The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer
| Jean-Jacques Glassner (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
As the first known system of writing, the cuneiform symbols traced in Sumerian clay more than six millennia ago were once regarded as a simplistic and clumsy attempt to record in linear form the sounds of a spoken language. More recently, scholars have acknowledged that early Sumerian writing―far from being a primitive and flawed mechanism that would be "improved" by the Phoenicians and Greeks―in fact represented a complete written language system, not only meeting the daily needs of economic and government administration, but also providing a new means of understanding the world.
In The Invention of Cuneiform Jean-Jacques Glassner offers a compelling introduction to this seminal era in human history. Returning to early Mesopotamian texts that have been little studied or poorly understood, he traces the development of writing from the earliest attempts to the sophisticated system of roughly 640 signs that comprised the Sumerian repertory by about 3200 B.C. Glassner further argues―with an occasional nod to Derrida―that the invention of writing had a deeper metaphysical significance. By bringing the divinely ordained spoken language under human control, Sumerians were able to "make invisibility visible," separating themselves from the divine order and creating a new model of power.
Editorial Reviews
Review
Glassner does not content himself with giving the Sumerian invention its full measure. He renders an homage to all writing that makes reparation for numerous humiliations.
(Le Monde)A strikingly original analysis of the origin of cuneiform writing.
(Choice)Did writing evolve from multiple stimuli into a script that represented a particular language? Or was it invented by a genius at a particular place and time? How did it happen? Jean-Jacques Glassner sets out to answer these questions in this stimulating book, translated from the French, in which he presents his own view―that writing was invented not as a recording device, nor as a primitive linkage of symbols representing objects, but as a purposeful rendering of the Sumerian language.
(Stephanie Dalley Technology and Culture)The Invention of Cuneiform is the only book that presents the origin and early development of the world's first writing system to a non-specialist audience within the context of the discourses on language and representation current in the humanities today. The book is brilliant and deserves to reach a broad Anglophone readership.
(Jerry Cooper, The Johns Hopkins University)Glassner has a sturdy knowledge of Sumerian writing, and good knowledge as well of the cuneiform languages that followed Sumerian, as well as New World pictographic writing.
(John A. C. Greppin Times Literary Supplement)About the Author
Jean-Jacques Glassner is a research director at the French National Center for Scientific Research. Zainab Bahrani is Edith Porada Professor of Art History and Archaeology at Columbia University. Marc Van De Mieroop is a professor of history and Middle East and Asian languages and cultures at Columbia University.
Product details
- Publisher : Johns Hopkins University Press (November 17, 2003)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0801873894
- ISBN-13 : 978-0801873898
- Item Weight : 1.2 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,409,899 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,281 in Ancient Mesopotamia History
- #1,670 in Assyria, Babylonia & Sumer History
- #3,974 in Ancient History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Let me start out by saying that the translators, both Assyriologists at Columbia University, did a superb job in translating this book into English. They both performed admirably at translating Glassner's often obtuse, hyper-literary style of French. There were only a few times in the book that I could "feel" that the sentence was translated.
However, other than the translation, I must agree with the other reviewers that this book is not going to prove useful or interesting to most, unless you are a French Assyriologist. The book's title would clearly lead one to believe that this book is going to be about the development of writing in Sumer. That is not what this book focuses on. The first indication of this is in the translators' preface, where they write "It is perhaps better to call Glassner's work a genealogy of writing, rather than a history, seeking writing's antecedents, rather than its origins." Sadly, there is more in here about philosophy than about Sumerian cuneiform.
Glassner seems to write only for an audience of his fellow French Assyriologists. Indeed, his style is very similar to that of his colleague Jean Bottero. While the book should be about Mesopotamian writing and its origins, he spends more time discussing linguistic theory and philosophy than anything else. If you are not familiar with de Saussure, Derrida, and Foucault, as well as a general background in linguistics and particularly French linguistic philosophy, do not bother reading this book. Glassner also assumes that you are familiar with the classics and French literature. I often had the impression that the author wanted to impress us by showing us just how much he knows, regardless of how relevant a statement is to the topic.
To label the different cuneiform syllables that represent the same phoneme Assyriologists use super and subscripts, as well as lower and upper case letters. However, Glassner bizarrely does not discuss this at all. He routinely makes a statement, and then fails to follow it with any discussion or justification.
There appears to have been no serious editing of the book, nor any attempt to make this book more accessible to an audience of those who aren't Assyriologists with training in French linguistic philosophy.
The book appears to have had no serious editing or other work done on it to make it more readable or accessible to non-specialists. Unfortunately, there is little available for the non-specialist in Assyriology. While there are many books for non-specialists on, for example, Greco-Roman studies, Mesoamerican studies, and Egyptology, sadly there is little for the lay audience in Assyriology.
I strongly recommend that you do not spend your time or money on this book.
