Michael Flamm has provided us with an exceptionally well researched and elegantly written book regarding the political uses of "Law & Order" to discredit liberals in the 1960s and catapult Conservatives into leadership positions in American government.
The book focuses on how the crisis of Law and Order, as seen by Americans in the 60s (primarily street crime & urban riots), led to a downfall of liberalism as the dominant political philosophy.
Flamm does an outstanding job of demonstrating how liberal programs such as the Great Society were unable to combat people's fears of rising criminal activity, and how Conservative candidates such as Goldwater & Nixon were able to play on those fears to bring Conservatism into power in 1968. Undoubtedly this was a critical piece in the rise of modern Conservatism, but it seems that this focus on "law & order" was lost shortly after Nixon gained the Presidency.
As Flamm demonstrates in his epilogue, this seems to have been a one or two election wonder at the federal level, thus posing the question of why did this problem only impact national politics for a short period - less than a decade? Flamm starts to get into some of the reasons why (resignation of Nixon as a "criminal", stagflation, end of the cold war, etc.), but the book tends to give a lot of credit for the rise of Conservatism to this one topic, butI'm not 100% persuaded. After reading this book, I believe that Law & Order was a signficant, but not the primary, factor leading to the rise of Conservatism. Other factors, such as the fear of Communism, opposition to increased taxation, and racial divisions must be considered in conjunction with crime.
Law and Order: Street Crime, Civil Unrest, and the Crisis of Liberalism in the 1960s (Columbia Studies in Contemporary American History)
by
Michael Flamm
(Author)
ISBN-13:
978-0231115131
ISBN-10:
023111513X
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
More Buying Choices
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in AmericaElizabeth Hinton Associate Professor of History and African American Studies and Professor of LawPaperback$19.95$19.95FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Sep 3
Sex Workers, Psychics, and Numbers Runners: Black Women in New York City's Underground Economy (New Black Studies Series)LaShawn HarrisPaperback$28.00$28.00FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Sep 6
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Sex Workers, Psychics, and Numbers Runners: Black Women in New York City's Underground Economy (New Black Studies Series)LaShawn HarrisPaperback$28.00$28.00FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Sep 6
From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in AmericaElizabeth Hinton Associate Professor of History and African American Studies and Professor of LawPaperback$19.95$19.95FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Sep 3
Editorial Reviews
Review
Recommended. ― Choice
Meticulously documented... an important contribution to the literature on the 1960s era and its link to today's political discourse. -- Edward P. Morgan ― Political Science Quarterly
Law and Order is essential reading for anyone interested in American society during the 1960s -- James Miller ― Journal of American Studies
A cohesive study of the politics-law-and-order nexus. -- John C. McWilliams ― The Historian
This book will be of interest to anyone who teaches and/or writes about the politics of the 1960s. -- Timothy N. Thurber ― H-Net
This is must reading. -- Michal R. Belknap, California Western School of Law and University of California, San Diego ― American Historical Review
Meticulously documented... an important contribution to the literature on the 1960s era and its link to today's political discourse. -- Edward P. Morgan ― Political Science Quarterly
Law and Order is essential reading for anyone interested in American society during the 1960s -- James Miller ― Journal of American Studies
A cohesive study of the politics-law-and-order nexus. -- John C. McWilliams ― The Historian
This book will be of interest to anyone who teaches and/or writes about the politics of the 1960s. -- Timothy N. Thurber ― H-Net
This is must reading. -- Michal R. Belknap, California Western School of Law and University of California, San Diego ― American Historical Review
About the Author
Michael W. Flamm is associate professor of history at Ohio Wesleyan University and the coauthor of The Chicago Handbook for Teachers and Debating the 1960s.
Michael Flamm is Associate Professor of History at Ohio Wesleyan Universtiy. He is co-author of The Chicago Handbook of Teaching (University of Chicago Press, 1999). He received his Ph.D. at Columbia University.
Michael Flamm is Associate Professor of History at Ohio Wesleyan Universtiy. He is co-author of The Chicago Handbook of Teaching (University of Chicago Press, 1999). He received his Ph.D. at Columbia University.
Start reading Law and Order on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Columbia University Press (February 13, 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 294 pages
- ISBN-10 : 023111513X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0231115131
- Reading age : 22 years and up
- Item Weight : 14.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 8.86 x 5.78 x 0.72 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,960,689 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #305 in Civil Law (Books)
- #785 in Civil Rights
- #1,845 in Criminal Law (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
5 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on July 26, 2008
Verified Purchase
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2006
Despite some scholars' claims to the contrary, there has by now developed a growing literature on the origins and development of post-World War II American political conservatism. This includes Patrick Allitt's, Neil Jumonville's, George Nash's and Peter Steinfel's explorations of the intellectual origins of conservative thought as well as Michael Dallek's, Lisa McGirr's, William Berman's and Jonathan Schoenwald's studies of conservative political development. Michael Flamm's new book represents a newer strand of scholarship supplementing the others -- a study of a discrete area of public policy and conservative politics. As a result, Professor Flamm helps show that the 1960s was an incubator for ascendant conservative politics in the last 30-35 years of twentieth century America (and beyond, of course).
