Save Big On Open-Box & Pre-owned: Buy "Ladies & Gentlemen: The Rolling Stones [Blu-ray]” from Amazon Warehouse Deals and save 48% off the $19.98 list price. Product is eligible for Amazon's 30-day returns policy and Prime or FREE Shipping. See all Open-Box & Pre-owned offers from Amazon Warehouse Deals.
Ladies & Gentlemen: The Rolling Stones [Blu-ray]
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Special Offers and Product Promotions
Top Customer Reviews
The Stones are working hard at this show, looking as if they have something to prove. And prove it they do. It's 1972 and there is still an element of danger in the air for this band. They're deadly serious and are leaning into these numbers. Mick Taylor--the sequel to Brian Jones and the prequel to Ron Wood--stands stock still and delivers those chilling licks that made Exile on Main Street legendary. Heck, even good ole honorary Stone Nicky Hopkins is on board for some rollicking piano fills.
This show just builds and builds. By the time they crash head on into Midnight Rambler you feel as if there's no other rock 'n' roll band.
And there IS no other rock 'n' roll band. THIS is the Stones. You SHOULD love them. Because of THIS.
Love in Vain
You Can't Always Get What You Want
All Down the Line
Bye Bye Johnny (a tribute to Chuck Berry)
Rip This Joint
Jumping Jack Flash
Street Fighting Man
Rehearsal footage and interviews with Jagger from 1972 and 2010 round out the DVD. I give it four stars only because of the relatively grainy transfer and slightly muddy audio mix, but these are artifacts of a film and of technology that are 38 years old. The Stones' impact on the world and our memories is indelible. Don't settle for the geriatric group we recently saw on Martin Scorsese's "Shine a Light" (good as it was). Go back to the source, back to when rock was young and dangerous!
The first noticeable visual change, for those who remember the rare Drive-in Movie showings of this film is the elimination of the triple split-screen effect. Split screen was state-of-the-art in 1972, (recall the films Woodstock and Elvis On Tour) but, was always over-done to the point of being annoying. Eliminating it was a wise decision. By today's standards, the onstage camera work will appear almost primitive to the computer stabilized Skycam generation. Instead, onstage cameramen vied for position, and clamored for a dramatic shot only to be foiled by a seemingly motionless Bill Wyman, curly chord stretched to the max, who had an uncanny knack for getting in the way. Likewise, the stage lighting of the day was totally inadequate for filming, thus rendering more than its share of dark moments. If eliminating split-screen added to the continuity of the film, splicing segments from four performances certainly did not. Costume changes from one song to the next, even from an intro to the song itself are, at time more than just noticeable. Some may savor the concert filming of the day, and enjoy the aviance. Others may be reminded of the down side to releasing a 38 year old relic.
The sound mix on the non-Blue-Ray copy I viewed leaves a lot to be desired. First, the over-all volume is lower than expected.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Stones fan since I saw a Satisfaction video on Dutch TV in 74/75 when I was 7/8. If you buy 1 live Stones DVD, this is the one to get (Totally Stripped, from much later, is my... Read morePublished 2 days ago by Brad M. Davis
As a long-time Stones' fan, I've wanted this deluxe set for quite a while, but was unable to afford it. Read morePublished 1 month ago by Sabrina Acree
Get it! Get it! Get it! I was there. They captured the sound perfectly. Play it LOUD. If you want studio sound get a cd: if you want the Rolling Stones LIVE, get this in Bluray. Read morePublished 3 months ago by Sam Shrader
what can I say I was there for this show back in 1972. even my 3 and 5 year old grand sons love it.Published 4 months ago by Jack Bower
The exclusive content is some TV interviews that are interesting in the fact that you get to hear from Mick Taylor, who apparently didn't do a lot of on-camera interviews while... Read morePublished 4 months ago by T. McCool