Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
King Richard: Nixon and Watergate--An American Tragedy Hardcover – Deckle Edge, May 25, 2021
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
In January 1973, Richard Nixon had just been inaugurated after winning re-election in a historic landslide. He enjoyed an almost 70 percent approval rating. But by April 1973, his presidency had fallen apart as the Watergate scandal metastasized into what White House counsel John Dean called “a full-blown cancer.” King Richard is the intimate, utterly absorbing narrative of the tension-packed hundred days when the Watergate conspiracy unraveled as the burglars and their handlers turned on one another, exposing the crimes of a vengeful president.
Drawing on thousands of hours of newly-released taped recordings, Michael Dobbs takes us into the heart of the conspiracy, recreating these traumatic events in cinematic detail. He captures the growing paranoia of the principal players and their desperate attempts to deflect blame as the noose tightens around them. We eavesdrop on Nixon plotting with his aides, raging at his enemies, while also finding time for affectionate moments with his family. The result is an unprecedentedly vivid, close-up portrait of a president facing his greatest crisis.
Central to the spellbinding drama is the tortured personality of Nixon himself, a man whose strengths, particularly his determination to win at all costs, become his fatal flaws. Rising from poverty to become the most powerful man in the world, he commits terrible errors of judgment that lead to his public disgrace. He makes himself—and then destroys himself.
Structured like a classical tragedy with a uniquely American twist, King Richard is an epic, deeply human story of ambition, power, and betrayal.
- Print length416 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherKnopf
- Publication dateMay 25, 2021
- Dimensions6.5 x 1.55 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-100385350090
- ISBN-13978-0385350099
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Most purchasedin this set of products
American Midnight: The Great War, a Violent Peace, and Democracy's Forgotten CrisisHardcover
From the Publisher
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Rich and kaleidoscopic… Dobbs has carved out something intimate and extraordinary, skillfully chiseling out the details to bring the story to lurid life."
—Jennifer Szalai, New York Times
"This fast-paced opus would be a rollicking fun read, a beach book even, if it weren’t so doggone real – and if it wasn’t so reminiscent of recent machinations in our nation’s capital. But fun or not, this is an important book at this moment in our tortured political history... Crucial. ★★★★ out of four."
—David Holahan, USA Today
"Richard Nixon, who’s own naughty mouth, blind spots and pathetic unraveling gets a renewed intimacy in Michael Dobbs’ surprisingly riveting King Richard: Nixon and Watergate — An American Tragedy. Like a great curse word, you have heard it endlessly, but told through a fresh voice, it’s as fun as it is lurid.”
—Christopher Borelli, Chicago Tribune
"Dobbs… has a keen sense of drama. And, by focusing on the 100 days after Nixon’s triumphant second inauguration, he provides a clever lens for viewing most all of the president’s disastrous decisions, with an intimacy — due to Dobbs’s subtle choice of extracts from the tapes — that is stunning… The story Dobbs tells is, by turns, hilarious, pathetic and infuriating.”
—Joe Klein, Washington Post
"Vivid... King Richard [has] a better shot than most histories have at reaching younger readers. At the same time, it gives a (much) older generation of Watergate junkies a way to rediscover the dark intrigues of Nixon and his entourage — with notes of relief that we all survived, and perhaps a touch of nostalgia as well.... Dobbs achieves something of a cinematic effect... Whether you lived through the Watergate years, or have studied them since, Dobbs' book hearkens back to an era when even a president elected in a landslide could be held to account by the system itself."
—Ron Elving, NPR
"Smart and highly readable... Dobbs has a talent for you-are-there description... Vivid and fun."
—David Greenberg, New York Times Book Review
"A rollicking narrative history of the first 100 days of Nixon’s second term—the break-in, the cover-up, the investigation—that manages to be searing, humane, and addictive."
—Alessandra Stanley, Air Mail
"This beautifully written and stunningly detailed portrait of one hundred essential days at the beginning of Nixon’s second term brings the Watergate scandal, its colourful cast of characters and Nixon himself to life in a way we’ve never before seen... King Richard’s vivid characterisations, novelistic detail and universal human themes make this a work of our time and for all time."
