Alvar Ellegard defends two strong lines:
1: The Teacher of Righteousness is behind the figure of Jesus. Ellegard searches for further confirmation in early Christian texts where he finds indications that Jesus was not considered as a man but as a spiritual savior, a mythical Messiah. When speaking of Jesus his missionaries must have been referring to some distant past. So the Jesus of the Gospels was a reinterpretation of the Essene Lawgiver, whatever came out of the story afterwards in the hands of Diaspora communities, be they Jewish, Gnostic or Christian. I can globally agree. Ellegard gives no particular reasons for the renewed first century interest in the Lawgiver. He also considers, a mistake I believe, that the Teacher of Righteousness had not been given a Messianic status before Christianity and concludes that it was Paul around the thirties who gave Messiah-ship to Jesus as a result of his visionary revelations. Relying on Paul’s visions to glorify the Jesus/Teacher as a Messiah considerably weakens his claims of keeping to an historical approach. He doesn't seem very aware that community strategies with their campaigning messages are behind all religious texts.
2: Ellegard is a specialist on dating texts. Here we find his most exclusive contribution. His linguistic analysis makes him consider that several texts, usually dated to the second century, belong to before the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE. And vice-versa, according to his criteria the Gospels, usually considered as first century documents written or at least started after the Temple's destruction, belong to the second century. (See Tyson: Luke-Acts and Marcion; a defining struggle. Tyson shows that the infancy and childhood chapters 1 and 2 were written late and essentially to establish a wide anti-heretical front)
Ellegard shows a lot of intellectual curiosity and explores well beyond official lines. Readers will find many ideas to graze on, whether they finally accept or reject them.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Jesus: One Hundred Years Before Christ Hardcover – October 1, 1999
by
Alvar Ellegard
(Author)
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length320 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherAbrams Press
-
Publication dateOctober 1, 1999
-
Dimensions5 x 1 x 8 inches
-
ISBN-100879517204
-
ISBN-13978-0879517205
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers also viewed these products
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Get everything you need
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
From Library Journal
These two books offer an enormous contrast. While Fredriksen provides a balanced, carefully reasoned, scholarly study of the historical Jesus, Ellegard's conclusions can only be described as preposterous. Ellegard (formerly dean, Univ. of G?teburg, Sweden) is clearly familiar with some mainline biblical scholarship, but he always opts for the minority view and stretches it beyond reason. For example, he believes that the Gospels were written in the second century C.E. and traces the origin of Christianity to "a group of pious Jews called the Essenes" (the Dead Sea Scrolls group). Then, based on this highly questionable and twisted "evidence," he leaps to several unjustified conclusions: that Jesus lived long before he was supposed to have and that his disciples had only "ecstatic visions" of him and never knew him in the flesh. The Gospel writers, he suggests, then mistook their visions for real events and created fictitious accounts of Jesus' life. Fredriksen (scripture, Boston Univ.), on the other hand, explores the conundrum of a well-established historical fact--namely, that Jesus was executed by the Roman prefect Pilate as a political insurrectionist while his followers were not. She concludes that it was the volatile mix of excited pilgrims in Jerusalem for Passover and their acclaim of Jesus at a time when Pilate was especially interested in keeping the peace that led to his death. Her balanced, well-written work could serve as a kind of introduction to the content and methodology scholars use in the study of the historical Jesus and is highly recommended for any library. Ellegard's work would only be useful as an example of the false conclusions that result when questionable opinion is stretched beyond reasonable limits.
-David Bourquin, California State Univ., San Bernardino
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.
-David Bourquin, California State Univ., San Bernardino
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.
About the Author
Professor Alvar Ellegard was until recently Dean of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Goteburg, Sweden. In addition to books and articles about language and linguistics, he has written extensively in the international scholarly press on historical and anthropological themes, as well as on the history of ideas.
Start reading Jesus: One Hundred Years Before Christ on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Abrams Press; First Edition (October 1, 1999)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0879517204
- ISBN-13 : 978-0879517205
- Item Weight : 1.45 pounds
- Dimensions : 5 x 1 x 8 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#3,055,960 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #17,118 in History of Christianity (Books)
- #17,848 in Christian Church History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
3.9 out of 5 stars
3.9 out of 5
22 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2014
Verified Purchase
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 30, 2016
Verified Purchase
A good book. A lot of people will dislike it, but some will see a different perspective.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 13, 2005
Verified Purchase
Although Mr Ellegard is rehashing some sholarship, there is much in this book that is new and intriguing. His dating of many biblical and extra-biblical documents is insightful and well presented. He does not appear to be pre-judging or allowing a bias to draw his conclusions for him in advance of his research. He presents his evidence in a clear and readable manner.
