Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$12.09$12.09
FREE delivery: Monday, Aug 14 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Payment
Secure transaction
Ships from
Amazon
Sold by
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Buy used: $6.68
Other Sellers on Amazon
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Authors
OK
Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue Hardcover – October 6, 2015
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Purchase options and add-ons
In this short book, Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz invite you to join an urgently needed conversation: Is Islam a religion of peace or war? Is it amenable to reform? Why do so many Muslims seem drawn to extremism? What do words like Islamism, jihadism, and fundamentalism mean in today’s world?
Remarkable for the breadth and depth of its analysis, this dialogue between a famous atheist and a former radical is all the more startling for its decorum. Harris and Nawaz have produced something genuinely new: they engage one of the most polarizing issues of our time―fearlessly and fully―and actually make progress.
Islam and the Future of Tolerance has been published with the explicit goal of inspiring a wider public discussion by way of example. In a world riven by misunderstanding and violence, Harris and Nawaz demonstrate how two people with very different views can find common ground.
- Print length144 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarvard University Press
- Publication dateOctober 6, 2015
- Dimensions4.75 x 1 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100674088700
- ISBN-13978-0674088702
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Provocative and profane… Islam and the Future of Tolerance exemplifies the virtues of open dialogue… All Harris and Nawaz seek is to give voice to the spirit of rebellion and reformation smoldering in the lands of Islam. Forcing it into flame will doubtless be a long time coming, but these two men should be lauded for endeavoring to provide a spark.”―Brian Stewart, National Review
“It is sadly uncommon, in any era, to find dialogue based on facts and reason―but even more rarely are Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals able to maintain critical distance on broad questions about Islam. Which makes Islam and the Future of Tolerance something of a unicorn. Nawaz and Harris discuss Islamism and jihadism from a historical as well as a philosophical angle, with no trace of sentiment or dogma. Most conversations about religion are marked by the inability of either side to listen, but here, at last, is a proper debate.”―New Statesman
“The ideas it leaves behind―about religion, politics, values and interpretation―linger long after the book is finished. They seem a vital contribution to the current conversation, so often defined by the real or imagined divides that the authors encourage us to cross… Islam and the Future of Tolerance deepens our understanding of religion, ideology, politics and the possibility of common ground. It could hardly come at a better time.”―Jeremy Rutledge, Post and Courier
“[A] wise little volume.”―Ray Olson, Booklist
“Readers with a knee-jerk opinion of Islam will learn a lot.”―Kirkus Reviews
“A worthwhile read on the state of Islam and religious tolerance in the world today… Those interested in a deferential and detailed dialogue about human rights, Islam, jihadism, and pluralism will find this book both enlightening and engaging.”―Publishers Weekly
“In this conversation, Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz achieve what so many who take part in the debate on Islam and the West fail to accomplish: a civil but honest dialogue. The result is as illuminating as it is fascinating. Courteous and at times even chivalrous, the two men address every thorny issue on Islam, issues that lead so many others into wild shouting matches, personal attacks, and accusations of Islamophobia. In this gem of a book the authors lay it all out and set the rest of us a great example: that an incisive debate on Islam between a believer and a non-believer is attainable. Given the importance and the urgency of the topic, we must all read it and follow in their footsteps.”―Ayaan Hirsi Ali, author of Infidel, Nomad, and Heretic
“Free thought and rational inquiry once characterized the relative liberalism and humanism of ancient Muslim societies and civilizations: the leading Sunni Imam, Abu Hanifa, would debate atheists inside the great mosques of Iraq; the Abbasid caliphs hosted debates amongst the leaders of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam at their courts in Baghdad; the Mughal emperors engaged in debate with Christians, Hindus, and Buddhists. Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz should be commended for conducting a frank and wide-ranging conversation about a number of key issues around religion, reform, and Islam in the modern world. Nawaz’s approach is based upon detailed familiarity with extremist worldviews, and with the history and tradition of reform theology and renewal within Islam that desperately needs to be amplified. I hope that this debate will be a fruitful endeavor, and illustrate that, in our increasingly-polarized world, it is possible and even normal for people with different viewpoints to have a civilized conversation and to learn from each other.”―Sheikh Dr. Usama Hasan, Islamic scholar
“Back in Islam’s formative centuries, the engagement of Muslims with their ideological opponents helped them to forge the doctrines and traditions of their nascent faith―and perhaps now, as Maajid Nawaz locks horns with Sam Harris, we are at the start of another stage in Islam’s evolution. It is certainly a privilege to read their conversation, and to enjoy a flavor of those great debates between rival scholars that were once staged for the entertainment of the Caliph in Baghdad.”―Tom Holland, historian and author of In the Shadow of the Sword: The Birth of Islam and the Rise of the Global Arab Empire
“The reform of Islam is shaping up to be the most important issue in political ideology of the twenty-first century. This honest and intelligent dialogue is a superb exploration of the intellectual and moral issues involved.”―Steven Pinker, author of The Better Angels of Our Nature
About the Author
Maajid Nawaz is the author of Radical and a cofounder and the chairman of Quilliam―a globally active think tank focusing on religious freedom, extremism, and citizenship.
