Buying Options
| Print List Price: | $19.99 |
| Kindle Price: | $5.99 Save $14.00 (70%) |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Jordanetics: A Journey Into the Mind of Humanity's Greatest Thinker Kindle Edition
| Vox Day (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
- Kindle
$5.99 Read with Our Free App - Paperback
$19.637 Used from $12.12 9 New from $15.63
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
He has, by his own admission, thought thoughts that no man has ever thought before. He has dared to dream dreams that no man has ever dreamed before.
Of course, Jordan Peterson also happens to be a narcissist, a charlatan, and an intellectual con man who doesn't even bother to learn the subjects upon which he lectures. He is a defender of free speech who silences other speakers, a fearless free-thinker who never hesitates to run away from debates, difficult questions, and controversial issues, a philosopher who rejects the conventional definition of truth, and a learned professor who has failed to read most of the great classics of the Western canon. He is, in short, a shameless and unrepentant fraud who lacks even a modicum of intellectual integrity.
But is Jordan Peterson more than a mere fraud? Is he something more sinister, more unbalanced, and even more dangerous? In JORDANETICS: A Journey Into the Mind of Humanity's Greatest Thinker, political philosopher Vox Day delves deeply into the core philosophy that Jordan Peterson advocates in both his written works and his video lectures. In doing so, Day methodically builds a shocking case that will convince even the most skeptical Jordan Peterson supporter to reconsider both the man and his teachings.
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateNovember 19, 2018
- File size429 KB
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- ASIN : B07JY9XV38
- Publisher : Castalia House (November 19, 2018)
- Publication date : November 19, 2018
- Language : English
- File size : 429 KB
- Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 199 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #699,872 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #703 in Political Philosophy (Kindle Store)
- #1,879 in Spiritual Self-Help (Kindle Store)
- #2,694 in Political Philosophy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Six-time Hugo Award finalist Vox Day writes epic fantasy as well as non-fiction about religion, political philosophy, and economics. He is a multi-platinum-selling game designer who speaks four languages and a three-time Billboard Top 40 Club Play recording artist.
He maintains a popular blog called Vox Popoli that averages over 3 million pageviews per month. He is an American Indian and the Supreme Dark Lord of the Evil Legion of Evil. The Wall Street Journal described him as "the most despised man in science fiction."
He is the Lead Editor at Castalia House and Arkhaven Comics, and the Chief Content Officer at Unauthorized.TV. His novel A SEA OF SKULLS was a 2017 Dragon Award Finalist for Best Fantasy novel.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on January 28, 2019
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
You will likely balk at thinking of the avuncular, mild-mannered, milquetoast self-help guru Jordan Peterson as a ravening wolf. But after you read this in-depth analysis of Peterson’s work by Vox Day, who has analyzed Peterson’s books and major reports and thought through the implications of his philosophy, you may well change your mind. Most likely you will not do so all at once, nor easily nor even quickly. But if you are able to approach this would-be secular savior with fresh eyes, objectively and rationally, based on the copious evidence and analysis Day brings to bear, you will come to understand how false, invidious and – yes – evil Peterson’s philosophy is.
The first few chapters of Jordanetics walk us through how Peterson came to the author’s attention, why he decided to dive more deeply into his work, and his process of seeing through Peterson’s extremely nebulous and murky writing and speaking style to expose the false and dangerous philosophy that lie beneath Peterson’s “word salad” and murky “bafflegarble”. The early chapters also present the reactions of Peterson fans to Vox’s extensive series of videos and blog posts critiquing Peterson.
Day caught out Peterson in a number of small but meaningful lies, or at least incorrect assertions. These assertions pointed to someone who was either intellectually lazy, overly reliant on outdated and specious sources, or fundamentally dishonest. “Whoever is dishonest in small matters will be dishonest in large ones.” The deeper Vox dug, the clearer it became that Peterson is all of these things, and ultimately, something worse: He is a false prophet who presents himself as a mentor and savior to young men, when in fact his philosophy serves to neuter them and lead them down a false and impotent path in the service of globalism and atomized individualism. As Vox Day succinctly states: “The 12 Rules for Life is a murder mystery disguised as a self-help book and the intended victim is you.”
