Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ Free Shipping
+ Free Shipping
Infomocracy: Book One of the Centenal Cycle (The Centenal Cycle, 1) Paperback – August 8, 2017
|New from||Used from|
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
"Kinetic and gripping, the plot hurtles toward an electoral climax that leaps off the page." ―NPR
"Futurists and politics geeks will love this unreservedly." ―The New York Times Review of Books
"This brilliant book is unquestionably one of the greatest literary debuts in recent history." ―The Huffington Post
"Far too messy to be utopian or dystopian, Older here raises all sorts of critical questions. I love this book; can’t wait to see what else she writes." ―Ian Bremmer, author of The End of the Free Market and Superpower
"Smart, ambitious, bursting with provocative extrapolations." ―Ken Liu, author of The Grace of Kings
"If you always wanted to put The West Wing in a particle accelerator with Snow Crash to see what would happen, read this book." ―Max Gladstone, author of Four Roads Cross
"An inspiring book about what we frail humans could still achieve, if we learn to work together." ―Karl Schroeder
"A futuristic world with eerie parallels to current events... [an] uncanny political thriller." ―The Washington Post
"A frighteningly relevant exploration of how the flow of information can manipulate public opinion...timely and perhaps timeless." ―Kirkus Starred Review
"Older’s sparkling debut, the first full-length novel from the novella-focused Tor.com imprint, serves as both a callback to classic futurist adventure tales by the likes of Brunner and Bester and a current examination of the power of information." ―Publishers Weekly
"Micro-democracy has several things to recommend it, but the biggest strength of Older's writing is how clear-eyed she is on the fact that no system we can imagine will fix the problems of human nature, whether apathy or lust for power." ―RT Reviews
"After sweeping you into a fascinating new world, Infomocracy will leave you with helpful ideas about what's happening in this one." ―Annalee Newitz for Ars Technica
"Infomocracy has the slick language of Snow Crash, the complex global politics of Persona, and the chaotic storytelling of Moxyland. It’s bold as hell and never boring, practically dizzying." ―Lightspeed
"Good science fiction delves not just into explorations of technology and the limits of human innovation, but the political implications of same, and Infomocracy does that extremely deftly." ―XOJane
"With roots in noir and heels firmly planted in the present, Infomocracy shows a world that really isn’t too different from today. Malka Older has created a thrilling, breakneck novel with fully human characters. And it asks tough questions." ―Electric Literature
"It’s a rare thing to find a book that accurately captures the mundane and insidious absurdity of politics, but Infomocracy gets it absolutely right. " ―B&N Sci-Fi & Fantasy Blog
"Older's universe is fascinating, with its believable if cynical view of how politics might evolve in the information age. The pace is brisk with enough action for fans of political thrillers, but with plenty of futuristic touches for sf lovers." ―Library Journal
"Science fiction for election nerds and for media geeks. I highly recommend it." ―BookRiot
About the Author
- Item Weight : 1.07 pounds
- Paperback : 400 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0765392364
- ISBN-13 : 978-0765392367
- Dimensions : 5.43 x 1.09 x 8.31 inches
- Publisher : Tordotcom; Reprint edition (August 8, 2017)
- Language: : English
- Best Sellers Rank: #192,752 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The novel involves three election operatives working for, apparently, different sides in an upcoming worldwide election. In the first 100 pages, they travel around because ... why? It's unclear. And they do, uh, ... what? I'm not sure. They have meetings for some reason supposedly related to election data. And they are confronted by, uh ... people chasing them? Maybe? All I know is that one of them has little antennae that warn him of, uh ... nothing so far. I see no reason to care about the characters or the supposedly important election.
According to other reviewers, the pace picks up later in the book, and then finally there is a dud of an ending with a heavy-handed "reveal". I'm not interested to plug along for that when I couldn't care less about either the characters or the plot.
I’ll start with the worldbuilding, because that is almost certainly why you are here. It’s that sort of book. It’s the sort of book that aspires to be hard social science fiction, taking the extrapolation seriously, but not so much of science but of social science. In this case that means political systems. Set roughly half a century in the future, most political institutions have been jettisoned in favor of worldwide “microdemocracy.” What the hell is microdemocracy? The participating parties (holdouts from Saudi Arabia to Switzerland refuse to join) have been divided into “centenals,” or districts of 100,000 people. Each centenal votes on a government. The government that (presumably) gets the most centenals wins the “Supermajority” (which presumably only requires a plurality of centenals). The Supermajority brings with it certain powers, but most governance is über-local, at the centenal level. Walking through a city, then, means constantly crossing political lines that can bring vastly different laws (and cultures). Elections are held every ten years, suffrage is universal, and voting is online. Which brings me to Information. Information is a Google/utility/government/bureaucracy all rolled into one. It both supplies the ubiquitous information at everyone’s fingertips and eyeball, er, tips for everyone and everything and runs the election and oversees and polices the whole system. Parties run the gamut from policy-based shops like Policy1st and YouGov to “corporate” shops like PhillipMorris, Heritage, and Liberty to nationalist outfits like 1China to security-based shops like SecureNation to an almost infinite number of niche governments. If you only need to win over (a plurality?) of 100,000 people to get some sway and power, there is a lot of incentive to specialize.
