Buy used: $29.95

Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime

FREE delivery Monday, March 25 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35. Order within 9 hrs 8 mins

Select delivery location

Used: Good | Details

Sold by From Vintage to New

Fulfilled by Amazon

Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.

Follow the author

Ernst Hartwig Kantorowicz

Follow

The King's Two Bodies Paperback – December 29, 1997

by Ernst H. Kantorowicz (Author)

4.9 19 ratings

See all formats and editions

In 1957 Ernst Kantorowicz published a book that would be the guide for generations of scholars through the arcane mysteries of medieval political theology. In The King's Two Bodies, Kantorowicz traces the historical problem posed by the "King's two bodies"--the body politic and the body natural--back to the Middle Ages and demonstrates, by placing the concept in its proper setting of medieval thought and political theory, how the early-modern Western monarchies gradually began to develop a "political theology.?

The king's natural body has physical attributes, suffers, and dies, naturally, as do all humans; but the king's other body, the spiritual body, transcends the earthly and serves as a symbol of his office as majesty with the divine right to rule. The notion of the two bodies allowed for the continuity of monarchy even when the monarch died, as summed up in the formulation "The king is dead. Long live the king."

Bringing together liturgical works, images, and polemical material, The King's Two Bodies explores the long Christian past behind this "political theology." It provides a subtle history of how commonwealths developed symbolic means for establishing their sovereignty and, with such means, began to establish early forms of the nation-state.

Kantorowicz fled Nazi Germany in 1938, after refusing to sign a Nazi loyalty oath, and settled in the United States. While teaching at the University of California, Berkeley, he once again refused to sign an oath of allegiance, this one designed to identify Communist Party sympathizers. He was dismissed as a result of the controversy and moved to the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, where he remained for the rest of his life, and where he wrote The King's Two Bodies.

Print length

616 pages
Language

English
Publisher

Princeton University Press
Publication date

December 29, 1997
Dimensions

6.25 x 1.75 x 9.5 inches
ISBN-10

0691017042
ISBN-13

978-0691017044
See all details

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Professor Kantorowicz has written a great book, perhaps the most important work in the history of medieval political thought, surely the most spectacular, of the past several generations. Here, in superbly designed chapters based upon the best scholarship in every field even remotely concerned with the Middle Ages, is the development of the theory and symbolism of the early national states from the eleventh to the sixteenth centuries."---P. N. Riesenberg, American Political Science Review

"Professor Ernst Kantorowicz has in this volume given us a monumental work of superb scholarship and profound learning, magnificently produced by Princeton University Press. Few, if any, contributions to the study of medieval thought comparable to this depth and width have been made for many years."---B. Chrimes, The Law Quarterly Review

About the Author

Ernst H. Kantorowicz taught at the University of California, Berkeley and was a member of the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey. His books include Frederick the Second and Selected Studies.

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Princeton University Press; Reprint edition (December 29, 1997)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 616 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0691017042
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0691017044
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.9 pounds
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.25 x 1.75 x 9.5 inches

Best Sellers Rank: #2,049,140 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,831 in European Politics Books
- #8,399 in History & Theory of Politics
- #32,224 in European History (Books)

Customer Reviews:
4.9 19 ratings

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Videos

Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!

Upload your video

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Ernst Hartwig Kantorowicz

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4.9 out of 5

19 global ratings

3 star

0%

2 star

0%

1 star

0%

How customer reviews and ratings work

Sort reviews by

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Peter Coen

this book - which is so esoteric -- has jokes in it and is fun to read

Reviewed in the United States on October 28, 2016

Verified Purchase

For those of us who find this stuff interesting, as I do, this book - which is so esoteric -- has jokes in it and is fun to read. An amazingly brilliant piece of work

4 people found this helpful

Helpful

von Neumann

a classic

Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2017

Verified Purchase

a classic, a work of incomparable learning and profundity

One person found this helpful

Helpful

José

recommendation

Reviewed in the United States on September 6, 2010

Verified Purchase

The purchase was very simple, and they had the available book, the times and delivery of the product was made under the engaged conditions. I recommend this company for their quality and responsibility. I recommend this company for their quality and responsibility.

