Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$42.86$42.86
FREE delivery:
Saturday, April 27
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $27.28
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Land of Too Much: American Abundance and the Paradox of Poverty Illustrated Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
The Land of Too Much presents a simple but powerful hypothesis that addresses three questions: Why does the United States have more poverty than any other developed country? Why did it experience an attack on state intervention starting in the 1980s, known today as the neoliberal revolution? And why did it recently suffer the greatest economic meltdown in seventy-five years?
Although the United States is often considered a liberal, laissez-faire state, Monica Prasad marshals convincing evidence to the contrary. Indeed, she argues that a strong tradition of government intervention undermined the development of a European-style welfare state. The demand-side theory of comparative political economy she develops here explains how and why this happened. Her argument begins in the late nineteenth century, when America’s explosive economic growth overwhelmed world markets, causing price declines everywhere. While European countries adopted protectionist policies in response, in the United States lower prices spurred an agrarian movement that rearranged the political landscape. The federal government instituted progressive taxation and a series of strict financial regulations that ironically resulted in more freely available credit. As European countries developed growth models focused on investment and exports, the United States developed a growth model based on consumption.
These large-scale interventions led to economic growth that met citizen needs through private credit rather than through social welfare policies. Among the outcomes have been higher poverty, a backlash against taxation and regulation, and a housing bubble fueled by “mortgage Keynesianism.” This book will launch a thousand debates.
- ISBN-100674066529
- ISBN-13978-0674066526
- EditionIllustrated
- PublisherHarvard University Press
- Publication dateDecember 31, 2012
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6.2 x 1.1 x 9.3 inches
- Print length344 pages
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
“This engrossing book provides an arresting answer to the questions of why America's welfare state is so weak and why so many Americans live in poverty. Prasad forges an elegant argument using both historical and cross-national evidence to show that countries chose between two strategies for managing income distribution, welfare programs and consumer credit. By the 1940s the U.S. had chosen consumer credit, and has since been using 'mortgage Keynesianism,' which does nothing for the truly poor and invites economic volatility. A startling and ultimately convincing contribution to the most important debate of our times.”―Frank Dobbin, Harvard University
“This book is a brilliant addition to two divergent literatures: American political development and comparative political economy. Prasad sees credit as the basis of the American welfare state and its robust capitalist economy; but the essential scaffolding of the Credit Welfare State was the remarkable system of regulatory institutions constructed from the late nineteenth to the late twentieth centuries. When regulation and progressive taxation were dismantled while credit continued to expand, the result was inequality and economic meltdown. Not understanding the vital interplay among taxation, credit expansion, and regulation, U.S. politicians did enormous damage to both democracy and the economy.”―M. Elizabeth Sanders, Cornell University
“Why is there more poverty in the U.S. than in similarly developed nations, notably in Europe? The conventional wisdom holds that the U.S. is less redistributionist due to the strong hold of laissez-faire ideology. In this interesting book, Prasad debunks conventional wisdom...A timely, accessible work on an important topic.”―R. S. Rycroft, Choice
“As one of the world’s super-rich countries, the poverty rate of the USA has remained stubbornly high for half a century, resulting in an intriguing paradox between the coexistence of American wealth and poverty. Prasad provides much needed insight into this troubling contradiction.”―Xueli Huang, Social Justice Research
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Harvard University Press; Illustrated edition (December 31, 2012)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 344 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0674066529
- ISBN-13 : 978-0674066526
- Item Weight : 1.53 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.2 x 1.1 x 9.3 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,131,503 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,086 in Government
- #1,165 in Poverty
- #1,202 in Non-US Legal Systems (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
As Prasad sees it American prosperity was built on the shaky foundation of easy credit generated by such trusted farmer supported insurgent programs as Federal Farm Loan Act, Federal Housing Administration and the now notorious Fannie Mae. European countries followed a more reliable route of high protective tariffs for agriculture, limited credit and non-progressive taxation. Tragically it was the very powerful and often left leaning farm lobby that saddled the nation with inadequate revenue producing taxes with unfortunate consequence for the nation's poor.
There is much to applaud in this justly praised book. As Prasad demonstrates, in spite of the myth of the invisible hand successful capitalist states are the creation of a political class anxious to serve mammon. In other words the hidden hand needs guidance from the not so hidden government. Secondly, agrarian actors both as creators of capital and victims of the predatory practices of the market have generally been the most forceful and articulate critics of capitalism's all too frequent abuses of power and wealth. She also is to be applauded for showing how lawyer friendly adversarial regulation poorly serves either industry or consumers.
One of the most impressive features of Prasad's scholarship is her remarkable command of the literature of comparative political economy. As she notes the robust welfare states of the Scandinavian countries are largely the product of an agrarian insurgency not unlike the Scandinavian supported Farmer-Labor tradition of the Upper Midwest. This of course begs an important question, if these agrarian insurgents created strong welfare states in Europe why not in the United States? What Prasad seems to miss is the fact that while insurgent agrarians did play key roles in supporting legislation establishing such credit friendly policies as the FHA, Farm Security Administration, and the establishment of the REA, these programs were never their ideal solutions to the farm crisis of the 1930s. A better student of comparative economy than history, Prasad also ignores the fundamental differences between competitive sectors of the agricultural economy. While Southern agrarians and Upper Midwesterners joined forces to support farm loans, TVA, rural electrification, and many other New Deal programs they often clashed over the specifics of marketing and tariffs. In fact key New Deal Agricultural policy creators such as Rexford Tugwell ridiculed the far more radical proposals of the Farmer's Union and actually supported key elements of the large scale farmer agenda of the Farm Bureau Federation. As a traditional Democratic free trader FDR's supported secret reciprocal trade agreements flooded the US with agricultural goods from South America, Canada, and even Australia while protecting such favored commodities as cotton and tobacco. As the Farmer's Union knew, the interests of dairy farmers and sometimes even wheat and beef producers were sacrificed to encourage increased economic activity that might possibly benefit manufacturing interests.
In spite of Prasad's provocative thesis as an unreconstructed La Follette Progressive, my faith in the power of progressive taxation remains unshaken. By exclusively focusing on tax policy Prasad ignores the choices societies make about spending the resources they have. As the Midwestern insurgents knew there is a real economic cost to empire. Prasad suggests that if we had a more robust non-progressive tax base we would now spend more on actual human needs. Progressives like Robert La Follette, Jr. and congressman Merlin Hull knew better. Instead of adequately funding old age pensions and increasing spending on health care, the US has since the late 1930s chosen to spend its limited resources fostering American empire aboard. It has chosen to fund often ill advised regime changes while enriching military contractors often with direct ties to Congress and the executive branch. I certainly respect Prasad's knowledge and find her book an engrossing read but the agrarians who helped give us progressive taxation would have (if left to their own devices) given us a far more robust welfare state than the New Deal, Fair Deal or Great Society. And even more importantly they would left us with a far more just society.
As for "Not understanding the vital interplay among taxation, credit expansion, and regulation, U.S. politicians did enormous damage to both democracy and the economy." --M. Elizabeth Sanders, Cornell University. This was/is a well understood socio-political inconvenience that neither suited the temper of the electorate, nor the ambitions of the aspirants to government, then and/or now, to confront.