Vox then shows how Peterson’s convoluted, meandering and obfuscating style both reveals and hides important aspects of Peterson’s mind and his intentions: It reveals that Peterson the man is mentally unbalanced, chaotic, and psychically – even spiritually – unwell. Equally important, Peterson’s esoteric and mystifying style of writing and speaking allows Peterson to hide the true face of his project: Peterson’s philosophy is a type of gnostic, radically materialistic individualism in the vein of Aleister Crowley, whose effect – intended effect – is to further the globalist New World Order and to neuter any opposition rooted in traditionalism, true religion and healthy organic group identity
Most important, Peterson views himself as a Messiah figure who will unite and lead the way in his deluded salvation project for “world peace”. Vox sums it up thus: “He is a mentally ill occultist who seeks to save the world from nuclear destruction by uniting the nations of Man under a single global government through a collective devotion to his esoteric religious philosophy.”
Peterson offers a Goldilocks’ version of religion and morality wherein to much evil is bad, but too much good is likewise bad. For many modern people, already awash in moral relativism and non-judgementalism, this “Middle Way” is alluring, but ultimately corrupting to those who need moral guidance and purpose. “[Peterson] offers salvation without sacrifice, redemption without remorse.”
Some defenders of Peterson may say that Day is putting the worst possible spin on Peterson’s words: cherry-picking and taking things out of context, needling through long texts in order to find contradictory “gotcha” passages. To this, I would say that Vox has penetrated the pretense and the mind-numbing labyrinth of Peterson’s writings, he has thought through Peterson’s ambivalent, contradictory style, to the ultimate conclusions and implications of what Peterson is saying, and he exposes the invidious but unavoidable conclusions that must be drawn from Peterson’s philosophy. Vox Day is shining a light where most people would simply see a muddled grayness and read into it the image they wish to see.
The chapters that tackle Peterson’s 12 Rules reveal a consistent pattern: Peterson presents a superficially straightforward rule and then proceeds to write a chapter than has _nothing_ to do with that rule in any outward, directly connected way. With the analysis and exegesis Day provides, the true implications and conclusions of Peterson’s rambling explications of his “rules” become clear. “It isn’t until you study the written meanings of the rules that you can begin to make sense of the coded rule titles.” The actual meaning and implications of Peterson’s recommendations on how to live are deceptive, disturbing and destructive. “Anyone who sincerely follows what passes for his practical advice here is almost certain to develop self-destructive habits, if not outright neuroses.”
Vox takes each of the 12 rules and exposes the actual underlying principle. To give two examples: Peterson’s superficial level Rule 6: “Set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world” is exposed in Vox’s analysis to be the occult “Inaction is always preferable to action.” Peterson’s Rule 8 “Tell the Truth—Or At Least, Don’t Lie” is exposed as “You can speak a new world into existence through your lies.”
Vox achieves several other important ends through his analysis: 1. He sheds light on Peterson’s overall character, and demolishes the idea that such a man is a worthy mentor and guide for young men seeking meaning. We learn of Peterson’s cowardice, depression and mental illness, propensity to lie, his inability to prevent bullying of his daughter, his truly disturbing dreams and visions, his aggrandized view of himself as a political and spiritual savior figure. 2. Vox shows the close affinity of Peterson’s work with occult figures and charlatans that should give pause to any would-be Peterson follower. For example, Peterson’s high regard for and reliance on the work of Carl Jung is well known. But it is not really Jung’s theory of archetypes that draws in Peterson. Rather, it was Jung’s intended creation of a messianic cult with Jung himself in the exalted seat of the enlightened prophet and savior that is Peterson’s real model and goal.
“His insidious campaign against group identity, against nationalism, and against Western civilization is rooted in a literally Satanic desire to raise up a single global government that will rule over all of humanity. And what Jordan Peterson is attempting to bring about through Jordanetics is the single global religion that will provide the spiritual bulwark for that massive totalitarian edifice, a religion in which he will serve the tripartite role of Messiah, Savior, and Pope.”
Some people will find these claims exaggerated and hyperbolic. “Evil? Satanic? False prophet? Surely, this kind of hyperbolic name-calling and scare-mongering makes more of this than need be, and even drives people away who might otherwise be open to hearing criticism of him. Peterson may be wrong-headed, sappy and kind of confusing. But don’t hurt your own case by referring to a harmless if misguided crank as a wicked and corrupting false messiah.”
It ultimately comes down to whether one sees the world through the lens of true religion. We are in the midst of a spiritual battle of immense proportions that is only going to get more stark, and whose outcome in this world is unknown. You will have to choose sides. If you can begin to comprehend that battle, you will understand what Vox Day is saying about the nature and import of Peterson and his work. However, if you see the world in largely secular and materialist terms (or through a pseudo-spiritual/religious outlook), you will likely turn a tolerant and indifferent eye towards this seemingly helpful and, surely, at worst harmless public intellectual. And that is exactly what Peterson, and the Prince of this world, fully expect and hope you will do.
------
“I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, ‘I have dreamed, I have dreamed’. How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal. .… Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the Lord, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies.” – Jeremiah, 23:25-27, 32
On our family road trips, I would force the family to listen to JP lectures or speeches, then proceed to tell them what JP was saying.
As a Christian and Bible student, I understood that JP's position on the Bible was flawed and that he was not a Christian himself, however, he was speaking against so many of the positions I was against that he inspired me to hope that he could stem the tide of those beliefs. I put some of my "faith" in JP...that was a mistake.
It is a strange experience to look back in time and see something I thought was so good, profound and impactful, that it moved me to tears, but now, realize JP did not really say anything I thought he said. I listened to the words he said, but I am the one that filled in the meaning...JP did not mean what I thought he meant.
As I was telling my family what he "meant", I was really telling them what I wanted him to mean. JP was my "reason", or excuse, for pontificating on various subjects and JP became a source of validation for my positions. I could state with confidence that my position was "right" and then point to JP and say, "See, he's saying the same thing...", thus making me feel good about this professor because he "backed me up".
Later, as I noticed inconsistencies, or position changes, with JP, I wrote them off as mistakes, or taken out of context, or simply ignored them. I was not willing to accept that I put my faith in someone who would actually be antithetical to my beliefs; that was something I was unwilling to consider.
About this time I learned about some of Vox Day's posts regarding JP's positions. Some of Vox's statements about JP were quite harsh. I thought, "Vox is not being fair to JP. JP is on "our side", so cut the guy some slack." However, one thing Vox said was the "key" that allowed me to reexamine my faith in JP. Vox said something like, "JP is repackaging Gnosticism and is not really saying what people think he's saying. JP is literally evil."
As a Christian, familiar with the problems of Gnosticism, I had to acknowledge that if Vox's point was true, it would be detectable if I reexamined JP's positions. My problem at that point was a pride, or ego issue. I did not want to admit that I could have been mislead, or duped, into following someone who was teaching something I knew to be evil. How could I possibly be fooled? I'm too smart to fall for that sort of thing, right? Not me.
So, I accepted some of Vox's challenges. One was to simply "read" what JP was saying, instead of "listening" to it. Wow, what a difference! Reading JP's words, I found they were devoid of the meanings I had been assigning to them. What he meant by good, evil, God, truth, etc. was not what I knew these words to mean.
When JP said to always tell the truth, I plugged my definition of truth into his statement. When JP said this or that position was "evil", I plugged my definition of evil into his statement. When JP talked about "consciousness" I "heard" my definition of consciousness, or "being" or whatever.
But after taking some time to go find how JP defined these words or ideas, and ignoring what I hoped he meant, I was shocked, to say the least.
One of my life axioms is, "Only the truth can withstand scrutiny." Therefore, never be afraid to scrutinize something; if it is true, then it will survive the scrutiny. It was time to scrutinize JP more fully.
