Killing Orders: Talat Pasha’s Telegrams and the Armenian Genocide (Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide) 1st ed. 2018 Edition, Kindle Edition

by Taner Akçam (Author) Format: Kindle Edition

Part of: Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide (11 Books)

Flip to back Flip to front

Audible Sample Playing... Paused You are listening to a sample of the Audible narration for this Kindle book.
Learn more

ISBN-13: 978-3319697864

ISBN-10: 3319697862

Why is ISBN important?

Share <Embed>

Other Sellers

from

Other Sellers

See all 3 versions

eBook features:

Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
In this edition, page numbers are just like the physical edition
Length: 282 pages
Word Wise: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Page Flip: Enabled
Part of: Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide (11 Books)

Read with the free Kindle apps (available on iOS, Android, PC & Mac), Kindle E-readers and on Fire Tablet devices. See all supported devices

Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC

Digital List Price: $54.99

Print List Price: $54.99 Save $11.55 (21%)‎

Enter a promotion code or Gift Card

eBook features:

Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
In this edition, page numbers are just like the physical edition
Length: 282 pages
Word Wise: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Page Flip: Enabled
Part of: Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide (11 Books)

Read with the free Kindle apps (available on iOS, Android, PC & Mac), Kindle E-readers and on Fire Tablet devices. See all supported devices

Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC

Today through selected date:

Rental price is determined by end date.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Enter a promotion code or Gift Card

The book represents an earthquake in genocide studies, particularly in the field of Armenian Genocide research. A unique feature of the Armenian Genocide has been the long-standing efforts of successive Turkish governments to deny its historicity and to hide the documentary evidencesurrounding it. This book provides a major clarification of the often blurred lines between facts and truth in regard to these events. The authenticity of the killing orders signed by Ottoman Interior Minister Talat Pasha and the memoirs of the Ottoman bureaucrat Naim Efendi have been two of the most contested topics in this regard. The denialist school has long argued that these documents and memoirs were all forgeries, produced by Armenians to further their claims. Taner Akçam provides the evidence to refute the basis of these claims and demonstrates clearly why the documents can be trusted as authentic, revealing the genocidal intent of the Ottoman-Turkish government towards its Armenian population. As such, this work removes a cornerstone from the denialist edifice, and further establishes the historicity of the Armenian Genocide.

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Peter Balakian
167
Kindle Edition
$14.99
& Free Shipping
Jesse Shipway
Kindle Edition
$56.99
& Free Shipping

What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Henry Morgenthau
96
Kindle Edition
$0.99
& Free Shipping
Taner Akcam
80
Kindle Edition
$11.99
& Free Shipping
Taner Akçam
39
Kindle Edition
$14.55
& Free Shipping
Benny Morris
124
Kindle Edition
$9.99
& Free Shipping

Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Taner Akçam is Professor of History at Clark University, USA. His publications include The Young Turks’ Crime Against Humanity: The Armenian Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing in the Ottoman Empire (2012), which was co-winner of the Middle East Studies Association’s Albert Hourani Book Award and one of ForeignAffairs.com’s ‘Best Books on the Middle East’.

--This text refers to the paperback edition.

Review

“The Sherlock Holmes of Armenian Genocide.” (Eric Weitz, The City College of New York, USA)

“This is an extraordinarily important work for those who understand its significance. Taner Akçam has quite literally blown the Turkish narrative as itself ‘fake news’.” (Mark Levene, University of Southampton, UK)

“Taner Akçam’s careful edition of an important Ottoman bureaucrat’s memoirs and related sources is a signal contribution to the contentious debate about state policy and practice towards Armenians during the First World War. It is essential reading for all those interested in Genocide and Human Rights Studies.” (Dirk Moses, University of Sydney, Australia)

--This text refers to the paperback edition.

ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0798MFM1B
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Palgrave Macmillan; 1st ed. 2018 edition (January 23, 2018)
Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 23, 2018
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 4453 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 282 pages
Page numbers source ISBN ‏ : ‎ 3319697862
Lending ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #1,335,230 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #67 in History of Switzerland
- #264 in History of Turkey & the Ottoman empire
- #584 in Historiography (Kindle Store)

Customer Reviews:
21 ratings

Customer reviews

5 star		80%
4 star		12%
3 star 0% (0%)		0%
2 star 0% (0%)		0%
1 star		8%

How are ratings calculated?

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

J. Varjabedian

Indispensable

Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2018

Verified Purchase

It would be impossible to overstate the importance of this book. Akcam presents a thoroughly researched work which proves that Talat’s orders for the Armenian Genocide are indisputably authentic. The writing is clear, and the argument is convincing. I could not recommend this book more highly.

17 people found this helpful

Helpful

Rob

Amazing Book

Reviewed in the United States on July 9, 2019

Verified Purchase

Must read!

2 people found this helpful

Helpful

Amazon Customer

An amazing book

Reviewed in the United States on October 9, 2020

Verified Purchase

This book destroys all the arguments presented by genocide deniers with unquantifiable facts. Very impressive work by the author.

Helpful

Arin S

Brilliant!

Reviewed in the United States on June 19, 2021

Verified Purchase

Amazing amount of research.

Helpful

Alaturka

What Telegrams? What Genocide?

Reviewed in the United States on August 17, 2019

Truth has a way of rearing its head. What "fact" needs this much support, help, effort and force to remain a "fact"? None. Taner, an avowed Turkophobe, who has found a warm welcome in the bosom of other haters, has been trying for years to turn myths into facts. It is doubtful if another century of obfuscation and propaganda will ever accomplish it.

British looked everywhere to find evidence against those who had been sent to Malta. Despite the complete cooperation of the Ottoman Liberal Union government, nothing incriminating could be found among the Ottoman government documents. Similar searches in the British archives were fruitless. Finally, in desperation, the British Foreign Office turned to the American archives in Washington, but in reply, one of their representatives, R. C. Craigie, wrote to Lord Curzon:

"I regret to inform your Lordship that there was nothing therein which could be used as evidence against the Turks who are at present being detained at Malta ... no concrete facts being given which could constitute satisfactory incriminating evidence.... The reports in question do not appear in any case to contain evidence against these Turks which would be useful even for the purpose of corroborating information already in the possession of His Majesty's Government."

Uncertain as to what should be done with prisoners, who already had been held for two years, without trial, and without even any charges being filed or evidence produced, the Foreign Office applied for advice to the Law Officers of the Crown in London, who concluded on 29 July, 1921:

"Up to the present no statements have been taken from witnesses who can depose to the truth of the charges made against the prisoners. It is indeed uncertain whether any witnesses can be found."

At this time the "documents" produced by Andonian were available, but despite their desperate search for evidence, which could be presented in a court of law, the British never, used them because it was evident that they were forgeries. As a result, the prisoners were quietly released in 1921, without charges ever having been filed or evidence produced.

It is useful to reiterate the main elements in the chain of evidence constructed in proving that Andonian's "documents" were all patent forgeries.

To show that his forgeries were in fact "authentic Ottoman documents" Andonian relied on the signature of the Governor of Aleppo, Mustafa Abdülhalik Bey, which he claimed was appended to several of the "documents" in question. By examining several actual specimens of Mustafa Abdülhalik Bey's signature as preserved on contemporary official documents, it is established that the alleged signatures appended to Andonian's "documents" were forgeries.

In one of his forged documents, Andonian dated the note and signature attributed to Mustafa Abdülhalik Bey. Again, by a comparison with authentic correspondence between the Governor of Aleppo and the Ministry of the Interior in Istanbul, on the date in question, it is proven that the Governor of Aleppo on that date was Bekir Sami Bey, not Mustafa Abdulhalik Bey.

