Kitchen Living Silicone B... has been added to your Cart

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Kitchen Living Silicone Baking Mat

4.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $17.97 & FREE Shipping on orders over $49. Details
Only 1 left in stock.

Find Products for your Kitchen
Selection for all your Kitchen needs; from pendant lights to appliances, cookware and more. Shop Now
$17.97 & FREE Shipping on orders over $49. Details Only 1 left in stock. Sold by Nez Treasure Trove and Fulfilled by Amazon.


Product Description

Silicone Pastry Mat is reversible with measurements in inches and centimeters. Large non-stick surface for kneading, rolling and shaping. Rolls up for easy storage.

Product Information

Product Dimensions 18 x 1.5 x 1 inches
Shipping Information View shipping rates and policies
Manufacturer Kitchen Living
ASIN B004JG7PRM
Customer Reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

4.0 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #1,427,428 in Home & Kitchen (See Top 100 in Home & Kitchen)
#2,368 in Kitchen & Dining > Bakeware > Baking Tools & Accessories > Baking Mats
#512,818 in Kitchen & Dining > Kitchen Utensils & Gadgets
Date first available at Amazon.com January 16, 2011

Warranty & Support

Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Feedback

Would you like to give feedback on images?
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
0%
4 star
100%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

I bought around ten of these mats, at least four years ago. I use two 18x25 on my kitchen island just for easy clean up when cooking Great!!!! and then i have four baking sheet size and gave rest away as gifts. They are staining now, but i've used them to the point of no return. Fabulous for the price and Im so disappointed I missed out to restock this year. Come on Aldi's restock soon!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse