Buy new:
$22.27$22.27
FREE delivery:
July 12 - 13
Ships from: Orion LLC Sold by: Orion LLC
Buy used: $3.50
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
It's Only a Movie!: Films and Critics in American Culture Hardcover – Box set, May 11, 2001
| Price | New from | Used from |
- Kindle
$10.99 Read with Our Free App - Hardcover
$22.2711 Used from $3.50 13 New from $16.00
Purchase options and add-ons
Haberski begins by looking at the barriers to film's acceptance as an art form, including the Chicago Motion Picture Commission hearings of 1918–1920, one of the most revealing confrontations over the use of censorship in the motion picture industry. He then examines how movies overcame the stigma attached to popular entertainment through such watershed events as the creation of the Museum of Modern Art's Film Library in the 1920s.
The arguments between Pauline Kael and Andrew Sarris's heralded a golden age of criticism, and Haberski focuses on the roles of Kael, Sarris, James Agee, Roger Ebert, and others, in the creation of "cinephilia." Described by Susan Sontag as "born of the conviction that cinema was an art unlike any other," this love of cinema centered on coffee houses, universities, art theaters, film festivals, and, of course, foreign films.
The lively debates over the place of movies in American culture began to wane in the 1970s. Haberski places the blame on the loss of cultural authority and on the increasing irrelevance of the meaning of art. He concludes with a persuasive call for the re-emergence of a middle ground between art and entertainment, "something more complex, ambiguous, and vexing―something worth thought."
- Print length264 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherUniversity Press of Kentucky
- Publication dateMay 11, 2001
- Reading age18 years and up
- Dimensions6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100813121930
- ISBN-13978-0813121932
Editorial Reviews
From Library Journal
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
"A splendidly researched and argued account of American film criticism's first golden age."―Bright Lights Film Journal
"Producing an interesting survey of familiar ground from a unique perspective, Haberski has written a book that will serve both serious students of the cinema and those looking for an introduction―a fine achievement."―Choice
"In this fine study of movies and cultural critics, Raymond Haberski does what few other writers on the subject manage: He places the endless debates over the cultural value of movies within the larger question of what culture should be. . . . A good read and an important work."―David Steigerwald
"A provocative study. . . . While there are many titles dealing with film culture, It's Only a Movie! takes the subject much further and ponders the strangest of societal phenomenon, America's love affair with motion pictures, the ramifications of this media in kneading contemporary thought, and the relevance of aesthetics in an information age."―Film & History
"The author raises some fascinating and controversial issues about filmmaking, such as how a director can become a genuine artist while turning out commercial pictures in the factory atmosphere of a film studio."―Gene D. Phillips
"My hope is that somehow―despite television, the Internet, and the flood of bland journalism―the old critical prowess can be revived. There was gallantry in that chivalric jousting, even if the knights were frequently errant."―John Simon, National Review
"Haberski's survey of film criticism makes compelling reading, covering a subject on which rather little has been written."―Journal of American History
"Thought-provoking and meaningful. . . . If you are interested in 20th-century American culture, art, sociology or, most importantly, film, then you will want to take a look."―Lexington Herald-Leader
"In this informative and entertaining work, Haberski uses historical perspective, logical and chronological structure, and an unassuming but convincing voice to trace the shifting role of movies in American culture."―Library Journal
"This is the story of how an entertainment became an art―how people learned to take movies seriously without losing the pleasure movies give. It's a longer and more complicated story than it might seem, touching on many personalities and ideas, and, in doing it full historical justice, Raymond Haberski's book tells us something, as well, about how American culture acquired its self-confidence."―Louis Menand
"A must-read for critics and would make a sure-fire addition to the library of movie buffs everywhere."―Online Film Critics Society
"If you like thinking about movies, rather than just sitting for some entertainment, and are interested in the American history of film criticism, this is a book you will enjoy."―Schmack
"Engages with issues of fundamental concern to anyone with an involvement in film studies."―Sight and Sound
"This witty take on the importance of movie marketing includes excepts from influential critics such as Pauline Kael and Andrew Sarris."―Variety
"Examines the origin of film criticism, exposes the critics who got a little too critical and even explores whether cinema is an art worthy of critique."―Video Age
"The story Haberski tells has, in current Hollywood parlance, a good arc."―Wilson Quarterly
From the Inside Flap
Haberski begins by looking at the barriers to film's acceptance as an art form, including the Chicago Motion Picture Commission hearings of 1918-1920, one of the most revealing confrontations over the use of censorship in the motion picture industry. He then shows how movies overcame the stigma associated with popular entertainment through such watershed events as the creation of the Museum of Modern Art's Film Library in the 1930s and the heated battles between movie critics Pauline Kael and Andrew Sarris in the 1960s.
