Buy new:
$38.43$38.43
FREE delivery:
Feb 21 - 27
Ships from: Book Depository US Sold by: Book Depository US
Buy Used: $14.99
Other Sellers on Amazon
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.


Just a Dog: Understanding Animal Cruelty and Ourselves (Animals, Culture, and Society) Paperback – June 16, 2006
Price | New from | Used from |
- Kindle
$15.31 Read with Our Free App - Hardcover
$81.13 - Paperback
$38.43
Enhance your purchase
- Print length232 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherTemple University Press
- Publication dateJune 16, 2006
- Dimensions6 x 0.4 x 9 inches
- ISBN-101592134726
- ISBN-13978-1592134724
![]() |
Popular titles by this author
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Product details
- Publisher : Temple University Press (June 16, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 232 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1592134726
- ISBN-13 : 978-1592134724
- Item Weight : 11.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.4 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,378,459 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #957 in Animal Rights (Books)
- #3,094 in Violence in Society (Books)
- #3,803 in Medical Social Psychology & Interactions
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Arnie Arluke is Professor Emeritus of Sociology at Northeastern University and Senior Scholar at the Tufts Center for Animals and Public Policy. His research examines conflicts and contradictions in human-animal relationships. His writing has received awards from the American Sociological Association, the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction, the International Association for Human-Animal Interaction Organizations, and the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. He formerly edited with Clinton Sanders the Animals, Culture, and Society series for Temple University Press.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Among the relevant points presented are:
1. "[W]orkers in animal laboratories or slaughterhouses, for example, are thought to undergo desensitization as a coping mechanism." P8
2. "[SPCA] agents think of professionalism as an ability to maintain emotional distance form cases." P43
3. Adolescents who engage in animal cruelty, which the author calls dirty play, sometimes do it to see if what adults say about things as cruelty is true and at other times, do it simply out of boredom. P56
However, I found the best chapter of the book to be the one on animal hoarders, especially as in my home city of Charleston, we are currently hearing about a man who killed over 200 hunting dogs, and was still found with about 45 more malnourished dogs at the time of his arrest, when neighbors alerted authorities to a terrible smell coming from his property. And just as the book predicted his defense is that he was simply a kindly man who wanted to help as many animals as he could, but things simply got out of hand. Yeah, and his saintly nature is why they found 200+ animal corpses in various stages of decay on his property. Having read this one chapter in the book almost makes it unnecessary to read the daily news on this event as it was all foretold in the book with the names and places changed. The author and I may disagree on this point, but I find these individuals to be suffering from anxiety types of disorders, and as he stated in the book, the man did not get along with other people, which is why it took the stink from 200 dead hunting dogs to cause neighbors to complain to local authorities. I think we can say this is an obsessive compulsive type of person, who becomes anxious at the lack of human to human contact, then displaces that to human animal contact, and then gets upset when the animals do not fulfill all his needs, so finally has to kill them as they are suffering due to his lack of proper care, although he believes he is actually helping them.
The author also gives a nice presentation on the difference in no-kill and open-admission shelters and how the workers from each think they are the real saviors of animals and the other type of shelter is exhibiting a form of cruelty by either killing what they consider to be adoptable animals or merely keeping animals alive with minimal socialization for months and sometimes over a year while waiting for the right person to adopt them.
Throughout the book the author describes how we anthropomorphize animal actions by intertwining their actions with our own fears and anxiety over what constitutes cruelty. Because what constitutes cruelty varies by culture from one group to another based on the sociological concepts of folkways and mores.
This is a must read for all those interested in animal welfare regardless of your specialty field or even if just concerned as a lover of a companion animal, i.e. - a PET. You may not agree with ever point, but it is a well presented argument on the whole.
The author's mechanical use of the distinction between a "normative" and a "descriptive" approach (i.e. that he is not making judgments, but rather simply giving an objective account) ill fits his subject; his approach to it is also rather naïve at this point in the history of the social sciences. The main upshot is a rather flattened account of what Arluke himself recognizes as a morally, legally, culturally, emotionally complex and compelling subject.
Arluke draws on the work of some truly original and interesting thinkers - notably, Clifford Geertz and Claude Levi-Strauss - unfortunately, to very little effect. His use of Levi-Strauss's analysis of why animals are "good to think" is especially unfortunate; in calling animal cruelty "good to think", Arluke simply sows confusion in the mind of anyone who has felt truly enlightened by Levi-Strauss's brilliant analysis of totemism .
My own favorite sentence in the book comes in the last paragraph, as the author is wrestling with the constraints imposed by his own concept of what is proper behavior for a sociologist: "I certainly struggled for the right words to describe the mistreatment of animals, but no matter how I expressed my thinking, it always fell short of what I suspected was the reality." One virtue this book definitely does have is honesty.
Although extremely informative, it should be updated (i.e., Utah is not an entire state of 'no kill' policies, although it is striving to do so).
Top reviews from other countries
