another (due to the universe’s expansion rate exceeding the speed of light)
    - its complementary inhomogeneity, the very small scale clumping of the early universe that is responsible for the structure we see today — galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and the even larger-scale web-like structures that crisscross all of the observable universe
    - its flatness, that is, a lack of any discoverable spatial curvature to the universe as a whole.

    That set of problems sets up the main body of the positive theoretical discussions in the book, inflation theory. Cosmic inflation — an extremely rapid period of expansion, during a tiny fraction of that first second.

    Inflation is a conjecture, not a “proven” theory. But it’s our best current conjecture for dealing with those three problems that Kinney articulates.

    Much of the book is taken up with Kinney’s discussion of exactly how inflation theory solves those problems, and what problems it poses on its own. Inflation theory is a genuine scientific theory, in so far as it does yield predictions that can be tested. Not all can be tested, but so far so good.

    It’s also not the end of the story. The details of inflation theory lead to questions about what caused it, what ended it, dimensionality, multiverses, primordial gravitational waves, . . . . , some of which are explorable and others that may not be.

    Not all of Kinney’s explanations are easy to follow. This is both to be expected and disappointing at the same time. Kinney is a working scientist, not always the best kind of person to explain complex physics to general audiences. There are jumps and gaps, and I found myself going back to re-read and to consult other sources to try to fill in.

    If you haven’t read Alan Guth’s book, The Inflationary Universe, I recommend reading it even before reading Kinney’s book. Guth is the originator of inflation theory, and his book is his own story of its invention and of why something like inflation theory is necessary.

    Did Kinney’s book scratch my itch? Somewhat. And maybe that’s all you can ask for with the state of current cosmology, at least in a book for a general audience. No, you aren’t going to understand everything you want to understand about inflation — I don’t. But I’ve advanced my confusions and questions.
    Eine Person fand diese Informationen hilfreich
    Melden

Spitzenrezensionen aus anderen Ländern

Alle Rezensionen ins Deutsche übersetzen
  • amit
    5,0 von 5 Sternen Good book
    Bewertet in Kanada am 29. Juli 2023
    Must read
  • Lindsay Forbes
    5,0 von 5 Sternen An in depth and honest review of Inflation.
    Bewertet in Großbritannien am 26. Juni 2022
    This is an extremely well written explanation of the theory of Inflation. Professor Kinney explains the pros and cons of the generally accepted theory of how the universe began. He presents the data which supports the theory and the challenges which have yet to be resolved.
    It's technically demanding for a non physicist like me. However I came away feeling that I had a far better appreciation of the subject.
    I agree with Dr Hossenfelder "An honest exposition from a true expert". But also an expert who aslo knows how to teach.
    It's not a big book but as my mother often said "guid gear's packed in sma bulk".
  • Bernd-Jurgen Fischer
    4,0 von 5 Sternen A finite book
    Bewertet in Deutschland am 1. Juni 2022
    Kinney knows how to tell the storyof the cosmic hatchling in endearing terms, though it takes a few corners to be cut - what was it with this 10^120-times too bid value for the acceleration of the expansion, if the dark energy is understood as a vacuum energy? I don't like it myself, but then the vacuum-energy concept seems to lead in any case into an exponential increase of dark energy - an outlook, that I would have liked to be explored in more detail; but this is where the book comes to a premature end. John Barrows lets the Big Rip stop at the level of galaxy clusters without rhyme or reason, Will Kinney goes a step further and lets it stop only at the level of galaxies, but again without any explanation. If dark energy were a vacuum energy, wouldn't then expansion be a run-away-process? But then again, if you wanted to moot these depths you would probably end up with an infinite book. I think a dark energy that increases beyond limits and hence expands the univers beyond limits would make a nice pendant to the "original dot" and its explosion in a big bang.
    Another point that I'd like to point out is (let me stress that I liked the book, is was a pleasant read indeed) the rather uncritical belief in the Copernican Principle. Of course, it is a useful tool to keep away all sorts of "beliefs" and to explore what you can get under its guidance. But then again, the point may have been reached where we should wonder where it leads us in the end. If we need a multitude of universes just to avoid that our universe is something special, would we then not also need a multitude of metaverses just to avaoid that ours is special ... and so on? Infinitely?
    So, you see, the book gives you a lot of stuff to keep your musings on the go, but then you can't help wishing for the 150+ pages more with all the answers - or speculations.
  • Rob
    5,0 von 5 Sternen Deep and insightful journey into modern cosmology
    Bewertet in Australien am 2. Oktober 2023
    Do you read a lot of popular science books about the universe and the Big Bang but always craved for something a little deeper? This book may be perfect for you! It covers the topic of inflationary cosmology at a level of technical depth that goes beyond the usual analogies and metaphors that most authors employ, but that can still be grasped by a determined reader. Some parts are a little dense and I had to re-read but the extra effort is worth it. I’d also recommend Alan Guth’s book on Inflation which is more of a historical account and a great primer before diving deeper with this book.
  • Jon Ellis.
    3,0 von 5 Sternen Understanding for the arts graduate.
    Bewertet in Großbritannien am 6. Oktober 2023
    This was a first class work.

    However even though it enlarged my horizons in an enjoyable manner and I am glad I attempted to read it there was so much that I failed to understand being only an arts graduate rather than a mathematician or scientist.
    Perhaps there should be a simpler version of the book for science dummies with the background science and technical stuff available on the web.Perhaps by subscription.

    However I am extremely glad I attempted to read the book.