- Hardcover: 320 pages
- Publisher: Harvard Business Review Press (May 27, 2008)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1591398460
- ISBN-13: 978-1591398462
- Product Dimensions: 7.8 x 1 x 9.5 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.7 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 14 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,243,444 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Innovator's Guide to Growth: Putting Disruptive Innovation to Work
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
See the Best Books of 2017
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the best books of the year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
...the authors have provided a model that should help companies spot and seize opportunities for growth --The Financial Times, July 10, 2008
About the Author
Scott D. Anthony is president of Innosight, a consultancy cofounded by Clayton Christensen that helps organizations build innovation expertise. Mark W. Johnson is chairman and cofounder of Innosight. Joseph V. Sinfield is a senior partner at Innosight and an assistant professor of civil engineering at Purdue University. Elizabeth J. Altman is vice president of strategy and business development in Motorola's Mobile Devices business.
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Also, please and please, aren't you fed up with the same exercises over and over, e.g. Nucor Steel and minimills etc.? Incidentally, if the authors refer to the book by AG Lafley & Ram Charan (The Game-Changer), they will find out that the Swiffer innovation story is totally different than their romantic explanation.