Product details
- Publisher : Harvard University Press; 1st edition (October 6, 2015)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 144 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0674088700
- ISBN-13 : 978-0674088702
- Item Weight : 6.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 4.75 x 1 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #320,473 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #76 in Islamic Social Studies
- #194 in Sociology & Religion
- #242 in Human Rights (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the authors

Sam Harris is the author of five New York Times best sellers. His books include The End of Faith, Letter to a Christian Nation, The Moral Landscape, Free Will, Lying, Waking Up, and Islam and the Future of Tolerance (with Maajid Nawaz), The Four Horseman (with Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens), and Making Sense. The End of Faith won the 2005 PEN Award for Nonfiction. His writing and public lectures cover a wide range of topics—neuroscience, moral philosophy, religion, meditation practice, human violence, rationality—but generally focus on how a growing understanding of ourselves and the world is changing our sense of how we should live.
Sam’s work has been published in more than 20 languages and has been discussed in The New York Times, Time, Scientific American, Nature, Rolling Stone, and many other publications. He has written for The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Economist, The Times (London), The Boston Globe, The Atlantic, and The Annals of Neurology, among others. He also hosts the Making Sense Podcast, which was selected by Apple as one of the “iTunes Best” and has won a Webby Award for best podcast in the Science & Education category.
Sam received a degree in philosophy from Stanford University and a Ph.D. in neuroscience from UCLA. He has also practiced meditation for more than 30 years and has studied with many Tibetan, Indian, Burmese, and Western meditation teachers, both in the United States and abroad. Sam has created the Waking Up Course for anyone who wants to learn to meditate in a modern, scientific context.

Maajid Nawaz is an author and Founding Chairman of Quilliam - a globally active think tank focusing on matters of integration, citizenship & identity, religious freedom, extremism and immigration.
He encourages the reform of Islam today, inclusive citizenship-based participation of Muslims in their respective countries, and seeks to synergize a respect for human rights with the civic liberal imperative to defend those in danger of being stigmatized by extremists of all stripes due to their personal choices.
Maajid's autobiographical account of his life story 'RADICAL' has been released in the UK and US.
Maajid is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, an Honorary Associate of the National Secular Society and has been listed as one of the most influential people in the UK Sunday Times' Debretts 500 index. Maajid is also a Daily Beast columnist, and provides occasional columns for the London Times, New York Times and Wall Street Journal among others. Maajid was the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary candidate for the May 2015 British General Election.
A British-Pakistani born in Essex, Maajid speaks English, Arabic and Urdu, holds a BA (Hons) from SOAS in Arabic and Law and an MSc in Political Theory from the London School of Economics (LSE). He is personally interested in Arabic grammar & morphology, Muslim Medieval jurisprudence and scholastics and emerging modern political thought and trends.
