Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$32.95$32.95
FREE delivery: Wednesday, April 10 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $28.06
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Killing the Host: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy Paperback – August 20, 2015
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length440 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherIslet
- Publication dateAugust 20, 2015
- Dimensions6.69 x 0.89 x 9.61 inches
- ISBN-103981484282
- ISBN-13978-3981484281
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you
Product details
- Publisher : Islet; First Edition (August 20, 2015)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 440 pages
- ISBN-10 : 3981484282
- ISBN-13 : 978-3981484281
- Item Weight : 1.53 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.69 x 0.89 x 9.61 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #629,261 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #482 in Political Economy
- #960 in Economic Conditions (Books)
- #1,272 in Economic History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In my area of the world, this is especially true. American Optical, with beginnings in 1833, was a powerhouse, with its great factory complex in Southbridge. Once dominant in its field, it is now defunct, brought out by others.
Driving along the Quaboag River on Route 67 in Warren, you can see the Wright's Mill Complex. It seemed like everyone knew someone who worked there. Since 2008, no more.
There are still factories, but they are all too often, sans workers. How could our region, let alone country go from having workshops everywhere, all highly productive, to the point where they have almost died out?
One man has an answer, debt.
Michael Hudson is a research professor of economics at the University of Missouri Kansas City. Your reviewer discovered him accidentally. As a history nerd, I came across his writing and was surprised to find out that his research found the builders of the pyramids were not slaves but well paid, skilled workers. It's too bad Charlton Heston and Yul Brynner are no longer with us, as some corrections need to be made to their movie, the Ten Commandments.
Mr. Hudson avers that the debts owed to the FIRE (Finance, Insurance, Real Estate) sector were causing labor and industry to suffer. American labor, squeezed by debt becomes over priced as do American products. Debt is taking a greater and greater share of revenues from non-financial businesses, and workers have to pay more in interest such that they are on the way to debt peonage.
According to Professor Hudson, we are headed to the day when the parasite of a financialized economy will kill the host, or the debts will have to be reduced or even forgiven. Your average free-marketer might be scandalized by the idea, but it is no more unfair than the bailing out of the banks in 2008.
The concept is one that raised its head with the phenomenon of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Mr. Hudson, among others, noted that student loans exceed credit card debt. Paying that debt takes a toll on graduates whose salary prospects may be less than what they can afford to service the loan.
As Michael Hudson states many times in his book, “Debts that can't be paid, won't be.” The FIRE Sector would want it to be for the debtors to sell off assets. As there are less and less assets with enough equity, that is not going to be too popular and one day it will be impossible. A reduction of debt or even forgiveness would be inevitable as an alternative to national ruin.
Many consider Hudson a bit of a commie as he participates in Marxist conferences and has good words to say about Karl. To be fair, he has some nice things to say about Adam Smith and Classical Economics.
He has, however a special dislike for free market economists. He sees them as champions of the FIRE sector. Free market advocates would disagree with that characterization. They would be adamantly against the existence of a central bank and would claim the crony capitalist shenanigans were only possible because there is a Federal Reserve. That discussion is for another day. If there must be a central bank, the author's points are well taken.
In his last chapter, he offers Reforms to Restore Industrial Prosperity. Will they bring economic nirvana? Some make common sense, such as writing down debts that can't be paid and letting people stay in their homes rather than protect the second homes of Goldman and Morgan execs.
His suggestion to tax economic rent to save it from being capitalized in interest payments has merit in that we should have a tax structure that promotes production over financialization. Is his emphasis on land taxes as the way to do it the right idea?
Revoking the tax deductibility of interest has some good arguments, but will not go over too well with every home buyer.
The public banking option, similar to the Japanese Post Office banks is not a bad idea, but my local savings bank provides most of those services. The Japanese system had low interest on savings, but they had been tax free. Bring that on any old time.
Funding government deficits by central bank, and not by taxes, is, for a true believer in that system, reasonable. Of course, if you are going to create money to cover the shortfall, hey, why not fund the whole budget in the same manner. No IRS or Form 1040 would make a lot of people happy this time of year.