At the most general level, Law and Order is about changing definitions of "security" and the effect of that transformation on American politics. Time was when economic security mattered, and the American mainstream voted the Democratic Donkey in the 1930s and 1940s. But starting in the 1950s, and accelerating in the 1960s, different notions of "security" took root; first came security from the Communist menance, then security from the perceived threat of urban disorder and cultural anarchy, which crested in the second half of the sixties. Though most so-called conservative voters would perhaps disagree, they began to vote for the Republican Elephant in the late 1960s because they wanted governmental security ... not economic, but cultural (and perhaps racial).
This trend manifested itself firstly, and most starkly, in the area of crime control policy and/or "law and order" politics. Professor Flamm shows how Democrats and Republicans each sought to provide the best political responses to three interwoven threats in the 1960s -- the rise of urban street crime; the increase in anti-war protests; and the frustratingly common urban riots in the "long, hot summers" of the late 1960s. Liberals, headed by Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, increasingly sought to connect rising crime to poverty as part of their effort to extend liberal social spending programs, most famously LBJ's Great Society. They also tried to staunch the racial implications of these separate developments; for example, the growing voter perception that civil disobedience in the early 1960s led to urban rioting in the late 1960s, or that urban crime was a direct result of the Great Migration's placement of African-Americans into the urban centers of the Northeast and West Coast. In a series of policy initiatives from combatting juvenile delinquency in the early 1960s to anti-riot commission proposals toward the end of the decade, liberals generally tried to argue that disorder in America would cease and desist once poverty -- for blacks and whites and browns -- was eliminated.
Flamm shows how this liberal agenda was attacked from both the left and the right. The New Left believed the Great Society was just another attempt to grow government at the expense of community empowerment and a white-wash of the root causes of the economic, racial, and social problems besetting America. But, more importantly politically, a series of rightist politicians -- Barry Goldwater; George Wallace; Richard Nixon; Ronald Reagan -- argued with increasing electoral success that the correct response to crime would not be more governmental programs to stop poverty, but the establishment of moral authority in national politics, the reversal of Great Society programs which stymied initiative and encouraged crime, the selection of tougher federal judges, the growth of the repressive apparatus of the state -- in short, the imposition of "law and order." And guess what?? -- they won!!
This argument, Flamm argues, formed the core of conservative politcal ascendency in the United States after 1968 even if, ironically, crime ceased to be a national issue after that time, more or less. Thus, the conservative response to the law and order issue marked the truly (counter) revolutionary event of the 1960s.
This a really good book for understanding federal policy and politics in the 1960s. It works well with Hugh Davis Graham's work on civil rights policy in the late 1960s and early 1970s as a way of understanding how the federal government, like the Energizer Bunny, just keeps going and going and going in an ostensibly conservative, anti-government political age. Especially fascinating in this regard is Professor Flamm's coverage of the increased security apparatus (i.e eavesdropping) in the late 1960s, fed by the related concerns of failure in Vietnam and anarchy in L.A and Detroit.
What is now needed is historical studies continuing the narrative from the 1970s through to 2005. The government keeps on promising us security and we keep buying into it. Oh well, buy this book in the meantime.
At the most general level, Law and Order is about changing definitions of "security" and the effect of that transformation on American politics. Time was when economic security mattered, and the American mainstream voted the Democratic Donkey in the 1930s and 1940s. But starting in the 1950s, and accelerating in the 1960s, different notions of "security" took root; first came security from the Communist menance, then security from the perceived threat of urban disorder and cultural anarchy, which crested in the second half of the sixties. Though most so-called conservative voters would perhaps disagree, they began to vote for the Republican Elephant in the late 1960s because they wanted governmental security ... not economic, but cultural (and perhaps racial).
This trend manifested itself firstly, and most starkly, in the area of crime control policy and/or "law and order" politics. Professor Flamm shows how Democrats and Republicans each sought to provide the best political responses to three interwoven threats in the 1960s -- the rise of urban street crime; the increase in anti-war protests; and the frustratingly common urban riots in the "long, hot summers" of the late 1960s. Liberals, headed by Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, increasingly sought to connect rising crime to poverty as part of their effort to extend liberal social spending programs, most famously LBJ's Great Society. They also tried to staunch the racial implications of these separate developments; for example, the growing voter perception that civil disobedience in the early 1960s led to urban rioting in the late 1960s, or that urban crime was a direct result of the Great Migration's placement of African-Americans into the urban centers of the Northeast and West Coast. In a series of policy initiatives from combatting juvenile delinquency in the early 1960s to anti-riot commission proposals toward the end of the decade, liberals generally tried to argue that disorder in America would cease and desist once poverty -- for blacks and whites and browns -- was eliminated.