Maajid can be contacted on Twitter: @maajidnawaz
or on: https://www.facebook.com/MaajidNawazFanPage
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Maajid Nawaz is a completely different guy than Harris. A former Islamist, Nawaz spent several years in Egypt as a prisoner where he had an awakening, politically and spiritually. After being released from prison, he renounced Islamism and became a secular Muslim (a Muslim who does not want Sharia law imposed on the world, but still a believer in the religion). He wrote a memoir, Radical, and established a think-tank to counter terrorism known as Quilliam. In short, Nawaz began his life in intolerance, but is now an outspoken proponent of tolerance. Knowing that he would be a more than adequate intellectual opponent for Harris, I thought this had the makings of a good bout, and I was not disappointed.
The book begins, and it is in dialogue format throughout, with Harris recalling that he first encountered Nawaz when Nawaz was debating former Muslim and critic of religion Ayaan Hirsi Ali. In the debate, Ali took the side that Islam was a religion of violence, while Nawaz took the side that Islam was a religion of peace. After the debate at a dinner that both authors were at, Harris asked Nawaz if he was being honest when he said he believed that Islam was a religion of peace. Nawaz answered that he was, and that he would be happy to discuss the matter with Harris further at a later time.
Nawaz then briefly recaps his story of being an Islamist and then becoming a secular Muslim. He also distinguishes and defines Islam, Islamism, and Jihadism. According to Nawaz, Islam is a religion, and religions are set of ideas so they are neither peaceful nor violent necessarily (though certain interpretations of them can be). Islamism is the desire to impose certain reading or teachings of Islam on society at large. Jihadism is the desire to impose Islamic teachings on society by force. So, all Jihadists are Islamists, but not all Islamists are Jihadists; Nawaz himself was a Islamist but because he never used force to accomplish his aims he was not a jihadist.
After clearing up the definitions, Nawaz states that there is no absolute way to interpret scripture, so no one can be absolute about their religion. Since there is no absolutely correct way to interpret scripture, this will lead to pluralism about scripture, which will in turn lead to secularism and humanistic values. If this happens, and it can according to Nawaz, then Islam can find its place as other religions have in a modern, secular world.
Harris, who does most of the listening, is not as optimistic as Nawaz about this. He reiterates things he said in other books that it is simply impossible or very unlikely to reform something as long as scripture is respected because while some may reform there will always be those who can say that it is fine for other people to interpret scripture as they choose, some people will choose to interpret it in an Islamist or Jihadist way, so the problem will always be there. Nawaz agrees that this can be a problem, but recalls the Golden Age of Islam and points out that Islamism and Jihadism are modern phenomena and that the past shows that Muslims can in fact be tolerant. Harris retorts that Islam was imposed and spread from the start by violence, even by the Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him). Nawaz does not disagree with this, but points out that there have been eras where Islamism and Jihadism were not significant problems, so it is possible for Muslims to assimilate.
The book ends with Harris and Nawaz agreeing that the battle to save the world from Islamism and Jihadism must be fought on multiple fronts. For starters, we cannot be afraid to say, as former U.S. President Barack Obama was, radical Islam. If we are fighting against something, we need to be very clear what it is we are fighting against. Second, we cannot exclude Ex-Muslims and non-Muslims from the fray; we are all in this together. Third, we must all regard pluralism and secularism as the end goals, if everyone can share these values then there is a chance we can win this fight. In the end, this is a war of ideas, and the secularists have better ideas than the Islamists and the Jihadists.
The book is well-written and shows thoughtful, informed conversation on both sides. In short, this book is itself a testament of what we are looking for; those of different faiths or no faith at all sharing a seat at the table and talking about their differences openly and clearly with no thought of violence, i.e pluralism and secularism.
I do have one criticism of the book, and it is aimed at Nawaz. He states several times that there is no correct reading of scripture, and this is not a view that many religious people will accept. While we may not always agree all the time about a given passage, that does not mean that the passage is therefore meaningless. This is an appeal to mysticism, and the Abrahamic religions in particular shun mysticism (though there Sufism does embrace mysticism). It would be better to say that there are things in religious texts that are not compatible with western society, but that these need to be taken in context of the times and that we need to do careful exegesis in order to get to the bottom of what a text is saying, but it is simply erroneous to say that there is no correct way to read texts, and believing that will not lead to pluralism, secularism, or tolerance. Good argument and a willingness to listen lead to those values.
We are going to be dealing with Islam, violence, and the conversation of how to be tolerant for the rest of our lives. Harris and Nawaz' book is a good start in talking about how to have that conversation, and evidence that it can in fact be done. I recommend this book to Muslim, and non-Muslim, because we must solve this problem if the human race wants to live in a tolerant manner.
“Islam and the Future of Tolerance” is an excellent, civil and honest discussion on Islam between a non-believer and a believer. In this insightful conversation, Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz discuss a wide-range of topics involving the reform of Islam and tolerance. This candid 144-page book touches upon the following important topics: the roots of extremism, the scope of the problem, the power of belief, the betrayal of liberalism, the nature of Islam, and the finding the way forward.
Positives:
1. A fascinating discussion on such an important and topical issue: Islam and the future of tolerance.
2. A respectful and insightful discussion. The book is appropriately titled a dialogue.
3. The respectful tone does not mean that sensitive topics are not discussed; on the contrary, it opens up the discussion.
4. Harris and Nawaz have mastery and command of the topics discussed, albeit from different perspectives. Harris as an atheist, and Nawaz as a liberal Muslim.
5. A succinct book that gets to the heart of the matter. Nawaz, “By focusing on the universality of human, democratic, and secular (in the British and American sense of this word) values, we can arrive at some common ground.”
6. The roots of extremism. Nawaz, “The grievance narrative that pins the blame on foreign policy is only half the story. It is insufficient as an explanation for radicalization.”
7. The problems with religion. Harris, “One of the problems with religion is that it creates in-group loyalty and out-group hostility, even when members of one’s own group are behaving like psychopaths.”
8. Nawaz does an excellent job of defining the differences between the different Islamic sects. Nawaz, “Political Islamists seek to impose their views through the ballot box, biding their time until they can infiltrate the institutions of society from within. Revolutionary Islamists seek change from outside the system in one clean sweep. Militant Islamists are jihadists.” “Most traditional Muslims consider Islamism an errant politicization of their religion.”
9. If there is one thing that the reader can take from this book is that an open and honest discussion is possible if both parties stick to discussing the ideas. “I think it would be extremely helpful if people focused on the ideas being discussed here, rather than on calling you names—which is an easy way to ignore your ideas.”
10. Once again but from another angle, Nawaz does a fantastic job of defining key terms that are so important to reference the discussion. “I prefer using terms that denote values, such as “Islamist,” “liberal,” or “conservative” Muslim.”
11. A paragraph that captures what’s behind the power of belief. Nawaz, “Now, I’ve argued that the motivation for Islamists and jihadists is ideological dogma, fed to them by charismatic recruiters who play on a perceived sense of grievance and an identity crisis. In fact, I believe that four elements exist in all forms of ideological recruitment: a grievance narrative, whether real or perceived; an identity crisis; a charismatic recruiter; and ideological dogma. The dogma’s “narrative” is its propaganda.”
12. A fascinating look at the betrayal of liberalism. Nawaz, “The great liberal betrayal of this generation is that in the name of liberalism, communal rights have been prioritized over individual autonomy within minority groups.”
13. Interesting angle on scriptures. Nawaz, “The only truth is that there is no correct way to interpret scripture.”
14. A frank discussion on the nature of Islam. Harris, “It seems to me that the Qur’an contains two central messages, the first is the demonization of infidels. The second central message—the other side of the same coin, really—is the promise of paradise, which explicitly devalues life in this world.”
15. The book is a quote fest and there are some outstanding ones. Nawaz, “My view is that no idea is above scrutiny, and no people are beneath dignity.”
16. Provocative statements. Harris, “But the problem we must grapple with—and must inspire millions of others to grapple with—is that, whatever other historical and political factors are involved, the reality of martyrdom and the sanctity of armed jihad are about as controversial under Islam as is the resurrection of Jesus under Christianity.”
17. Conclusions that we can agree with. Nawaz, “We take the unequivocal view that no place on earth should seek to impose any given interpretation of religion over the rest of society.” “A complete overhaul of cultural identity patterns and a reformed scriptural approach is required. Identity must start with humanity as a founding principle, and human rights as a basis.”
18. The future of reforming Islam. Harris, “As daunting as the project of reforming Islam is, it cannot even begin if the way forward is thought to be a choice between wishful thinking on one hand and bigotry on the other.”
Negatives:
1. My biggest negative is the lack of supplementary materials that could have added much value to this excellent discussion. As an example, I would like a table and a map breaking out the different main Islamic sects by area, level of orthodoxy and so forth.
2. What’s in the book is excellent but I wanted more of it. I wanted more topics discussed. I wanted to know more about specific sects and regions of the world.
3. Lacks structure. As an example, since this book is a discussion there is no table of contents to allow a digital reader to link directly to say the further reading section.
In summary, finally a civil discussion on what is such an important issue, Islam and religious tolerance. Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz should be commended for such a refreshing and enlightening discussion particularly in light of all that has gone on recently. The lack of supplementary materials and depth aside, this is a highly recommended book!
Further recommendations: “Radical: My Journey out of Islamist Extremism” by Maajid Nawaz, “The End of Faith” by Sam Harris, “Faith vs. Fact” by Jerry A. Coyne, “Why I’m not a Muslim
by Ibn Warraq, “Heretic” and “Infidel” by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, “The ISIS Apocalypse” by William McCants, and “ISIS: The State of Terror” by Jessica Stern”
Top reviews from other countries
This slim book is a record of a dialogue between the two about issues of immense contemporary concern related to Islam and Muslims. Harris raises thought-provoking questions—such as about terror in the name of Islam and widespread Muslim attitudes towards people of other faiths—while Nawaz, in responding to these issues, acknowledges the immensity of the challenges, points to the possibilities of using Islamic arguments to counter extremism in the name of Islam and reflects on the need to promote secularism, democracy and human rights in Muslim contexts.
The friendly interchange between the two reveals that although their understanding and appreciation of religion may differ markedly on many points, an atheist and a religious reformer can find sufficient common ground to have an engaging and meaningful dialogue—a common commitment to peace, democracy, secularism (understood as separation of religion and state) and justice.
Today, issues related to Islam, peace and violence are hotly-debated, given the horrific terror that continues to be committed in the name of Islam in large parts of the world. The conversation between Harris and Nawaz focuses mainly on this subject.
Harris argues that contrary to what Muslim reformists claim, Islam is not a religion of peace. Instead, he contends, Muslim extremists “are seeking to implement what is arguably the most honest reading of the faith’s actual doctrine”. Nawaz politely responds to Harris’ allegations about the nature of Islam. Pointing out that the “polarization of this debate between those who insist that Islam is a religion of war and proceed to engage in war for it and those who insist that Islam is a religion of war and proceed to engage in war against it” would lead to an intractable situation, Nawaz helpfully says that religion and religious texts do not speak for themselves—they need to be interpreted.
The Quran, like any other text (religious as well as other) can be interpreted in diverse, often mutually-contradictory, ways. If radical Islamists champion a violence-driven, politics-centric interpretation of their faith, many Muslim reformists articulate diametrically different interpretations of Islam, which are rooted in a quest for peace. What people read into a text depends heavily on their cultural and ideological baggage.
There will, Nawaz explains, thus always be multiple interpretations of any scripture (or any other text for that matter). Hence, he says, “all variant readings of a holy book would become a matter of differing human perspectives”. This is a point that challenges the Islamists’ claim to be in possession of Absolute Truth as well as indicating the possibilities for articulating alternate understandings of Islam that champion peace, compassion and friendly relations between Muslims and people of other faiths.
