|Print List Price:||$12.99|
Save $9.00 (69%)
A King Ensnared: A Historical Novel of Scotland (The Stewart Chronicle Book 1) Kindle Edition
Try Kindle Countdown Deals
Explore limited-time discounted eBooks. Learn more.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This novel covers the time just prior to his being taken captive by Henry IV of England through the death of Henry V. Taking the reader from the Shores of Scotland, to London, and to the wars of Henry V in France. It tells the story of a twelve year old further King taken prisoner and held as such for 18 years. We witness the growth of strength and character in spite of his circumstances.
Anyone who enjoys the history of Scotland would enjoy this story - a tale of perseverance and determination that so often embodies the Scot people.
We get to feel the changes in emotion felt by James as he is alternately thrown from prison into the fierce fighting of war. My only advice is to read the notes and lists of characters, explanations, and Scottish terms. I would have to say that there were many unfamiliar terms, and although they were explained at the end and were the obviously the product of extensive research, I believe most readers could follow the storyline better if many terms would have been left out. I can recommend this writing though.
It just wasn't quite interesting enough to keep me going through it--and everything with Joan was pretty eye-roll-inducing.
Other reviewers have praised the absence of too much exposition. That’s grand, if you know the history. For those of us with no knowledge of this era, SOME exposition would have helped. But that’s nothing when compared to the confusion of characters.
At one point it occurred to me that Prince Hal and Henry of Monmouth might have been the same person. Briefly researching it, I see the appellation “Prince Hal” was used by the character Falstaff in Shakespeare’s Henry V written roughly 150 years later. Was the real Henry V ever called Prince Hal? That might be a fairly large contextual error, and I could live with it, considering all the Henrys that pepper the story. By all means, call him Prince Hal even if it doesn’t really happen for at least another century, but please be consistent.
Then there is James’ brother, starved to death in the dungeons of the Duke of Albany. First he’s Davey, then he’s Robert. “Davey can’t be dead.” And a few sentences later: “[T]he Duke of Albany ordered Lord Robert starved to death.” James had never “seen Davey after Albany took him prisoner.” He dreams of “Robert in an oubliette, desperately gnawing his fingers…” And I’m thinking, why the hell is Lord Robert called Davey? Then I look it up and see James had TWO brothers, Robert and David; Robert died in infancy and David died under suspicious circumstances while a detainee of Albany (who is also named Robert).
It’s not my fault I’m confused.
The Douglas family clearly had different factions with different loyalties, so just plunging us into the middle of it was bewildering. All the Richards and the Williams and the Davids and the Henrys and Lord This, Earl of That, Duke of Somewhere Else. Yes, I’m aware that is how the aristocracy works, but someone coming to this more or less cold needs at least a rudimentary primer. Still, the biggest consideration is characterization. Who are they, as people? What is their relationship to James? What do they want? Why do they want it?
Even without all this character-muddling, the story is not terribly compelling. I’m one-third in and there’s been nothing but transferring James from one castle to another. I’m not sure I’ll finish it, even if I can figure out who all these people are.