I am an engineer by profession and my background is that of circuit design and signal processing. I have a PhD in analog circuit design. I read math purely out of interest and I am extremely passionate about it. Unfortunately, I do not have a professor to guide me so I look for good books online and teach myself.
Not to refute what other reviewers have said but I feel that the negative points that are usually mentioned about this book are actually the most positive aspects about the book. It is amazing that the same aspect can be very useful for one person while for others, it might not be that suitable.
1. People say that it is verbose: For me, I would like to rephrase that as 'the book carefully walks the student through the basic notion and structure of logic the way it must be in an introductory course'. For someone like me who is new to pure math, his presentation is extremely useful. Logic is very abstract and unless taught well, it will not sink in.
Example: Why the hell did they formulate the 'if....then....' statement in such a weird manner? More precisely, the sentence 'if 2+2=5, then santa clara is a small town' is considered true. Why? For someone who is being introduced to logic for the first time, this sentence will sound really weird. What the hell is the relationship between 2+2=5 and the size of santa clara? On top of that, how can this statement be true when the two sentences are not related in any possible way?
The answer lies in the difference between material logic which is used in mathematical logic and formal logic which we are all familiar with. MATH LOGIC is not same as the logic we are used to. I realized this when I read this book and has been explained extremely well in the second chapter. Please do make sure that you read the paragraphs which are marked with '*' sign. Those are supposed to be difficult concepts but whether you understand it or not, the quality of the experience of the learning process increases by a h_uge factor if you read those sections. The difference between material logic and formal logic is discussed in a section marked with '*'.
2. People say that the first half of the book is well known and is redundant: It is not. For me, it is a boon that he wrote those initial sections explaining very carefully what a sentence is and what a sentential function is. If you are doing a course in a school, the prof helps the student with these subtle but extremely important concepts. For someone like me who is doing self study of pure math, these sections are extremely useful.
I would like to stress that it is an INTRODUCTORY course and it lives very well to the title. If you are really familiar with this matter, then I suggest you move on to Schoenfeld's or Rautenberg's books.
All in all, this has been a great book to read so far and I am quite positive that it will prove crucial in me being able to read the more advanced books on mathematical logic.
Introduction to Logic: And to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences (Dover Books on Mathematics) Dover Books on Mathematics Edition
by
Alfred Tarski
(Author)
|
Alfred Tarski
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
ISBN-13:
978-0486284620
ISBN-10:
048628462X
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Start reading Introduction to Logic on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Dover Publications; Dover Books on Mathematics edition (March 27, 1995)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 048628462X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0486284620
- Item Weight : 10.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.43 x 0.53 x 8.44 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#432,012 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #198 in Mathematical Logic
- #2,365 in Technology (Books)
- #2,708 in Mathematics (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
73 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on August 27, 2012
Verified Purchase
102 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2018
Verified Purchase
Excellent but, a poor translation (1945) in a field where precision and clarity are demanded. No excuses, publisher should be ashamed that this has not been edited after 73 years.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 24, 2011
Verified Purchase
This is the first book that any logic student should read. I even recommend it for those studying logic for a philosophy major. Tarski was a great logician, and this book clearly shows that he was a great teacher as well. The book is small, but dense with information. The author easily explains intricate ideas such that even the beginner should have no problem in understanding them. The footnotes included are also very valuable. Finally, I loved how Tarski used the ideas presented in part 1 to develop those in part 2. It is impossible to overstate the importance of this book. I just wish that there were solutions to some of the problems. Buy it and you wont regret it.
16 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2011
Verified Purchase
This is a pure jewel and it definitely surpasses Quine's and Hodges's books on the same subject : in fact, I enjoyed reading the three of them.
This book now stands in my list of outstanding books on logic :
1. A. Tarski's "Introduction to Logic", a jewel, followed by P. Smith's superb entry-point "An introduction to Formal logic" and the lovely "Logic, a very short introduction" by Graham Priest
2. D. Goldrei's "Propositional and Predicate calculus"
3. Wilfrid Hodges' "Logic", followed by Smullyan's "First-order logic".
4. P. Smith's "An introduction to Gödel's theorems".
5. Kleene's "Introduction to metamathematics" & "Mathematical Logic".
6. G. Priest's " Introduction to non-classical logic".
Hence forgetting altogether Van Dalen's indigestible "Logic & Stucture" as well as the even more indigestible Enderton, Mendelson & al...