Helpful

Carlos Eduardo Carvalho R Machado

OK

Reviewed in the United States on January 15, 2014

Verified Purchase

Well, I was looking for this book and the rest is not nobody's business understand their boring, boring, boring too! OK?

3 people found this helpful

Helpful

Arthur A.

New York Times Review by Levy as an application

Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2008

A Sacred Aura by Bernard-Henri Lévy
Nicolas Sarkozy lacks one, and that's all the problem.
Post Date Friday, March 07, 2008

There is one book that says it all.

An old book, nearly a classic. Oddly, it is rarely mentioned in France.

This book, published in 1957, is titled The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology.

Its author is Ernst H. Kantorowicz, a Jewish historian and medievalist from Germany who immigrated to the United States in 1939.

If I could give only one piece of advice to French President Nicolas Sarkozy, and to those around him who are concerned about his image, and in particular the perception of his presidency--which has been greatly damaged not only by an economic downturn, but also by his autocratic style, his recent divorce, his whirlwind romance with ex-model Carla Bruni--it would be to drop everything and consult this great book, this masterpiece about the history of the Middle Ages and contemporary political science.

What exactly is Kantorowicz's thesis? Broadly speaking, it is that a sovereign or ruler does not have one body but two.

More precisely, it is that at the exact moment a man attains political office, his person, his being, literally splits in two.

He has an ordinary body, which Kantorowicz calls "profane." It has all the desires of the human body, its aggravations and passions.

And then he also has a sacred body, quite detached from the scheming of the profane body, as impassive as the other is passionate, as silent as the other is loquacious and temperamental. If not mystical, it is at least mysterious, immaterial, invisible.

The theory suggests that the exercise of power and prestige is related to the struggle between the "vulgar" and the "ethereal" bodies, between the perishable and the sublime. The proportions may vary, but there must be balance; coexistence is a non-negotiable principle.

When Sarkozy's situation is examined through this prism, his case is quite simple: Too much of the profane body and not enough of the sacred. The profane body is in fact dominant, taking over, swallowing up the sacred one.

Somehow, in his romance, his penchant for jogging, his displays of impatience, there is too much flesh, an overexposure of ordinary passions and pleasures, something never before seen in other presidential administrations: an unexpected eclipsing of the sacred body, which does not experience pleasure or passion, and demands both distance and respect.

Unlike some of his other adversaries, I look upon the president with a fair amount of sympathy.

The problem is not his private life--Francois Mitterrand certainly had his secrets, which he later revealed rather ostentatiously.

It is also not the coarseness of his recent imbroglio at the agricultural fair in Paris when he shot back, "Get lost, you jerk," to a man who had insulted him. Is that really more shocking than Jacques Chirac's outburst at Israeli security during his visit to Jerusalem's Old City in 1996, or the rather inappropriate "chienlit" expression used by Charles de Gaulle in May 1968?

It isn't even that he's too present, too directly involved in day-to-day policy--is it not for this, and for his boundless energy, that the French electorate chose him?

No. The real problem--which the public perceives and does not excuse--is that he has seemingly tossed aside the sacred body and the modern doctrines of the Machiavellian prince. The real problem, which is chipping away at Sarkozy's popularity in the polls, and which will soon hamper his ability to effect change, is that this man, so attentive, perhaps too attentive, to France's "Christian roots," has in this matter crossed the line toward full and complete secularity.

The presence of the sacred body was palpable with Chirac, Mitterrand, de Gaulle, Bill Clinton, and now, even with poor, hopeless George W. Bush; its aura could be felt despite the vulgarities they committed. But we don't see any trace of it in the young French president, and that is tragic.

