To share your reaction on this item, open the Amazon app from the App Store or Google Play on your phone.

Add Prime to get Fast, Free delivery

Kindle
$26.93

Available instantly

Paperback
$28.35

$28.35 with 17 percent savings

List Price: $33.99

Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns

FREE delivery Saturday, February 1 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35

Or Prime members get FREE delivery Thursday, January 30. Order within 15 hrs 28 mins.

In Stock

$$28.35 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details

Ships from

Amazon.com

Sold by

Amazon.com

Returns

30-day refund/replacement

Payment

Secure transaction

Add a gift receipt for easy returns

Other sellers on Amazon

New & Used (24) from $19.85 + $3.99 shipping

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Color:

To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the authors

King and Messiah as Son of God: Divine, Human, and Angelic Messianic Figures in Biblical and Related Literature Paperback – November 3, 2008

by Adela Yarbro Collins (Author), John J. Collins (Author)

4.5 11 ratings

See all formats and editions

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$28.35","priceAmount":28.35,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"28","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"35","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"qRK4ByEHlILBwHgn1u1doGFRYlOoeCm4Hx81bio4XcO9fjERHOZPV2%2F6%2FCRwss87CJ%2BsLDK6CRxyCReCglZYzu6OopwdYy4g0ArhSlN8zNMCKoQkjtbhsJt7cS0xirvFLiQCHyTyjgE%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

This book traces the history of the idea that the king and later the messiah is Son of God, from its origins in ancient Near Eastern royal ideology to its Christian appropriation in the New Testament.

Both highly regarded scholars, Adela Yarbro Collins and John J. Collins argue that Jesus was called “the Son of God” precisely because he was believed to be the messianic king. This belief and tradition, they contend, led to the identification of Jesus as preexistent, personified Wisdom, or a heavenly being in the New Testament canon. However, the titles Jesus is given are historical titles tracing back to Egyptian New Kingdom ideology. Therefore the title “Son of God” is likely solely messianic and not literal. King and Messiah as Son of God is distinctive in its range, spanning both Testaments and informed by ancient Near Eastern literature and Jewish noncanonical literature.

Editorial Reviews

Review

Mark S. Smith
— New York University
"This volume addresses one of the most important yet difficult questions in all of the Bible — the divinity of Jesus. To understand this issue, two world-class scholars have collaborated to produce an insightful survey of the Messiah in the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament, Second Temple literature, and the New Testament. The result is a very readable and engaging study The result is a very readable and engaging study background."

Peter Machinist
— Harvard University
"Adela and John Collins add yet another book to their long list of significant contributions to biblical studies. King and Messiah as Son of God stands out as a comprehensive, systematic, and authoritative study of the much discussed and controversial issue of their title. They succeed admirably in demonstrating that kingship, messiahship, and divinity form a complex relationship whose understanding underwent an organic development, yet with a range of variations, from early monarchic Israel and its ancient Near Eastern roots through the Christianity of the New Testament era. In laying out this picture, the Collinses offer an exemplary set of close readings of the ancient sources and the welter of modern scholarship on them. Everywhere evident is their capacity for incisive, balanced judgments regarding difficult texts and problems and their ear for subtle nuances that might easily have escaped other interpreters."

Christopher Rowland— Queen's College, Oxford
"The combined wisdom of Adela and John Collins is here brought to bear on the study John Collins is here brought to bear on the study of messianism, its origins and history, and its role in the emergence of Christian theology. Their grasp of the subject and their intellectual breadth will make this book a standard reference breadth will make this book a standard reference come."

Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society
"The authors have produced a fine volume that touches on an underappreciated area in biblical studies, namely, the relationship between kingship/messiahship and divinity. . . It is a worthwhile volume to read for anyone with an interest in ancient kingship or NT Christology."

About the Author

Adela Yarbro Collins is Buckingham Professor of New Testament Criticism and Interpretation at Yale University.

John J. Collins is Holmes Professor of Old Testament Criticism and Interpretation at Yale Divinity School and a recognized expert in early Judaism and the Dead Sea Scrolls. His many other works include The Apocalyptic Imagination, Beyond the Qumran Community, The Scepter and the Star, and (with Daniel C. Harlow) The Eerdmans Dictionary of Early Judaism.

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.; First Edition, First Printing (November 3, 2008)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 275 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0802807720
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0802807724
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 13.6 ounces
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.7 x 9 inches

Best Sellers Rank: #640,913 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #875 in General History of Religion
- #1,151 in Christology (Books)
- #1,206 in History of Religions

Customer Reviews:
4.5 11 ratings

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Videos

Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!