Paying Social Security and Medicare out of the general budget has some appeal as there are demographic problems and the last deal raided SS for $150 million for the Disability Trust Fund.
Keeping natural monopolies out of the public domain is okay. Privatizers have taken over some water departments and gouged the public. No, one, however, is remotely thinking of trying to take the MBTA away from the government.
As most capital gains are in real estate, taxing them at progressive rates should dampen speculation.
Hudson's desire to deter irresponsible lending by making the creditor bear the cost of any loan that could be considered a fraudulent conveyance is worthwhile. Many loans have been made that there was no way that they could be paid without looting assets. That should be stopped.
One question about his reforms is why he did not propose a restoration of the Glass-Steagall Act separating retail deposit banking from investment banking. It would seem if you are not going to hang investment bankers from the lamp posts, you would want to restore that law.
One might grant a federal reserve run by Mr. Hudson or someone like him would establish policies that would better serve the economy as a whole. It is hard to believe it could be anything more than an interregnum as capture by interests is what happens to bureaucracies.
Still, it should be given a try. It would be hard to do worse. If it fails, we can bring in Ron Paul to shut down the Fed.
The book has its flaws. It has typos, but they don't ruin the reading experience at all. But a work of this caliber should have no typos. Second, the book is written by a guy who identifies as a marxist. So yes, this is a marxist critique of finance capitalism. But he does not say that communism is the answer. If anything, he says that industrial capitalism is the answer. The Marxists' of yesterday (like the author), are basically where status quo center leftists are today. I walked away from this book feeling more philosophically moored to industrial capitalism than ever.
This book explained to me complex economic concepts in a digestible way that was overall, well written. Good work. I will probably read another of Mr. Hudson's works on economics.
What makes Hudson's book so enlightening (and frightening) is how he exposes the fundamental sickness of an economic system built on debt and rent extraction. For the longest time, I figured that the financial crash was simply a combination of greed and negligence. Hudson, on the other hand, demonstrates how the housing collapse was inevitable, and how we're in for even more pain unless we make some serious reforms.
Ultimately, what Killing the Host really does is expose how, contrary to the mainstream liberal myth of progress, we're really reverting back to a feudal era - one in which we overpay rentiers (landlords, monopolists, and bankers) while they sit back and collect a free lunch. His revival of classical economic theory and the important distinction between productive labor/income versus unproductive wealth is alone worth buying the book. Since so many Americans still subscribe to the bootstrap theory and believe that the poor are simply lazy and stupid compared to the rich, this book serves as a necessary counter to that narrative. When you actually analyze the origins of many rich peoples' wealth, you'll come to realize that they "earned" their fortunes more from unearned rent than from genuinely productive labor. If you think about it, charging people monopoly prices or reaping income from rising property values doesn't really require any effort or creativity. Therefore, many rich people aren't amazing job creators who deserve every penny they have.
If you're interested in challenging our current economic system and refuting pro-1% lies, this book is an absolute must-read.
Top reviews from other countries
This book deserves the highest praise: it can radically change the way you perceive the world around you, and gives insight into the outrageous mechanics that keep everything running.
If Piketty is very good on the net effect (in terms of massive inequality and stagnant growth), and Steve Keen is excellent on the details of why orthodox economic theory is bunkum, then this is the best I've read in terms of describing the underlying fundamental fight between productive and unproductive wealth, and how finance is a (worthless) tax on productive activity, not a source of genuine new wealth. He hammers home the point that the classical economists (Ricardo, Adam Smith, Marx) all viewed their most fundamental problem as trying to reduce the drag on the economy caused by unproductive rent-seeking, and that orthodox economics has forgotten or disavowed that fundamental fight.
Several sources I respect have said that in a better world he'd have won the economics 'Nobel' several times. A huge plus point is that he has worked inside business, worked inside finance and worked inside government, and in all cases learned how things actually really worked, as opposed to how theory insisted they worked.
One big gripe - the standard of proofreading/copyediting is almost nonexistent. I suppose that's probably the only way a book like this could have been published at all, but it's vital that the mainstream is not given any excuse to rubbish this kind of work as the output of cranks.