—Greg Garrett, The Spectator
"Dobbs has used them to produce the story of a White House meltdown that Watergate aficionados will find irresistible.”
—Jim Dey, The News-Gazette
"With cohesion of purpose, command of subject, wealth of specificity and precision of prose, Dobbs fashions an absorbing narrative. A capital work of history rendered with Dobbs’ ability to convey immediacy, King Richard adds welcome clarity and nuance to the Watergate story.”
—The Free Lance-Star
"Fresh... Ingenious... It is Dobbs’s ability to use the techniques of fiction — getting inside the characters’ heads and reconstructing their interactions scene by scene — that gives this book its page-turning power."
—Charlotte Allen, Washington Examiner
"The tale of the two-bit break-in at Washington’s Watergate building and its monumental consequences is complex and labyrinthine, but Dobbs manages to tell it with sparkling clarity... One of the many virtues of this book is that, while acknowledging his often grotesque, even comical shortcomings, it also conveys quite a bit of sympathy for the unlovable, joyless, workaholic Nixon, and the hole into which he dug himself... [Dobb's] tells the story amazingly well."
—Craig Brown, Daily Mail (UK)
"Dobbs masterfully crams in the odds and sods of Nixon’s curious personality... Dobbs’s book combines clarity, amusement and tragedy, opening up the Watergate story, perhaps, to a younger
generation of readers who might imagine that Trump is as bad as it gets."
—Tim Stanley, Literary Review (UK)
"Vivid.. Parts of it read like a script from The West Wing... If All the President’s Men was the first rough draft of Watergate history, this is the polished re-write. Older readers will enjoy its deft mix of personality, history and politics – and younger ones can spare themselves from ploughing through the dustier volumes on the Watergate shelf."
—Colin Freeman, Daily Telegraph (UK)
"Riveting... The book is excellent at painting the scene... Good, brisk, and readable."
—Daniel Finkelstein, The Times (UK)
"The potent research and narrative skills of Michael Dobbs reach new heights in King Richard, his Shakespearean study of the endlessly compelling self-inflicted fall of Richard Nixon. Here again, as he did in his study of the Cuban Missile Crisis, Dobbs applies his signature technique of revealing character through the dramatic compression of time. It makes for illuminating and addictively readable history."
—David Maraniss, author of Barack Obama: The Story
"Michael Dobbs is a master at narrative history. By focusing on the most critical 100 days of Watergate, and by sticking closely to the written and spoken record, Dobbs is able to bring to life the tragedy of Richard Nixon in a way no one else has. A truly gripping read and a moving portrait."
—Evan Thomas, author of Being Nixon
"A balanced but frank account of a critical period in Richard Nixon’s downfall and a valuable addition to the literature of this dramatic era in American political history... Engrossing."
—BookPage
"The strength of the work stems from Dobbs’s bringing lesser-known events into clear focus... Spanning biography and history, this is a gripping narrative and a fine account of events in the presidency. Recommended for readers unfamiliar with Watergate or in need of a refresher."
—Library Journal
"The unraveling of Richard Nixon’s presidency plays out in intimate detail in this vivid recreation of a key period in the Watergate scandal.... Dobbs skillfully quotes from the tapes to paint colorful, nuanced portraits of White House yes-men, a manipulative Henry Kissinger, and a Nixon who is vulnerable, melancholy, paranoid and vengeful...The result is an indelible study of a political antihero."
—Publishers Weekly, starred
"This is a compelling, moment-by-moment narrative, psychological as much as political, offering a sense of intimacy with the beleaguered Nixon without mawkishness."
