Luxury Beauty Killers of the Flower moon STEM nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Starting at $39.99 Wickedly Prime Handmade Mother's Day Gifts hgg17 Shop Popular Services Catastrophe Catastrophe Catastrophe  Introducing Echo Look Starting at $49.99 Kindle Oasis Shop Now disgotg_gno_17
asked by Hung on October 31, 2011
Sort: Most Helpful first | Newest first | Oldest first
Showing 1-4 of 4 answers
A
Donovan X answered on November 7, 2011
Comment | 6 of 6 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse

A
Charles C. Seay answered on November 1, 2011
Comment | 2 of 2 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse

A
What you see is what you get. F2.8 is "better" and costs more than F4.0. The IS is "better" and cost more than non-IS. Is the extra cost worth it? I don't know -- that is for each person to decide, depending on what you want to use it for. For me photography is a hobby and I got the "cheap" F4.0, no IS. This lens is more than good enough for my purposes, at least for now. The money I "save" compared to the F2.8 can be used for something else such as another lens or college tuition for my daughter. I haven't decided yet :)
Xavier Ascanio answered on November 1, 2011
Comment | 4 of 4 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse

A
Hung answered on November 1, 2011
Comment | 0 of 3 found this helpful. Do you?  Yes No | Report abuse
‹ Previous   1   Next ›

See all questions about this product