Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Insectopedia Paperback – March 22, 2011
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Neil Shubin Reviews Insectopedia
Neil Shubin is provost of The Field Museum as well as professor of anatomy at the University of Chicago, where he also serves as an associate dean. Educated at Columbia, Harvard, and the University of California at Berkeley, he lives in Chicago and is the author of the national bestseller, Your Inner Fish. Read Shubin's guest review of Insectopedia:
Insectopedia is one of the most remarkable books I have read in a long time. Like its subject, it is many things, all of them fascinating. First, it is a reference book of the first order: it is loaded with facts--some profound, others curious, and still others laugh-out-loud funny. Insectopedia is also part personal memoir, scientific detective story, and even cultural study. We travel the Amazon, visit Chernobyl, and enter laboratories and sidewalk cafes in search of insects and the ideas and cultures they inspire. Insects stir eerie fascination: they are beautiful, disgusting, important, and annoying. To some they are tasty. To others they are a source of sexual fetish. Who knew? In Raffles's hands insects become windows into our culture, science, health--even our psyche. In each page of Insectopedia, the more we learn of insects, the more we come to face--and sometimes even challenge--our own views of the world.
Hugh Raffles's work stands alone for what it says both about its subject and about us. After reading Insectopedia, it's hard to look at a cricket, a bumblebee, and a human being the same way ever again. I adored the book. What an accomplishment. And I thought I knew insects... --Neil Shubin
A Q&A with Hugh Raffles
Question: You’re an anthropologist who has written about life in the Brazilian Amazon in In Amazonia: A Natural History. Why insects for this book? Have you always been fascinated by insects and people’s interactions with them?
Hugh Raffles: Actually, no! But since I started researching this book a few years ago, I’ve become completely obsessed by insects and our relationships with them. Now they seem like the most amazing creatures. But before that, they were around me but weren’t something I paid that much attention to unless they were biting me or invading my apartment.
For a long time though, I’ve been interested in the connections between people and animals of all types. And I’ve thought a lot about what other worlds exist alongside the ones that we people live in. Most of these worlds are invisible to us. To give an example: we usually assume that time is a universal measure that everyone experiences in more or less similar ways. But it seems likely that other animals’ experience of time is completely different from ours--that for them, their short lives might actually last a very long time.
Despite the complexity of our own reality, it’s quite a limited universe when we consider all the parallel realities within which other beings exist. Insects are fascinating because they’re so different from us. It’s almost impossible to imagine what the worlds they live in are like. Recreating those worlds is one of the things I try to do in The Illustrated Insectopedia, often by meeting people (artists, musicians, and scientists, for example) who have their own interesting ways of thinking about this.
Question: How did you decide on this encyclopedic format of A to Z? Did that seem a natural order after you wrote the essays or did you plan that from the beginning?
Hugh Raffles: I’m one of those people who’s interested in pretty much everything. After spending a long time writing a book about one small community in the Brazilian Amazon, I wanted a project that would give me the freedom to find out about as many things as possible. The form of an encyclopedia seemed perfect for that. Now, I also realize that the insects pushed me in this direction: there are so many of them and so many different species, they’re everywhere and they won’t stay still--the book needed a structure that would capture some of that energy.
There were two other reasons for the A to Z. One was that, much as I like encyclopedias, I also wanted to make fun of them--the vanity of the idea that it’s possible to know everything, and then possible to collect all that knowledge in one place. My entries are a little arbitrary, but then, so are the entries in a real encyclopedia when you compare them with all the possible information that could be included.
The second reason was that I wanted to find out what it would be like to write with such a constraining form. It was tough! In fact, it was exhausting to be locked into 26 entries. There was a long period when I’d already written enough chapters for a whole book but still wasn’t even halfway through the alphabet. I’d say there were a couple of years when I lost hope that I’d ever get the thing finished. But on the other hand, there’s no doubt that the alphabet pushed me to be more creative than I would have been otherwise--and it let me experiment with writing essays of different lengths and different styles. And it was fun--it encouraged me to be playful, which is always good!
Question: How did you research topics in this book? What led you from one topic to the next?
Hugh Raffles: I started working on this book back in 2003 and since then I’ve been constantly on the lookout for interesting stories and situations about insects. Lots of people sent me ideas and I built up a collection of possible topics. I wanted an "encyclopedic" spread of chapters--a wide range across history and geography. And, in fact, the book visits 11th century Japan, 16th century Prague, 19th century France, modern-day China, Niger, and Florence, among many other times and places.
I was especially interested in situations in which people and insects encountered each other in such a way that the superiority of human beings was no longer certain. I looked for situations in which the meeting between people and insects led to the person discovering something new about themselves, about his or her relationship to other beings, and about what it means to be human. I’d like to say that the insects had some kind of experience in these encounters too, but I don’t think I’ve managed to figure that out yet!
Question: What was the most bizarre thing you discovered about people and insects? How about the most universal thing?
Hugh Raffles: The most bizarre thing? Well, it’s probably the most universal thing too. The more I’ve learned about insects and the more amazing they’ve become to me, the more strange it seems that we kill them without the least thought. Elias Canetti said that insects are "outlaws" because they are the only living beings which we kill with absolutely no moral qualms--think of Obama and the fly he swatted during that CNBC interview. What did he say? Something like "Got you, sucker!" That seems pretty bizarre to me and, unfortunately, more or less universal!