—Booklist, starred
"Spellbinding... Masterful... The author delivers an intimate, engrossing picture of Nixon as a visionary man “obsessed with privacy and solitude,” an affectionate husband and father, and a gut-fighting outsider mystified by power and all its trappings, styling himself as a kind of blend of Abraham Lincoln, Benjamin Disraeli, and Charles de Gaulle. A riveting portrait of ambition, hubris, betrayal, and the downfall of an American president"
—Kirkus, starred
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
It had been “one helluva show.” The Grieg piano concerto, in particular, had been a revelation. Van Cliburn was superb: no one could match his virtuosity. Of course, most of the Republican high rollers who feasted on colonial roast duckling and plantation pineapple in their tuxedos and long dresses—“clowns,” in Richard Nixon’s estimation—“did not know what the hell was going on.” But the president had thoroughly enjoyed both the music and the political symbolism of the evening.
His arrival at the Kennedy Center had been heralded with “ruffles and flourishes” from sixteen military trumpeters in full Ruritanian regalia. The orchestras at each of the three inaugural concerts had blared out “Hail to the Chief” as he entered the presidential box, as per an “action memo” from his chief of staff, H. R. “Bob” Haldeman. Best of all, he had succeeded in “sticking it to Washington” by excluding the dreary, politically correct National Symphony Orchestra from the festivities. Instead, he had brought the outspokenly conservative Eugene Ormandy down from Philadelphia to conduct the rousing finale to a wonderful event.
The clanging church bells and simulated cannons of Tchaikovsky’s 1812 Overture were still reverberating in Nixon’s ears as he said good night to the evening’s guest of honor, Mamie Eisenhower, at the front door of the White House. He took the mirror-paneled elevator to the residence on the second floor and then headed left through a succession of grand hallways lined with books and paintings to his private den in the far corner of the mansion. This was the Lincoln Sitting Room, the smallest room in the White House and his personal favorite. The cozy Victorian parlor was the place where he did his best thinking and writing, scribbling his ideas onto yellow legal pads to the booming strains of Victory at Sea. He settled into his plush Louis XV–style armchair, a birthday present from his wife Pat, resting his feet on the matching ottoman. A black-and-white print of the Lincoln family hung on the wall above his head, next to the window, which provided a perfect picture frame for the floodlit Washington Monument.
Snug in his sanctuary, Nixon gazed into a crackling fire set by his personal valet, Manuel “Manolo” Sanchez. He was still dressed in the tuxedo he had worn to the Kennedy Center, offset by black bow tie and gleaming presidential cuff links. His hair, dark brown with splotches of gray, was carefully brushed back, a sartorial choice that emphasized his receding hairline and protruding widow’s peak. His already thick jowls had filled out even more during his first four years in office. Combined with his darting eyes, they gave him a tortured look, as if he were perpetually brooding over past slights and disappointments. The upturned, slightly twisted nose, on the other hand, suggested a bumbling American everyman, like Walter Matthau in a goofy Hollywood comedy. Assembled together, it was a face that was neither handsome nor ugly, distinguished nor plebeian. But it was certainly memorable.
It was already past midnight, but the thirty-seventh president of the United States had no desire to sleep. In less than twelve hours, at noon, he would be appearing on the steps of the Capitol to deliver his second inaugural address. He was still tinkering obsessively with the text. “As I stand in this place so hallowed by history, I think of others who have stood here before me,” read one of his last-minute tweaks. Another note reflected his determination to scale back the Great Society that his Democratic predecessor, Lyndon Johnson, had devoted so much energy to constructing: “our goal for government—to take less from people so that people can do more for themselves.”
Nixon read through the speech once more, fountain pen in hand, marking the passages he wished to emphasize in dark blue ink. He underlined some phrases and scratched in a few additions, until the text resembled a heavily annotated sheet of music. He had issued strict instructions that the speech not go “a word over 1200 words.” As with so many of his peremptory commands, the order had gone unfulfilled, largely due to his own contradictory impulses. He had planned to emulate Abraham Lincoln—who had used just 701 words for his second inaugural address, one of the most memorable in American history—but there was too much he wanted to say. In the end, he had settled for a speech of 1,800 words, still reasonably short by modern-day presidential standards. He calculated that it would take sixteen minutes to deliver, including applause.
As he prepared to take the oath of office for the second time, the son of the struggling Quaker grocer had many reasons to celebrate, despite his perpetually restless nature. He had been reelected by the largest margin of popular votes of any president in the nearly two-hundred-year history of the Republic. He had won the grudging respect of the foreign policy crowd—that despised band of elitist snobs—for the geostrategic brilliance of his opening to China. Most gratifying of all, he was on the cusp of concluding a peace agreement with the Communist government of North Vietnam, heralding an end to a war that had cost the lives of fifty-eight thousand Americans and countless Vietnamese. Four years previously, in his first inaugural address, he had described the “title of peacemaker” as “the greatest honor history can bestow.” The road to peace had been long and bloody, but the prize was finally within his grasp. The initialing of the peace accords was set for January 23, just three days away, in Paris.
Of course, the Nixon haters were still out in force. They had seized on the bizarre scandal spawned by the attempted bugging of Democratic Party headquarters in the Watergate office building back in June 1972—“a third-rate burglary attempt,” the White House spokesman Ron Ziegler had termed it—to cast a shadow over his smashing reelection victory. There had been sensational stories in the press alleging a link between the White House and the hapless band of Cubans caught in the act of breaking in to the Watergate. But the trail seemed to be petering out. The burglars were refusing to provide the names of the mysterious higher-ups who had set the plot in motion. Important witnesses had developed amnesia. Even The Washington Post, which had covered the scandal most aggressively from the beginning, was running out of leads to pursue. A special inaugural section of the newspaper titled “The Nixon Years” did not contain a single mention of the dreaded word “Watergate.”
Unable to sleep, and excited by the prospect of four more years in the White House, Nixon was eager to share the moment with “the son I never had.” He lifted the receiver of the telephone on the polished mahogany coffee table beside him and was instantly connected to an operator.
“Mr. Colson, please.”
The political operative known around Washington for his boast that “I would walk over my own grandmother” to ensure Nixon’s reelection came on the line less than a minute later, at 1:04 a.m.
“Yes, sir, Mr. President.” Despite the late hour, Chuck Colson managed to sound chipper and eager to please. He had evidently been waiting for the call.
“Well, how’d you like the evening?”
Nixon cut off his aide before he could answer the question. He wanted Colson to know that he had practiced the Grieg piano piece as a sophomore in high school, back in California, at a time when he had been “quite advanced in music.” He had never heard it performed better. In the hands of a less skillful conductor, the orchestra could easily have overwhelmed the piano. But Ormandy was superb. He was a fantastic musician and a fantastic man. Word had reached the president that the Hungarian-born maestro had told dissident members of his orchestra—“goddamn left-wingers”—to go to hell when they asked to be excused from the concert as a protest against the Vietnam War.
“Marvelous, that’s marvelous,” enthused Colson.
Formally, Colson had the title of special counsel, but this concealed his true function in the White House, which was to serve as Nixon’s chief political adviser and confidant. The self-described “hatchet man” was accustomed to such late-night calls, which he considered a form of “handholding.” One of his responsibilities was to help Nixon deal with his chronic insomnia and talk himself to sleep. A few months earlier, he had received a 1:00 a.m. call from Camp David, the president’s weekend retreat. Nixon had just returned from Moscow. It was obvious he had been drinking, in addition to taking sleeping pills to fight jet lag. He slurred his words so badly that he was practically incomprehensible. In the middle of the telephone conversation, he passed out. Worried that the president might have injured himself or could even be dead, Colson tried desperately to get back through to Camp David. He could not make a call on his own phone, because the party on the other end—Nixon—had not hung up. Rushing out into the night, he woke up a neighbor and managed to reach Manolo Sanchez, who went to investigate. After a few minutes, the valet reported back: the commander in chief was snoring peacefully.
This time, Colson had no difficulty understanding his boss. Both men viewed the inaugural festivities as an opportunity to promote a new conservative majority in the country that had cleaved off great chunks of the old Democratic coalition. They had already made inroads into the Democratic power base in the Old South by appealing to white voters alarmed by the gains of the civil rights movement. Colson had now set his sights on the labor unions, allied traditionally with the Democrats. He wanted to bring pro-Nixon union leaders to the front of the presidential reviewing stand on Pennsylvania Avenue one by one so they could stand alongside the president as he took the salute at the parade. It would be a visible demonstration of a seismic shift in American politics. Soon, the Democrats would be left with just the blacks, the poor, the intellectuals, and a “lavender shirt mob” composed of “homos and queers.”
Nixon could see the value of giving the defectors their moment in front of the television cameras. Those two and a half hours on the reviewing stand could be mined for “a hell of a lot of gold.” But he was worried about being caught chatting with a supporter when he should be saluting the flags carried aloft by the marching bands.
“You see, I’ve got to stop every two minutes to put my hand on my heart as the flag goes by,” he reminded Colson, his deep baritone voice tinged with irritation. He wanted to make sure that actual conversation was kept to a minimum. Wives must definitely be excluded.
Colson reassured him. “We won’t do too much of it, but I think a little bit of it would be a nice touch . . . I believe that the New Majority is there, Mr. President. I really do.”
The conversation turned to Nixon’s controversial decision to launch a massive bombing campaign against North Vietnam over Christmas. For eleven tension-filled days, waves of American B-52s supported by thousands of tactical aircraft had pounded North Vietnamese ports and airfields and power plants, as well as air defenses around Hanoi. The North Vietnamese had earlier agreed to release all American prisoners of war and permit the anti-Communist South Vietnamese leader, Nguyen Van Thieu, to remain at least temporarily in office. They refused to make further substantive concessions but did allow some token modifications to the peace agreement that were sufficient for Nixon to claim he had achieved his goal of negotiating a “peace with honor.” His toughness had been vindicated. The huge sacrifices of the last four years, including a further twenty-one thousand American lives, had been justified. That, at least, was how Nixon saw it.
It had not been easy. Even his national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, had wavered toward the end beneath a firestorm of criticism of the bombing from Congress and the media. Had Nixon given in to the critics, “the goddamn war” would have continued for months if not years, and thousands more Americans would have been killed. There was one outstanding problem: that “son of a bitch Thieu” was threatening to boycott the signing ceremony in Paris because he mistrusted Communist promises of an end to hostilities. But Nixon believed that his South Vietnamese ally would cave when threatened with a cutoff in American aid. Thieu was not about to “commit suicide.”
“We go ahead and make our deal,” he told Colson. “We sink Thieu and everybody says, ‘Thank God [Nixon] was a tough son of a bitch on both sides.’ The hell with them.”
“That’s right,” Colson chimed in. “We accomplished our objectives.”
Once “peace with honor” was achieved, Nixon continued, it would be Colson’s job to stick it to the antiwar people, both on Capitol Hill and in the country. “We just pour it right to ’em.”
It was the kind of assignment the hatchet man relished. A bespectacled former marine captain with a mischievous grin, Colson shared the president’s disdain for the “East Coast elite,” even though he was himself the product of a top New England prep school. He liked to boast that he had turned down a full scholarship to Harvard, choosing instead to attend slightly less prestigious Brown University, where he became a champion debater and leader of the Young Republicans. He was proud of his reputation for political ruthlessness, summed up by the Teddy Roosevelt quotation he kept in the den of his house: “When you’ve got ’em by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow.” The president knew he could rely on Colson to carry out his orders without question—unlike some other aides, who would prevaricate when asked to do something that seemed impractical or illegal. He had put Colson in charge of “dirty tricks,” such as tracking down photographs of Edward Kennedy dancing with starlets or harassing the leakers of secret government documents. He praised his forty-two-year-old assistant for having “the balls of a brass monkey.” For Nixon, Colson was “Mr. Can-Do.”
Although the hour was late, Nixon wanted to give his most appreciative audience a preview of his inaugural address. He flicked through the large-font, double-spaced copy he had been marking up and began reading his favorite portions aloud.
“The stuff on the world is good. I mean, it’s very strong,” the president enthused. “The time has passed when America will make every other nation’s conflict our own or make other nations’ future our responsibility or presume to tell the people of other nations how to manage their own affairs . . . Get the point?”
“Yes, sir. Yes, sir.”
“Abroad and at home, the time has come to turn away from the condescending policies of paternalism, of Washington knows best.”