“The best way to undermine extremists’ insistence that truth is on their side”, Nawaz tells us, “is to argue that theirs is merely one way of looking at things.” “When you open up like that”, he points out, “you’re definitely saying there is no right answer. And in the absence of a right answer, pluralism is the only option. And pluralism will lead to secularism, and to democracy, and to human rights.” Striking an optimistic note, he adds, “I genuinely believe that if we focus on the pluralistic nature of interpretation and on democracy, human rights, and secularism […] we’ll get to a time of peace and stability in Muslim-majority countries.”
Along with popularizing awareness of the multiple interpretations of scripture, Nawaz also urges a transformation in the way people relate with religion —a moving away from viewing religion as a set of injunctions, a matter of strict legal rules, to seeing it as “a spiritual, mystical relationship with God, a journey”. For this, he sees considerable scope in the Sufi tradition.
Acknowledging the immensity of the challenge posed by radical Islamists today, Nawaz stresses the urgent need for Muslim reformists to articulate and popularize among Muslims alternate interpretations of Islam, interpretations that are committed to peace, democracy, secularism and human rights and that challenge Islamist interpretations of the faith. These alternate understandings of Islam, he suggests, are also necessary in order to counter human rights abuses in the name of Islam even among Muslims who may not support radical Islamists—on issues such as apostasy, women’s rights and relations with people of other faiths, for instance.
In contrast what both radical Islamists as well as critics of Islam would claim, Nawaz highlights the fact that there are ample theological resources available within the Muslim religious tradition for promoting democracy, pluralism and human rights values among Muslims using specifically Islamic arguments. One example that he cites concerns the term kafir, often translated into English as ‘infidel’.
While many Muslims use it in a contemptuous way to refer to anyone who isn’t a Muslim, or even anyone who isn’t their sort of Muslim, Nawaz refers to some early Islamic scholars who were of the view that “only those who—like Satan—recognise Islam as true and then knowingly reject it out of arrogance can be described as Kuffar, or infidels.” These scholars, he tells us, “referred to the literal Arabic meaning of the word kafir, ‘one who conceals’, to argue that concealing the truth is a deliberate act and cannot be ascribed to anyone who doesn’t recognize it as truth in the first instance.” Accordingly, Nawaz says, the view “that only malicious, arrogant rejection was deserving of the label kafir”, practically do[es] away with the concept of infidel, to be honest.”
Nawaz also highlights the need to counter what he calls “Muslim tribalism”, a narrow communalism that lends itself to “a generally hostile approach to ‘the other’”. He calls for a “complete overhaul of cultural identity patterns”, based on “humanity as a founding principle, and human rights as a basis.” “The Islamic concept of Ummah, or people, must be reappraised here”, he says. For this purpose, too, he sees rich possibilities within the Islamic religious tradition itself. Most Muslims today, he explains, would view the Ummah as comprising of solely other Muslims. And this, he points out, can promote Muslim “tribalism”.
But by adopting “a more adaptive look at texts”, he suggests, “one can find that the Prophet was reported to have included non-Muslims in his definition of Ummah upon authoring a document—known as the Covenant of Medina—that regulated the rights and duties of those residing under his authority.” Understanding what the Ummah is about in this way, then, can help overcome the pronounced Muslim “tribalism”, enabling Muslims to expand their circle of concern beyond their community, narrowly defined, to include other people, too. This, Nawaz seems to suggest, would be in conformity with normative Islamic practice, rather than a deviation from it.
An immense treasure-trove of wise insights packed into a few dozen pages, this book is a must-read for anyone interested in the many issues of global importance that it discusses.
As such these regressive leftists are quite happy to accept the opponents of this ‘greatest evil of all times’ to actually perpetrate all sorts of crimes that any critically thinking mind would associate with what, well actual chauvinism, supremacism and religious bigotry.
It is this complex of a complete inversion of any meaning or ethics that makes this book so important. Of course it also clearly identifies the need for the world of islam to critically review their scriptures for plausibility and clearly expose the impossible examples of Mohammed from the general claim of quasi divine perfection.
