Buy new:
$24.99$24.99
Delivery Wednesday, July 24
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$10.99$10.99
Delivery Wednesday, July 24
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Hohn Books
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Landscapes & Cycles: An Environmentalist's Journey to Climate Skepticism Paperback – June 30, 2013
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length342 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateJune 30, 2013
- Dimensions7.01 x 0.71 x 10 inches
- ISBN-101490390189
- ISBN-13978-1490390185
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; First Edition (June 30, 2013)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 342 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1490390189
- ISBN-13 : 978-1490390185
- Item Weight : 1.31 pounds
- Dimensions : 7.01 x 0.71 x 10 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,475,231 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,351 in Environmental Science (Books)
- #3,772 in Environmentalism
- #4,091 in Nature Conservation
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the science in the book well-researched, easily understood, and authoritative. They also appreciate the great insights and fun to read. Readers also say the book is required reading for environmentalists.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book's science well researched and easy to understand. They also appreciate the wonderful explanation of the complexities of the interactions of currents, climates, and landscapes. Readers also mention that the text is documented in 999 source notes.
"...Landscapes and Cycles contains the most comprehensible explanation of climate and weather I have read to date, clearing explaining the heat and..." Read more
"...This book is thought provoking, easy to read, and well written...." Read more
"...The text is documented in 999 source notes.Jim Steele’s special fields of interest and expertise are biology, wildlife, and ecology...." Read more
"Jim Steele has authored a very readable book regarding the concerns that he shares with many respected climatologist and scientist in related fields..." Read more
Customers find the book has great insights, compelling stories, and compelling evidence. They also say it's refreshing, factual, and easy to read. Readers also say the book broadens their horizons and understanding of natural phenomena.
"...trap, and his thorough, documented, heavily footnoted, and illustrative evidence comes from an environmentalist well-schooled in the scientific..." Read more
"...This is an excellent introduction to reality." Read more
"...the greatest service possible to us non-scientists: It empowers us with the understanding of how our comparatively small individual efforts can..." Read more
"...What I found was a refreshing new perspective regarding the possible causes of global warming...." Read more
Customers find the writing quality of the book clear, well-crafted, and nearly like-new. They also appreciate the reasonable price and fast delivery.
"...is well written and the logic and thought arguments are clear and well crafted...." Read more
"Condition is actually nearly like-new. Reasonable price and fast delivery. I'm a very pleased customer!" Read more
"solid, common sense book..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Landscapes and Cycles contains the most comprehensible explanation of climate and weather I have read to date, clearing explaining the heat and moisture transfer mechanisms of ocean currents and air circulation, as currently understood. I especially found the description of the interaction of air (Hadley cells) and ocean (El-Nino / La Nina) circulations to be illuminating.
Landscapes and Cycles conclusively demonstrates that while “climate change” may be global, it is the local changes in climate and environment that affect species and landscapes. Critical conclusions from the book are:
• When considering local effects, it is imperative to consider local climate.
• An obsession with “global climate change” leads many researchers and environmental advocates to blind themselves to the possibilities of local effects, whose remediation or mitigation holds real promise of preserving and improving fragile ecosystems.
• That natural systems (PDO, ENSO, AMO, sunspot cycles, etc.) have far quicker and far larger effects on climate than “global climate change”, and that the effects of these systems will continue regardless of human activities, so that learning to live with and mitigate their effects holds greater promise for a benign environment than mandating a “carbon free world”.
For example, learning that California experiences severe drought 30% of the time (over decades or centuries) implies that extreme wildfires are better prevented by wise land use and watershed protection than mandating electric vehicles (whose effect on CO2 emissions is infinitesimal compared to increased coal use in China and India).
• A trend towards politicized “science” and a quasi-religious subservience to the cause of “global climate change” has led far too many advocates of “global climate change” to corrupt their research, findings, and publications in order to promote their narrative, often through intentional obfuscation, omissions, or downright fraud.
The author does NOT deny that “global climate change” may be occurring. He simply states that it is not the end-all and be-all of observed species and landscape changes, and that many of the examples that purport to show that are simply not true.
His message is, to quote “The Princess Bride” – “"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”
1) Climate change cannot be reduced to one, or even a few reasons.
2) Scientists are fallible; can and do follow their biases--and career opportunities.
3) Bad science, however well-intentioned, does exist.
4) There are much more productive ways to help our environment--and adapting to it--than vilifying oil companies and laggard governments.
