Bastiat is a good essayist, and his main point is well-taken. One should be careful about social policy, it involves real people. However, some of the things he takes issue with seem to be preoccupations you might expect for the well-to-do in the 19th century.
Law is justice. What is justice, though? Bastiat thinks that if a person would do something and it would be considered wrong, then if a government does it, likewise it is wrong [focusing on taking what others have]. This sounds like a sound principle, but falls apart almost immediately upon some inspection. A group may have properties that an individual does not (the famous example being atoms are invisible, but things made of atoms are not necessarily so), and so it seems to me that we can accept governments can do things that we would not individuals to do. It may or may not be true, but the reason cannot come from examples for individuals. For example, we let governments enforce the law and carry-out punishments. I'm sure Bastiat would answer that these sorts of things are only the sorts of things that people would agree to, and so it would not be compulsory, but undoubtedly some would not agree, and so then it is not clear what should be done. Perhaps he's right that without a government people will rationally choose to give up things, but my own experience tends to tell me that poor Nash equilibria (such as for air pollution) do occur if we don't have some sort of strong third-party to enforce some standards (usually the government is one of the few entities that can do this). People's decisions affect each other in various ways, and so we should be careful about how much we limit others' decisions, we have to acknowledge that others' choices make a substantial difference to our lives. It should perhaps be of last resort to let governments do these sorts of things, but Bastiat has few concrete examples to let us ponder actual circumstances.
Also, free public education is mentioned, (as are almost all taxes) as a type of plunder. Free public education has been fairly important for creating economic wealth. It is not obvious how the supposed harm from taking taxes to support this necessarily outweighs the actual harm of depriving some of education. It seems to simply be a fact that left to our own means, society does not provide for those less fortunate as often as would be beneficial. The argument against philanthropy by the government also does not seem very strong. It could lead to problems, but governments around the world do quite well with all sorts of varying levels of philanthropy.
There is a deeper issue, as well. His argument seems to implicitly assume that we know what we own (and so deserve). I don't think it is obvious what we "deserve" and therefore have a right to own. What sort of things become my property? Land? If this land came from some act of plunder previously, is it still my property? In addition, if my abilities come from natural talents rather than hard work, do I truly deserve it? Is it justice? I think the idea of justice needs to be more strongly motivated. It isn't hard to come up with some reasonable but by no means definitive answers to these questions that are favorable to a Bastiat-like viewpoint, but this is not touched. Bastiat talks clearly of the evil of slavery, but in this short essay he doesn't explore what the consequences are. What is the status of a slave owner's (non-human) properties that come through plunder?
I think Bastiat is on stronger ground when he cautions about believing leaders who claim they have everyone's best interests in mind, and that we should not rush into societal experiments without strong amounts of evidence and experience to guide us. While I personally didn't find Bastiat's arguments for such a hands-off government, he does write well, and if you think that you know what property is proper, his arguments are sound enough. It is a short essay, and so it is possible Bastiat answers these questions in other writings.
Other Sellers on Amazon
$9.95
FREE Shipping
on orders over $25.00
shipped by Amazon.
FREE Shipping
Get free shipping
Free shipping
within the U.S. when you order $25.00
of eligible items shipped by Amazon.
Or get faster shipping on this item starting at $5.99
. (Prices may vary for AK and HI.)
Learn more about free shipping
Sold by:
The Books & Print Depot
Sold by:
The Books & Print Depot
(1 rating)
100% positive
100% positive
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$6.00
+ $4.74 shipping
+ $4.74 shipping
Sold by:
mises-institute
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Got a mobile device?
You’ve got a Kindle.
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
Send link
Processing your request...
