Ivan Kushnir

Follow to get new release updates and improved recommendations

About Ivan Kushnir

Ivan Kushnir is an economist and a theologian, has written hundreds of books.
As an economist, Ivan Kushnir popularizes economics as a science that describes the life and prosperity of society. His books are necessary for strategists and analysts to understand the economic trends, the current state and direction of development of countries and regions.
As a theologian, Ivan popularizes the Bible and the christian art.

Are you an author?

Help us improve our Author Pages by updating your bibliography and submitting a new or current image and biography.

Learn more at Author Central

1 11 1

$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.66

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition
$3.99

Kindle Edition

Author Updates

Books By Ivan Kushnir

All Formats Kindle Edition Paperback

Economy of Kuwait Jan 25, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Kuwait from the 1970s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the GDP of Kuwait was equal to $140.0 billion per year; the value of agriculture was $621.0 million; the value of manufacturing was $8.9 billion. Since the share in the world is between .1% and 1%, the country is classified as an average economy.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product per capita was $37 928.8, the value of agriculture per capita was $168.2, the value of manufacturing per capita was $2 411.0. Since the productivity is greater the average above average, the economy is classified as high developed.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of GDP was 1.5%; the growth of agriculture was 10.0%; the growth of manufacturing was 3.2%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Kuwait included: industry (55.6%), services (32.4%), transportation (5.3%), trade (4.1%), construction (2.1%), and agriculture (0.39%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the export was 74.4% higher than the import, the net export was equal to 26.9% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is not better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is not better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will not increase.

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of Pakistan Jan 27, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Pakistan from the 1970s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the GDP of Pakistan was equal to $245.8 billion per year; the value of agriculture was $57.4 billion; the value of manufacturing was $31.6 billion. Since the share in the world is between .1% and 1%, the country is classified as an average economy.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product per capita was $1 243.9, the value of agriculture per capita was $290.3, the value of manufacturing per capita was $160.0. Since the productivity is less the average below average, the economy is classified as least developed.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of GDP was 4.2%; the growth of agriculture was 2.0%; the growth of manufacturing was 3.5%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Pakistan included: agriculture (24.6%), services (23.6%), trade (19.7%), industry (18.2%), transportation (11.9%), and construction (2.1%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the import was 71.3% higher than the export, the net import was equal to 7.8% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is not better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is not better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will not increase.

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of Estonia Jan 24, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Estonia from the 1990s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product of Estonia was equal to $25.5 billion per year; the value of agriculture was $702.2 million; the value of manufacturing was $3.5 billion. Since the share in the world is between .01% and .1%, the country is classified as a small economy.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the GDP per capita was $19 267.8, the value of agriculture per capita was $531.3, the value of manufacturing per capita was $2 628.8. Since the productivity is between the average and the average of above average, the economy is classified as developed.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of GDP was 3.7%; the growth of agriculture was 1.1%; the growth of manufacturing was 6.4%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Estonia consisted of: services (40.9%), industry (21.1%), trade (14.4%), transportation (14.0%), construction (6.5%), and agriculture (3.2%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the export was 5.0% higher than the import, the net export was equal to 3.7% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is not better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will increase.

Other Formats: Paperback

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of Germany Jan 24, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Germany from the 1970s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the GDP of Germany was equal to $3.7 trillion per year; the value of agriculture was $29.3 billion; the value of manufacturing was $735.2 billion. Since the share in the world is between 1% and 10%, the country is classified as a regional leader.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product per capita was $44 732.1, the value of agriculture per capita was $358.5, the value of manufacturing per capita was $8 981.7. Since the productivity is greater the average above average, the economy is classified as high developed.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of GDP was 1.9%; the growth of agriculture was -3.4%; the growth of manufacturing was 3.5%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Germany consisted of: services (48.7%), industry (25.4%), trade (11.3%), transportation (9.1%), construction (4.6%), and agriculture (0.89%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the export was 15.7% higher than the import, the net export was equal to 6.2% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will increase.

Other Formats: Paperback

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of the United States Jan 28, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.66

This book about the economy of the United States from the 1970s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product of the United States was equal to $18.0 trillion per year; the value of agriculture was $180.3 billion; the value of manufacturing was $2.1 trillion. Since the share in the world is greater than 10%, the country is classified as a global leader.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product per capita was $56 220.1, the value of agriculture per capita was $564.3, the value of manufacturing per capita was $6 481.0. Since the productivity is greater the average above average, the economy is classified as high developed.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of GDP was 2.3%; the growth of agriculture was 2.0%; the growth of manufacturing was 1.9%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of the USA included: services (55.4%), industry (15.3%), trade (14.6%), transportation (10.0%), construction (3.8%), and agriculture (1.0%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the import was 24.1% higher than the export, the net import was equal to 3.0% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is not better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is not better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will not increase.

Other Formats: Paperback

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of Samoa Jan 28, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Samoa from the 1970s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the GDP of Samoa was equal to $786.4 million per year; the value of agriculture was $74.7 million; the value of manufacturing was $64.1 million. Since the share in the world is less than .01%, the country is classified as a micro economy.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product per capita was $4 091.7, the value of agriculture per capita was $388.7, the value of manufacturing per capita was $333.7. Since the productivity is between the average of below average and the average, the economy is classified as developing.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of gross domestic product was 1.4%; the growth of agriculture was -0.64%; the growth of manufacturing was -3.4%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Samoa consisted of: trade (32.7%), services (29.6%), transportation (10.9%), industry (10.8%), agriculture (9.5%), and construction (6.5%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the import was 67.8% higher than the export, the net import was equal to 21.7% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will increase.

