Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
Justification: Understanding the Classic Reformed Doctrine Paperback – August 1, 2008
"Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress"
Is the world really falling apart? Is the ideal of progress obsolete? Cognitive scientist and public intellectual Steven Pinker urges us to step back from the gory headlines and prophecies of doom, and instead, follow the data: In seventy-five jaw-dropping graphs, Pinker shows that life, health, prosperity, safety, peace, knowledge, and happiness are on the rise. Learn more
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
"John Fesko has given the church a thorough and welcome treatment of the doctrine of justification. It is reliable, Reformed, and relevant. Now I know where to direct students, ministers, and interested congregants for a 'one stop shop' overview of justification by faith alone." --Guy Prentiss Waters
"John Fesko has an uncanny ability to tackle difficult subjects and make them clear to a wide audience, and this book does just that. So many important and timely topics are covered: the covenant of works, union with Christ, the New Perspective on Paul, Eastern Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism. I heartily recommend this work." --Bryan D. Estelle
"By the author's frank admission, there is nothing new in this book, and therein lies the value of this remarkable study. It is an encyclopedic treatment of what Calvin called the 'main hinge on which religion turned,' and an indispensable resource for the defense of the Reformed faith in our time." --John Muether
About the Author
J. V. Fesko (BA, Georgia State University; MA, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary; PhD, University of Aberdeen) is working with the Evangelical Theological Society, the Society of Biblical Literature and the Institute for Biblical Research.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Fesko responds: "Can such a fine distinction be supported by the grammar alone...What difference exists between the two? `Corresponding to' is common in reference to the precise and impartial standard of judgment that will be applied on the great Day.
Gaffin and Venema fail to account for judgment according to works for the wicked....According to Gaffin's interpretation, are the wicked judged according to their works, but the works are not the ground of their condemnation? Romans 4:4--"now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as WHAT IS DUE."
Surely there are many unanswered questions. If the non-elect are condemned ON ACCOUNT OF THEIR WORKS, how do the elect live with the notion that works of faith are necessary for their justification? I will make one simple point that Fesko (also Caneday, correcting Piper) makes: God does not count faith as the righteousness.
Neither the initial act of faith nor the continuing acts of faith are the basis of justification. God counts the death of Christ for the elect alone as the righteousness. The elect have legal union with Christ's obedience to death for the elect. The elect come to share in this righteousness by legal imputation. The righteousness credited ( a free gift received by imputation, Romans 5:17) results in the justification of elect.
btw: Even though Richard Gaffin supports Shepherd, he should not to be confused with Shepherd. See my Amazon review of Gaffin's By Faith, Not by Sight, another Oak Hill lecture.
1. ... in Church History
2. ... and Prolegomena
3. The Structure of Redemptive History
4. ... and the Covenant of Works
5. ... and the Work of Christ
6. ... in Its Historical Context
7. ... by Faith Alone
8. ... and the New Perspective on Paul
9. ... and Imputation
10. ... and Union with Christ
11. ... and Sanctification
12. ... and Final Judgment
13. ... and the Church
14. ... and the Roman Catholic Church
15. ... and the Eastern orthodox Church
Does that whet your theological appetite?
This isn't some milky introductory work either, there's real meat Fesko serves up. Fesko pulls from all sorts of corners, profiting from all aspects of theological loci - biblical, systematic, exegetical, historical etc., in explaining and defending the classical, Reformed (Pauline!) doctrine of justification by faith alone. The issues discussed in the chapters are so wide-ranging, the arguments so weighty, and his interlocutors so many, a detailed, even semi-detailed, review doesn't seem feasible on goodreads character limits. So below I'll offer the basic resources he pulls from to argue for and defend the doctrine of justification, and then I'll briefly discuss his interlocutors.
Fesko makes much of the two-age eschatological construct, as seen especially in the writings of Paul. This stems from his insistence that one not divorce the ordo salutis from the historia salutis. That is, we need to look not only at the application of justification to the individual and how it relates to the other elements of redemption, but we need to look at what time it is in redemptive history too.