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Flip to back
Flip to front
The Law Paperback – July 4, 2011
by
Frederic Bastiat
(Author)
|
Frederic Bastiat
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Paperback, Illustrated
"Please retry"
|
$6.49 | $5.84 |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$12.96 | $9.47 |
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length72 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
Publication dateJuly 4, 2011
-
Dimensions5.5 x 0.18 x 8.5 inches
-
ISBN-101612930123
-
ISBN-13978-1612930121
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
Full of truths that are not merely relevant, but are absolutely vital to our future. --Congressman Dick Armey
No work before or since has made such a compelling case for freedom. Bastiat's message will influence students of liberty for years to come. --Andrea Millen Rich, Laissez Faire Books
No work before or since has made such a compelling case for freedom. Bastiat's message will influence students of liberty for years to come. --Andrea Millen Rich, Laissez Faire Books
About the Author
Frederic Bastiat, who was born two hundred years ago, was a leader of the French laissez-faire tradition in the first half of the nineteenth century. He was influenced by Cobden's Anti-Corn Law League and became a convinced free trader. Joseph Schumpeter described Bastiat as "the most brilliant economic journalist who ever lived."
Start reading The Law on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Audible Holiday Deal
Save 46% on your first 4 months. Get this deal
Product details
- Publisher : Tribeca Books (July 4, 2011)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 72 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1612930123
- ISBN-13 : 978-1612930121
- Item Weight : 4.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.18 x 8.5 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#986,690 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,615 in Democracy (Books)
- #1,903 in Communism & Socialism (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Read moreRead less
Customer reviews
4.8 out of 5 stars
4.8 out of 5
1,509 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2019
Verified Purchase
23 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2019
Verified Purchase
This book changed my view of the world, and my peers, and my expectations of life. A concept so simple and straight forward. Translated from early 1800s French, it can take a small adjustment to wording if you aren't used to it.
So amazingly far ahead of its time, you realize that none of the current political world is new. This has all been tried before...
So amazingly far ahead of its time, you realize that none of the current political world is new. This has all been tried before...
34 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 18, 2020
Verified Purchase
This book is an interesting read. It can be little difficult to follow sometimes because of the author's reference to other historical people and economists of the period (1850). The author was French and this book has been translated (quite well, I think). The book is only 88 pages and I got through it in a few hours. I'm sure if I were interested, I could have gone more slowly and taken notes or researched the people the author referenced. If you are interested in Libertarian ideas or believe that the government has become too big, powerful and intrusive, you will probably like this book. While I'm not a Libertarian, I'm a fan of economics and probably lean a little "Austrian School" and I enjoyed reading this book. Keynesians will probably like this book, Marxists...not so much. I hope this review was useful to you!
12 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2018
Verified Purchase
The one dissenter of the philosophers of the day during the before and after periods of the French revolution. This man will help any American to see what is true and good about the Constitution for the United States. After all, France adopted our constitution shortly after we did .. . .. as United States born Natural persons.
30 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 14, 2019
Verified Purchase
This copy is a complete joke of the actual work by this author.
There are so many errors and typos that it makes it hard to understand and read.
The way it's formatted doesn't make sense either.
I will repeat the work of author itself is great, the translation copy is complete waste of money.
There are so many errors and typos that it makes it hard to understand and read.
The way it's formatted doesn't make sense either.
I will repeat the work of author itself is great, the translation copy is complete waste of money.
12 people found this helpful
Report abuse
5.0 out of 5 stars
Written in 1850, feels contemporary.... Fantastic explanation of how we are plundered by "law"
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2020Verified Purchase
I listened to the Audible version x 3 and couldn't get over how 170 year old essay felt totally contemporary. It talks about failing public schools, banksters extracting dividends from governmental connections, protective taxes for the connected manufacturers, regulation as barrier to entry etc. Law can pervert to violent means of plunder and we witness this progression on nearly daily basis in present day USA. On top of that - great foreword by Thomas di Lorenzo, a treat in its own right.