Other Formats: Paperback

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of Australia Jan 21, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Australia from the 1970s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the GDP of Australia was equal to $1.4 trillion per year; the value of agriculture was $32.7 billion; the value of manufacturing was $89.5 billion. Since the share in the world is between 1% and 10%, the country is classified as a regional leader.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the GDP per capita was $60 077.9, the value of agriculture per capita was $1 378.0, the value of manufacturing per capita was $3 769.3. Since the productivity is greater the average above average, the economy is classified as high developed.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of gross domestic product was 2.4%; the growth of agriculture was -1.4%; the growth of manufacturing was -0.84%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Australia included: services (51.8%), industry (18.3%), trade (11.4%), construction (8.3%), transportation (7.8%), and agriculture (2.5%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the export was 1.1% higher than the import, the net export was equal to 0.24% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is not better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will increase.

Other Formats: Paperback

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of Greece Jan 25, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Greece from the 1970s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product of Greece was equal to $230.1 billion per year; the value of agriculture was $8.0 billion; the value of manufacturing was $18.1 billion. Since the share in the world is between .1% and 1%, the country is classified as an average economy.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product per capita was $21 549.4, the value of agriculture per capita was $750.0, the value of manufacturing per capita was $1 699.3. Since the productivity is between the average and the average of above average, the economy is classified as developed.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of GDP was -2.2%; the growth of agriculture was 1.7%; the growth of manufacturing was -3.5%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Greece included: services (51.7%), trade (18.1%), industry (13.5%), transportation (10.0%), agriculture (4.0%), and construction (2.7%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the import was 10.6% higher than the export, the net import was equal to 3.3% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is not better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is not better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will not increase.

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of China Jan 23, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of China from the 1970s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the GDP of China was equal to $10.5 trillion per year; the value of agriculture was $886.2 billion; the value of manufacturing was $3.1 trillion. Since the share in the world is greater than 10%, the country is classified as a global leader.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the GDP per capita was $7 491.3, the value of agriculture per capita was $631.9, the value of manufacturing per capita was $2 221.3. Since the productivity is between the average of below average and the average, the economy is classified as developing.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of GDP was 7.7%; the growth of agriculture was 3.8%; the growth of manufacturing was 7.5%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of China consisted of: industry (35.1%), services (33.8%), trade (11.4%), agriculture (8.4%), construction (7.0%), and transportation (4.4%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the export was 10.8% higher than the import, the net export was equal to 2.1% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will increase.

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of Azerbaijan Jan 22, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Azerbaijan from the 1990s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the GDP of Azerbaijan was equal to $56.5 billion per year; the value of agriculture was $3.1 billion; the value of manufacturing was $2.6 billion. Since the share in the world is between .01% and .1%, the country is classified as a small economy.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product per capita was $5 913.2, the value of agriculture per capita was $321.8, the value of manufacturing per capita was $270.2. Since the productivity is between the average of below average and the average, the economy is classified as developing.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of GDP was 1.6%; the growth of agriculture was 3.7%; the growth of manufacturing was 4.3%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Azerbaijan included: industry (47.6%), services (17.4%), trade (10.9%), construction (10.6%), transportation (7.7%), and agriculture (5.8%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the export was 62.4% higher than the import, the net export was equal to 18.9% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is not better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is not better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will not increase.

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of Armenia Jan 21, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Armenia from the 1990s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the GDP of Armenia was equal to $11.3 billion per year; the value of agriculture was $1.8 billion; the value of manufacturing was $1.1 billion. Since the share in the world is between .01% and .1%, the country is classified as a small economy.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product per capita was $3 867.7, the value of agriculture per capita was $628.8, the value of manufacturing per capita was $393.7. Since the productivity is less the average below average, the economy is classified as least developed.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of GDP was 4.4%; the growth of agriculture was 1.0%; the growth of manufacturing was 7.9%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Armenia consisted of: services (32.2%), industry (18.6%), agriculture (17.9%), trade (13.9%), construction (10.5%), and transportation (7.0%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the import was 51.9% higher than the export, the net import was equal to 16.3% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is not better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is not better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will not increase.

Other Formats: Paperback

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

Economy of Colombia Jan 23, 2019

by Ivan Kushnir

$3.99

This book about the economy of Colombia from the 1970s to the 2010s. Source data from UN Data.

Size. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product of Colombia was equal to $330.1 billion per year; the value of agriculture was $20.0 billion; the value of manufacturing was $40.7 billion. Since the share in the world is between .1% and 1%, the country is classified as an average economy.

Productivity. In the 2010s, the gross domestic product per capita was $6 949.5, the value of agriculture per capita was $420.1, the value of manufacturing per capita was $857.5. Since the productivity is between the average of below average and the average, the economy is classified as developing.

Growth. In the 2010s, the growth of gross domestic product was 3.7%; the growth of agriculture was 3.2%; the growth of manufacturing was 1.9%.

Structure. In the 2010s, the economy of Colombia included: services (39.1%), industry (25.7%), trade (12.9%), transportation (8.4%), construction (7.2%), and agriculture (6.6%).

Export and import. In the 2010s, the import was 22.9% higher than the export, the net import was equal to 3.8% of the GDP. The technological structure of export is not better than the structure of import.

Consumption and reproduction. The attitude of reproduction to the consumption is not better than the global average, so the share of GDP in the world will not increase.

Other Formats: Paperback

This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited.

←Previous Page
1
2
3

...

More Information

Are you an author? Visit Author Central to change your photo, edit your biography, and more

See Author Pages Frequently Asked Questions

Anything else? Provide feedback about this page

Similar authors to follow

About Ivan Kushnir

Are you an author?

Author Updates

More Information