Law and the Long War: The Future of Justice in the Age of Terror: Wittes, Benjamin: 9780143115328: Amazon.com: Books

Available instantly

Hardcover
$6.68

Paperback
$6.69

Mass Market Paperback
from $33.38

Buy used: $6.69

$20.98 delivery February 2 - 20. Details

Deliver to Finland

Used: Good | Details

Sold by WonderBook

Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.

Added to

Unable to add item to List. Please try again.

Follow the author

Benjamin Wittes

Law and the Long War: The Future of Justice in the Age of Terror Paperback – May 26, 2009

by Benjamin Wittes (Author)

3.8 10 ratings

See all formats and editions

An authoritative assessment of the new laws of war and a sensible and sophisticated roadmap for the future of liberty in the Age of Terror

America is losing a crucial front in the ongoing war on terror. It is losing not to Al Qaeda, but to its own failure to construct a set of laws that will protect the American people during this global conflict. As debate continues to rage over the legality and ethics of war, Benjamin Wittes enters the fray with a sober-minded exploration of law in wartime that is definitive, accessible, and nonpartisan. Outlining how this country came to its current impasse over human rights and counterterrorism, Law and the Long War paves the way toward fairer, more accountable rules for a conflict without end.

Print length

320 pages
Language

English
Publisher

Penguin Books
Publication date

May 26, 2009
Dimensions

5.5 x 0.7 x 8.3 inches
ISBN-10

0143115324
ISBN-13

978-0143115328
See all details

Editorial Reviews

Review

" A rich and thoughtful volume . . . Law and the Long War addresses an impressively broad range of questions."
-Los Angeles Times

" Law and the Long War deserves to be read widely. It is one of the most balanced and nonpolemic accounts of legal issues in the war on terror to date."
-Foreign Affairs

" A strong case for adjusting our policies so that the public can support them more robustly."
-The Wall Street Journal

About the Author

Benjamin Wittes is a Fellow and Research Director in Public Law at the Brookings Institution. A former editorial writer for The Washington Post specializing in legal affairs, Wittes currently writes a column for The New Republic online and is a contributing editor for The Atlantic Monthly. He is a member of the Hoover Institution Task Force on National Security and Law.

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Penguin Books; Reprint edition (May 26, 2009)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 320 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0143115324
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0143115328
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 10.2 ounces
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.5 x 0.7 x 8.3 inches

Best Sellers Rank: #3,883,569 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #4,373 in Terrorism (Books)
- #36,670 in International & World Politics (Books)
- #63,576 in Law (Books)

Customer Reviews:
3.8 10 ratings

Important information

To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Benjamin Wittes

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

3.8 out of 5

10 global ratings

3 star

0%

How customer reviews and ratings work

Sort reviews by

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Kenneth Anderson

Best single book on Guantanamo

Reviewed in the United States on July 4, 2008

Benjamin Wittes, a former editorial writer for the Washington Post, has written the indispensable book on reforming US policy on detainees at Guantanamo. His exhaustive reading of everything that has been said, by the government, by the detainees themselves uncoerced in open hearings, so to give the best available portrait of the men at Guantanamo today - not those who were there in the first years, but those who are there now - is worth the price of the book. His policy prescriptions are well thought out, moderate, temperate, and are a special call to Congress to stop sniping from the sidelines and actually decide what to do. I do not think that anyone can have a serious opinion about what to do about detainee policy without reading this book.

9 people found this helpful

A Tough Topic to Broach

Reviewed in the United States on February 6, 2009

Verified Purchase

The law of terrorism is a difficult topic to broach, no matter what your political affiliation, and given the history of the last eight years since 9/11, it has become even more difficult. However, even as a non-lawyer, Wittes provides some interesting and compelling ideas. His evaluation of what has happened provides engaging discussion of not only how the Congress and President Bush have tried to grapple with the new and difficult issues presented by terror in a globalized world. Terrorists don't fall under the normal classifications of enemy soldiers, who are acting as instruments of the state, nor do they quite seem to qualify as criminals, and therefore for all the rights and procedures that come with the US criminal procedure regime.

SO what system of law do you apply? Obviously, detainees for terrorism cannot be kept incommunicado indefinitely, but neither can they be treated as common criminals. A hybrid system? And lead by whom: the executive or the Congress? And why hasn't the judiciary taken a more leading role in preserving the basic human rights of detainees.

No easy answers, but Wittes does a good job of examining what has happened to date, and what might be the course of action Congress (who he believes should take the lead) might take in the future to remedy some of the failings of the Bush Administration.

One person found this helpful

Full of Weak Argument, Excessively Praised

Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2011

Verified Purchase

Author Benjamin Wittes opens his much-praised book with a shocking display of intellectual dishonesty. To make the case for, in Dick Cheney's words, "working the dark side" in the "war on terror," he offers a supposedly illuminating anecdote. But instead of illumination, he gives us a naked bait-and-switch ploy, he crosses the line by violating Godwin's Law, and he wildly distorts the facts of his anecdote as well as exaggerating the implications thereof.