Kael and Sarris's arguments heralded a golden age of criticism, and Haberski focuses on how Kael, Sarris, James Agee, Richard Schickle, Roger Ebert, and others, created "cinephilia." Described by Susan Sontag as "born of the conviction that cinema was an art unlike any other," this love of cinema flowered around coffee houses, universities, art theaters, film festivals, and, of course, foreign films.
The lively debates over the place of movies in American culture began to wane in the 1970s, and in provocative and insightful prose Haberski blames the critics' loss of cultural authority and the increasing irrelevance of the meaning of art. He concludes with a persuasive call for the re-emergence of a middle ground between art and entertainment, "something more complex, ambiguous, and vexing-something worth thought."
From the Back Cover
"The author raises some fascinating and controversial issues about filmmaking, such as how a director can become a genuine artist while turning out commercial pictures in the factory atmosphere of a film studio."-Gene D. Phillips
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : University Press of Kentucky; First Edition (May 11, 2001)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 264 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0813121930
- ISBN-13 : 978-0813121932
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 1.25 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,117,263 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,711 in Censorship & Politics
- #12,941 in Movie History & Criticism
- #17,310 in Popular Culture in Social Sciences
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Professor of History and Director of American Studies at IUPUI; contributor to S-USIH blog; and former Fulbright Danish Distinguished Chair in American Studies
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Beyond this, Haberski's books is full of mistakes. The important journal Movie, for instance, becomes Film in the Haberski/University Press of Kentucky verse. Peter Biskind becomes Bisking in the index. The title of Roland Marchand's essay is missing from the bibliography. And this is only the beginning.
So, to sum up Its Only a Movie is an interesting book marred, in my opinion, by a shift into polemics and apologetics overdrive in chapter seven...THE book on the history of film criticism in the US, which was, by the way, part of a global phenomenon, is still, in my opinion, to be written...
That movies are an art form is a proposition that has been long debated. It would seem to me that if one simply considers the films of theatrical productions (like, say, _Rope_ or _A Long Day's Journey Into Night_), it becomes very easy to answer the question in the affirmative, but none of the players in Haberski's volume seems to have performed this exercise. But even if we allow that such efforts are truly art, does that make _The Mummy Returns_ art, too? I would say yes, but perhaps a better answer is "Who cares?" Even so, there are lots of people who have cared about the issue, from the beginning of the movies. The first critics of film recognized that movies were taking up a space in culture somewhere between fine art and mindless amusement, and movie criticism has hovered in discussion over where they should actually go ever since. Haberski gives a fine summary of how critics looked at the silent movies, and how (when the Supreme Court decided they were products, not free speech), criticism was used in formation of censorship boards. It has an excellent chapter on Theodore Dreiser's attempt to get his novel, _An American Tragedy_, filmed in what he thought was a proper fashion. Dreiser took Paramount to court; like critics if the time, he wanted studios to "get serious" about art uncorrupted by commerce. He lost. Here is also an excellent summary of the famous Sarris / Kael feud over "auteur theory."
Haberski obviously cares for his subject. Painstaking research into this narrow field of endeavor is easily apparent in all his chapters. He has a sense of humor, and does not take these battles (or himself) with excessive seriousness, as his title indicates. There is a good deal to be enjoyed here by anyone interested in 20th century culture and film.
Scott Cooper