“Oh, great.”
Product details
- Publisher : Knopf; First Edition (May 25, 2021)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 416 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0385350090
- ISBN-13 : 978-0385350099
- Item Weight : 1.68 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1.55 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #325,873 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #297 in Political Corruption & Misconduct
- #814 in US Presidents
- #1,595 in Political Leader Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

As a former Washington Post reporter who covered the collapse of communism, I have long been fascinated by historical turning points. How a political leader confronts the gravest challenges of modern times, and how his decisions affect the rest of us, is a recurring theme of my seven books.
One Minute to Midnight focused on possibly the gravest crisis ever, in October 1962, when John F. Kennedy stepped back from the nuclear brink at the last possible moment. The Unwanted looked at Franklin Roosevelt's handling of the Jewish refugee crisis that preceded the Holocaust. Six Months in 1945 examined how FDR and Truman negotiated the perilous transition from World War to Cold War. My latest book, King Richard, relates the Shakespearean tale of the self-made man who scrambled his way to the top only to see his dreams turn to nightmares because of tragic character flaws.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
As events spiral out of control, Richard Nixon's multi-faceted personality is put on full display and there are times where readers may sympathize with an emotional Nixon as someone who originated from a modest background and overcame adversity to reach the presidency. At other times though, Nixon is shown to be relentless and lacking in remorse throughout his efforts to protect himself and his allies at the expense of others and justice itself. While offering parallels to Shakespearean or Greek tragedies, Dobbs is sure to emphasize that Watergate was an inherently American saga and one that should not be swept away from public memory. However, some may be disappointed to read that the area of focus is largely contained to early to mid 1973 and does not trace the complete chain of events that led to Nixon's resignation on August 9, 1974. Regardless of its scope though, "King Richard" is a great account of the final crisis of Richard Nixon’s political career and the beginning of one of the most consequential scandals in American history.
My only objection, however, is at the book's conclusion (Dobbs calls it "Exodus" but we usually read it as Shakepeare's last stage direction, "exeunt.") Dobbs calls the Nixon drama a uniquely "American" tragedy because we Americans simply can't put it down, can't stop thinking about Watergate or Nixon or the other characters, who are so "American," like "us."
I simply cannot agree with this assertion.
I remember Nixon as the empty cipher-character who learned dirty tricks from McCarthy and Roy Cohn, who institutionalized "opposition 'research'" as part of modern political behavior, who built the White House culture of ends allowing for the outrageous means, who caused a war to continue for 4 "extra" years without a plan to exit at the cost of 17,000 further American soldiers' lives and those of nearly a million Vietnamese. Nixon envied nearly everybody else as a part of his ruminative self-pitying soul while declining to serve anyone else, who knifed his colleagues in the back whenever he felt it necessary. His psychological and personal limitations were so extraordinary as to go beyond "tragic."
The experience of Nixon is "tragic" only in the sense that he presaged further political deterioration in America, finally culminating in Trump and the Q-Anon. It is not so much that Nixon was an American tragedy, standing by his crimes; it is that we are a tragic people, unable to see the connection between //our// hubris and //our// political catastrophe.
Having said that, if this was a literary circle, I would give the book as many stars as I could - I really enjoyed this take and the approach that Michael Dobbs took to write this work. However, I think we could have used more of the last few months of Nixon's presidency - why does the book only cover up through July 17, 1973? Were there no pertinent details about the Watergate scandal that transpired after that date? Why is that Dobbs didn't talk about Nixon's emotional state in August 1974 when he actually resigned the Presidency? Instead, we go from mid-1973 to Gerald Ford's pardon of Nixon in September 1974.
Despite this, the book is a great work and should be read by every student interested in understanding Nixon and his psyche during those first 6 months of his second term.
Top reviews from other countries
Well written,
Starts in January 1973 inauguration day, until Nixon's resignation.
Characters are described well.
Good use of photographs.
The book describes Nixon's character flaws well guiding the reader through his inner demons.
Highly recommended and a very relevant book.