Flamm shows how this liberal agenda was attacked from both the left and the right. The New Left believed the Great Society was just another attempt to grow government at the expense of community empowerment and a white-wash of the root causes of the economic, racial, and social problems besetting America. But, more importantly politically, a series of rightist politicians -- Barry Goldwater; George Wallace; Richard Nixon; Ronald Reagan -- argued with increasing electoral success that the correct response to crime would not be more governmental programs to stop poverty, but the establishment of moral authority in national politics, the reversal of Great Society programs which stymied initiative and encouraged crime, the selection of tougher federal judges, the growth of the repressive apparatus of the state -- in short, the imposition of "law and order." And guess what?? -- they won!!
This argument, Flamm argues, formed the core of conservative politcal ascendency in the United States after 1968 even if, ironically, crime ceased to be a national issue after that time, more or less. Thus, the conservative response to the law and order issue marked the truly (counter) revolutionary event of the 1960s.
This a really good book for understanding federal policy and politics in the 1960s. It works well with Hugh Davis Graham's work on civil rights policy in the late 1960s and early 1970s as a way of understanding how the federal government, like the Energizer Bunny, just keeps going and going and going in an ostensibly conservative, anti-government political age. Especially fascinating in this regard is Professor Flamm's coverage of the increased security apparatus (i.e eavesdropping) in the late 1960s, fed by the related concerns of failure in Vietnam and anarchy in L.A and Detroit.
What is now needed is historical studies continuing the narrative from the 1970s through to 2005. The government keeps on promising us security and we keep buying into it. Oh well, buy this book in the meantime.
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 9, 2005
For one who (like me, born in 1936) lived through the period, LAW AND ORDER is truly compelling. Michael Flamm has written a non-pedantic account of most important social and political aspect of the domestic scene in the USA in the 1960s. His narrative has a vibrant, multi-dimensional quality that seems to take us right into the heads of the people involved--from President Johnson and public figures on all levels to persons struggling in the many urban jungles which seemed on the point of destroying all social cohesion. The story is here: how Johnson's Presidency was eaten away as much by crime, violence, and riots in the cities and on the streets of the homeland as by the escalating death and destruction in Vietnam. Master politician though he was, Johnson was unable to maintain the combination of liberalism and populism which had characterized the Democratic Party throughout its best years.
The eighth chapter is a vivid re-creation of those sad days during the Chicago convention in August 1968, when Mayor Daley's police battled it out with radicalized liberals. The ninth explains--correctly, I think--how Law and Order trumped Vietnam as an issue in the election. The Democrats lost by a narrow margin; but conservatism was the real winner. A brief "Epilogue" summarizes events through 9/11. President Nixon more or less dropped both Johnson's domestic "Wars," on Poverty and on Crime. And everything that followed his doomed administration has demonstrated the political utility of fear over hope. It is impossible for me not to reflect that we now have two more such politically motivated, open-ended, "Wars," a War on Drugs and a War on Terrorism. LAW AND ORDER is a highly readable book, but it also has documentation massive enough to satisfy the most demanding professional critics.
The eighth chapter is a vivid re-creation of those sad days during the Chicago convention in August 1968, when Mayor Daley's police battled it out with radicalized liberals. The ninth explains--correctly, I think--how Law and Order trumped Vietnam as an issue in the election. The Democrats lost by a narrow margin; but conservatism was the real winner. A brief "Epilogue" summarizes events through 9/11. President Nixon more or less dropped both Johnson's domestic "Wars," on Poverty and on Crime. And everything that followed his doomed administration has demonstrated the political utility of fear over hope. It is impossible for me not to reflect that we now have two more such politically motivated, open-ended, "Wars," a War on Drugs and a War on Terrorism. LAW AND ORDER is a highly readable book, but it also has documentation massive enough to satisfy the most demanding professional critics.
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 26, 2005
Mr. Flamm skillfully takes us through the history of the urban unrest in our major cities in the '60's.
Having lived through the era, it is fun to review all the events that changed us forever and led to rise of the Republican Party and
their conservative agenda.
Well worth a read.
Having lived through the era, it is fun to review all the events that changed us forever and led to rise of the Republican Party and
their conservative agenda.
Well worth a read.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Deals related to this item
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: history of criminal law, administrative law books