After my own findings were eroding my faith in JP, I took the plunge and purchased "Jordanetics".
The first couple chapters did little to shed more light on JP, but did add more reasons to doubt my faith in him. However, once I reached chapter 3 and beyond, Vox's dissection of JP's positions began in earnest. Vox's approach is quite simple.
1. Here is JP's Rule for Life #X
2. Here is what JP says, which does not address said rule at all.
3. What JP is saying means this, using JP's own words.
4. Now that we are clear on what JP is saying, you have to decide what to do.
I decided. Instead of a thinking JP is a man that supports what I support, I've come to the sad realization that he is antithetical to most of my values and beliefs. Wow! That hurt my pride and ego, but truth doesn't care about those.
I'll summarize:
If you believe any of the following, then JP is your man:
- There is no such thing as Objective Truth.
- Truth is whatever helps you survive.
- Being or State of Being is contingent on your acceptance of truth (little "t") and rejection of "evil" (little 'e').
- Evil is that which hinders you.
- Jesus represents a state of being, but not a person, and definitely NOT the Son of God (God being the Creator).
- Satan represents a state of being, but is not an actual fallen angel.
- Social hierarchies exist, however, if you are too low or high, that's evil. The goal is the middle, that's where "good" is.
- All ideas of God / gods are simply mankind's attempts to explain states of being.
- Belonging to a "group" will negatively affect your being.
- All concepts of "good", "evil", God, Being, heaven / hell can be unified and coalesced into one concept...the one JP supports.
I could keep going. However, if you find these concepts appealing, then JP is your man. If, like me, you find these ideas to be irrational, nonsensical, demonstrably wrong, the opposite of your beliefs, etc., and you've been influenced by JP, then read "Jordanetics" and see for yourself...
To those who wrote negative reviews; I read them. I was where you are...putting my meanings into what JP says. I feel pity for those who continue to base their support for JP because of "what they think he means", when what he actually means is there for everyone to find. However, like me, getting passed your ego and pride might be the toughest step for you to take. But take the challenge...
In other words - Only the truth can withstand scrutiny.
Top reviews from other countries
As Vox Day shows in this book however, my surface-level like of JBP's work was misplaced, and badly so. As the author likes to say, SJWs always project, and whilst Peterson is not an SJW, his constant talk of dangerous snakes reeks of the same kind of projection, as he is most definitely one himself. Even if you're more sensible or perceptive than I, and always knew there was something wrong with the man, this book will be a excellent read, because it does much to explain what Peterson is up to in his work. Needless to say, if you're a Peterson fan, then the book is a must-read, because whatever good his scattered nuggets of genuine wisdom and do for you, they're hidden in vast quantities of poisonous muck. Even if you're utterly convinced that Vox Day is wrong, as I am about any anti-Christian tract, at the very least you have a duty to your own personal integrity and belief in Peterson's work to tackle head-on the most comprehensive and thorough attack on Peterson's work there is. If I can read the works of Dawkins, Hitchens et al and come away secure in my faith, you can surely read this and maintain yours. Right?
Beyond that, the book is well written, although there's plenty of discussion about esoteric topics that more casual readers might find difficult or weird, but such criticisms hardly detract from the message or prove even a halfway serious impediment to reading it (like I said, it's well written). Although he's known for being a controversial figure for his political views, Vox Day's own politics barely make an appearance, and do nothing to detract from what he says about Peterson and his work. I daresay there will be plenty of criticisms about the author and why he wrote it, so as this is a fairly early review (I bought & read it on the day of release), here's the criticisms that Vox pre-emptively answers in the book itself (copied verbatim):
-Jordan Peterson is a complex thinker with a Platonic approach that is easily misunderstood by those who don’t carefully follow him. You just don’t understand him.
-The 12 Rules are designed to be a la carte. Just keep what you find useful and discard the rest.
-You are just jealous of Jordan Peterson’s success!
-I am an intelligent person. How could a smart person like me possibly be fooled by the esoteric incoherence of a lunatic?
-He has helped so many people and he does so much good for the broken, confused young men of today. He even cries for them!