We open right in the thick of microdemocracy’s third election season. Heritage has won both of the two previous Supermajorities, and people are starting to get concerned that they will never give up power, and that the system will not endure, if they win another. Older rotates through several POVs—Ken, a young, undercover operative for Policy1st; Mishima, a “fixer” of sorts for Information who goes to work well armed; Yoriko, a spy for Policy1st; Domaine, an anti-election radical and necessary to justify the Cyberpunk tag.; and Suzuki, one of the “faces” of Policy1st (Policy1st is a bit odd is rotating through several; it appears the other parties use a single figurehead but are run by committee with the centenal-level governments having their own arrangements). Ken and Mishima are very much the main characters, though. A certain amount of skullduggery is afoot, as you might expect.
It’s a cool concept but not one I can’t find fault with. How did we ever get there? (Older admits this is an issue in her post on Tor.com today.) There is a sort of throwaway reference to a sort of almost unnoticed UN resolution, but that doesn’t give any real leverage over countries with armies to get them to give up their sovereignty (even with some sci-fi handwaving that takes care of small arms). There are strict rules against coalitions, but if the Supermajority is so important, it would seem that the pressure for coalition or consolidation would be enough to defeat any rules designed to thwart it. It’s not entirely clear how much power the Supermajority brings; obviously an enormous amount of power resides at the centenal level.
There are frequent mentions of rules around things like smoking, but what about the centenals where they throw gays off buildings? You can leave—presumably immigration is largely unrestricted—and apparently people do move in large numbers when centenals change governments post-election, but that raises another issue not really addressed—massive, ongoing redistricting. One of the characters at one point mentions eventually microdemocracy will have to get down to divisions of one to keep everyone happy but, hey, here is a crazy idea. Maybe government shouldn’t do so much and then there would be less to fight over.
Centenal-level government also seems incredible inefficient. I’m all for Coasian bargaining, but 100,000 is an arbitrary number that is certainly far too low to allow any sort of effective governance of a major international city. Although the book admits that public transportation in the form of trains is basically a thing of the past (it looks to be replaced by Uber-like alternatives at this point, but the book suggests a collective action problem also plays a role). Many of these problems can be solved by contracting out for services, as we see centenals do for security (perhaps the most daring nuance, but one quite supportable, I think). And any organization as powerful as Information would have its own potential for despotism, but, ah, I’ll just say that comes up.
It’s also curiously utopian. First, let’s think about Information as a benevolent protector and enforcer of the system. Color me skeptical. Not because I’m not a globalist (((I am))), but because I look at international government and I see a lot of dysfunction and failure—I’m looking at you, UN and EU—as I mention in my review of Double Star. Until the institutions in the underlying states are sufficient to protect and support liberal democracy, the role of international government should be kept very limited. Information is intended to perform much of that role, constantly feeding objective information to the masses, but there are problems with that too. Information initially approaches it the right way. Facts and context accompany everything. This corresponds with what factcheckers are doing today and does them one better. Even (supposedly) nonpartisan and objective factcheckers run by respected journalistic outfits like Politifact show significant bias. A lot of this shows up in the Truth-O-Meter. Better to just give us the context and let us draw the conclusions. But there is a perhaps irresistible temptation to put a thumb on the scale and eventually Information starts to succumb to that.
The other problem with it is that someone has to generate all that content. The book suggests its cube monkeys, pounding away at their keyboards (well, pretty much everything is voice-driven by then). This is a step back. Even very smart people aren’t going to be able to create better, more accurate content than a wiki (even with the misinformation that invites). Older is obviously brilliant and has figuratively been around the block and literally been around the globe. By now she should have internalized Hayek’s admonition that “The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.”
