Other Sellers on Amazon
$6.07
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
allnewbooks
Sold by:
allnewbooks
(267857 ratings)
92% positive over last 12 months
92% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
$10.07
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by:
307 Books
Sold by:
307 Books
(23 ratings)
96% positive over last 12 months
96% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$11.31
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
The Reading Nook - Texas
Sold by:
The Reading Nook - Texas
(25631 ratings)
71% positive over last 12 months
71% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Killed Cartoons: Casualties from the War on Free Expression Paperback – Illustrated, March 17, 2007
by
David Wallis
(Editor)
-
Print length288 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
-
Publication dateMarch 17, 2007
-
Dimensions6.1 x 0.8 x 8.2 inches
-
ISBN-100393329240
-
ISBN-13978-0393329247
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
WhitePaperback$16.95$16.95FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Sep 4
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Operating under the premise that it's fun to get a glimpse of something verboten, Wallis (Killed: Great Journalism Too Hot to Print) presents dozens of political cartoons yanked prior to publication. Functioning as both a compendium and history of political cartooning, the book is full of cartoons, each accompanied by a brief narrative describing why it was killed, and though some cartoons seem fairly innocuous, the background provides intriguing context. Perennially controversial cartoonist Ted Rall has several entries, including one from 1991 captioned "How Gulf War Veterans Like To Spend Their Summers," which features a kooky-looking guy burying beachgoers. It was inspired, Wallis writes, "by a report in Newsday that U.S. Gulf War veterans might be having some remorse about using tanks outfitted with earthmoving plows to bury Iraqi troops alive." Older cartoons are included, as well, like a David Low cartoon killed in 1937 that "skewered the imperialist ambitions of Fascist leaders in Spain, Japan, Germany and Italy." Catholicism gets spanked, too, as do a host of presidents, notably Clinton, Bush I and II and Reagan. With 100 illustrations, this is a commendable collection.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
If editorial cartoonists are the court jesters of journalism, using humor to speak truth to power, I^Killed Cartoons demonstrates that the monarchs who run newspapers have grown increasingly unwilling to listen. The collection rescues dozens of cartoons rejected for politics, offending advertisers, or just plain effrontery. Their artists include Pulitzer Prize winners Garry Trudeau, Doug Marlette, Paul Conrad, Paul Szep, and Mike Luckovich; renowned illustrators Al Hirschfeld and Edward Sorel; and young turks Ted Rall and Keith Knight and comics creators Carol Lay, Ward Sutton, and Peter Kuper. Sometimes the editorial vetoes are understandable, such as the I^Los Angeles Times spiking Conrad's rendition of a Republican elephant humping a Democrat donkey, but just as often what has been squelched is surprisingly benign. Historical examples include a 1952 Herblock cartoon excoriating McCarthy I^ and Nixon and a 1968 Norman Rockwell illustration for I^ Look, but "old" in this book means 1982 or 1991. Most selections are recent, attesting to increased media cowardice and irrelevance. But not all cartoon killers are daily papers or otherwise corporate-owned. A handful have been such purportedly open-minded publications as the I^ Nation, the I^ New Yorker,and I^ Mother Jones. Gordon Flagg
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
A sequential reading reveals Wallis's thoughtful editorial choices as each entry builds subtly on the last. Powerful. -- Library Journal
A very positive thumbs up...a very well-gathered collection and amazing in its range. -- Gahan Wilson, cartoonist and author
[V]aluable illustration...that freedom of speech is being eroded away and nobody is either aware of it, or cares. -- Pat Oliphant, cartoonist
A very positive thumbs up...a very well-gathered collection and amazing in its range. -- Gahan Wilson, cartoonist and author
[V]aluable illustration...that freedom of speech is being eroded away and nobody is either aware of it, or cares. -- Pat Oliphant, cartoonist
About the Author
David Wallis, editor of the acclaimed Killed: Great Journalism Too Hot to Print, is the founder of Featurewell.com, a syndicate that markets articles by more than 1,500 writers and journalists. He lives in the New York City area.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company; Illustrated edition (March 17, 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0393329240
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393329247
- Item Weight : 12.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.1 x 0.8 x 8.2 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,733,056 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,627 in Censorship & Politics
- #3,396 in Journalism Writing Reference (Books)
- #4,285 in Comic Strips (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
19 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on August 24, 2017
Verified Purchase
The chosen topic of this book is right on. However, the analysis of the subject matter and chosen cartoons have been filtered through a very particular worldview lens. Who gets to decide when we are exercising free speech (considered a fundamental right) and when we are exercising hate speech (considered a taboo)? American journalist and attorney Glenn Greenwald aptly said, "Free speech, in the hands of many Westerners, actually means: it is vital that the ideas I like be protected, and the right to offend groups I dislike be cherished; anything else is fair game. It's free speech if it involves ideas I like or attacks groups I dislike, but it's something different when I am the one who is offended."