-Assuming for the moment that Peterson’s Rules are deceptive. How does he pull off the alleged scam?
-Jordan Peterson is a well-respected academic and an internationally bestselling author who is noted for his brilliant intellect and his common sense wisdom. How can you possibly suggest that he is some sort of con man or something even worse?
-You claim that Jordan Peterson has been misleading me. How do I know that you aren’t the one who is lying about him?
Suffice it to say, if you find a review here following one of the above templates... well the author's already answered them in resounding fashion, so I leave you to draw your own conclusions as to the usefulness of such reviews.
I freely admit that I was fooled by Jordan Peterson to begin with. But after a while of following his videos, I began to feel firstly confused, then uneasy, then I was reminded of Tolkien's description of Saruman: "Suddenly another voice spoke, low and melodious, its very sound an enchantment. Those who listened unwarily to that voice could seldom report the words that they heard; and if they did, they wondered, for little power remained in them. Mostly they remembered only that it was a delight to hear the voice speaking, all that it said seemed wise and reasonable, and desire awoke in them by swift agreement to seem wise themselves. When others spoke they seemed harsh and uncouth by contrast, and if they gainsaid the voice, anger was kindled in the hearts of those under the spell. For some the spell lasted only while the voice spoke to them, and when it spoke to another they smiled, as men do who see through a juggler's trick while others gape at it. For many the sound of the voice alone was enough to hold them enthralled; but for those whom it conquered the spell endured when they were far away, and ever they heard that soft voice whispering and urging them. But none were unmoved; none rejected its pleas and its commands without an effort of mind and will, so long as its master had control of it." (The Two Towers, Ch. 10)
If I tried to grasp what Peterson said and make proper sense of it, it was impossible. He uses words like Humpty Dumpty in Alice Through the Looking Glass; every meaning is fluid and a word can mean something different every day. And yet pointing out any contradiction or inconsistency, or even mild questioning, stirs up a frothing rage in his followers.
Vox Day is the Gandalf to Peterson's Saruman, destroying the illusion and showing the man for what he truly is. No doubt he seems harsh and uncouth to those enthralled by Peterson. But in this book, with surgical precision he eviscerates Peterson's writings, smokes out their incoherence and insanity, reveals the bones of their underlying malignancy, and displays the results like a neatly filleted kipper. Sadly, like the kipper - and Saruman's malevolence - Peterson's words may superficially taste good, but their oily stench is likely to linger for some time. That's why this book needs to be spread far and wide, to counteract the spell.
I noticed one paragraph in chapter 15 which I think sums up the book: "The answer is simple: Peterson is attempting to avoid scaring the women and children with the the true nature of his philosophy. The masses are not ready to accept the idea that neither God nor reality nor truth actually exist, therefore it is necessary to very carefully conceal one's true meaning beneath a fog of word-salad that confuses all but the most worthy. In order to maintain his dominance, the philosopher must conceal his secret, because as soon as it is revealed in a straightforward manner, everyone will understand that all Peterson has to offer is warmed-over occult gnosticism. A secret remains at its most powerful when it has not yet been revealed."
By the way, the coruscating and excoriating foreword by Milo is worth the price of the book on its own. Even if you don't read the whole thing, at least read that. Killer line for me: "He [Peterson] is a line of coke masquerading as the Eucharist."
Vox Day's thesis is Peterson is not what he claims to be, he asserts there is a more pernicious underlying message where he is using techniques to influence the reader to become a member of the Jordan Peterson fan club, warning that it is slowly becoming a full blown cult, of the scientology variety mixed with the likes of Aleister Crowley and Helena Blavatsky.
So does the book prove this? No it doesn't, not to say it doesn't have any merit, it does highlight some of Peterson's inconsistencies, highlights some of Peterson's sloppy use of citations from out dated sources, some of which he interprets the complete opposite of what the data actually says. And it does clearly show Peterson's philosophy/ethos of "life is suffering" and his frequent usage of telling his reader/audience what to think, not how to think, all could be argued is a pernicious ethos. These are all valid points.
But the problem is when it comes to accusations of developing into a cult, Vox Day is frequently relying in each chapter on his own personal analysis and interpretation of Peterson's message that it is similar (in his view) to that of cultists. He makes the assumption that Peterson is secretly planning to start a cult, going through each rule and interpreting it to how Vox sees this. Now the problem with this form of argument is these are all fallacious arguments, based on association> Vox relies heavily on this thus discrediting his whole thesis. Perhaps it does have some merit, but either way, the burden of proof with these arguments are lacking for any thoughtful person, although it may persuade others who are easily influenced.
Normally I wouldn't look to much at a author on a book like this, but considering the subject of it, the thesis re Cult developments; I think on this occasion, Vox Day should be looked at, regardless of whether some of the book has merit, the motives behind the book from the self proclaimed "supreme dark lord" should be examined a little, as I believe it is highly questionable.
Vox Day is a pen name for Theodore Beale (aka Teddy Spaghetti). Vox Day means "Voice of God" (also voice of Theo, but either its a highly dubious name for a self professed Christian to give, plus "supreme dark lord") He claims to be a Christian, yet if you look deeper, he doesn't believe in the Trinity, or Jesus is God, something that has more in common with actual cults.
He also has his groups of sycophantic followers, one in particular he boasts of called the "VFM" (vile faceless minions) that in his words "mindlessly obey him", plus other groups called the Reprehensibles, Dread Ilk, The Bears (siphoned from the Owen Benjamin following).
So the question is, is Teddy Spaghetti, motivated to warn Peterson followers of the threat of being involved in a cult (which again, may have some merit) for altruistic reasons, or perhaps he's looking to recruit disillusioned Peterson fans to buy into his own form of "truth telling". If you look at the backgroiund of the author, its highly likely it is the latter.
Ultimately, its worth a read and probably serves as a warning of all kinds of personality cults developing in social media, but be warned, the author without a doubt has his own insidious agenda.
Karl Barth and other “bafflegarble” theologians. Question of time .... I suppose.
I applauded his bloody-mindedness in opposing Canada’s bill C-60, mistaking it for a general resistance to our current SJW-tinged politically correct atmosphere in the Anglophone world. (The infamous Kavanaugh tweet confirms that my estimation was misplaced. Should've known it before with the Faith Goldy incident.)
I followed his doings and watched/listened to a lot of his lectures. Some of them had some real nuggets of truth in them, but then some quite didn’t hit the mark on my own understanding of things – such as his Bible lecture series.
I bought 12 Rules for Life and lapped it up, but still something wasn’t quite right, something I couldn’t put my finger on. But most of the advice, on its surface, was fairly pedestrian, and would appear to be a good starting point for those who might be truly lost.
(I must admit, his rule about petting cats just didn’t strike me as being altogether wise and might belie some hidden psychosis in the man. Okay, I am biased against cats, but, then there was the bit about taking pills, and inviting a crazy person to live with his young family, and then, and then…)
I had bought and was poised to read Maps of Meaning when I accidentally came across Vox Day’s critiques of JBP. I had already read SJWs Always Lie and SJWs Always Double Down, but was unaware that Vox Day maintained a long-running blog.
And in his blog, he pointed to Peterson’s involvement with Agenda 21-style UN work. I followed the links and, yes, it was true. Which immediately got my spidey sense tingling.
And Vox Day has managed to point out what it was that wasn’t quite right.
As someone who had dabbled in the occult in my misspent youth, I was very familiar with some of the teachings of Alistair Crowley, and Vox Day has managed to point to the Crowleyan/Blavatskyist subtext of some of the 12 Rules. Once that filter was placed upon Peterson’s work, it became very clear to me that underneath the unassuming prairie golly-gee-whizness of Peterson’s delivery, there probably lurks something darker.
Read the book for the details. Well worth it.
My only critique is the prodigious use of comments from JBP’s fanboys and ex-fanboys, but Vox Day defends this decision well in one of his recent blog posts.
I never did get around to reading Maps of Meaning.