9 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 27, 2020
Verified Purchase
I first encountered and read this extraordinary book when an adult student taking a course in American history and the development of its Judeo-Christian legal system in the mid 1980's. "The Law" and the course's other required reading, "The Making of America: The Substance and Meaning of the Constitution," (W. Cleon Skousen, author) absolutely and dramatically changed my path as an American citizen. They provided me a core education in my nation and many aspects of world history that either had not been taught to me or had fallen on deaf ears. (I fear the former more true.) I understand that "Civics" as a required course for high school graduation is a subject long obsolete. In 2020, we may well reconsider what is required from those who teach our progeny. I cannot rightly offer an eloquent critique of "The Law" but to advise you to get it, read it (even with a good dictionary or thesarus at hand), keep a permanent copy, and give one to those who seek your vote. (For them, you may give "pop quizes."
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2021
Verified Purchase
Read or listen to Bastiat's The Law while you can.
Cancel culture may cancel this book and its author without ever having read, listened to, or understood it, and it's author under the blanket that everything cancel culture hates is "hate speech" and racism.
Cancel culture may cancel this book and its author without ever having read, listened to, or understood it, and it's author under the blanket that everything cancel culture hates is "hate speech" and racism.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
J. J. Bradshaw
5.0 out of 5 stars
Arguably the most insightful book ever written, should be read by everybody
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 19, 2018Verified Purchase
Quite possibly one of the most insightful books ever written, although it is more of an expanded essay than book. In less than 100 pages Bastiat provides a compelling case for what the law should be and what it has become, and summarises the core principles of libertarianism in a way which has seldom been matched by much longer works and never bettered.
Bastiat considered the law to be the collective defence of life, liberty and property, nothing more, nothing less. He considered that individuals had a right to protect their life, liberty and property, including by use of force. He posited that that contrary to the assumption that people are granted rights to life, liberty and property by the law, it was rather that life, liberty and property allowed the creation of laws. That is still a truly profound idea and one which challenges the almost universal belief in much of the Western world in particular. However although the law should only be concerned with protecting life, liberty and property, or as Bastiat puts it, justice, it ends up undermining justice when it is used to promote plunder and false philanthropy. Once the law exploits it's unique position of legitimacy and call on obedience to promote various "progressive" ideals such as wealth redistribution and attempts to improve mankind then the engine of justice becomes an engine of oppression. Bastiat contrasted societal and state attitudes towards non-legal plunder such as criminal theft with those to legalised plunder (i.e. taxes, monopolies and tariffs), he considered both to be plunder.
One of the most powerful sections of the book is his complete destruction of the conceit of ruling classes who venerate state plunder to improve the lot of people whilst simultaneously seeing those they rule as nothing more than live stock, inanimate beings not possessed of sound judgement or thought. This patronising attitude of those who take it upon themselves to rule towards those they rule has not changed since Bastiat's time.
Bastiat saw three possible outcomes for society:
-the few plunder everybody (such as traditional monarchies)
-everybody plunders everybody (i.e. socialism, the modern state)
-nobody plunders anybody
Bastiat favoured a state in which there was no plunder but we live in a world which proves the truth of Bastiat's pithy observation that "the state is the great fictitious entity by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else". Writing in the first half of the 19th Century it is almost as if Bastiat could see into the 20th Century, the expansion of the state and its associated legal plunder, false philanthropy and abuse of the law leading to injustice and worse, like I say he basically synthesised the entire basis of libertarian ideals in under 100 pages and did in a very readable, accessible way. Despite the age of the book it is very easy to read.
Some may disagree with Bastiat's ideas and values, but I would challenge anybody to read this book and not find many elemental truths.
Bastiat considered the law to be the collective defence of life, liberty and property, nothing more, nothing less. He considered that individuals had a right to protect their life, liberty and property, including by use of force. He posited that that contrary to the assumption that people are granted rights to life, liberty and property by the law, it was rather that life, liberty and property allowed the creation of laws. That is still a truly profound idea and one which challenges the almost universal belief in much of the Western world in particular. However although the law should only be concerned with protecting life, liberty and property, or as Bastiat puts it, justice, it ends up undermining justice when it is used to promote plunder and false philanthropy. Once the law exploits it's unique position of legitimacy and call on obedience to promote various "progressive" ideals such as wealth redistribution and attempts to improve mankind then the engine of justice becomes an engine of oppression. Bastiat contrasted societal and state attitudes towards non-legal plunder such as criminal theft with those to legalised plunder (i.e. taxes, monopolies and tariffs), he considered both to be plunder.
One of the most powerful sections of the book is his complete destruction of the conceit of ruling classes who venerate state plunder to improve the lot of people whilst simultaneously seeing those they rule as nothing more than live stock, inanimate beings not possessed of sound judgement or thought. This patronising attitude of those who take it upon themselves to rule towards those they rule has not changed since Bastiat's time.
Bastiat saw three possible outcomes for society:
-the few plunder everybody (such as traditional monarchies)
-everybody plunders everybody (i.e. socialism, the modern state)
-nobody plunders anybody
Bastiat favoured a state in which there was no plunder but we live in a world which proves the truth of Bastiat's pithy observation that "the state is the great fictitious entity by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else". Writing in the first half of the 19th Century it is almost as if Bastiat could see into the 20th Century, the expansion of the state and its associated legal plunder, false philanthropy and abuse of the law leading to injustice and worse, like I say he basically synthesised the entire basis of libertarian ideals in under 100 pages and did in a very readable, accessible way. Despite the age of the book it is very easy to read.
Some may disagree with Bastiat's ideas and values, but I would challenge anybody to read this book and not find many elemental truths.
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse
A. Libertarian
5.0 out of 5 stars
Short and Decisive
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 9, 2021Verified Purchase
This is the definitive book on minarchism: the philosophy that government should be limited only to justice. That is, providing laws, a court system, police and national defence.
Written in a zippy style, Bastiat makes a passionate deontological argument for liberty, relying on moral principles that it is wrong for legislators to impose their arbitrary and subjective ideas upon others, and to plunder their resources to finance said ideas. This avoids the weakness of utilitarianism, where classical liberalism was initially the way to maximise happiness for the most number of people, but predictably social engineering schemes wormed their way in, justified along the same lines.
Bastiat makes a compelling (if mildly repetitive) claim that since we have the right to individual self defence, justice is simply the collective manifestation of that individual right, and as such the system of collective justice shouldn't be able to do anything we can't do as individuals. Once you concede this premise, for whatever special interest, arbitrary power has been created and things spiral out of control from there.
Written in a zippy style, Bastiat makes a passionate deontological argument for liberty, relying on moral principles that it is wrong for legislators to impose their arbitrary and subjective ideas upon others, and to plunder their resources to finance said ideas. This avoids the weakness of utilitarianism, where classical liberalism was initially the way to maximise happiness for the most number of people, but predictably social engineering schemes wormed their way in, justified along the same lines.
Bastiat makes a compelling (if mildly repetitive) claim that since we have the right to individual self defence, justice is simply the collective manifestation of that individual right, and as such the system of collective justice shouldn't be able to do anything we can't do as individuals. Once you concede this premise, for whatever special interest, arbitrary power has been created and things spiral out of control from there.
busybutterflies
5.0 out of 5 stars
Don’t pass this by
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 15, 2019Verified Purchase
Amazing buy for my teen - such thought provoking, moving, frustrating points raised. I’m reading it myself as the contents seem enthralling - really worth the time
Mike F
5.0 out of 5 stars
Politics 101
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 13, 2013Verified Purchase
Although a product of the relatively "dry" subject of political theory, this is one of the very best books I have ever read. Although it was written over 150 years ago, it is incredibly relevant today. Bastiat builds a perfect argument against socialist economic policies, clearly (and in quite simple language, despite the age of the document) explaining how taking from one man and giving to another is nothing more than "legal plunder". Although this book didn't change my view of how the world works, it certainly clarified things for me. An excellent beginning point for anyone trying to get to the root of our problems today.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Paul Marks
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Classic.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 27, 2015Verified Purchase
Those interested in the principle of justice, to each their own (justice being the great enemy of "Social Justice") and how the principle of justice should underpin positive law and policy - should read this book.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1