I very nearly stopped reading right at that point, but I continued on. Surely, I thought, a book so highly praised couldn't all be like that terrible, Glenn Beck-like opening. Surely a book lauded for being "masterful," "fair-minded" and "thoughtful" would start to overflow with wisdom if I just persevered. Well, that didn't happen. The book is terrible from start to finish.

Space doesn't permit me to explore every issue that Wittes addresses, so to illuminate the flaws in his book I'll focus on his treatment of the issue of detention. Wittes announces his intention to get Americans who love liberty, like me, to "cross the psychological Rubicon" of admitting the supposed necessity of locking up large numbers of people not because they have committed crimes, but because someone in the government decides that they might commit crimes in the future.

Wittes begins his efforts by trying to show that detention is as American as apple pie, by giving what he says are examples of "routine" detention that are "given no thought" by Americans. He fails to persuade the skeptical reader, however. His "closest to home" example of supposedly legitimate detention is the confinement of the mentally ill. This is a poor example because, first, the history of this practice is rife with massive abuses, and second, because the government's authority to confine the mentally ill has, rightly, been sharply curtailed in the past few decades.

Next, Wittes tries to make the case that there are people currently in detention at Gitmo who simultaneously are impossible to convict of any crime, and are so deadly that we have to lock them up forever, without trial. His poster child for these "dangerous enemies" is one Bashir Nasir al-Marwalah. Presumably, he selected al-Marwalah because his case is one of the strongest examples of the desperate need for detention without trial.

What's shocking is how weak a case Wittes makes for detaining al-Marwalah. There are innumerable recent cases that illustrate how easy it is for the government to make an innocent person appear guilty enough to justify criminal charges against them--the Bear Stearns prosecutions, the Duke lacrosse case--and sometimes even to convict them (as in the Tulia cases recounted by Nate Blakeslee). If al-Marwalah was at all dangerous, Wittes should have had no difficulty making him appear to be the second coming of Carlos the Jackal.

Yet, the worst thing that Wittes can find, combing carefully through a lengthy interrogation of al-Marwalah and cherry-picking tiny fragments of the man's answers, is that al-Marwalah at one point declares "I know I am an Arab fighter." That vague statement hardly constitutes conclusive proof that releasing al-Marwalah would create an imminent danger of violent harm to Americans, even if one discounts the fact that he also explicitly said that he has no desire to kill Americans. If this case is the most potent evidence Wittes has for the necessity of detention without trial, he has no case at all.

The remainder of Wittes' discussion is much like his handling of detention. He offers a great deal of unsupported assertion on virtually every issue, but whenever he gets down to trying to actually make a case based on facts and logic, he fails completely.

I'll close with one other serious failing of this book. Wittes repeatedly castigates civil libertarians like me for our failure to accept, as he does, the supposed necessity to "work the dark side" when dealing with terrorism. We are cast as inflexible idealists, starry-eyed in our devotion to abstract principles, while Wittes and those like him have their feet firmly on the ground.

The reality is very different. Civil libertarians are not mindless devotees of abstraction. We base our positions firmly on history. We have learned that, throughout our country's history, perceived threats to our security have existed. We have seen these threats be wildly exaggerated, and we have seen how these supposed threats have repeatedly led to unjustified infringements of people's rights and liberties. We are trying to get the nation to learn from history, not, as Wittes alleges, to restore a past that never was.

At the end of the epilogue to this book, Wittes has the nerve to assert that civil libertarians supposedly are "uninterested in engaging [their opponents`] arguments." But in fact, it is Wittes who fails to engage civil libertarian arguments. Since 9/11, a number of civil libertarians have written or co-written books on some or all of the issues he discusses here. A partial list would include Nancy Chang, David Cole, Nat Hentoff, Aziz Huq, and Geoffrey Stone. Yet one looks in vain for any mention of these authors in Wittes' book, much less an attempt by Wittes at engaging their rigorous arguments. Having opened his book with an exercise in intellectual dishonesty, Wittes ends it with blatant hypocrisy.

The wise Justice Brandeis warned us long ago that "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." I do not doubt that, in his heart, Mr. Wittes means well. But he has far more zeal than he has understanding, and he is very dangerous to our liberties.

9 people found this helpful

Richard M. Kuntz

Best Book on Enemy Combatant Legal Issues

Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2008

This is the best currently available treatment of the legal issues attendant to holding and interrogating prisoners in the war on terror. It stakes out a middle road between unchecked executive autonomy and unworkable judicial review. It benefits from detailed examination of actual evidence and the stories of many detainees, to make the point that our standard criminal justice system is not capable of dealing with terrorists presenting an imminent danger, captured on foreign soil, but that an unchecked executive branch system will likewise result in unacceptable error in detaining some individuals who do not present a threat. The solution is clear and workable standards imposed by the Legislative branch, as noted by another reviewer.

3 people found this helpful

Amazon Customer

Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2016

Verified Purchase

Only four stars because it is a slow read. However, the subject is well worth the effort.

Get to Know Us

Make Money with Us

Amazon Payment Products

Let Us Help You

English $USD - U.S. Dollar United States

© 1996-2024, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates