A great book for those following Supreme Court hearings. Ms. Karlan has laid out a half dozen issues settled by the Court. In the process, she explains carefully and patiently why those insisting on an "original reading" of the Constitution's language are just wrong. The Constitution was carefully written to permit our republic lots of flexibility in adjusting to new challenges that the founders could not possibly foresee. Its language is sparse, and intended to lay out general humanitarian principles, not specific positions to be taken in the future for all time.
Yet the Supreme Court has responded to the challenge of the industrial revolution, computer age, new technologies, vastly new medical discoveries.
Not everyone agrees with the Court's decisions in Roe v. Wade, or Citizen's United v. FEC, for example. But they are reasonably consistent with prior decisions. It's up to the Congress and the people to correct the court should certain decisions are considered by enough people to be unreasonable - and the Constitution provides a mechanism for doing just that.
- Amazon Business : For business-only pricing, quantity discounts and FREE Shipping. Register a free business account