Upload your video

About the authors

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Adela Yarbro Collins
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
See more on the author's page
John Joseph Collins
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
See more on the author's page

Customer reviews

11 global ratings

5 star
68%
4 star
16%
3 star
17%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%

How customer reviews and ratings work

Review this product

Write a customer review

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Athanasius
An historical investigation of messianic terms and concepts underlying the Biblical documents
Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2009
Verified Purchase
Christopher Kaiser has given a good overview of the book, which I need not repeat, but I hope it will not lead readers to think the book is about Christology or the diety of Christ. On the contrary, it is about the historical development of messianic concepts and the cluster of terms that denoted them. At the end it questions the adequacy of Hurtado's claim that the early Christians' concept of Christ is fully revealed in the fact of their worship of Jesus. In the last paragraph it questions the sufficiency of Bauckham's explanation of the unification of divine nature and activity in the person of Christ, noting that it leaves unanswered the question of "how and to what degree Christ participates in that sovereignty and activity of creation." The authors themselves make no attempt to explain this mystery, and it falls outside the scope of their work. What they do explain, and quite admirably, are the meanings the messianic terms had for the various people who used them, as these developed over the biblical period. This is invaluable information for biblical lexicology and exegesis, which itself is a prerequisite for Christological study.

Read more

34 people found this helpful

Helpful

Report
David Bartlett
A wonderfully helpful survey of a great deal of material helping ...
Reviewed in the United States on August 16, 2016
Verified Purchase
A wonderfully helpful survey of a great deal of material helping to put early Christian claims in their historical context.

Read more

Helpful

Report
Angel Arellano Jr
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2016
Verified Purchase
The book is better than I expected. Many Thanks.

Read more

Helpful

Report
Tom
Impressive but too cautious
Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2013
The authors traces the concepts of "son of God," and "son of man," together with "messiah," "Melchizedek" and "wisdom" and a bit on the "suffering servant." Although their interpretation of the NT materials is quite cautious, they succeed in demonstrating that there was some kind of Egyptian-influenced divine king ideology in Judah that morphs into the "heavenly messiah" concept of the Second Temple period. This ancient royal ideology is either preserved or was developed before the LXX translation of the Psalms, as these show the messiah to be pre-existent and addressed as God. This figure is first and foremost, however, the "son of God," as this was a royal title. After Daniel, this figure becomes associated with the "son of man" the apocalyptic figure of God's judgment and with "wisdom," reenforcing the pre-existence of the "son of God/heavenly Messiah." This figure was angelomorphic. Jesus' teaching about the "son of Man" became applied to Him by the apostles after the Resurrection.

Despite demonstrating that all aspects of later christology were in place before the birth of Jesus, they takes great pains to develop slightly different christologies for Paul, the synoptics, and John (the gospel and Revelation.) Why Hebrews and the rest of the NT materials are ignored is not explained. They follows the presumed chronological order, but the discussion of Revelation shows it to be the most primitive in its christology, as it still has the messiah as angelomorphic rather than anthropomorphic. It would have been more useful to assume that Revelation represents the earliest strain of Christian symbolism and christology and have found development from Revelation through Paul and then discuss the gospels and the remaining NT materials. The authors are cautious about going beyond the implications of the narrow, yet key, band of terms they are investigating, implying that the synoptics, for instance, do not explicitly teach the Messiah's or Jesus' pre-existence, even though they cite Psalm 110 LXX, which does explicitly state this. The "messianic secret" of Mark may have more layers than is imagined and the full revelation of who Jesus is was most likely reserved for the Mysteries. In the gospel of John, however, all the elements of later christology, the identification of the son with the father, the divinity of the son, the pre-existence of the son, etc. are all fully developed. John may simply reflect the post-initiation instruction as opposed to the synoptics, which keep some matters under wraps.

Reading between the lines, one can see that in present-day scholarship, reintroducing the idea that the Judahns had an Egyptian divine king ideology (this idea was popular a century ago), is a no go, yet they provide all the materials to support a thesis that the LXX Psalms are not a Second Temple reading but a preservation of the last scraps of the original ideology, which had an angelomorphic heavenly Messiah as the heavenly counterpart to the earthly king, who incarnated the heavenly Messiah, at least in certain liturgical or court contexts, especially as the high priest/king on the Day of Atonement. This angelomorphic heavenly Messiah figure survived the exile and the attempts of the compilers of the OT to suppress the former royal ideology. Ultimately, this figure was derived from the Canaanite/Jebusite inhabitants of Jerusalem, whose Egyptian-based divine king ideology David adopted, as the association of Melchizedek with the heavenly messiah and the royal ideology makes clear. A more thorough analysis of Hebrews in light of the topic of this book would have been useful.

Read more

5 people found this helpful

Helpful

Report
Christopher B. Kaiser
Angelic Messiah
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2009
Was the Jewish messiah believed to be divine? The answer, based on this wide-ranging study of the Old Testament, Second Temple literature, and the New Testament, is "yes and no." But the reader should be advised that answers to questions like this can vary widely with differing definitions of "messiah" and "divine." The volume can be read as a sustained apology for an angelic Messiah and an angel Christology. For those who do not take the time to read the entire work, there is an excellent summary of the main points in the final pages (204-213). The book concludes by challenging some ideas of two leading proponents of early high Christology, Larry Hurtado and Richard Bauckham (211ff.).
Co-author John Collins summarizes his own work on the Old Testament (OT) and Second Temple literature in such a way as to provide background on the ideas of the king, messiah, and son of man for New Testament Christology. His definition of "messiah" (42, 71) is stricter than that of William Horbury (Horbury, Messianism Among Jews and Christians: Twelve Biblical and Historical Studies, London: T&T Clark, 2003), who includes Daniel 7:13 and Isaiah 52:13, but it is broader than that of Joseph Fitzmyer, who limits it to an eschatological ruler who is explicitly called the "messiah" (Fitzmyer, The One Who Is to Come, Eerdmans, 2007). John Collins tries to press OT texts like Isaiah 11:1-5; Jer. 33:14-16; and Zechariah 9:9-10 in the direction of messianic readings (43ff., 61f.). The widely-recognized expansion of messianic ideas in the first century BCE (esp. in the Dead Sea Scrolls ) is for him, therefore, a "resurgence of messianic expectation" (46) rather than an origin. The difference is largely a matter of definition.
As the title indicates, the book has two distinct topics: ideals of kingship and ideas about the messiah. Trying to cover both of these topics at the same time is necessary for New Testament purposes, but it causes some difficulties because the Old Testament has little if anything explicit to say about an eschatological messiah. Accordingly, John Collins focuses on ideals of divine kingship in the Old Testament, and his first two chapters are more useful for learning about the background for a quasi-divine "son of god" than they are for learning about background for messianic beliefs.
The kings of Israel were already called "sons of God" (2 Sam. 7:14; Pss. 2:7; 89:26-7). Royal enthronement could be portrayed as a divine "begetting" (Pss. 2:7; 110:3 Septuagint) that elevated the king of Israel to a status well above other humans (14-17). According to John Collins, this divine begetting was more than mere adoption (pp. 20ff., 204). The king was empowered to act as God's surrogate on earth, and the title "god" (elohîm, also used for angels) was applicable (Ps. 45:6; Isa. 9:6), a usage that had its roots in Canaanite and Jebusite culture (13, 16, 41f.). Still, none of the kings of Israel were divine in the (proper) sense of parity with the God of Israel (22, 204). This clear subordination may be the reason these divine titles were not completely obscured by the Deuteronomic reform (24, 41f.).
A chapter on "messiah and the Son of Man" focuses on major new developments in the late Second Temple period. In the Similitudes of Enoch and 4 Ezra, the messiah was equated with Daniel's angelic "son of man" (78, 90, 94) and regarded as pre-existent (97, 99, 207). John Collins's coverage of this material is excellent, but the focus on superhuman traits of the king-messiah can give a mistaken impression. Texts like Psalms of Solomon 17-18 that are important for more mundane messianic beliefs are only mentioned in passing (46, 63, 206). John Collins's conclusion, that "it is not surprising or anomalous that divine status should be attributed to someone who was believed to be the messiah" (100), provides a transition to the four chapters covering the New Testament, where co-author Adela Yarbro Collins reaches the same conclusion. This conclusion is rather one-sided: it is based on a few texts that suggest the pre-existence of the messiah (172) and it skirts over the difficulties that the more mundane concept of messiah raised for early Christians (see Paula Frederickson, Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews, New York: Knopf, 2000). It also risks misleading readers who miss the strictures the book places on the meaning of "divine status." It is a middling Christology at best.
Co-author Adela Yarbro Collins packs a wealth of exegetical insights into her chapters on the New Testament. Her review of the literature on the "son of man" idiom (156-73) is by itself worth the price of the book. Like John Collins, she has a tendency to read messianic meaning into New Testament texts where other meanings are equally possible (she also finds Jesus as pre-existent Wisdom in 1 Cor. 8:6; 2 Cor. 4:4; 111ff., 147, 208) For example, she repeatedly argues for equivalence of the titles "son of God" and messiah (104, 106). Clearly there is a connection between the two titles largely due to a messianic reading of Psalm 2 (102). But Paul's use of "son" also has important connections to the "binding of Isaac" in Genesis 22 and the Suffering Servant in Isaiah 53. Yarbro Collins misses this in her treatment of Galatians 2:20 (106 ) and she does not even discuss Romans 8:32 (although she does cite the binding of Isaac in her treatment of John 3:16; 181, 202). In both of these texts, Paul describes Jesus as "son of God" in terms very different from any previous treatment of the messiah.
Yarbro Collins also sees Paul's references to the "Lord" who is coming (1 Cor. 1:7, 8; 1 Thess. 3:13) as the coming messiah or "son of man," interpreting them in terms of the Synoptic Gospel Sayings Source (Q), even though Paul is earlier (108f., 208). She studiously avoids Paul's descriptions of Jesus as Yahweh using OT texts like Zech. 14:5 that describe Jesus as Yahweh (cited in most footnotes of English translations of the Bible; see Donald Capes, Old Testament Yahweh Texts in Paul's Christology, Tübingen: Mohr, 1992). Other divine epithets like "Lord of glory" (1 Cor. 2:8) and "the name above every name" (Phil. 2:9) are said to have been "transferred to Jesus" as a result of the Resurrection. (110f., 118). The possibility that Paul saw the Great Glory in human form (as in 1 Enoch 14:20) and realized that it was Jesus is never considered (cf. Alan Segal, Paul the Convert, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990). The problem here is not so much the particular explanations that Yarbro Collins offers, many of which are well argued, but her systematic attempt to exclude other possibilities (although she occasionally expresses some uncertainty) and make all texts affirm an angel (or first creature) Christology. Yarbro Collins does not appear to allow for the possibility that early Christians arrived at a diversity of formulations, human, angelic, and truly divine.
Yarbro Collins does give a thoughtful account of the origin of "deity" Christology, which goes like this: when the disciples had visions of Jesus exalted to heaven, they identified him with the Son of man whom he had proclaimed as coming in glory (taking Mark 13:26 as authentic). Since contemporary Jewish sources discussed by John Collins regarded the Son of man as a pre-existent angelic being who exercised divine kingship as God's agent, the risen Jesus was also recognized as an angelic being. Since human rulers were worshipped as gods in Hellenistic ruler cults, Jesus was even worshipped as a god (172ff.). In her final chapter, Yarbro Collins suggests that her ideas are hypotheses (172, 201). If so, it would help to make that clear from the start. Hypotheses can be affirmed and tested, but the researcher ought to begin with all current hypotheses on the table. What is clearly needed is a study in which various hypotheses concerning the origin of deity Christology are articulated and tested at critical points. One of the values of this volume is that it may provoke a more comprehensive research program.
In short, I recommend this volume to scholars who already have a good grasp of the diverse possibilities for the meaning and origin of deity Christology, but a newcomer to the field may be misled by the biases of this (as any) particular approach.

Read more

53 people found this helpful

Helpful

Report

Amazon Prime Free Trial

Follow the authors

King and Messiah as Son of God: Divine, Human, and Angelic Messianic Figures in Biblical and Related Literature Paperback – November 3, 2008

Purchase options and add-ons

Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Editorial Reviews

Review

About the Author

Product details

Videos

About the authors

Adela Yarbro Collins

John Joseph Collins

Customer reviews

Review this product

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

5.0 out of 5 stars An historical investigation of messianic terms and concepts underlying the Biblical documents

5.0 out of 5 stars A wonderfully helpful survey of a great deal of material helping ...

5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars

4.0 out of 5 stars Impressive but too cautious

4.0 out of 5 stars Angelic Messiah

An historical investigation of messianic terms and concepts underlying the Biblical documents

A wonderfully helpful survey of a great deal of material helping ...

Five Stars

Impressive but too cautious

Angelic Messiah