Buy Used and Save: Buy a Used "B+W 67mm Kaesemann Circular Polarizer with Multi-R..." and save 67% off the $264.00 list price. Buy with confidence as the condition of this item and its timely delivery are guaranteed under the "Amazon A-to-z Guarantee". See all Used offers.
B+W 67mm Kaesemann Circular Polarizer with Multi-Resistant Coating
- Enter your model number to make sure this fits.
- This filter uses our standard B+W F-Pro filter mount, which has a front accessory thread and is made of brass.
- MRC by B+W is not only an extraordinarily effective multiple layer coating.
- It is also harder than glass, so that it protects filters from scratches,
- And it is also water and dirt repellent, thus facilitating filter maintenance.
- Manufactured from Water-White Schott Glass
- MRC by B+W is not only an extraordinarily effective multiple layer coating, it is also harder than glass,
- Protects filters from scratches, and it is also water and dirt repellent, thus facilitating filter maintenance.
There is a newer model of this item:
Customers who bought this item also bought
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Special offers and product promotions
|Package Height||0.87 x 3.7 x 3.7 inches|
|Shipping Weight||0.18 pounds|
Compare to similar items
This item B+W 67mm Kaesemann Circular Polarizer with Multi-Resistant Coating
|Shipping||—||FREE Shipping||FREE Shipping||FREE Shipping||FREE Shipping||FREE Shipping|
|Sold By||Available from these sellers||Amazon.com||Amazon.com||Amazon.com||Photo Savings||Big pineapple|
|Item Dimensions||2.73 x 2.73 x 0.37 in||0.75 x 3.75 x 3.75 in||0.75 x 3.75 x 3.75 in||3.6 x 4.1 x 0.8 in||1.5 x 2.5 x 0.3 in||3.7 x 3.7 x 0.8 in|
Circular polarizing filters are made for all cameras with beam splitters in the light paths of their TTL exposure meter and with autofocus lenses. Circular polarization has the same pictorial effect as linear polarization, but allows for proper exposure metering and/or autofocus distance settings. The "high-end" polarizing foils of the Käsemann-type filters are neutral in color, they have a higher efficiency than conventional polarizing foils and they are cemented between high-grade plane-parallel optical glass. The resulting sandwich is then precision-polished again to achieve highly accurate plane-parallel surfaces. Subsequently they are edge-sealed to protect the foil against humidity. Discriminating photographers regard the B+W Käsemann-Type Polarizing Filter to be the very best of all polarizing filters. They are well suited for applications that require the highest possible imaging quality, especially with high-speed telephoto lenses and apochromatic lenses.
Top customer reviews
This filter is a marvel of engineering. The build quality is simply top-notch (the filter is Made in Germany).
This Filter vs A Non-Käsemann Filter
I debated between this filter and the other B+W filter, the B+W 77mm Circular Polarizer MRC Filter. According to B+W (Schneider Optics), the Käsemann uses the same MRC (Multi-Resistant Coating) technology, but it's one-up on the non-Käsemann filter because it uses "high-end" polarizing foils. To quote Schneider Optics:
"The \"high-end\" polarizing foils of the Käsemann-type filters are neutral in color, they have a higher efficiency than conventional polarizing foils and they are cemented between high-grade plano-parallel optical glass."
Another advantage the Käsemann filter has over the non-Käsemann filter is that it is edge-sealed to protect the polarizing foil from humidity.
Since the Käsemann filter is only a tad more expensive (as of this writing), the choice between the Käsemann and the non-Käsemann filter was a no-brainer for me.
A common advice photographers give regarding filters is to pick a filter that fits the largest of your lenses so you can use the same filter for your smaller lenses as well (by using Step-Up Rings). Since step-up rings allow you to use this filter for your smaller lenses, this could be the only circular polarizer filter you need for *all* of your lenses with varying filter thread sizes (77mm, 72mm, 67mm, 62mm, 58mm, 55mm, 52mm, and 49mm).
If you have a high quality lens, you shouldn't scrimp on the filter because your pictures will be only as good as your lowest-quality lens component allow. This filter may be pricey, but it's well worth the money.
Some of my information came from Lenstip.com. One thing that impressed me was the lack of flare the B+W had. I might have even considered the slim version of this filter which was rated #1 overall, but I opted for a different approach which, so far, has saved me some money, and might reduce or eliminate problems with vignetting or homogeneity towards the outer edges of any filter...even though this filter was exceptional in both of these categories.
My initial lenses which I wanted to use with this filter are the 18mm-55mm Nikon DX VR and the 55mm-200mm DX VR. Neither of these lenses would be considered exceptional professional equipment, but I wanted to plan for the future where I might start using more expensive professional lenses and didn't want to have filters which would limit the performance of the lens.
I chose to purchase 52mm to 72mm filter adapters from Goja (great quality BTW) for the two lenses above and then get the best filters I could afford in the 72mm size, as opposed to the native 52mm size of the lens interface. I was new to this concept, but a few of the more professional photographers have said this concept is a good one (It is interesting that I have seen very little information on this approach).
I didn't want to start investing in 77mm or 82mm filters since, like most things, the "extreme" practical limits of any product usually sky-rocket the cost. My reasoning was the 72mm size was a sizable upgrade to the 52mm lens and adapting the 72mm filter to the 52mm lens would effectively utilize the most perfect inner section of the filter. Additionally, I reasoned, any vignetting would be eliminated unless it came from the 52mm-72mm adapter ring. And, then additionally, it would probably be no problem to stack two filters such as a UV-Haze and the CPL without concern for vignetting.
Please understand I am not a professional photographer. Most of the above just seems logical to my engineer brain although my Grandfather was a professional photographer and I spent many many hours developing film in a dark room and have taken 1000's of pictures throughout the years.
Bottom Line: After using this filter for several hours of overall use and over the past month or two, my impressions are as follows:
-build quality is gorgeous--it feels like quality, and if there are any issues with threading and un-threading the filter into the lens (as a small number of reviews have mentioned), I have not experienced that since once threaded into the adapter ring, it stays with it and never comes out. The adapter rings are inexpensive and seem to screw and un-screw with no issue...so I would rather take the chance of wearing out an adapter ring's threads than an expensive filter's threads.
-picture quality is gorgeous--obviously this can be subjective to any degree depending on the specific requirements or desires of the user. I can only say the effect of the polarizer is, in my opinion, very natural and obvious. There is no flare that I have seen in more than 100 pictures with my Nikon D90 using both the 18-55 and the 55-200 lenses. And possibly any benefit of having the 72mm filter on the 52mm lens might be imagined, but it seems to work perfectly and looks good too.
-operation--the filter polarity adjustment ring is VERY smooth...I can't imagine it would make a difference if it were somehow "better" or smoother.
I considered other brands, but some issues with quality control and other things swayed me away from them. The B+W is not cheap, but the level of confidence in the build quality and picture quality easily justify the extra cost.