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 25, 2014
Verified Purchase
I think free speech is always a good thing, perhaps especially when it's way out of line. Most if not all of these cartoons fall into that category. As a conservative leaning independent who has voted liberal when that candidate was the best for the job, I note that the majority of these cartoons are liberals attacking conservatives. The American Criminal Liberties Union not withstanding, I've observed that the left is in the majority when political comment becomes vicious, petty and belittling. Perhaps that is due to the overwhelming majority of liberals in the media professions. It is interesting to find out that at least some of the most spiteful and malicious comments actually do not get into general circulation, though I suspect that is due more to cooler heads not wanting to be too obvious when dealing with what they see as the easily confused public. I, for one, would like to see all of these offensive cartoons published in every editorial page in the country. It might open a few eyes, which, of course, would not be a good thing for the left wing.
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2017
Verified Purchase
Readers will understand why these cartoons were killed and they should be all the more pissed off in knowing why.
Reviewed in the United States on September 18, 2010
Verified Purchase
This book was not what I expected...but it ended up being better. It's does feature cartoons that have been "killed" by various publications for various reasons but the focus is more on the reasons then the cartoons themselves. That said, I found it a very interesting read.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2015
Verified Purchase
Great book, insightful and a must read for anyone interested in political cartoons
and the editing process.
Highly recommend.
and the editing process.
Highly recommend.
Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2007
Verified Purchase
The Book was good enough it just wasnt quit what I was looking foward to
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 17, 2011
Killed Cartoons contains a good collection of censored cartoons by major practitioners like Gary Trudeau, Herblock, Mike Luckovich, and others but nothing before the 1930s. Surprisingly, there is even an illustration by "family friendly" artist Norman Rockwell. More pages are taken up with commentary than cartoons which is not really a problem except that the commentary precedes the cartoon. It should be the other way around. Disappointingly, the commentary often discusses cartoons which are not shown in the book.
Topics include abortion, sex, war, religion, pollution, corporate and government misbehavior, and the media itself. Commentary includes the varied reasons behind censorship: liberal or conservative editorial prejudices, left and right political correctness, scatological and sexual explicitness, simple bad taste, fear of reprisal by corporate sponsors, fanatics and fundamentalists, and fear of offending the sensibilities of their perceived audience. The author also points out that the nature of the cartoon as form of expression, its immediacy, and its power to evoke a gut level reaction also discourages nuance, subtlety, and "balance". This and its relative permanence as print media and its potential availability to young readers combine to make cartoons more heavily censored than, say, the routines of late night TV comedians. There is an intelligent discussion of the evolving nature of cartoons and their censorship but nothing groundbreaking here. This book is a worthy contribution to the study of media, exploring an aspect not always included in the general discussion, but it is not essential reading.
Topics include abortion, sex, war, religion, pollution, corporate and government misbehavior, and the media itself. Commentary includes the varied reasons behind censorship: liberal or conservative editorial prejudices, left and right political correctness, scatological and sexual explicitness, simple bad taste, fear of reprisal by corporate sponsors, fanatics and fundamentalists, and fear of offending the sensibilities of their perceived audience. The author also points out that the nature of the cartoon as form of expression, its immediacy, and its power to evoke a gut level reaction also discourages nuance, subtlety, and "balance". This and its relative permanence as print media and its potential availability to young readers combine to make cartoons more heavily censored than, say, the routines of late night TV comedians. There is an intelligent discussion of the evolving nature of cartoons and their censorship but nothing groundbreaking here. This book is a worthy contribution to the study of media, exploring an aspect not always included in the general discussion, but it is not essential reading.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 15, 2007
Wherein you find examples that the press within the USA is timid and still serves the whims of people who pay the advestisements and those who own the papers and whose leaning in the political spectrum often rule over sensibilities.
A previous complaint that there is too much text is irrelevant. The substance is in the illustrations and the text. They go hand in hand.
As a sidebar to this book I'd recommend the combined collections of Stephan Pastis PEARLS BEFORE SWINE, where he has written of censorship on his own little morbid strip, showing that the fears of offending any audience still rides high.
As it is, this book is pretty good. It's funny, the land of the free still cowers at offending the guys who advertise, when a little bit of truth pokes its ugly head upright.
And the Philadelphia Inquirer was the only place USA wise that printed some of those "Muhammed" political cartoons that caused an uproar in Europe.
Boo!
None of those here though.
A previous complaint that there is too much text is irrelevant. The substance is in the illustrations and the text. They go hand in hand.
As a sidebar to this book I'd recommend the combined collections of Stephan Pastis PEARLS BEFORE SWINE, where he has written of censorship on his own little morbid strip, showing that the fears of offending any audience still rides high.
As it is, this book is pretty good. It's funny, the land of the free still cowers at offending the guys who advertise, when a little bit of truth pokes its ugly head upright.
And the Philadelphia Inquirer was the only place USA wise that printed some of those "Muhammed" political cartoons that caused an uproar in Europe.
Boo!
None of those here though.
Top reviews from other countries
Scott Nesbitt
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 27, 2014Verified Purchase
thanks
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: history of censorship, cartoon science, editorial design, science cartoons



