Buy new:
$33.52$33.52
FREE delivery:
Jan 19 - 24
Ships from: little goods shop Sold by: little goods shop
Buy used: $14.99
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
+ $4.99 shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War Hardcover – September 18, 1996
| Robert B. Strassler (Editor) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
- Print length711 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFree Press
- Publication dateSeptember 18, 1996
- Dimensions8 x 1.75 x 9.75 inches
- ISBN-100684828154
- ISBN-13978-0684828152
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
From Library Journal
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Product details
- Publisher : Free Press (September 18, 1996)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 711 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0684828154
- ISBN-13 : 978-0684828152
- Item Weight : 3.17 pounds
- Dimensions : 8 x 1.75 x 9.75 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,863,715 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,062 in Ancient Greek History (Books)
- #48,711 in Military History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on February 5, 2021
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
To illustrate my point, compare the translation used here to the one found in the Penguin Classics edition, translated by English novelist and classicist Rex Warner in the 1950s. The passages in question are from book three, wherein Athenians Cleon and Diodotus publicly debate whether or not the Mytilenians should be executed for their revolt. Both men go on a bit of a digression regarding the purpose of political debate. Here Diodotus justifies the need for reasoned, public debate to inform democratic decision making, and criticizes Cleon’s insinuation that political speakers and advisors are primarily motivated by self interest.
Here is the Crawley translation included in the Landmark edition:
‘As for the argument that speech ought not to be the exponent of action, the man who uses it must be either senseless or interested: senseless if he believes it possible to treat of the uncertain future through any other medium; interested if wishing to carry a disgraceful measure and doubting his ability to speak well in a bad cause, he thinks to frighten opponents and hearers by well-aimed calumny.’
Compared to Warner’s translation in the Penguin edition:
‘And anyone who maintains that words cannot be a guide for action must be either a fool or one with some personal interest at stake. He is a fool if he imagines that it is possible to deal with the uncertainties of the future by any other medium, and he is personally interested if his aim is to persuade you into some disgraceful action, and, knowing that he cannot make a good speech in a bad cause, he tries to frighten his opponent and his hearers by some good-sized pieces of misrepresentation.’
Later in the same speech compare Crawley:
‘The good citizen ought to triumph not by frightening his opponents but by beating them fairly in argument; and a wise city, without over-distinguishing its best advisers, will nevertheless not deprive them of their due, and, far from punishing an unlucky counselor, will not even regard him as disgraced. In this way successful orators would be least tempted to sacrifice their convictions for popularity, in the hope of still higher honours, and unsuccessful speakers to resort to the same popular arts in order to win over the multitude.’
...to Warner:
‘The good citizen, instead of trying to terrify the oppression, ought to prove his case in fair argument; and a wise state, without giving special honours to its best counsellors, will certainly not deprive them of the honour they already enjoy; and when a man's advice is not taken, he should not even be disgraced, far less penalized. In this way successful speakers will be less likely to pursue further honours by speaking against their own convictions in order to make themselves popular, and unsuccessful speakers, too, will not struggle to win over the people by the same acts of flattery.’
I find Warner’s translation much clearer and easier to follow: compare the very dated sounding "speech ought not to be the exponent of action" to the more direct and modern "words cannot be a guide for action," as well as the nearly euphemistic "popular arts" to the single word "flattery." On several occasions while reading the Landmark edition I had to go over passages multiple times to discern exactly what was being said or relayed. It was worse for the long orations, which are particularly wordy.
As for Thucydides’s histories itself, we’re so very lucky that the text has survived to be read--and published--into our century. And though I do much prefer Herodotus, in part because of my own interest in the Achaemenid Empire and in part because it’s simply more fun to read, the political discussions and events of Thucydides, despite being 2500 years past, still bare a powerful and at times startling relevance to our modern world. I recommend reading Thucydides, just not this particular translation.
wasn't history buff till I read Thucydides
Strassler has put together a very accessible book on studying both Thucydides's own account (the most valuable part of the book) as well as adding to it with maps of the areas in question, notes, and appendices following the text that help illuminate some of the military, political, some social and economic aspects of the Greek world. Thucydides's account covers mainly the military side of the twenty-seven year long conflict known as the Peloponnesian War, although his account ends in 411 BC, some seven years before Athens's ultimate defeat. But his narrative gives us at least some important glimpses of other aspects of life in the Hellenic world at that time, though precious little especially on the social side.
There is so much to learn in this narrative, despite the horrendous conflict that engulfed nearly twenty-seven years between the two chief city-states, Athens and her allies versus Sparta and her allies. We learn very little of the author; he seems to believe that his part is very minor compared to everything else that occurred and therefore is not worth discussing. As others have noted, he seems not to have had a profound religious side, at least it seems the notions of oracles and omens and the likes aren't as widely discussed as others have written, e.g. Herodotus's Histories. The author displays a fairly balanced view of the conflict, though he was an Athenian.
The speeches that he includes are quite remarkable, though you have to doubt the veracity of all of these in terms of word for word accuracy, maybe some were conjured, but who can say for sure, we weren't there. It seems hard to find fault with his careful examination of events and his efforts to provide a fairly accurate account of that tragic war. He was a participant, and like any writer of history, is influenced by his own prejudices and his own experiences, to some extent at least. Without his account we would know far less.
There are many memorable and very human episodes that will strike you in this account, such as the effects of the Plague on Athens's population, the oratory of Pericles, the Athenian disaster at Sicily, the civil strife erupting between people who shared the same homeland, and so forth. You'll learn of the growth of the Athenian empire and the problems possessing an empire can lead to, the nature of the Spartan military, the strategies and battles fought, public leaders like Pericles, Hermocrates, Nicias, Cleon, Brasidas, Alcibiades and so many others.
Accounts like Thucydides's prove that human nature doesn't really change that much, despite all the evident technological, political, economic and cultural changes that have occurred, we still possess the same strengths and weaknesses innate to human nature from time immemorial. This account is invaluable and this edition by Strassler makes it imminently accessible. A true classic.
Top reviews from other countries
This saves the time looking every single place name. Very well organised.
There were one or two missing references even though they had been subscripted otherwise it would have received 5 stars.
It is still the best of its type.