Perhaps he thinks he can bring it all back with a clear, lucid strategy.

Perhaps he thinks he is breaking with tradition, generating a new image of the sovereign.

And perhaps he thinks that in so doing, he is way ahead of the commentators he scorns, who are stuck in the past. Does he think "he who laughs last, laughs best"?

If this is the case, Sarkozy is making a mistake.

Even if he tries to re-create the presidency, wipe the slate clean and begin again, he is governed by the same rules as all politicians. The theory of Kantorowicz is not a hypothesis but a theorem, and theorems, by definition, have no exceptions.

French philosopher and writer Bernard-Henri Lévy is the author, most recently, of American Vertigo: Traveling America in the Footsteps of Tocqueville and Ce Grand Cadavre a la Renverse. Translated from the French by Sara Sugihara.

9 people found this helpful

Helpful

Dr. Thomas Ryba

Five Stars

Reviewed in the United States on October 22, 2015

Verified Purchase

Exactly as expected

One person found this helpful

Helpful

Jacob

A genealogy of Western political theology

Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2011

Ernst Kantorowicz analyzes the development in later medieval political thought by isolating one aspect of it: the King's Two Bodies. By this phrase he means the conjunction of the king's own natural body with that of the "body politic" (9). It is not entirely clear exactly what "body politic" denotes, and Kantorowicz's ambiguity is deliberate: the phrase shifted in meaning throughout the Middle Ages. It is Kantorowicz's further claim that this shift in meaning had theological roots.

Kantorowicz argues, somewhat counter-intuitively, that "The King's Two Bodies" is a monophysite construction--while purporting to be an analogy between the King and the divine, it actually takes the form of a heretical Christology (14-15; see also p.18). The charge of monophysitism is somewhat difficult to follow, but Kantorowicz claims it resulted from the indifference (and inability) to properly distinguish the body of the mortal king from the body of his realm (p. 18). As is evident, the medieval jurists were seeking to imitate their constructions of kingship from Christological truths. That is nothing new, nor is there anything wrong with it. The Eastern Romans already were doing that for hundreds of years. The problem arose when other theological currents changed the way the Church in the West did Christology, and thus changed the way it did politics.

In the early middle ages Western Europe was similar to the Eastern Romans in terms of using Christology to shape kingship. Both civilizations shared a common faith and used that common faith to understand politics. They saw the King as imitator of Christ (47). It should be noted, however, that the Eastern Romans did not use the phrase "King's Two Bodies" as extensively (at all?) as the West did. While the phrase wasn't heretical, per se, it was always attended by many possible dangers. In either case, both sides saw the King as the representative, not of God the Father, but of Christ. This reflects the ancient reading of the Old Testament as a revelation of God the Son. A moment's meditation on this point will make it obvious: political theologies are almost always based on the Old Testament simply because it deals with politics more than does the New Testament. Therefore, one's reading of the Old Testament will shape the way one does political theology.

The West's grammar changed, though. Previously, kingship was done in the context of liturgy. The King represented Christ's rule in a mystical way. He was anointed with oil for the sake of the realm. He was, in short, an ikon of popular piety.

The watershed mark demonstrating the transition best is the reign of Otto II, and the best way to illustrate this difference is in the ikonography surrounding Otto. Otto is important for he represents the intersection between the Byzantine East and Frankish West, including the best and worst elements of both. Kantorowicz contrasts two ikonographic paintings which portray rulers: the Aachen miniature over against the Reichenau painting of Otto. The former portrays the Charlemagnic king as the representative of God the Father whereas the Reichenau painting places Otto in the foreground of a Byzantine halo, suggesting he represents Christ (77).

The above is an important point and I suspect the larger part of it is lost upon Kantorowicz. This ikonography reflects a shift in theology, which probably reflects a shift in the way sacred texts are read. It was mentioned earlier that the Old Testament was now read, no longer as a revelation of God the Son, but of God the Father. One could probably take it a step further--it was seen as a revelation of God-in-general.

The Corpus Mysticum
In many ways it is the concept of a "Mystical Body" that contributed to the secularization of Western political thought. One must avoid, however, overly simplistic reductions regarding the phrase. The phrase "Mystical Body" originally connoted the interplay between the Eucharist, the body born of the Virgin Mary, and the Church itself. While the phrase is not Pauline, if left at this stage there is no problem. As Kantorowicz, drawing upon the work of Henri Cardinal de Lubac, notes, the distinctions between the two bodies hardened into oppositions. Therefore, the body of Christ per the Church was separated from the body of Christ the Son of God. While small at first, this opened the door for a secularization of concepts.

The King as Corporation
One suspects that the idea of the "corporation" arrived in the West coterminous with the sharpening of the "King's Two Bodies." Indeed, even if not chronologically accurate, it is logically consistent. Jurists were puzzled over the problem of whether the king's other body--his realm--died when he died. The short answer to this problem was that the king's other body did not die. The people were in-corporated into this body and outlived the king. The canon lawyers coined a phrase for this: dignitas non moritur--the dignity does not die.

One cannot avoid noticing throughout this work, and if the argument holds then throughout Western history, a progression of concepts regarding political theology. Like its Byzantine cousin, Western political theology began with liturgical roots (59). After the Ottonian period, these liturgical roots were translated into secular terms (115). Therefore, when the King is called a "corpus mysticum," this cannot be interpreted in early liturgical Christian categories. Rather, it can only reflect the ongoing secularization. Because of the hardening of "the King's two bodies," jurists had to account for the fact that the second body, the realm, did not die , and they could only do this by introducing the idea of the corporation. Therefore, one can trace the movement of Western political theology along the following line:
Liturgical Kingship ' Law-based Kingship ' Corporate Kingship ' Corporation ' The State

Conclusion
This book is a genealogy of political theology. It traces the rhythm of Western politics through the lens of a highly disputed phrase. Further, it traces the nuances later attributed to that phrase, and the earth-shattering consequences. Our only regret is that this was the only book of its kind that Kantorowicz had written.

There are some difficulties with the book, though. Kantorowicz does not always identify his main point in each chapter, or he might wait until some random moment in the middle of the chapter before he informs the reader of his argument. Further, there are some portions of the book which do not seem relevant at all (e.g., his extended discussion on medieval English fiscal rights). On top of all of this is the rather dense style in which he wrote, coupled with the numerous (usually un-translated) sentences and paragraphs in Latin. One suspects that many of these phrases are indeed central to his main argument, but if one's grasp of Latin is not on a post-graduate level, the argument will be lost on the reader.

18 people found this helpful

Helpful

Frederick J. Graboske

The Relationship of the English King to the Law

Reviewed in the United States on August 25, 2014

This is a serious study for those interested in political theory, history, and constitutional law. Louis XIV famously said, "I am the state". In earlier times that was true almost everywhere, including England. Kantorowicz focuses on the development of English political theory in re the role of the king. The king may die, but the institution of the monarchy (and thus, the state) continues under a different ruler. As a person, the king becomes subject to the law. As a sovereign, he is immune to it.

2 people found this helpful

Helpful

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English

Michael Montagu

Superb book, a lot of well researched information. ...

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 15, 2015

Verified Purchase

Superb book, a lot of well researched information. Not a bedtime read; probably need a PhD in philosophy and theology to really understand it.