Consistently, Andonian's forgeries attest to the fact that he was either totally unaware of, or carelessly neglected to account for, the differences between the Muslim Rumi and Christian calendars. The numerous errors he made as a result of this oversight are, in and of themselves, sufficient to prove the fabricated nature of his "documents". Among other things, the errors Andonian made in this respect served to destroy the system of reference numbers and dates that he concocted for his "documents".

By way of a detailed comparison of the entries made in the Ministry of the Interior's Registers of outgoing Ciphers, wherein are recorded the date and reference number of every ciphered communication sent out by the Ministry, with the dates and reference numbers placed by Andonian on his forgeries, it is proven that his so-called "ciphered telegrams" bear no relationship whatsoever to the actual ciphers sent by the Ministry to Aleppo in the period in question.

Again, by comparing the Turkish "originals" of Andonian's "ciphered telegrams" with actual examples of contemporary Ottoman ciphered messages, it is shown that the number groupings he employed bear no relationship to the actual ciphers the Ottomans were using in that period. Thus, in his attempt to make his forgeries appear credible, he created a whole series of unusable, non-existent ciphers. Further, from the dates he affixed to his forgeries in this category, the Ottomans would have had to use the same ciphers over a six-month period, which was impossible. By publishing a series of documents instructing officials to change the ciphers they were using, it is shown that, in fact, the Ottomans were changing their cipher codes on average once every two months during the war years.

By comparing the manner in which the common Islamic injunction, Besmele, was written on Andonian's two forged letters with numerous examples of the way in which it appears on authentic contemporary Ottoman documents, it is suggested that Andonian's clumsy forgery of this term may well have stemmed from the fact that non-Muslims, even those who knew Ottoman Turkish, did not employ this injunction.

A number of examples from Andonian's forgeries show that it is simply inconceivable that any Ottoman official could have used such sentence structures and made grammatical errors. In the same vein, a host of expressions; allegedly uttered by prominent Ottoman officials are used, which no Ottoman Turk would ever have used. Andonian's intention in these instances was clear: he wanted nothing less than the Turks themselves to be seeming to confess to crimes which he had manufactured for them.

The forged documents, with two exceptions, were written on plain paper with none of the usual signs found on the official paper used by the Ottoman bureaucracy in this period. The fact that one of the forged Turkish originals was written on a double-lined paper, which the Ottomans did not even use for private correspondence, constitutes an even more serious error on Andonian's part. Even the two forgeries, which appear at first glance to have been written on some kind of official Ottoman stationery, are actually written on blank telegraph forms, which anyone wishing to send a telegram could pick up in any Ottoman post office.

At a time when the British were frantically searching the world's archives for anything to be used as "evidence" against the group of Ottoman officials whom they were holding for trial as being "responsible for the Armenian incidents", their failure to utilize Andonian's "documents" which were readily available in their English edition, strongly suggests that the British Government was fully aware of the nature of these forgeries.

Had documents of the nature of those concocted by Andonian ever actually existed, their confidential nature would have dictated that they be sent by courier for security reasons; rather than through the easily breachable public telegraph system. Likewise, had such documents really ever been written; it is inconceivable that they could have lain around in a file for three years, instead of being destroyed as soon as they had been read.

There are also numerous differences between the French and English editions of Andonian's book. Indeed, these variations are of such significance that it is absolutely impossible to ascribe them to printing errors, or errors in translation.

Finally, the fact that even some authors with close links to Armenian circles, who serve as spokesmen for Armenian causes, have indicated their own doubt as to the veracity of Andonian's "documents" should not be overlooked.

In short, from start to finish the so-called "Talat Pasha Telegrams" are nothing more than crude forgeries, concocted by Andonian and his associates.

Moreover the Ottoman archives contain a number of orders; whose authenticity can definitely be substantiated, issued on the same dates, in which Talat Pasha ordered investigations to be made to find and punish those responsible for the attacks which were being made on the deportation caravans. It is hardly likely that he would have been ordering massacres on one hand and investigations and punishments for such crimes on the other.

