Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$15.80$15.80
FREE delivery: Friday, Aug 4 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $13.48
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Leftmost City: Power and Progressive Politics in Santa Cruz 1st Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
Purchase options and add-ons
Almost all US cities are controlled by real estate and development interests, but Santa Cruz, California, is a deviant case. An unusual coalition of socialist-feminists, environmentalists, social-welfare liberals, and neighborhood activists has stopped every growth project proposed by landowners and developers since 1969, and controlled the city council since 1981. Even after a 1989 earthquake forced the city to rebuild its entire downtown, the progressive elected officials prevailed over developers and landowners. Drawing on hundreds of primary documents, as well as original, previously unpublished interviews, The Leftmost City utilizes an extended case study of Santa Cruz to critique three major theories of urban power: Marxism, public-choice theory, and regime theory. Santa Cruz is presented within the context of other progressive attempts to shape city government, and the authors' findings support growth-coalition theory, which stresses the conflict between real estate interests and neighborhoods as the fundamental axis of urban politics. The authors conclude their analysis by applying insights gleaned from Santa Cruz to progressive movements nationwide, offering a template for progressive coalitions to effectively organize to achieve political power.
- ISBN-100813344387
- ISBN-13978-0813344386
- Edition1st
- PublisherRoutledge
- Publication dateDecember 30, 2008
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6 x 0.58 x 9 inches
- Print length258 pages
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Editorial Reviews
Review
“In most US cities, the growth coalition controls local government. Santa Cruz, California, is one of the few exceptions to this rule, which is why Gendron and Domhoff’s analysis of its politics is of particular interest. … [They] use their case study to evaluate the effectiveness of competing theories of urban politics and end up arguing that a modified version of growth coalition theory does a superior job of explaining urban politics. Highly recommended.” —Choice
"This is a terrific book that shows how cities can chart a course between self-destruction at the hands of the ‘growth at any cost’ advocates while maintaining the tax base to provide social services and preserve neighborhoods. It’s a lively case study of two decades of progressive government, carefully documented, reads like a novel. And along the way, Gendron and Domhoff provide a theoretical underpinning that suggests how this experience can be repeated elsewhere." —Pierre Clavel, Professor of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University; Author of The Progressive City "The Leftmost City provides cogent insights on the opportunities for and persisting barriers to progressive politics at the local level. From a rigorous case study of Santa Cruz and critical analysis of urban political theory, this book offers essential reading to anyone who wants to understand and change the quality of life along with the opportunity structure in the nation’s metropolitan areas." —Gregory D. Squires, Professor of Sociology andPublic Policy and Public Administration, George Washington University; Coauthor of Privileged Places: Race, Residence, and the Structure of Opportunity
“A well-written and jargon-free book that is pitched at an appropriate level for advanced undergraduates and master’s-level students. . . . This book represents an important new addition to the arsenal of books that can be used to teach courses in urban or political sociology. It is theoretically informed, well organized, has an interesting case, and is written in a way that most undergraduates and new graduate students will find approachable.” —Teaching Sociology "The Leftmost City gives the reader lively prose, provocative arguments, and a fresh stream of ideas. Advocates of progressive politics will find this book a rich resource to draw on. Across the political spectrum, all will learn from the extraordinary politics of Santa Cruz, thanks to the lucid and down-to-earth instruction by authors Gendron and Domhoff." —Clarence N. Stone, Research Professor, George Washington University; Author of Regime Politics
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Routledge; 1st edition (December 30, 2008)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 258 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0813344387
- ISBN-13 : 978-0813344386
- Item Weight : 11.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.58 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,843,738 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #298 in Local U.S. Politics
- #514 in Political Ideologies
- #732 in Political History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonSubmit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I read the authors' website on political views that informed this book and can say that this is a book from the NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard) neighborhood activist perspective rather than a sustainability perspective. The authors assume opposing urban growth in order to further "quality of life" is in and of itself always "progressive." This camp increasingly finds itself at odds with groups such as the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, advocates for affordable housing, and indeed the entire modern sustainability movement. At the same time, this camp finds itself increasignly akin to the east coast conservatives who try to limit development in upper-class suburbs. They tend to celebrate small towns and suburbs, which no dobut will appeal to a certain part of the population.
It has been established beyond a doubt that denser developments, supported by walking and public transit, are sustainable. This is realized in cities such as Vancouver, BC and Portland, OR, and of course all of Western Europe, which have increased urban densities in centers and near transit, allowed smaller lot homes to be built throguhout urban areas, practiced balanced growth management, protected open space and farmland, and increased transit, walking and cycling. A key part of the successful approach is that it is regional in nature.
This contrasts to the "neighborhood activism" paradigm the authors advocate, where all intensification of land use is seen as greed by "real estate developers and their buddies" that damages "quality of life;" the only people seen as deserving of land value increases are the owners of (single-family) homes. Hence the author cites opposing downtown development as a "left wing" approach.
Yes, the activist perspective gets a few things right - opposing new highways and protectiong environmentally sensitive lands, for instance - but even in these cases, the concern seems to be about the home values and "quality of life" of a few neghborhoods rather than the sustainability of a community or region.
The reality is that the neighborhood activist paradigm leads to increasing home values for those who bought homes a generation ago (the new "haves,") while damaging the environment by forcing sprawl and commuting by car; and disadvantaging moderate-income folks because workers must then live far away and spend money on transportation. The neighborhood activists may then respond with limited affordable housing programs that fall far short of need.
The neighborhood activist approach is therefore not progressive, and I am not sure what they mean by it being left-wing or Marxist, but I'll leave that to them. The approach is at its heart anti-urban, and reflects the same underpinnings that drove suburban sprawl, auto-dependency, or the anti-urban policies of Ronald Reagan. It finds bedfellows in upper-class suburbs that want to keep out the riff-raff.
In opposition to this, I believe the future of the sustainability movement lies with those striving to create livable cities and regions where many of us would choose to live, work, bike or take transit, and reduce our carbon footprints while celebrating diversity and community. The future of the sustainability movement does not lie with neighborhood activists who hunker down in small, exclusive communities ...