Sebastian Lotzer

Ein Klassiker der Geschichtswissenschaft des 20. Jahrhunderts

Reviewed in Germany on January 3, 2014

Verified Purchase

Eine eigentliche Rezension eines vor über einem halben Jahrhundert erstmals erschienenen Buches zu schreiben, das längst zum Klassiker geworden ist, erscheint wenig sinnvoll. Auch über den Inhalt möchte ich nicht viele Worte verlieren; wer "The King's Two Bodies" sucht, wird in aller Regel wissen, was er will und warum.
Das 1957 erschienene Buch ist noch heute das Standardwerk zum Verständnis der speziellen englischen Verfassungstheorie von den beiden Körpern des Königs (body natural und body politic). Die Lehre, die über kontinentaleuropäische Vorstellungen von königlicher Majestät in Vertretung Gottes (der König als vicarius Dei) weit hinausgeht, hat ihren Ursprung in der Theologie der Spätantike und der Verfassungsgeschichte und politischen Theologie des Mittelalters, stand aber gerade zur Zeit der Tudor- und Stuart-Könige auf dem Höhepunkt ihrer Bedeutung. Die Theorie spiegelt sich in historischen Dramen Shakespeares wider (Richard I, Henry V), ohne sie wäre der Hochverratsprozess gegen und die Hinrichtung von König Charles I. 1649 undenkbar gewesen, und sie wirkt bis heute nach: Wenn ein britischer Monarch stibt, wird sein Nachfolger im selben Moment automatisch König, da der "politische" Körper des Königs unsterblich ist: "The king is dead. Long live the king!" Zuletzt geschah dies am 6. Februar 1952, als George VI. starb und seine Tochter als Elizabeth II. im selben Moment Königin wurde; ihre Krönung erfolgte erst eineinhalb Jahre später, am 2. Juni 1953.
Da das Buch sowohl in deutscher als auch in englischer Sprache seit mehreren Jahrzehnten vorliegt, möchte ich in diesem Zusammenhang noch einmal kurz daran erinnern, das Ernst Kantorowicz ein ursprünglich deutscher Historiker war, ein Jude, der 1895 in Posen geboren wurde und seine Jugend großenteils in Hamburg verbrachte. Er hatte bereits eine ansehnliche akademische Karriere in Deutschland hiner sich, als er 1938 vor den Nazis nach Oxford fliehen mußte. 1939 emigrierte er weiter in die USA, wo er zunächst in Berkeley einen Lehrauftrag erhielt, den er aber 1945 wieder verlor, als er sich weigerte, den geforderten antikommunistischen Loyalitätseid zu unterschreiben. 1951 erhielt Kantorowicz eine Professur in Princeton, wo dann auch "The King's Two Bodies" entstand. Ein Leben wie ein Roman! Man mag sich wundern, warum Hollywood den Stoff nicht längst verfilmt hat. Aber tragische Emigrantenschicksale wie dieses gab es eben in der Mitte des letzten Jahrhunderts zuhauf.
"The King's Two Bodies" enstand 19 Jahre nach der zwangsweisen Emigration des Autors in die englischsprachige Welt in englischer Sprache und ist nicht nur wissenschaftlich, sondern auch sprachlich eine Glanzleistung. Kantorowicz eignete sich die neue Sprache scheinar mühelos an. Den Text im Original zu lesen ist ein echtes Vergnügen. Vergleiche an Joseph Conrad oder Vladimir Nabokov drängen sich auf, die eine ähnliche Meisterschaft im Gebrauch des Englischen erlangten, das gleichfalls nicht ihre Muttersprache war.
Zu guter Letzt möchte ich betonen, daß dieses Buch nicht nur etwas für Historiker ist, sondern in die Bibliothek jedes Menschen gehört, der sich für England, für Großbritannien und/oder für Shakespeare interessiert. Es ist spannend, unterhaltsam und einfach sehr gut geschrieben und öffnet dem Leser die Augen für das Verständnis so mancher Kauzigkeit in der Verfassungswirklichkeit Großbritanniens und des Commonwealth: die "shared monarchy" der 16 "Commonwealth realms", die Beziehungen der "Crown Dependencies" und der "Overseas Territories" zur Krone, das Wesen des auf so eigentümliche Art und Weise konföderierten "United Kingdom" und die Institution der "Crown" an sich.

4 people found this helpful

Translate review to English

See more reviews