An American aid organization called "the Near East Relief Society" was allowed by the Ottoman Government to stay and fulfill its functions in Anatolia during the deportations. Even following the entry of U.S. into war on the side of Entente powers against Ottoman Empire, the same organization was permitted to remain in Anatolia. This was dealt in the reports of the American Ambassador Elkus in Istanbul. In this case, if an order for "massacring Armenians" had been given, would the Ottoman Government have allowed to an American organization to be witness to the "massacres". In other words, it is ridiculous to suppose that the Ottomans said to America: "We are massacring Armenians. Why don't you have a look at it." Such an allegation could never be a logical explanation of historic facts.

Finally, and in the end most important, when the war came to an end, the Armenian population still was substantially in place in Western Anatolia, Thrace and Istanbul. Had the Ottoman government ordered massacres, evidently they too would have been killed. And for that matter, had the Ottoman government wanted to eliminate all the Armenians in the Empire, it could have done so far more easily by killing and disposing of them where they lived, rather than undertaking a large-scale deportation of those in the Eastern war zones under the eyes of foreign observers.

The claim, thus, that the Ottoman government ordered and carried out a general massacre of Armenians in the Empire cannot be sustained and is disproved by the facts.

8 people found this helpful

Helpful

ANGELA BARSEGHIAN

a sad history of Ottomans which needs to be reckoned with ...

Reviewed in the United States on April 3, 2018

A serious academic work, very interesting, sheds light on Ottoman personalities and characters...a sad history of Ottomans which needs to be reckoned with by this and future generations...You may want to read it twice to believe your eyes...

12 people found this helpful

Helpful

armen khatchatrian

The truth always prevails

Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2021

Great book written by a brave author.

Helpful

Amazon Customer

Five Stars

Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2018

Powerful, credible evidence!

9 people found this helpful

Helpful

Top reviews from other countries

Dkut0608

Misleads its readers and misrepresents opposing authors’ arguments

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 7, 2018

Verified Purchase

Author Taner Akçam argues that the documents published by Aram Andonian in 1920 are authentic. These documents allegedly belonged to several important Ottoman Empire officials, particularly Minister of Interior Talat Pasha who is frequently referred to as the mastermind behind a genocide perpetrated against Armenians in 1915. However, in 1983, Şinasi Orel and Süreyya Yuca had published a book titled “The Talat Pasha Telegrams: Historical Fact or Armenian Fiction?”, in which they had made a strong case for why these documents were in fact fake. Mr. Akçam argues that Orel & Yuca’s arguments are faulty and that these documents as such prove the existence of an Armenian genocide.

However, there are three fundamental flaws in Mr. Akçam’s book:
1) Mr. Akçam oversimplifies and sometimes outright distorts the actual arguments put forth by Orel & Yuca. He then goes on to discredit the oversimplified and distorted versions of Orel & Yuca’s arguments. These arguments concern questions over the existence of a “Naim Efendi”, ciphering methods used in Ottoman telegrams, and the paper type used in the Andonian documents.
2) Mr. Akçam provides no evidence for his assertions regarding the telegram numbers in the Andonian documents. Furthermore, if you analyze them carefully, the sample signatures of the Ottoman Governor of Aleppo Mustafa Abdülhalik Bey provided by Mr. Akçam do not in fact match up with the ones in Ottoman archives.
3) Mr. Akçam completely ignores glaring issues with Andonian documents (such as chronological mistakes) that cast serious doubts on the authenticity of these documents.

For these reasons, irrespective of whether you wholeheartedly believe in the existence of an Armenian genocide, Taner Akçam’s book cannot be considered a proper scholarly work. If you really want to read this book, you should also pick up a copy of Orel & Yuca's book to better understand the distortions committed by Mr. Akçam.

3 people found this helpful

J A Shahbazian

Four Stars

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 18, 2018

Verified Purchase

Good book about neglected subject

One person found this helpful

See all reviews

Killing Orders: Talat Pasha’s Telegrams and the Armenian Genocide (Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide) 1st ed. 2018 Edition, Kindle Edition

Buy for others

Buying and sending eBooks to others

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?