Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Left Back: A Century of Battles over School Reform Paperback – August 7, 2001
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Gail Russell Chaddock The Christian Science Monitor Diane Ravitch's latest -- and best -- history of education reform in the United States...could help frame the education debate for the twenty-first century.
Joseph Adelson The Wall Street Journal Does much to convey what went wrong with the schools -- and what is still right about them.
Richard Rothstein The New York Times An important new book.
About the Author
Top Customer Reviews
Really, Ravitch devotes most of her efforts to giving a history of Progressivism in education. Consdierable time is spent on Dewey, Kilpatrick, and their followers. The book starts around the time of Eliot's Committee of Ten Report detailing how all should receive a college preparatory education and discusses how progressivism chipped away at this democratic ideal. There is a little bit of respect for Progressivism's desire to make classroom less dependent on rote memorization. But Ravitch gives an accurate critique of Progressivsm's ultimate consequences: in an effort to make the child's experience the center of the classroom and the focus of learning, the academic content of the curriculum was diluted. Ravitch clearly holds Progressivism to be largely responsible for why our nation lags behind other nations in most international evaluations of school quality. I learned from this book that Progressivism's core concepts have remained the same under different rhetorical incarnations. I also learned that ultimately, Ravitch considers Progressivism to be antidemocratic because it made college preparatory content optional; only the children of elites or the most highly motivated students opted for the rigorous college preparatory track.Read more ›
Through the 1800s for most teachers the answer was to teach children how to read, write, and do arithmetic. This was called the academic curriculum. By the late 1800s there was almost universal schooling.
Starting in the early 1900s, some education leaders thought it was best to prepare children for the job market, and especially once the IQ tests become popular, children were tested and slotted for a college track, or other tracks, as early at age six and seven. Some people pushed to improve self-esteem as the only real goal of education. Additionally many leaders of education started seeing schools as a place to "improve" society, and they wanted to go behind the backs of the parents and mold the children.
Over the years there has been a wide variety of programs, some of which have been a bit useful or effective, most have been destructive. For example in the 1920s and 1930s there was a push to be efficient in education, and that by figuring out where children would be working as adults and giving them only the education they would need, the schools could be good use of resources. There was a belief by some of the experts that students had little ability to transfer knowledge. As an extreme example of what this belief mean, just because students had been taught the basics of addition, they would have to learn from scratch the basics of subtraction. Because of this belief there was little interest in teaching children more than they really "needed" to know.Read more ›
This book is an eye-opener for those who have been misinformed by other sources. It vividly portrays how our students have been guinea pigs of educational fads which did not provide reasonable solutions to the problems they were attacking.
Kudos to Diane Ravitch for not being afraid to expose how education reforms have failed for over a hundred years.
Most of this book centers around two recurring dualisms of 20th century educational theory: essentialism v. utilitarianism, and learning as transmission between teacher and student v. learning as natural student-led proces.
The debate between essentialists (like Bagley) and instrumentalists (like Dewey and Thorndike) was over whether educational learning was valuable in itself or whether its value derives from its utility. In Left Back, Ravitch demonstrates that the concept of justifying education in utilitarian terms (how useful it is to students' lives) may have been an interesting idea at one point, but, like many ideas, it was pushed too far. Not many people - even the eseentialists - would argue that education should not have utility to students lives, but the overselling of this idea by progressives resulted in everything from hastily done tracking (tailoring instruction to students' predicted 'station' in later life), to the stripping away of academic rigor (why take biology when one can take a class on how to grow plants?).
The debate between those who argued for teacher-led education versus those who argued for student-led education was an outgrowth of the previous debate. The 'student-led' advocates (William Kilpatrick, Carl Rogers) rediscovered and revamped the Rousseauian idea that the best education is a non-coercive process of letting the student explore what she likes, and fostering her creativity.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
This book includes a lot of points that aren't being discussed by the policy-makers for education "reform". Read morePublished on May 25, 2014 by Dog Owner
Ravitch is the greatest critic of American education at work today. Her arguments are always interesting, well-supported, and relevant to the debate of the day. Read morePublished on July 9, 2011 by J. Smallridge
Needlessly thick and long: the evidence against progressive education overwhelms
Must have been summarized in a much shorter book with plenty of endnotes for further... Read more
"Left Back" provides a credible, calm, and compelling history of recent school reforms in the U.S. Readers learn how our public schools veer from one "reform" (fad) to another, and... Read morePublished on July 15, 2010 by Loyd Eskildson
The book arrived at my office (normally I have to drive to the post office and pay some additional fees)
The book was in excelent condition, it arrived a stated. Read more
The author seeks to cover a whole century of educational history while at the same time offer a great deal of detail. That sounds like a strength, but it is more a weakness. Read morePublished on January 28, 2007 by Colin Story
This a wonderful book that should be read by everyone. You should read this book if you are curious as to why the education system produces ever-worse results; why graduates of... Read morePublished on October 10, 2006 by Mitchell Langbert
Ravitch's book and its quack version of public education and the progressive legacy can not be taken seriously as she is heavily invested in bashing public schooling through a... Read morePublished on April 5, 2006 by WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
If you want to know how acquisition of knowledge moved from being the locus for the educational mission to a curious sidebar on the school calendar, this is your ticket. Read morePublished on December 20, 2004 by V. Harris