Climate change has become a media darling, and for good reason: If our changing weather patterns can be reduced to one cause, our simplified news sources can always use a good sound byte--and who doesn't like to talk about the weather? If we can turn this into a political issue, all the more simple! We know all-too-well the two sides that will line up against each other. It can be a whole branch of the entertainment industry!
But Mr. Steele does not fall into this trap, and his thorough, documented, heavily footnoted, and illustrative evidence comes from an environmentalist well-schooled in the scientific method, not from an oil industry shill. The book begins with his own epiphany: A once thriving meadow that he and his students were studying for years had dried up. Mr. Steele's bias at the time was to blame climate change, but a little research into California's climate history showed no such trend (though California does have climate cycles of drought and heavy rain dictated by the Pacific Ocean and its cycles--he goes into this in great detail). Yes, the meadow's lifelessness was due to man-made causes, but a little local, hard-work restored the watershed by removing an old sunken railroad track that altered the landscape and ecosystem. Such a small-scale observation! What about our large scale industrial farming; continued rain forest decimation; over-fishing of the oceans? Yes, these are also CO2 culprits, but could these factors be a bigger threat than the more often blamed sources (coal, oil) of CO2 emissions, I thought?
Mr. Steele's book is not full of such conjecture; the bulk of it is research and critical examination of many scientific studies that support the current bias of man-made climate change: The seminal 1996 butterfly study by Dr. Camille Parmesan is a real eye-opener! There are chapters on pikas, penguins, frogs, walruses, whales, seals, and polar bears. In all, Mr. Steele questions their methods, deliberate exclusion of data, and documents contradictory studies. He also rightfully points out that wildlife react to local changes in the environment, not necessarily global ones--the latter being much harder to prove, unless we are talking about a catastrophic extinction event. . . It is evident all is not well in the 'peer review' department of these studies.
There is some finger-pointing at climate scientists--and the ever present blogs--of 'not playing fair'; of being too loose with the facts; of exclusion of meaningful contradictory data; in short, of preventing honest debate. This is to be expected, and more importantly, needs to be said. I think, however, Mr. Steele is very cautionary and fair, and gives most scientists the benefit of the doubt.
Woven throughout the book is an elucidation of climate patterns: Within and above the oceans, the arctic, glaciers, the tropics, in our industrialized landscapes--both urban and farmed. Solar patterns, ice ages, little ice ages are revealed. Tree-ring data, long the reliable thermometer of climate change through the ages, contradicts CO2 theory. . . The famous 'hockey-stick' spike in CO2 as documented and popularized in Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" does not even show up in the tree-ring studies, so they are 'conveniently' ignored. . . by some; that is, not Mr. Steele.
This is a book that should be read--and recommended--by every environmentalist, lover of the scientific method and nature: In short, by every thinking person.
This book is thought provoking, easy to read, and well written. He focuses on land use and other environmental factors that explain phenonomen that are routinely blamed on climate change. To assist butterflies, for example, his team focused on addressing their local environment, which allowed their butterflies to thrive. Others more politically driven, recommended moving the butterflies farther north; those others were given global kudos, but their butterflies did not benefit from their recommendations.
Top reviews from other countries
The many complex natural cycles always have and still do drive our weather and climate - Jim Steele discusses how local climate is what matters and how some locations have not warmed over the past few decades. Many places that have warmed almost always have some kind of landscape change around the weather stations that influence this. This book thoroughly details many examples of climate change from a historic and recent perspective - ice cores and other data show it has been warmer than today at lower CO2 concentrations, and that climate warming has been more rapid at the end of the last ice age. We have nothing to be alarmed about right now.
He also links this to some of the most pressing threats to our wildlife and habitats - over millions of years our species have always dealt with changes in weather and climate, but habitat loss and degradation, pollution, invasive species, disease and over-harvesting are the most important factors.
I would recommend this book to anyone who actually wants to learn about and help the environment.
Jim Steele quietly and slowly debunks varied ecological scares. He also gives carefully reasoned arguments of why polar bears are not endangered. Also why what warming that has recently occured in the Arctic is cyclical and due the varying ocean currents and has little or nothing to do with CO2.
The book is written in a straightforward and knowledgeable manner which is easily understood.
Thank you Jim Steele
My major take away after reading the book "Is WHY are governments and the main media constantly preaching climate change is solely based on human emissions of CO2". There is no doubt that they are -but why? Undoubtedly the answer is more complex that we imagine given the number of organizations and governments involved.

