Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Judging Thomas: The Life and Times of Clarence Thomas Hardcover – Deckle Edge, August 3, 2004
Customers who bought this item also bought
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
From Publishers Weekly
This in-depth look at the life of Clarence Thomas, who has kept a low public profile for over a decade, is a refreshing change. Foskett, a journalist for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, focuses on Thomas's growth—from his upbringing at the hands of a strict grandfather through his time at Yale Law School and his eventual, albeit controversial, ascension to the Supreme Court. Relying on a mixture of secondary sources and oral interviews, Foskett delves into Thomas's intellectual development, from a flirtation with black power in college to his embrace of the natural law philosophy that dictates his strict reading of the Constitution. While Foskett leaves no stone unturned in detailing Thomas's history, he occasionally is less effective at connecting the dots: is there a connection between Thomas's strict upbringing, his attendance at religious schools and his hard-line judicial philosophy? Foskett is occasionally critical of Thomas (he notes a scandal that dogged Thomas when he headed the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), but mainly argues that Thomas's legal mind has been unfairly criticized because he's a black conservative. Foskett's conclusion that Thomas was likely more truthful at his Senate confirmation hearings than Anita Hill will be a turnoff to some. But those able to suspend political judgment will learn a lot about the court's most controversial justice.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Bookmarks Magazine
Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter Foskett cracked Justice Thomass media-wary shell by approaching him after a Good Friday service. He deserves points for bravery, but most critics agree that this partially authorized biography leaves much to be desired (Thomas did not grant him access to his private papers). It makes sense that the conservative New York Sun would be the lone rave review, since Foskett is highly sympathetic towards Thomas throughout, even defending him against Hills charges (she declined to be interviewed for the book). Others excoriate Foskett for not thoroughly examining the strange pattern of anger and ideological shifts that define Thomass life; more than one critic called Fosketts research shoddy. A highlight? Two sitting members of the Supreme Court went on the record (with complimentary remarks) about Thomas.
Copyright © 2004 Phillips & Nelson Media, Inc.
Top customer reviews
The book did address some of Judge Thomas early social ideas, but the book seem to be written without much input from Judge Thomas. I did not get the sense that I knew Judge Thomas after I completed the book.
I keep asking myself, how did Thomas obviously talented, who benefited throughout his academic and professional life from affirmative action, become the courts most ardent advocate of absolute color blindness in the law? Most people who have experienced in life what Thomas has have become liberals. Why did Thomas become an extreme conservative? I have read the biographies of O’Connor, Ginsburg and Sotomayor who also fought discrimination and benefitted from affirmative action. They appear grateful for affirmative action and look at it positively. Ginsburg like Thomas had great difficulties obtain a job after law school due to discrimination, Thomas because he was black and Ginsburg because she was a Jewish woman. Both overcame the obstacles and advanced their career in spite of this discrimination. How can he have become the current court’s staunchest adherent to the so-called original intent of the constitutional framers, when so many of these framers would have seen him as less than a man? Foskett concludes that Thomas’s life and philosophy are a sequence of extreme reaction to terrible shaming events in his past. His pattern has been to join groups then break with them over an act of racial shaming. He apparently has not been able to overcome a lingering reaction to his confirmation hearing.
After reading this book I came away with a better understanding of the man but with a lot of questions about his judicial and political philosophy. The book is well worth reading. I read this as an eBook on my Kindle app for my iPad.