11 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 29, 2013
Alvar Ellegård (1919-2008) was a Swedish professor of English and Dean of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Gothenburg, and a member of the academic board of the Swedish National Encyclopedia. His earlier book, The Myth of Jesus [Myten om Jesus] has not been translated into English.
He begins this 1999 book by saying, "I shall argue in this book for an entirely new perspective on the earliest history of Christianity... I argue that the earliest Christians, among them Paul, regarded Jesus as a great Jewish prophet and teacher of their movement---but one who had lived in the distant past. To them, accordingly, he was not a contemporary, crucified before their eyes, but a historical figure, on a par with the Old Testament prophets... When Paul and his companions experienced ecstatic visions of Jesus as a heavenly figure, they inferred that Jesus had been 'raised from the dead' by God. They also thought that Jesus' appearance to them at this particular time... was a sign from heaven that the Last Day, God's Final Judgment, was now at long last approaching." (Pg. 1)
He states, "The Jesus of the six early documents [The Shepherd of Hermas; the Didache; 1 Clement; the Letter of Barnabas; the Letter to the Hebrews, and the Revelation of John] treated in this chapter was primarily a teacher and prophet, and an adviser on points of liturgy and worship. He was closely attached to the communities which in the first century, and earlier, were commonly referred to as ... the Church of God. They regarded him as a pre-existent interpreter of God's words, and as a revealer of religious truths and mysteries, e.g. the Ellegårdpromise of immortality... the Saints came to look upon Jesus as having impersonated the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53, and his suffering death came to be interpreted as a sacrifical act." (Pg. 77-78)
He argues, "there is hardly any room for doubt: the earliest writers do not provide any information about the earthly Jesus, simply because they not know much about him. Now, if they do not know, they cannot have been Jesus' companions and contemporaries. Yes Jesus was clearly a well-established and revered figure in the Churches of God. The only natural explanation, it seems to me, is that Jesus' fame was of long standing... Jesus was by no means a near contemporary of these early Christians, but a figure belonging to the late second century BC." (Pg. 141) He adds, "Paul's virtually complete silence on the earthly figure of Jesus had a very simple explanation: he was convinced that the figure that had appeared to him in his visions was a teacher and prophet who had lived and died long since." (Pg. 157)
He summarizes, "the Jesus of the first Christian visionaries was, at least to many of the first Christians, the revered Teacher of Righteousness of the early Essene movement... the main question now is not whether the Teacher of Righteousness of the Essenes was in fact the figure---historical or not---behind the Jesus of Paul and his contemporaries. That may now be regarded as settled. The main question at this stage is why the second-century Christians substituted another, fictional Jesus, and how they managed to convince their communities on this point, and how they succeeded in obliterating virtually all evidence about the original, Essene Jesus." (Pg. 158)
He concludes, "In this book I maintain that precisely the basic story of Jesus in the Gospels has to be completely abandoned as an account of 'what really happened.' ... Jesus of Nazareth, born of Mary at the end of Augustus' reign, is a fiction created in the second century by the Gospel writers... They knew Jesus because he was the great prophet and founder of the religious movement that they belonged to, namely, a branch of the Essenes... The change of focus from a heavenly to an earthly Jesus seems to have been initiated by the highly respected Ignatius, bishop of Antioch... at one stroke Ignatius made Jesus a contemporary of Paul and his colleagues among the apostles." (Pg. 258)
The notion that Jesus was the Essene "Teacher of Righteousness" isn't particularly original, but Ellegård's other arguments are, if not particularly convincing historically, at least provocative. Those interested in "Jesus Myth" theories will probably enjoy this book.
He begins this 1999 book by saying, "I shall argue in this book for an entirely new perspective on the earliest history of Christianity... I argue that the earliest Christians, among them Paul, regarded Jesus as a great Jewish prophet and teacher of their movement---but one who had lived in the distant past. To them, accordingly, he was not a contemporary, crucified before their eyes, but a historical figure, on a par with the Old Testament prophets... When Paul and his companions experienced ecstatic visions of Jesus as a heavenly figure, they inferred that Jesus had been 'raised from the dead' by God. They also thought that Jesus' appearance to them at this particular time... was a sign from heaven that the Last Day, God's Final Judgment, was now at long last approaching." (Pg. 1)
He states, "The Jesus of the six early documents [The Shepherd of Hermas; the Didache; 1 Clement; the Letter of Barnabas; the Letter to the Hebrews, and the Revelation of John] treated in this chapter was primarily a teacher and prophet, and an adviser on points of liturgy and worship. He was closely attached to the communities which in the first century, and earlier, were commonly referred to as ... the Church of God. They regarded him as a pre-existent interpreter of God's words, and as a revealer of religious truths and mysteries, e.g. the Ellegårdpromise of immortality... the Saints came to look upon Jesus as having impersonated the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53, and his suffering death came to be interpreted as a sacrifical act." (Pg. 77-78)
He argues, "there is hardly any room for doubt: the earliest writers do not provide any information about the earthly Jesus, simply because they not know much about him. Now, if they do not know, they cannot have been Jesus' companions and contemporaries. Yes Jesus was clearly a well-established and revered figure in the Churches of God. The only natural explanation, it seems to me, is that Jesus' fame was of long standing... Jesus was by no means a near contemporary of these early Christians, but a figure belonging to the late second century BC." (Pg. 141) He adds, "Paul's virtually complete silence on the earthly figure of Jesus had a very simple explanation: he was convinced that the figure that had appeared to him in his visions was a teacher and prophet who had lived and died long since." (Pg. 157)
He summarizes, "the Jesus of the first Christian visionaries was, at least to many of the first Christians, the revered Teacher of Righteousness of the early Essene movement... the main question now is not whether the Teacher of Righteousness of the Essenes was in fact the figure---historical or not---behind the Jesus of Paul and his contemporaries. That may now be regarded as settled. The main question at this stage is why the second-century Christians substituted another, fictional Jesus, and how they managed to convince their communities on this point, and how they succeeded in obliterating virtually all evidence about the original, Essene Jesus." (Pg. 158)
He concludes, "In this book I maintain that precisely the basic story of Jesus in the Gospels has to be completely abandoned as an account of 'what really happened.' ... Jesus of Nazareth, born of Mary at the end of Augustus' reign, is a fiction created in the second century by the Gospel writers... They knew Jesus because he was the great prophet and founder of the religious movement that they belonged to, namely, a branch of the Essenes... The change of focus from a heavenly to an earthly Jesus seems to have been initiated by the highly respected Ignatius, bishop of Antioch... at one stroke Ignatius made Jesus a contemporary of Paul and his colleagues among the apostles." (Pg. 258)
The notion that Jesus was the Essene "Teacher of Righteousness" isn't particularly original, but Ellegård's other arguments are, if not particularly convincing historically, at least provocative. Those interested in "Jesus Myth" theories will probably enjoy this book.
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Lydia
5.0 out of 5 stars
This is good
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 8, 2013Verified Purchase
As the title suggests,this work places Jesus as an historic person at Qumran around a hundred years before the usual story we are fed.This also looks at why the Gospels were penned and by whom as well as examining the role Jesus played as a Righteous One-far different in meaning than one thinks.Get this for a refreshing change from the normal stuffy theological works.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
David M Carter
5.0 out of 5 stars
A persuasive hypothesis
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 30, 2010Verified Purchase
It is perhaps inevitable that with a question as many-faceted as the origins of Christianity, no one book will cover all the bases. But Ellegard's is a joy to read, and he does an excellent job of bringing together a wide range of evidence, some of it familiar, some very novel. Though he presents his work as a hypothesis deserving further study rather than as fact, the scenario he offers constitutes a very plausible middle ground between the purely mythical/spiritual Jesus of Earl Doherty and the conventional view that follows from taking the four gospels as (containing) historical fact.
I wholeheartedly recommend this book to anyone willing to approach the "Christian origins" question with genuine openness rather than just looking for excuses to dismiss unconventional ideas as a potential threat to their faith. After all, if Ellegard is right, then Paul and his first-century colleagues found it perfectly possible to live out a full-blooded faith despite knowing nothing of any "Jesus of Nazareth" as described in the gospels -- so why shouldn't twenty-first century Christians do the same?
I wholeheartedly recommend this book to anyone willing to approach the "Christian origins" question with genuine openness rather than just looking for excuses to dismiss unconventional ideas as a potential threat to their faith. After all, if Ellegard is right, then Paul and his first-century colleagues found it perfectly possible to live out a full-blooded faith despite knowing nothing of any "Jesus of Nazareth" as described in the gospels -- so why shouldn't twenty-first century Christians do the same?
One person found this helpful
Report abuse