Eschatology isn't just dealing with the final few days of history and the time after Jesus' return. We live in "the last days" now, says Paul. So Jesus, the last Adam, has inaugurated the eschaton. In his death and resurrection, the verdict of the final judgment has been brought foreword in history, declared in the present. Thus those who are united to Christ have already been judged and found innocent. They have been given his righteousness. The have been raised "according to the inner man" and now only wait the raising of the "outer man" by means of the bodily resurrection which is simply the visible manifestation of what is true of those who have placed their faith in Christ. (Fesko makes use of and profits from the view that the general resurrection, the Parousia, and the final judgment are not separate events but one single event.) By faith alone we are propelled into the indefectible state of the last Adam. We are not returned to "protology;" to the state Adam was in while in the Garden-temple (see book for an excellent discussion on Adam, the Garden-temple (relying ob Beale's excellent work here), and the covenant of works).
So we who place our faith in Christ are part of the eschatological Adamic humanity. We are the bride of Christ, the eschatological Eve. This is had by faith alone. But this does not lead to antinomianism, especially if one takes note of "what time it is," i.e., the historia salutis. In "the last days" God, by His Spirit, causes his people to walk in his ways. He writes his law on their heart. Thus antinomianism forgets our place in redemptive history. Works are thus necessary for salvation in the sense that they are the inevitable fruit of our justification, justification cannot be divorced from the work of last Adam, and hence the inauguration of the eschaton whereby God's justified people will have his law writ large on their heart. But nomianism is avoided too since the ground of justification is extra nos, the active and passive obedience of Christ out side us, and the sole instrument of justification is faith alone. Faith trusts and rests in Christ. It is by faith alone that we are saved, but that faith is never alone in that it is accompanied by the works promised to be a part of the eschatological age brought about by the last Adam.
Emphasizing the historia with the ordo doesn't mean we ignore the ordo. This helps us in specifying the ground and nature of justification and all other aspects of our redemption. The ordo is needed to distinguish works from our justification. It helps us reflect the logical priorities in our redemption as set forth in Scripture. Paul doesn't bring union with Christ to Galatia to confront the Judaizers with, he brings justification. Good works must logically come after justification. Without the ordo, the gospel is lost.
These are some of the categories and arguments Fesko invokes to explain and defend the doctrine of justification by faith alone. He invokes imputation, law/Gospel hermeneutic, Covenant of Works, Redemptive history, and biblical, systematic, and exegetical theology with great profit and defends them against myriad attacks. He looks at contemporary literature on Second-Temple Judaism. He even discusses, though somewhat briefly, the Greek philosophical presuppositions of Roman Catholic understandings of salvation and anthropology, benefiting from some trenchant critiques of RCC/Thomistic views of our knowledge of God, faith and reason, and anthropology by Cornelius Van Til.
When he turns to criticisms and critics of the classical Reformed doctrine of justification, Fesko deals with almost every challenge, and almost every challenger to the Reformed doctrine of justification. As you should expect, he spends the majority of his efforts dealing with those of the New Perspective on Paul, NPP. He ably explains the position of many of the top advocates of the NPP, and then subjects them all to blistering critiques, spending most of his time on N.T. Wright. He really shows that, for all their erudition, advocates of NPP are rather ignorant of the Reformers they attack, the divide between Protestantism and Rome, exegesis of relevant texts, and important systematic doctrines.
He interacts with ecumenicalist attempts at a feigned, forced, and alethically disrespectful "resolution" between Reformed and RCC explications of the doctrine of justification. In Jeremiahic style, Fesko shows that the eccuenicalists "dress the wound of my people as though it were not serious. `Peace, peace,' they say, when there is no peace" (6:14). Basically, if you make things sloppy enough, anything looks like it could belong there.
Fesko interacts with both the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, showing that: (a) there is no unity to be had between their views and classical protestant ones on the issue of justification without such major concessions that the RC and EO churches would be unrecognizable, and (b) their views on the matter are such that "they preach another gospel" (yet Fesko allows that there is a church among the apostate institution of the RCC and EOC). He notes that all of these contra-protestant positions end up just not offering good news.
I'll close this all-too-brief review with Fesko's conclusion: "In the end, the doctrine of justification by faith alone turns on the question of whether sinful man will take shelter in the righteousness of Christ. It is the glorious exchange where man's sin and guilt are imputed to Christ, and Christ's active obedience is imputed to his people. Sola fide is indeed the main hinge on which all religion turns, the only foundation for our salvation. It is the article on which the church stands or falls" (413).
Most recent customer reviews
In the stirring, yet astute volume, "Justification" by J.V.Truth, Knowledge and the Reason for God: The Defense of the Rational Assurance of ChristianityRead more