Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Kennedy Justice Hardcover – June 1, 1971
- Print length482 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherScribner
- Publication dateJune 1, 1971
- ISBN-100689104138
- ISBN-13978-0689104138
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : Scribner; First Edition (June 1, 1971)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 482 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0689104138
- ISBN-13 : 978-0689104138
- Item Weight : 3 pounds
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,844,573 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,068 in United States Judicial Branch
- #19,436 in Political Leader Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Navasky's goal with Kennedy Justice is to focus on the powers and limits of the office of Attorney General under Robert Kennedy. Navasky argues, with reason, that RFK was in a unique position to take advantage of his office because of his unique relationship with President JFK. Navasky's approach is unique in focusing not just on this period of RFK's life but also focusing so narrowly on his performance as Attorney General. Unlike many books about the Kennedys, Navasky keeps his promise and his focus. This book doesn't devolve into a general biography of RFK.
Navasky does an outstanding job portraying bureaucratic politics. He gets into the minutiae of how RFK managed - or failed to manage - the FBI and civil rights. Navasky shows how an exchange of particular memos or telephone calls had profound implications for Kennedy's ability to rein in J. Edgar Hoover. For example, Hoover used memoranda on wiretapping and bugging to implicate RFK in condoning those activities. Navasky also uses extensive quotes or transcripts from calls, memos, etc to convey the day-to-day activities of the Kennedy Justice Department. This allows Navasky to provide a more nuanced and realistic look at government administration than most books about the Kennedys, which tend to focus on the drama or personalities involved.
The extent to which the FBI obstructed Justice Department investigations and attempts to enforce civil rights is downright shocking. While many other books have been written about the FBI, Navasky does a particularly good job trying to understand the institution. Navasky likens the FBI under Hoover to a secret society, which might sound extreme but actually works quite well as an analogy. Navasky is very through in his exploration of reasons for the FBI's - and, by extension, Hoover's - intransigence.
The book is on shakier grounds when assessing the motivations of Kennedy's staff. Navasky attempts to figure out why RFK did not exert more control over Hoover. He tends to conclude that RFK simply conceded to bureaucratic realities and thought compromise would yield better results. However, there are later allegations that RFK worried Hoover had compromising information about JFK's sexual exploits. There is also relatively little exploration of the political deal-making and electoral politics that often influenced RFK's ability to enforce civil rights in the South. This certainly doesn't undermine the book's credibility, but readers should be aware that Navasky could not always tell the full story (partly due to the lack of information at the time he was writing).
Given that the book was initially written during the early 1970s, I wish this new edition had an editor's note or even new chapters putting Navasky's work in context. I have read several books about RFK but admit I did not focus on the issues discussed in Kennedy Justice. I don't have a good sense of how research during the past four decades has influenced our understanding of Kennedy's tenure as Attorney General. To my knowledge, Navasky's Kennedy Justice is still the only book focused exclusively on this aspect of RFK's life, but I can't imagine we haven't learned anything new during the interim.
For some readers, this lack of modern context might prove even more of a hinderance to appreciating the book. Navasky assumes most readers will know the basic history of the early 1960s, including key figures such as George Wallace. That's probably fair for most readers, but be aware that this is not a book for beginners. Navasky does not spend much time introducing periphery characters or events. We don't beta 50 page digression into the history of the FBI. I for one appreciate this because Navasky keeps the focus on RFK's attorney generalship, but I'd also advise that readers should at least have a passing familiarity with RFK's life and the civil rights movement.
Overall, I'd definitely recommend this book to anybody interested in RFK, but also scholars interested in bureaucratic politics and law enforcement.