(Photo © Michael Lionstar)--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. Though the title suggests a Latin-heavy lexicon of insects from aphids to wolf spiders , anthropologist Raffles (In Amazonia) takes a decidedly different approach in his erudite and entertaining paean to bugs. Some chapters focus on nations: the paradox that in Niger, where crops are regularly ravaged by locusts, that very scourge—when salted and fried or boiled like shrimp—is also a protein staple; the craze in Japan for stag and rhinoceros beetles as pets; and the revival of a Chinese tradition—now televised—of crickets locking jaws with the ferocity of fighting dogs. Other sections feature individuals who have dedicated their lives to the contemplation of insects, e.g., the Austrian painter Cornelia Hesse-Honegger, who draws inspiration from radiation-deformed leaf bugs. One short chapter considers same-sex behavior (interspecies ass play); a longer one studies the crush-freaks who fetishize the close-up sight and amplified sound of bugs being crushed by women's feet. Raffles' eclectic examination of our diverse reactions to bugs, ranging from scholarly and aesthetic awe to revulsion or phobia, is an enthralling hodgepodge of historical fact, anthropological observation, and scientific insight. (Mar.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Top Customer Reviews
Particularly interesting chapters include a first hand account of Chinese cricket fighting, the history of the theory of evolution through insect study, and the amazing chapter about honeybee dances -- great cocktail party fodder! Did you know researchers can translate bees' dances into coordinates (as in, "there's a great stash of spilled jam 90 yards to the southeast")? Who *doesn't* find this stuff fascinating?!
The author is an anthropologist, not an entomologist. If you're looking for a simple guide to insects, this is not the book you're looking for. But if you're curious about how the worlds of insects and humans collide, Insectopedia is an interesting read. You know that insects outnumber humans by some 200 million to one, right? I, for one, welcome the knowledge about our future insect overlords.
into a miniature world that reflects and philosophizes on just about everything in the human size world.
Insectopedia gives the reader all at once the spirit of l9th century delirious excitement, modernist story telling,
highly sophisticated humor in the telling, and an incisive journalistic account of particular places that few have gone to.
Hugh Raffles' writing and the accounts of his mysterious journeys are a pure and absolute pleasure to read.
--- Toni Schlesinger
Here ends my criticism. The book is a delight for those interested in bugs and beetles. I hesitate to say 'for entomophiles', as many representatives of this large class of the animal kingdom are not really lovable.
The author is not an entomologist, actually, but an anthropologist. His scope of interest and knowledge is astounding and covers history, art, philosophy, biology, physiology, entomology, epidemiology, sexual fetishes, ... I never saw a broader approach to 'the bug'.
Raffles uses the term 'love' a bit too much, when he talks about researchers and their subjects. I am not convinced that is the right term. It comes up with fighting crickets (the Chinese cricket masters), with honey bees (Frisch and his colleagues), and I am sure with some others. Just a mild doubt of mine.
Who are we talking about? Crickets, cicadas, locusts, grasshoppers, butterflies, flies, fruit flies, cockroaches, bees, wasps, ants, lice, silk worms, praying mantises, bark beetles, clothes moths, stag beetles...
What is Raffles saying about them? Here some of the subjects of the essays, incompletely.
French entomologist Fabre, a great observer and writer, not a theorist, skeptical about Darwinian evolution.
Cricket fighting in Shanghai. Didn't we know it, the Chinese have invented, besides everything else, also entomology. Gamblers that they are, they found a way to bet on the beasts. The surprise lies in the allegation of sympathies between man and beast, and in the claim that these little bundles of protein have individuality.
Himmler, lice and antisemitic world views.
Maria Sibylla Merian and metamorphosis. Joris Hoefnagel and his miniatures.
Karl von Frisch, his bees, the Nazis, and the concept of language. Are bees fascists? Do animals have 'language'? If I have to vote for one essay as best of the bunch, this is it.
Land mines and locusts as joint terrorists in Niger. On the other hand, locusts are also food, not just something to fear. West African ambiguities.
Homosexual games of silkworms and fruit flies. Does everything need to have a function in evolution? Or could it be that they just do it for fun? Do insects have fun, do they do things without purpose?
Talking about fun in homo sapiens. The list of sexual fetishes that humankind is able to enjoy includes some amazing absurdities. Raffles finds and introduces a group of people who get off on squashing beasts with their feet. The crush freaks. They produce crush videos, which are allegedly available on youtube. (I have not verified that.) Somewhat connected to the esoteric world of the foot fetish. Don't wince. We are here to learn. Raffles' main interview partner, a crush filmer, is a vegan and animal rights activist. Animal snuff movies could only be banned via the animal rights angle. Otherwise they were protected by the first amendment. Nice circle.
In some species of flies, males have to bring gifts to the females if they want sex. Talking about anthropomorphism. On the other hand, we learn in an essay about insect vision, eyes, brains, evolution, and neuroscience, that different species live in different worlds. Sometimes it seems to me that this is true even within our species.