|Item Weight||8 ounces|
|Product Dimensions||3.5 x 6.5 x 3 inches|
|Item model number||W-10001|
|Item Package Quantity||1|
|Included Components||T-Shirt Rags (10)|
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ Free Shipping
+ Free Shipping
+ $4.59 shipping
Intex Supply Co W-10001 Exact Cut T-shirt Paint & Staining Rags 14"x16"
Get free shipping
Free 5-8 business-day shipping within the U.S. when you order $25 of eligible items sold or fulfilled by Amazon.
Or get 4-5 business-day shipping on this item for $5.99. (Prices may vary for AK and HI.)Learn more about free shipping
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Have a question?
Find answers in product info, Q&As, reviews
Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question.
Sold in a convenient 10-pack, intex Supply Co.’S t-shirt rags are perfect for painting and staining. The rags are sold by exact size and weight, ensuring no pieces are unusable due to holes, seams, or ragged edges. Each rag is the perfect size and clean cut with straight edges, which means there are no stringy edges to create messes. Pre-washed, the rags are extremely absorbent and have minimal lint.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
If your priority is lint free rags these might serve your purpose. If you need a soft, absorbant rag these don't work. I tried washing them and one washing didn't help with absorption or softness. There was virtually no lint left in the dryer so I think they are nearly lint free. I compared the washed rag to one I had gotten in the stain department at the home improvement center and the Intex Exact Cut rags were much rougher and much less absorbant. I suspect it will take many, many washings before these rags become soft and absorbant. When you wash them the edges will curl, as with all unhemmed rags of this type. The size after washing and drying is 11" x 13", not including the unusable curled edges. Almost exactly the size of a decent washcloth.
I’d have to triple layer. I’d be using more which defeats the purpose of buying lower cost.