Buying Options
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Author
OK
Into the Forbidden Zone: A Trip Through Hell and High Water in Post-Earthquake Japan (Kindle Single) Kindle Edition
| William T. Vollmann (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMay 1, 2011
- File size1757 KB
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
Product details
- ASIN : B004YXB5RG
- Publisher : Byliner; 1st edition (May 1, 2011)
- Publication date : May 1, 2011
- Language : English
- File size : 1757 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 61 pages
- Lending : Not Enabled
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

William Tanner Vollmann (born July 28, 1959) is an American novelist, journalist, war correspondent, short story writer, and essayist. He won the 2005 National Book Award for Fiction for the novel Europe Central. He lives in Sacramento, California, with his wife and daughter.
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Photo by Øystein Vidnes (http://www.flickr.com/photos/oysteinv/160077312/) [CC BY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Here's the crucial part: the author was unable to find anyone in the public or private sector who knew how much radiation had been leaked, even weeks after the fact. So Vollmann took his chances, hired taxis and explored the disaster areas with a translator and a dosimeter (a post-Geiger-Muller gadget) he'd bought in Sacramento, CA. Counting on the approximate radiation readings he was getting on his dosimeter, they interviewed people along the roadways and small villages who had not evacuated (which was mostly voluntary anyway). Floods, waste, debris, lack of clean water, and electric outages aside, few knew anything about the danger they or their families were in from radioactive fallout. They were not particularly angry, figured that things would eventually work out, and went about the work that had to be done--staying alive, looking for the missing, cleaning up, rebuilding.
As a journalistic report, the language is a bit heavy on metaphors, the narrative meanders at times, but the brave, on-the-ground concerning the disaster reveals how it was dealt with on the ground.
I think a lot had to do with his timing, which was clearly off; the Japanese people were still trying to cope with the quake and tsunami, as opposed to concentrating fully on what had happened at Fukushima Daichi and the aftermath they would suffer from it. Had the author allowed more time to elapse, perhaps he would have found those he spoke with to be more focused on the literal fallout from the nuclear disaster.
While I can slightly recommend you read this if you're into general details about daily life near the exclusion zone, it's repetitive and short on real minutiae and depth when it comes to his 'interviews' of people affected by the triple disaster. His writing style is breezy and easy on the eyes, he seems like a person who was genuinely interested in learning about those who were the most affected by everything that happened, but there was no real backbone to the story. And the ending? There really wasn't one...it just...stopped. This would not have passed muster for a student of journalism, but it was possibly worth the money paid for it. The jury's still out on that one.
Personally, in retrospect, I should have given that money to the NYT instead and looked for more in-depth personal interest stories with a logical flow from start to finish. What I received here was a wandering monologue of sorts, with no real purpose other than to presumably satisfy the author's curiosity about post-Fukushima Japan.
The beginning was fairly engaging and Vollman's experience getting a dossimeter to measure radiation exposure when he got to Japan whet my appetite for the remainder of the story. However, I found the rest of the read rather disjointed and lacking real purpose or coherence. There were a range of interview snippets from various individuals once he got to Sendai and the earthquake zone, but nothing that grabbed me emotionally the way other great journalism on this tragedy has done. Furthermore, the question of nuclear power and particularly the fact that Japan had to suffer through this given the legacy and impact of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was never fully realized by Vollman.
In the end, this had far too many valleys over the course of the piece with just a few bright spots. At some point in the near future, someone will provide a more comprehensive historical account, similar to Douglas Brinkley's account of Hurrican Katrina. Until then, hold off on this as it does little to other existing and shorter form journalism pieces in places like the NYT, New Yorker, etc.