But maybe she has. There are no massive author filibusters (I have access to HeinOnline and JSTOR, I don’t need you to smuggle me philosophy tracts in fiction). It rightly, leaves much for the reader to ponder. But I could have used a little more grist for my mill. I’m a speculative fiction fan. I think worldbuilding is cool. I want it in my fiction. And I wouldn’t be reading Infomocracy if I wasn’t a poli sci geek (which is very different from a poly sci geek). So give me worldbuilding! I would have loved to see Older say much, much more about her ideas. You have an organization called Information, dump a little info!
And there is a lot to like. The first half of the book is heavy on setup, but it’s easy to digest with flowing prose, effortless looking transitions between viewpoints and venues, and pacing kept at a brisk clip. There is a rich international flavor as Older takes good advantage of her experience hopping the globe doing humanitarian work. The action and romance are both subtle and superb. It works as a thriller, but only in conjunction with the worldbuilding—this is Brad Thor-top-of-his-game level stuff. The last third of the book works in a few twists. But ultimately, though, I found the final resolution a bit flat and pat. The characterization is very strong, in general, except that the characters don’t every really stand out from each other. I had trouble keeping Yoriko and Mishima straight for roughly half the book. They’re all smart, passionate, driven, clever, attractive—very much like Older herself, no doubt. Good, maybe even great for what they are but I would like to see more range. The diversity of people who agree but see the world differently is more interesting, I think, than the diversity of people who disagree but see the world in the same way. The POVs were used in an odd way, too. Every POV but Ken and Mishima could theoretically have been cut without harming the story. And while I’m not opposed to third-person omniscient, Infomocracy tends to fall more into the off-putting “third-person omniscient when convenient.”
But this adds up to a handful of nits and a lot of thoughts. Thoughts are good! As Older pointed out on Twitter the other day, political systems are constructs. They don’t have to be constructed in any particular way. To which the Burkean conservative in me must reply is a pretty good argument for whatever the political system already is, but that isn’t the point. Changing political systems in the real world comes at enormous cost. Positing change in academic and other nonfiction comes with certain norms and strictures. Positing change in speculative fiction allows us the explore the full panoply of possible political systems and how they butt against human nature. It’s one of the Big Things about speculative fiction, and we could use plenty more in this space in particular.
The technology described in the book was all eventually convincing, and probably true to the future. While much of it was fun and innovative, the initial description of the technology seemed thin, and often left me wondering through much of the book what the technology really was. A better description of the tech when it first showed up in the book would have made the book easier to read, and made the idea of the tech more interesting in my opinion.
The story itself was well though out, as was the general world (places and events), and made the story one which I really wanted to get to the next page. While I did not find the story had much of a twist, and kinda thing it should have had one, It was a well written straight forward story. While it had the formation of a relationship between main characters, it was not forced upon them or the reader, and flowed well not taking away from the greater story. Which I think is done with too many modern novels.
For a first novel this is an amazing start, and I can see where future novels from this author could be amazing, and she left enough of an opening at the end of this story to carry forward to new adventures by the main characters. All in all I enjoyed the book. It was not the best book I have read in the last year, but it was fun enjoyable.
Top reviews from other countries
The two main characters seem both credible and somewhat alien. The way they interact is credible - lots of "but what if I contact her and she's not really interested?". There's no obvious sexual or racist stereotyping (at least not to me, white middle-aged man), and the secondary characters seem credible and have a purpose. The villains are not cartoonish - though perhaps their motivations aren't totally clear.
The plot is complex - there are many moving parts, conflicting perspectives, lots of motivations to keep in mind. The story is credible (if you buy into the premise, which does have some problems), and the overall flow is nearly perfect. I really like how the author makes the boring, painstaking analysis work seem both to take for ever, and pay off with interesting new insights.
My only quibbles are that every now and again, a bit of weird sentence structure crept through, and there are some grammar niggles - but those are not distracting.
I found myself putting the book down regularly and thinking about the ideas the author presents.
Since the political situation in 'the West' took a sinister turn around a year ago I've been burying my head in sci-fi - at least as far as my recreational reading is concerned - hoping that it will all just go away. Sadly, that looks unlikely, but this book (which first came to my attention when the author was interviewed by Jeremy Scahill on the wonderful "Intercepted" podcast) manages to force me back into thinking about politics, whilst simultaneously allowing me to continue with my sci-fi reading splurge. For context, I came to this book hot off my first ever reading of Asimov's "Foundation" trilogy (which I also loved).
And yes, I'm saying 'sci-fi' in the knowledge that some may not agree with that genre tag, but whatever. Genres aside, this is a great book.
Information is paramount to voter's decisions, and if it is compromised or manipulated, power on a global scale is at stake.
Gripping from start to finish.