Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$22.50$22.50
FREE delivery: Thursday, May 18 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $12.56
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend Paperback – November 15, 1996
| Price | New from | Used from |
Purchase options and add-ons
Trained in physics and astronomy, Feyerabend was best known as a philosopher of science. But he emphatically was not a builder of theories or a writer of rules. Rather, his fame was in powerful, plain-spoken critiques of "big" science and "big" philosophy. Feyerabend gave voice to a radically democratic "epistemological anarchism:" he argued forcefully that there is not one way to knowledge, but many principled paths; not one truth or one rationality but different, competing pictures of the workings of the world. "Anything goes," he said about the ways of science in his most famous book, Against Method. And he meant it.
Here, for the first time, Feyerabend traces the trajectory that led him from an isolated, lower-middle-class childhood in Vienna to the height of international academic success. He writes of his experience in the German army on the Russian front, where three bullets left him crippled, impotent, and in lifelong pain. He recalls his promising talent as an operatic tenor (a lifelong passion), his encounters with everyone from Martin Buber to Bertolt Brecht, innumerable love affairs, four marriages, and a career so rich he once held tenured positions at four universities at the same time.
Although not written as an intellectual autobiography, Killing Time sketches the people, ideas, and conflicts of sixty years. Feyerabend writes frankly of complicated relationships with his mentor Karl Popper and his friend and frequent opponent Imre Lakatos, and his reactions to a growing reputation as the "worst enemy of science."
- Print length203 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
- Publication dateNovember 15, 1996
- Dimensions8.51 x 5.4 x 0.65 inches
- ISBN-100226245322
- ISBN-13978-0226245324
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
From the Back Cover
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : University of Chicago Press; 1st edition (November 15, 1996)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 203 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0226245322
- ISBN-13 : 978-0226245324
- Item Weight : 10 ounces
- Dimensions : 8.51 x 5.4 x 0.65 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,021,385 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,120 in Scientist Biographies
- #27,193 in Philosophy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I'm a big fan of philosophy of science and have been for the past 40 years or so, and I think Feyerabend, the most radical of the Gang of Four, is my fave. I'm currently working on a book on Earth science that will have a big dose of history and philosophy of science (HPS) in it, so I was hoping to glean some more nuggets from Paul. I found several in his book, but, as it turned out, he devoted as much time of his life to the theater and opera (at least in the early days) as he did to science (physics) and its philosophy.
Feyerabend was a very interesting man.
"During the first plenary session [of a seminar at Alpbach] I almost fell off my chair; so much nonsense, so many errors! Didn't the learned gentlemen know anything? I made notes for the discussion, hoping to straighten them out. At last the lectures were over I raised my hand. The chairman chose one Eminent Person, and that Eminent Person spoke. He chose another Eminent Person, and that Eminent Person too spoke at great length without saying anything. Finally it was my turn. ... Ernesto Grassi and Thure von Üxküll had discussed truth in a way that struck me as empty rhapsodizing. I let them have it. ... When the discussion was over and I moved into the sun, I suddenly had Popper at my side: 'Let's take a walk,' he said. ... Popper talked---about music, the dangers of Beethoven, the Wagnerian disaster; he criticized me for having mentioned Reichenbach's 'interphenomena' (from his book on quantum mechanics), and he suggested we use the familiar du form of address. In the evening he took me to a select meeting with Bertalanffy, Karl Rahner, von Hayek, and other dignitaries; I, a mere student, and a beginner at that, had been found worthy of participating in their sublime debates!" (pp. 71-72)
The same intellectual culture also appreciated teaching as the intellectual and honourable activity that it is, rather than a "teaching load" which is how the anti-intellectual charlatan professors of today regard it. For example:
"My interest in physics and astronomy came from an excellent physics teacher at our school, Professor Oswald Thomas, a well-known figure in Viennese education. Once a month, Thomas assembled about two thousand people in a large meadow outside Vienna, turned off the streetlights and explained the constellations. ... He also gave lectures at his office and at the university. I attended most of them and assisted him in various ways. On my thirteenth birthday I was permitted to give a lecture of my own. 'Two minutes,' said Professor Thomas; I had to be removed after ten." (p. 28)
In Feyerabend's generation this spirit was upheld by professor attending each other's lectures and engaging in debates. When Feyerabend "gave my usual philosophy of science course" at Zürich, several professor from other departments attended, including van der Waerden, who "would interrupt and raise objections, and we would have a lively exchange" (p. 157). At the LSE "Imre Lakatos ... came to every lecture" and did the same (p. 128).
It seems to me that Feyerabend squandered this entire inheritance. The heritage is crucially imprtant: we saw Feyerabend assert the importance of Thomas, and of his time in Alpbach where he met Popper and had other fruitful intellectual exchanges as a young student he writes that "This was the most decisive step of my life. I would not be where I am today, with the pensions I am drawing, [and] the ambiguous reputation I seem to possess, ... had I not accepted" (p. 70).
But Feyerabend failed to be a Thomas or Popper for the next generation. Broken down to a depression following the "chauvinism, illiteracy, and intolerance" (p. 148) with which his book Against Method was met, Feyerabend lapsed into a rather disgustingly content egotism. He wines about his "teaching load" (p. 156), he cheers at being relieved of office hours (p. 158) and at having a student run his seminar ("I accepted at once---the less I had to do the better"; p. 160), etc. No wonder, then, that no Feyerabends are being produced today, since he broke with such arrogance the precious tradition that by his own admission had made his own career possible.
Top reviews from other countries
This autobiography is very revealing indeed. It gives an in depth view of Feyerabend's eventful life, his difficult character, his fierce philosophical battles, his profound (physical and intellectual) loves and his (self-) inflicted deceptions.
As a young soldier, he was physically heavily marked by World War II, but astonishingly his fighting spirit was enhanced. On the other hand, was this experience not the main reason for his deep pessimism: `Me? A family? Children? Not on this planet!' He called himself an `icy egotist'. All his life he had violent outburst of inner rage: `We shall act in a barbaric way. We shall punish, kill, meet violence with violence.'
During the war, he was lived, as Nietzsche said: `the aims of Nazism - I hardly knew what they were.' Already then for him, `a clean moral vision implies simplifications and acts of cruelty and injustice.'
After the war, he had to choose between a career as a professional singer (he had a beautiful voice and loved opera) or as a scientist. He became a philosopher of science.
But now the intellectual caste became the target of his violent attacks: `intellectuals prepare a New Age of ignorance, darkness and slavery.' His main foe was the man he saw as the new POP(p)E(r) of philosophy.
Overreactions and exaggerations made him even return to animism: `two types of tumors to be removed - philosophy of science and general philosophy (ethics, epistemology etc.) ... Nor is there one way of knowing, science. There are many such ways, and before they were ruined by Western civilization, they were effective in the sense that they kept people alive and made their existence comprehensible.'??
His anger culminated in his best known book `Against Method', called by his caste `anything goes'. Already the title is a provocation. It provoked an avalanche of devastating reviews which traumatized him deeply. He defends himself: `I never denigrated reason, only some petrified and tyrannical versions of it.'
After meeting the love of his life, the rebel (sometimes without a cause) became less caustic, and even wanted children.
All in all, this book is a fascinating read.