This book now stands in my list of outstanding books on logic :
1. A. Tarski's "Introduction to Logic", a jewel, followed by P. Smith's superb entry-point "An introduction to Formal logic" and the lovely "Logic, a very short introduction" by Graham Priest
2. D. Goldrei's "Propositional and Predicate calculus"
3. Wilfrid Hodges' "Logic", followed by Smullyan's "First-order logic".
4. P. Smith's "An introduction to Gödel's theorems".
5. Kleene's "Introduction to metamathematics" & "Mathematical Logic".
6. G. Priest's " Introduction to non-classical logic".
Hence forgetting altogether Van Dalen's indigestible "Logic & Stucture" as well as the even more indigestible Enderton, Mendelson & al...
23 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 10, 2018
Verified Purchase
I bought this book because I’m studying for the LSAT and since logic has so much to do with the test, I figured that reading this book in addition to my studies would give me a leg up. However, this is book is so so dry. I tried to get into it but I simply could not. As it is commonly used as a textbook, I could see how with additional instruction it could be useful but in my opinion this is not a particularly a helpful leisurely read for those who want to get an introductory background to logic on their own.
Reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2012
Verified Purchase
It had been years since I studied logic. Reading this was good refresher and got me up to speed. One small issue - you have to do all of the problems - the main text is often very general or abstract so it was often while doing the problems that I had my "ah ha, that's what it is all about" or "I remember this now" moments.
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 6, 2013
Verified Purchase
I just finished this book. It is very clear and well written. But, I agree with some comments here. You will enjoy it if you have a previous notion about logic.
It is better to begin with "How to prove it" and do some exercises (logical statements, truth tables, proofs).
But, it is a masterpiece to "link" definitions and construction of a axiomatic system.
For me, as a "curious" about mathematics and logics, it was one of the best books I've read in maths.
It is better to begin with "How to prove it" and do some exercises (logical statements, truth tables, proofs).
But, it is a masterpiece to "link" definitions and construction of a axiomatic system.
For me, as a "curious" about mathematics and logics, it was one of the best books I've read in maths.
11 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2011
Verified Purchase
Having read four logic books before, some of which I've read a couple of times, made reading this book easier than if I had approached the book without prior learning. I think that beginners will struggle with this book and would have to reread many of the later portions over and over until concepts sink in, which is not a bad way of learning either.
I don't think that many of the rules of inference have been explicitly laid out.
Another thing I didn't like is that there are no answers for the exercises at the end of each chapter.
One thing I liked was the use of math to demonstrate logical arguments. It's also easy to read.
In any event, the book still has value and is worth getting.
I don't think that many of the rules of inference have been explicitly laid out.
Another thing I didn't like is that there are no answers for the exercises at the end of each chapter.
One thing I liked was the use of math to demonstrate logical arguments. It's also easy to read.
In any event, the book still has value and is worth getting.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Francis Warren
4.0 out of 5 stars
The author is a brilliant logician
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 14, 2018Verified Purchase
A masterful handling of a difficult subject on which I am highly unqualified to comment. This is probably why I got stuck on the very first line : "a = a". As I see it the left and right symbols cannot be equal or equivalent because left is different to right. What does "a" mean what does "=" mean ?
Michel Gauvin
5.0 out of 5 stars
A classic
Reviewed in Canada on December 15, 2013Verified Purchase
It's incredible to be able to read this logic textbook and appreciate Tarski's intuitively appealing approach to logic. The writing style is clear and the logical syntax is neat and easy to make out. I especially enjoy the fact that, although this is a textbook of sorts, it also reads something like an essay. The text has a philosophical and historical depth not found in some mainstream textbooks e.g. The Logic Book by Bergmann & al.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
karl d.. hanzuk
1.0 out of 5 stars
Introduction To Logic
Reviewed in Canada on February 14, 2017Verified Purchase
A photocopied reprint of a book written in the 1930's ! disappointed in Amazon
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Alex
1.0 out of 5 stars
Bad scan of an old printout with pen annotations
Reviewed in Germany on February 11, 2015Verified Purchase
Obviously they did not have the original file.
The book is a scan (bad quality) of an old printout.
And somebody has underlined and marked passages of the printout.
I don't know about the content. I stopped reading at the first page and bought a proper book.
The book is a scan (bad quality) of an old printout.
And somebody has underlined and marked passages of the printout.
I don't know about the content. I stopped reading at the first page and bought a proper book.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
CanadianUser GS
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in Canada on December 11, 2016Verified Purchase
very useful book; fast shipping
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: math logic, books on music, foundation engineering, foundations of mathematics, pure mathematics, set theory