What I miss in this book is a little bit more detail on how islam could support societies following mostly the same principles of humanism for centuries. If I am not mistaken the sura are the recollection of Mohammed's actual prophecies, a lot of which urge the listener to follow the example of the prophet, allegedly around 20% are unintelligible even to people fluent in Arabic and the rest can be separated into the early Meccan phase where the suras are spiritual and peaceful and the later Medinan phase where Mohammed appears as conqueror and his prophecies are gruesome and violent. This oral tradition was put to paper somewhere between 70 and more likely around 200 years after Mohammed’s death and are accompanied by the hadiths - the tellings of Mohammed’s life. These were compiled around the time of the creation of the written Koran in a process where the author evaluated around 300,000 sayings of which he discarded around 90% as implausible.
These hadiths are supported by Isnād, the chain of witnesses that supported it. I believe it is in the discussion of these hadiths and their foundations where the rationalisation of the mixed message of the Koran is traditionally located. It would be this area where I would have like the book to have provided some more detail, not so much on the individual sura, hadiths or isnad, but on the principal how these function in moderate muslim societies.
I regard the literal reading of the Koran as practiced by the islamists as a strange aspect of “modernity”. It is quite apparent that the Koran was present in the middle east in a similar way as the bible was present before translated from latin into the common languages. A book of secrets controlled by a priesthood, claiming that they - the priests - read and understand god’s book and by (t)his proclaimed objective or absolute authority we tell you how to live your life.
Ever since John Locke (argumentum ad verecundiam) we know the argument from authority to be a logical fallacy, when this is not merely a shorthand for reliable evidence, but rather a means to avoid or suppress factual evidence or, in the case of the supernatural authority, supposedly superseding the existing evidence or any man-made social arrangements.
In case of the bible the process of acquiring the meaning of the gospel, more precisely the new testament directly, promoted humanism and was, as I believe, foundational for the renaissance/ enlightenment, although of course the greek philosophers are the centrepiece of this period.
It seems almost an irony that we learned about these from the persian translations of the greek texts and the discussions of their meaning in the islamic world and that while the world of islam was open amongst others towards these philosophers it blossomed and prospered and it collapsed when it decided to treat these as subversive to the authority of their Koran.
On the other hand when the Koran is read literally and the tradition that later (medinan (violent) period) comments on any given topic supersede earlier comments (meccan (spiritual) period) on the same question and when they are in conflict are applied, it seems impossible to end up anywhere else than where the islamists and taliban (‘teachers’!) arrive.
I tend to believe that societies can be civilised in spite of the presence of any form of religion when I look back that humanism has proceeded against all sorts of resistance by the religions of the past. And while this be a story of mostly the jewish and christian faiths aspects of the same struggle appear in Muslim history also. However, since the appearance of the Taliban, or if you like the Muslim Brothers the thrust of the ideological discourse in the muslim world seems to have shifted and it is by no means determined into which direction the majority of muslims will lean in the near future.
Sam Harris is a good interviewer a thought provoker, and brings up interesting points for discussion and makes interesting hypotheses . However his analysis is lacking as he doesn't seem to be able to put his finger on the pulse of various issues pertaining to Radical Islam and oftentimes misses the mark and misunderstands various issues .
Maajid Nawaz is the "Sachin Tendulkar" of this book . With his razor sharp analysis and clear and precise understanding of all the issues of the Islamic Faith , the necessity for delineating the exact interpretation that ISIS and AQ derive from , the various factors that contribute to an individuals radicalization in a manner worthy of publication in a journal hits it out of the ballpark !!
Maajid Nawaz is respected by MI6 , BND of Germany , The CIA , and even the British Police as a reliable source . Read this book and you will know why
A must read . this is a scholarly , authoritative book that is a MUST read !!!





![Free Will [Deckle Edge]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71M+MkYZA9L._AC_UL200_SR200,200_.jpg)









